On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 20:31:07 -0600, Tom Duerbusch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(At that point, CP can do I/O above the 31 bit line. Native Linux on
LPAR, already can do I/O above the 31 bit line.)
Just to add to the confusion... CP can do I/O above the line already,
the problem is with the *user*
Hi to everyone !
I have currently installed:
- z/VM 4.4
- SLES8 under z/VM 4.4
- DB2/ESE 8.2 under SLES8 under z/VM 4.4
Now our next goal is to migrate our current DB2/VM 7.1 into the DB2 ESE 8.2
under SLES8 but the main problem I have is that I can't find any migration
guide or any guidelines
On Friday, 02/04/2005 at 11:27 ZE7, Andri W Sundara [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Does anybody have comparison between Linux and Unix ?
Mr. Thornton's cough syrup-induced remarks aside, Unix is a brand name
conferred upon a variety of POSIX-oriented operating systems, indicative
of a common
Our Oracle 9i databases run well in 350M SLES8. Actually they do alright with
256M, but 350 is required to apply some Oracle patches, so we leave it at that.
Four 200K block v-disks are assigned to each instance. The total SGA sizes vary
between 110M and 225M, which according to our DBA's
Linux refers to a specific implementation of a POSIX-oriented
operating system
According to Richard Stallman, Linux refers to a kernel. It is
GNU/Linux that refers to an operating system and at least the Debian
folks honor that (from www.debian.org: Debian uses the Linux kernel, but
most of the
Alan Altmark wrote:
[snip]
To splitters of hairs: Yes, z/OS has a Unix-branded API and shell
available, but I you can't call z/OS Unix.
[snip]
i don't see why unix systems services on z/os can't be called unix. it has
all the standard services of any other unix that i know of (albeit from my
On Friday, 02/04/2005 at 10:17 AST, Robin Murray
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i don't see why unix systems services on z/os can't be called unix. it
has
all the standard services of any other unix that i know of (albeit from
my
very limited experience). it has ftp, web server(s), telnet, dns,
On Feb 4, 2005, at 8:07 AM, Alan Altmark wrote:
On the surface, many would
claim that there is no difference (Adam's point)
Actually, my point was that the question was so broad there was no way
it could be meaningfully addressed without further clarification
regarding the specific nature of the
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 09:23:20 -0500, Mrohs, Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our Oracle 9i databases run well in 350M SLES8. Actually they do alright with
256M, but 350 is required to apply some Oracle patches, so we leave it at
that.
Four 200K block v-disks are assigned to each instance. The
Go to http://www.idugdb2-l.org/ and follow the instructions to subscribe.
That list deals with your kind of question all the time, and there are some
very knowledgeable people on it (of whom I am not one...)..
Rgds, GStC.
- Original Message -
From: Josi Razl Barsn Rodriguez [EMAIL
To put something else into the discussion
We are planning to migrate Oracle from some WinTel dedicated platforms
to z/Linux (yes 64 bit also).
My stance is with dedicated platforms, the memory allocation was
simple.
Total memory on box - memory needed for the OS - memory needed for
Oracle =
I know Oracle 10g isn't certified for use on SLES 9 (64bit), but I
thought I might try and install it. Has anybody managed to do this ? Or
would I just be wasting my time ?
As our zLinux install is relatively new we went straight on to SLES 9, I
am loathe to install SLES 8 in another LPAR just so
If you can wait just a little while, it will be certified. The next
pathset, if I'm not mistaken, will have SLES9 certification.
And while you're at it, it doesn't hurt to try.
-Original Message-
From: Harris, Christopher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 9:19 AM
I am hearing that i will be end of 1st quarter for certification on that. i am
installing anyways.
-Cameron
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Little, Chris
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 11:29 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re:
We were in the same situation. We trashed the tapes and reordered z/VM
Version 5.1 on DVD. We then installed z/VM using the DVD drive in the HMC.
This was our first exposure with z/VM and it worked without a hitch.
Peter
--
For
One of the options we're looking at in the future is moving to
a RS-6000 running Linux -- using an IBM Unidata solution .
Does anyone have any experience with Unidata (good, bad or
ugly)? I've never heard of it.
Is anyone aware of another list that addresses Unidata database?
Kim:
Thanks Alan, I was expecting that reply.
On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 00:18 -0500, Alan Altmark wrote:
On Thursday, 02/03/2005 at 06:02 PST, Jerry Whitteridge
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just received my 5.1 order. Installation requires access to 18 track
tape (3480) and a Standalone IPL of the
Of course, UTS Global (a spin-off of Amdahl) has for years offered the
Amdahl UTS operating system, which runs only on mainframes and is a full
SVR4 ASCII Unix operating system.
Dick Hitt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alan Altmark wrote:
On Friday, 02/04/2005 at 11:27 ZE7, Andri W Sundara [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
Actually, there IS a commercially viable mainframe implementation
of Unix. UTS Global was spun-off from Amdahl Corp. a few years ago,
and we continue to provide (and support) an SVR4 implementation that
was ported - and optimized - to run on XA/ESA/S390/zSeries processors.
Our customer
So the CD version of the 3390 DDr install arrived at my datacenter this
morning. Loaded the CD into the HMC DVD drive and tried an IPL from
CD/Rom or Server. HMC returns unable to read CD or find software. Can I
only use the DVD install version on the HMC ? HMC in question is at
1.7.3 (without
Please make it friendlier. At least a bash shell to start with. Thanks
__
Ranga Nathan / CSG
Systems Programmer - Specialist; Technical Services;
BAX Global Inc. Irvine-California
Tel: 714-442-7591 Fax: 714-442-2840
Dick Holic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
Jerry:
The CD for z/VM is meant for the unit that emulates tape. You need the
DVD media. The same thing happened to us. We do not have that kind of CD
drive. We only have DVD drive. We ordered the DVD media and that worked
fine.
We assume that CD media should work on DVD. But the CD media that
Jerry:
I replied to your later mail. However, here is some more info.
If you could gen a tape drive for your z/VM LPAR and your operations are
willing to manually mount/dismount tape, then you could IPL from the tape
drive. Our Operations refused to consider this option.
So the CD version of the 3390 DDr install arrived at my datacenter this
morning. Loaded the CD into the HMC DVD drive and tried an IPL from
CD/Rom or Server. HMC returns unable to read CD or find software. Can I
only use the DVD install version on the HMC ? HMC in question is at
1.7.3 (without
24 matches
Mail list logo
