On Nov 2, 2005, at 3:35 PM, Yu Safin wrote:
Agree, I apologize for the poor use of words.
However, I am still confused as to the explanation about using a
routing daemon. can you be more specific as to what this is all
about. We have our solution fully implemented and we have no such
daemon.
On 11/2/05, Vic Cross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 02/11/2005, at 6:38am, Yu Safin wrote:
> > I am not sure I understand what you are talking about. There is no
> > routing daemon involved. There are two methods to set up VIPA, static
> > using "ip route" and dynamic using quagga (zebra/ospf).
Try running it with strace to see what might be going on when the hang
happens.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Bernard Wu
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 2:54 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: NFS login problems
-sni
Hi List,
We are a native SLES9 shop ( no SP1 or SP2 ), with z/OS 1.4 files mounted
on our Linux LPAR via NFS. On other unices ( AIX and SUN ) we have to
execute mvslogin before we can access the files on z/OS. I tried compiling
the 3 programs ( mvslogin, mvslogout and showattr ) but the makefile
Like I saidI may be in for a rude awakening .
But the network people tell me that my supernet is directed to a vseg 3
which is sent to all "mainframe" gbe adapters. So...I may be covered.
Tom Duerbusch
THD Consulting
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/02/05 12:11 PM >>>
On Nov 2, 2005, at 11:54 AM, T
If you want someone to not be able to authenticate locally, you need to
remove their entries from /etc/passwd and /etc/shadow.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
James Melin
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 2:06 PM
To: LINUX-390@
The problem turned to be the introduction of /etc/ldap.conf in SLES-9.
Configuring /etc/openldap/ldap.conf is no longer sufficient.
That said, I have RACF authentication working. I'm not to the point of
having RACFLDAP supply UID, GID, home dir and all the other stuff contained
in the OMVS segment
> If we can standardize on
> minidisk addresses, a configuration interface, and capture
> 95% commonality of what an Oracle (or any) server should
> provide, and optimize it, that would be a good thing.
Agreed. Been there, done that.
I have the toolkit for building such appliances set up, and all
On Nov 2, 2005, at 11:54 AM, Tom Duerbusch wrote:
I don't see any need for the IP addresses to need to change or
different routing or anything. But then, once I start using both OSA
cards, and I do by test by unplugging a GBE cable, perhaps I will
be in
for a rude awakening.
Are your two OSA c
I keep getting confused when we talk about addresses. There are two
types of addresses in this discussion (ok, maybe more)...
1. The IP address of your node in the Guest LAN .
2. The CUA address that addresses your NIC.
VSWCNTRL1 and VSWCNTRL2 only knows about the CUA address. If one goes
dow
Imagine a PC vendor shipping just one operating system with their PCs :)
Linux/390 made a fairly big splash a few years ago. But it seems the community
news is languishing, and if you don't make headlines once in a while, you cease
to exist in the eyes of business managers. Our project manager sai
James,
I can't comment on your setup, per se, but it's been my experience that
debugging LDAP issues are much better done with the command line tools
such as ldapsearch, etc. Turn on tracing/verbose debugging and try to
decipher the output.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 3
> I thought the original
> poster wanted a "self contained appliance" that ran Oracle.
> The concept of an "appliance", to me, is "no user servicable
> parts inside", so to speak.
All true. The first problem appears when you start asking questions about
backup, or database automation, or system mo
So, what are the applications that had been talking to the server on the
old address(es) supposed to do? Somehow magically know that they now
have to start communicating with a new address? That's what VIPA buys
you. You assign a virtual address, and the applications don't have to
worry about st
We need a "stupid systems programmers club". I'll join.
What I see with Suse, is 5 - 10 "maintenance updates" hitting my mail
box every day. Some are just to make things work right, but many are
security related.
Now, I'm not sure how much is needed, for an Oracle database running on
a mainfram
OK, I'll admit that I'm rather stupid. I thought the original poster
wanted a "self contained appliance" that ran Oracle. The concept of an
"appliance", to me, is "no user servicable parts inside", so to speak.
So Oracle implements their code using something like Debian. The distro
comes with all r
On Nov 2, 2005, at 10:05 AM, Alan Altmark wrote:
On Wednesday, 11/02/2005 at 09:12 CST, Adam Thornton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Oh, I'd say that chatter is still necessary.
But what you do is define two different TCPIP VSWITCH controllers, on
(by definition) different physical OSA ports, wit
On Wednesday, 11/02/2005 at 09:52 CST, Tom Duerbusch
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Funny, when I cancelled "VSWCTRL1", then "VSWCTRL2" seemed to be active
> and had taken over communications. VSWCTRL2 was using a different set
> of addresses (which would have been on our second card, if I had defi
On Wednesday, 11/02/2005 at 09:45 CST, Tom Duerbusch
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is not only an Oracle problem/concern. Consider what would happen
> if IBM picks a "perferred" Linux and bundles it with VM. Replace their
> TCPIP product with IP running under Linux for one. A real DB2 runnin
On Wednesday, 11/02/2005 at 09:12 CST, Adam Thornton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh, I'd say that chatter is still necessary.
>
> But what you do is define two different TCPIP VSWITCH controllers, on
> (by definition) different physical OSA ports, with different cables
> connecting them to the sw
Please refer to:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/linux390/whatsnew.html
for the 2005-11-02 change summary:
* "April 2004 stream"
- kernel 2.6.5 (patch 31) recommended kernel bug fixes
- Restrictions updated to reflect prerequisite z/VM PTFs for
re-IPL/re-boot
* As how-to inform
I haven't been following this thread, but when it came to VSWITCH
My previous goal was to do VIPA. I wanted to be protected from a
card/cable/switch failure.
Last month, I brought up VSWITCH in a second lpar. Kind of playing
around, but I wanted to start using it for Linux images.
Funny, w
> downloaded for a simple DDR installation
I was talking (read: pushing) this with Rob 3.5-4 years ago. We were
discussing distribution/cloning strategies for our newly installed
Linux on S/390 systems.
Unfortunately we didn't get round to doing it. Can't quite remember
why...
Rod
-
In the next 5 years, I would think the chances of this happening are
zero.
Oracle, would either have to package their Oracle with each flavor of
Linux, at a great cost to them, which would minimize the number of
different flavors on Linux in each shop, or they will have to pick up
the maintenance
> A new approach is needed regarding maintenance of Linux
> images and product installation in general. I'm a strong
> proponent of server appliances which are pre-packaged with
> optimized OS and applications.
I've been promoting this approach for about a year now, and we deliver most
of our prod
On Nov 2, 2005, at 3:35 AM, Vic Cross wrote:
One thing I forgot to mention last time is for those who are running
Linux under z/VM 5.1, give more-than-serious thought to using VSWITCH
instead of Linux guests with multiple interfaces and VIPA. z/VM will
do the heavy-lifting as far as interface re
A new approach is needed regarding maintenance of Linux images and product
installation in general. I'm a strong proponent of server appliances which are
pre-packaged with optimized OS and applications. In this case, SLES9 and Oracle
would come on a tape or be downloaded for a simple DDR installati
On 02/11/2005, at 6:38am, Yu Safin wrote:
I am not sure I understand what you are talking about. There is no
routing daemon involved. There are two methods to set up VIPA, static
using "ip route" and dynamic using quagga (zebra/ospf). Maya be you
are talking about quagga, which does require bo
28 matches
Mail list logo
