Re: hipersockets

2006-05-01 Thread ING. A. Neij
Rob, thanks for your response. Everything you describes seems to be okay, but the hipersockets is still not working. It is now possible to ping the own ip-address of the hipersocket but pings to other hipersockets still fails. I did use Yast to configure the, automatically, detected hipersocket.

Re: hipersockets

2006-05-01 Thread Rob van der Heij
On 5/1/06, ING. A. Neij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is now possible to ping the own ip-address of the hipersocket but pings to other hipersockets still fails. Most likely then the other side does not know where to respond. You can check with tcpdump against the interface to see that the

Re: Installing THE 3.2

2006-05-01 Thread Peter Webb, Toronto Transit Commission
Thanks Rick, that fixed it. I had been using an old Object Rexx RPM, and when I changed to Regina, it worked. -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Troth Sent: April 27, 2006 22:23 To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Installing THE 3.2

Re: Installing THE 3.2

2006-05-01 Thread Peter Webb, Toronto Transit Commission
Yes, I am installing from source. -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Post, Mark K Sent: April 30, 2006 23:37 To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Installing THE 3.2 Peter, I'm not sure I know what you mean when you say install version

3390-3 DASD vs. 3390-9 DASD

2006-05-01 Thread Ryan Stewart
Hi all, I am about to configure some dasd on our shark and I was considering using 3390-9 instead of 3390-3. Currently we have mostly 3390-3 with some 3390-9 at the end of the array in order to use all of the space. I was wondering if anyone knew of any issues using 3390-9 and some of the pro's

Re: 3390-3 DASD vs. 3390-9 DASD

2006-05-01 Thread Rob van der Heij
On 5/1/06, Ryan Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am about to configure some dasd on our shark and I was considering using 3390-9 instead of 3390-3. Currently we have mostly 3390-3 with some 3390-9 at the end of the array in order to use all of the space. I was wondering if anyone knew of

Re: 3390-3 DASD vs. 3390-9 DASD

2006-05-01 Thread Ryan Stewart
Rob, I think we initially went with 3390-3 at the beginning because we still have our production system running VSE and the volumes were all 3390-3 when we converted. When IBM initially configured the dasd they just made the two arrays the same. The Linux images that I will be using will be

Re: Suse install parmfile options ..

2006-05-01 Thread Spann, Elizebeth (Betsie)
This is what works for me (after reading more carefully): cio_ignore=all,!0.0.0200-0.0.0209,!0.0.0009,!0.0.0400-0.0.0402 I only see devices 9, 200-209 and the nic at 400-402. Thanks, Betsie -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Post, Mark K

Re: 3390-3 DASD vs. 3390-9 DASD

2006-05-01 Thread Rob van der Heij
On 5/1/06, Ryan Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Linux images that I will be using will be database servers so I don't see putting more than one Linux server on the same 3390-9. Do you think there will be any major performance issues with using the 3390-9 as compared to the 3390-3, or is

Re: 3390-3 DASD vs. 3390-9 DASD

2006-05-01 Thread Aria Bamdad
On Mon, 01 May 2006 17:19:44 +0200 Rob van der Heij said: When possible you should avoid having all disks of the server on a single drawer (or whatever the units in your subsystem are that share some of the logic inside the box). Typically that means avoiding using a range of consecutive real

Re: 3390-3 DASD vs. 3390-9 DASD

2006-05-01 Thread Tom Duerbusch
In my case, now that I have a DS6800 with lots of disk space... My test Linux images are (2) 3390-9 volumes. One for Linux and application code and the other for data (Oracle, DB2, Samba, etc). And vdisk for paging. I only did it this way so I can easily manage dasd without much thought. Two

Re: Problem with RMFPMS and the recent time change

2006-05-01 Thread Fargusson.Alan
I only worked with Windows 95 and later. If you mean Windows 3.x then you might be right. Now that I think about it, since Windows 3.x starts from DOS it must use local time like DOS. I think the reason for the popup was due to the problem with DOS programs using local time, by which I mean

Re: 3390-3 DASD vs. 3390-9 DASD

2006-05-01 Thread Ryan Stewart
Frank, No I have not yet, but I am currently looking into it. Thanks, Ryan Stewart Indian River Community College -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank Gowdey/Admin/Avery/MCS Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 11:54 AM To:

Re: 3390-3 DASD vs. 3390-9 DASD

2006-05-01 Thread Frank Gowdey/Admin/Avery/MCS
Our hardware marketing support provider explained how it was a well documented performance feature. Perhaps the only real multi path performance feature there was. It is well documented in the IBM Shark manuals and just seems to cost you a UCB # per volume from your total available per channel. We

Re: 3390-3 DASD vs. 3390-9 DASD

2006-05-01 Thread Tom Duerbusch
On our DS6800, PAV support is a chargeable option. Is it chargable on your box and/or did you pay for it? One thing to consider in favor of some large volumes (when they don't get in the way of performace), is something about the total number of addresses available. I think I have either 256 or

Re: 3390-3 DASD vs. 3390-9 DASD

2006-05-01 Thread Ryan Stewart
Thanks all for your suggestions and help. Ryan Stewart Systems Programmer Indian River Community College [EMAIL PROTECTED] 772-462-7310 -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL

Re: your chance

2006-05-01 Thread O'Brien, Dennis L
Susanne is coming to meet the entire mailing list? She must be quite, um, friendly. Dennis I did not have sexual relations with that woman. -- Bill Clinton -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

Re: your chance

2006-05-01 Thread Peter Webb, Toronto Transit Commission
The only picture related to this list is a fox in an 'M'(http://www2.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?linux-vm). So that suggests she is an animal lover. And with the ability to be in several countries around the world at one time, suggests she is rather large. -Original Message- From: Linux on

Re: your chance

2006-05-01 Thread Joe Poole
On Monday 01 May 2006 01:50 pm, O'Brien, Dennis L wrote: Susanne is coming to meet the entire mailing list? She must be quite, um, friendly. Dennis Apparently, spelling is not among her finer qualities.

Re: your chance

2006-05-01 Thread Adam Thornton
On May 1, 2006, at 12:50 PM, O'Brien, Dennis L wrote: Susanne is coming to meet the entire mailing list? She must be quite, um, friendly. I guess someone put her interfaces into promiscuous mode. Adam -- For LINUX-390

Re: your chance

2006-05-01 Thread Ryan Stewart
Awe man, I thought I was specialyou got that to. Did anyone respond? Ryan -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Thornton Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 2:13 PM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: your chance On May 1, 2006, at

Re: 3390-3 DASD vs. 3390-9 DASD

2006-05-01 Thread Frank Gowdey/Admin/Avery/MCS
PAV, hm what does the way back machine say Mr Peabody ? Its been a while, but I think it was a nocharge built in, use it if you want or not. No one here can remember very well. Frank -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff /

Re: 3390-3 DASD vs. 3390-9 DASD

2006-05-01 Thread Tom Duerbusch
On what subsystem? On the DS6800 it was a chargable feature. We didn't need it and I still think we don't need it. Tom Duerbusch THD Consulting [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/1/2006 1:45 PM PAV, hm what does the way back machine say Mr Peabody ? Its been a while, but I think it was a nocharge built

Re: 3390-3 DASD vs. 3390-9 DASD

2006-05-01 Thread Frank Gowdey/Admin/Avery/MCS
2105 model 800 for us. Frank -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

Re: 3390-3 DASD vs. 3390-9 DASD

2006-05-01 Thread Joe Poole
On Monday 01 May 2006 02:45 pm, Frank Gowdey/Admin/Avery/MCS wrote: PAV, hm what does the way back machine say Mr Peabody ? Its been a while, but I think it was a nocharge built in, use it if you want or not. No one here can remember very well. It's a chargeable feature, based on the

Can you display the blocksize the filesystem was created with?

2006-05-01 Thread Dave Hansen
Hi, Most systems have file systems on them. Perhaps file systems that were created when you weren't around. How can you tell what block size the file systems were created with? mke2fs says it should default correctly. It also says if you specify 1K blocks on your mke2fs and your dasdfmt

Re: Can you display the blocksize the filesystem was created with?

2006-05-01 Thread Adam Thornton
On May 1, 2006, at 2:28 PM, Dave Hansen wrote: Hi, Most systems have file systems on them. Perhaps file systems that were created when you weren't around. How can you tell what block size the file systems were created with? mke2fs says it should default correctly. It also says if you

Re: Can you display the blocksize the filesystem was created with?

2006-05-01 Thread Adam Thornton
On May 1, 2006, at 2:33 PM, Adam Thornton wrote: I always specify it directly, because it doesn't always get it right, and just do mke2fs -b 4096 ... Which wasn't your question. I guess you could run badblocks with various blocksizes and see which one DOESN'T give you tons of errorsbut

Re: Can you display the blocksize the filesystem was created with?

2006-05-01 Thread Rob van der Heij
On 5/1/06, Adam Thornton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I guess you could run badblocks with various blocksizes and see which one DOESN'T give you tons of errorsbut there's got to be a nicer way. dumpe2fs -h /dev/dasdb1 -- Rob van der Heij Velocity Software, Inc http://velocitysoftware.com/

Re: your chance

2006-05-01 Thread John Summerfied
Peter Webb, Toronto Transit Commission wrote: The only picture related to this list is a fox in an 'M'(http://www2.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?linux-vm). So that suggests she is an animal lover. And with the ability to be in several countries around the world at one time, suggests she is rather

Tom Shepherd - vacation May 1-14

2006-05-01 Thread Thomas R Shepherd
I will be out of the office starting 05/01/2006 and will not return until 05/15/2006. I will be on vacation May 1 - 14.. returning May 15. Please contact Steve Hawley for any issues while I am out. -- For LINUX-390 subscribe /