Rob,
thanks for your response.
Everything you describes seems to be okay, but the hipersockets is still
not working.
It is now possible to ping the own ip-address of the hipersocket but pings
to other hipersockets still fails.
I did use Yast to configure the, automatically, detected hipersocket.
On 5/1/06, ING. A. Neij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is now possible to ping the own ip-address of the hipersocket but pings
to other hipersockets still fails.
Most likely then the other side does not know where to respond. You
can check with tcpdump against the interface to see that the
Thanks Rick, that fixed it. I had been using an old Object Rexx RPM, and
when I changed to Regina, it worked.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Rick Troth
Sent: April 27, 2006 22:23
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Installing THE 3.2
Yes, I am installing from source.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Post, Mark K
Sent: April 30, 2006 23:37
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Installing THE 3.2
Peter,
I'm not sure I know what you mean when you say install version
Hi all,
I am about to configure some dasd on our shark and I was considering
using 3390-9 instead of 3390-3. Currently we have mostly 3390-3 with
some 3390-9 at the end of the array in order to use all of the space. I
was wondering if anyone knew of any issues using 3390-9 and some of the
pro's
On 5/1/06, Ryan Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am about to configure some dasd on our shark and I was considering
using 3390-9 instead of 3390-3. Currently we have mostly 3390-3 with
some 3390-9 at the end of the array in order to use all of the space. I
was wondering if anyone knew of
Rob,
I think we initially went with 3390-3 at the beginning because we still
have our production system running VSE and the volumes were all 3390-3
when we converted. When IBM initially configured the dasd they just
made the two arrays the same.
The Linux images that I will be using will be
This is what works for me (after reading more carefully):
cio_ignore=all,!0.0.0200-0.0.0209,!0.0.0009,!0.0.0400-0.0.0402
I only see devices 9, 200-209 and the nic at 400-402.
Thanks,
Betsie
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Post, Mark K
On 5/1/06, Ryan Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Linux images that I will be using will be database servers so I
don't see putting more than one Linux server on the same 3390-9. Do you
think there will be any major performance issues with using the 3390-9
as compared to the 3390-3, or is
On Mon, 01 May 2006 17:19:44 +0200 Rob van der Heij said:
When possible you should avoid having all disks of the server on a
single drawer (or whatever the units in your subsystem are that
share some of the logic inside the box). Typically that means avoiding
using a range of consecutive real
In my case, now that I have a DS6800 with lots of disk space...
My test Linux images are (2) 3390-9 volumes. One for Linux and
application code and the other for data (Oracle, DB2, Samba, etc). And
vdisk for paging.
I only did it this way so I can easily manage dasd without much
thought. Two
I only worked with Windows 95 and later. If you mean Windows 3.x then you
might be right. Now that I think about it, since Windows 3.x starts from DOS
it must use local time like DOS.
I think the reason for the popup was due to the problem with DOS programs using
local time, by which I mean
Frank,
No I have not yet, but I am currently looking into it.
Thanks,
Ryan Stewart
Indian River Community College
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Frank Gowdey/Admin/Avery/MCS
Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 11:54 AM
To:
Our hardware marketing support provider explained how it was a well
documented performance feature.
Perhaps the only real multi path performance feature there was.
It is well documented in the IBM Shark manuals and just seems to cost you a
UCB # per volume from your total available per channel.
We
On our DS6800, PAV support is a chargeable option.
Is it chargable on your box and/or did you pay for it?
One thing to consider in favor of some large volumes (when they don't
get in the way of performace), is something about the total number of
addresses available. I think I have either 256 or
Thanks all for your suggestions and help.
Ryan Stewart
Systems Programmer
Indian River Community College
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
772-462-7310
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
Susanne is coming to meet the entire mailing list? She must be quite,
um, friendly.
Dennis
I did not have sexual relations with that woman. -- Bill Clinton
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
The only picture related to this list is a fox in an
'M'(http://www2.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?linux-vm). So that suggests
she is an animal lover. And with the ability to be in several countries
around the world at one time, suggests she is rather large.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on
On Monday 01 May 2006 01:50 pm, O'Brien, Dennis L wrote:
Susanne is coming to meet the entire mailing list? She must be quite,
um, friendly.
Dennis
Apparently, spelling is not among her finer qualities.
On May 1, 2006, at 12:50 PM, O'Brien, Dennis L wrote:
Susanne is coming to meet the entire mailing list? She must be quite,
um, friendly.
I guess someone put her interfaces into promiscuous mode.
Adam
--
For LINUX-390
Awe man, I thought I was specialyou got that to. Did anyone
respond?
Ryan
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Adam Thornton
Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 2:13 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: your chance
On May 1, 2006, at
PAV, hm what does the way back machine say Mr Peabody ?
Its been a while, but I think it was a nocharge built in, use it if you
want or not.
No one here can remember very well.
Frank
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff /
On what subsystem? On the DS6800 it was a chargable feature.
We didn't need it and I still think we don't need it.
Tom Duerbusch
THD Consulting
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/1/2006 1:45 PM
PAV, hm what does the way back machine say Mr Peabody ?
Its been a while, but I think it was a nocharge built
2105 model 800 for us.
Frank
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
On Monday 01 May 2006 02:45 pm, Frank Gowdey/Admin/Avery/MCS wrote:
PAV, hm what does the way back machine say Mr Peabody ?
Its been a while, but I think it was a nocharge built in, use it if you
want or not.
No one here can remember very well.
It's a chargeable feature, based on the
Hi,
Most systems have file systems on them. Perhaps file systems that were
created when you weren't around. How can you tell what block size the file
systems were created with? mke2fs says it should default correctly. It also
says if you specify 1K blocks on your mke2fs and your dasdfmt
On May 1, 2006, at 2:28 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
Hi,
Most systems have file systems on them. Perhaps file systems
that were created when you weren't around. How can you tell what
block size the file
systems were created with? mke2fs says it should default
correctly. It also says if you
On May 1, 2006, at 2:33 PM, Adam Thornton wrote:
I always specify it directly, because it doesn't always get it right,
and just do mke2fs -b 4096 ...
Which wasn't your question.
I guess you could run badblocks with various blocksizes and see which
one DOESN'T give you tons of errorsbut
On 5/1/06, Adam Thornton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess you could run badblocks with various blocksizes and see which
one DOESN'T give you tons of errorsbut there's got to be a nicer
way.
dumpe2fs -h /dev/dasdb1
--
Rob van der Heij
Velocity Software, Inc
http://velocitysoftware.com/
Peter Webb, Toronto Transit Commission wrote:
The only picture related to this list is a fox in an
'M'(http://www2.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?linux-vm). So that suggests
she is an animal lover. And with the ability to be in several countries
around the world at one time, suggests she is rather
I will be out of the office starting 05/01/2006 and will not return until
05/15/2006.
I will be on vacation May 1 - 14.. returning May 15. Please contact Steve
Hawley for any issues while I am out.
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe /
31 matches
Mail list logo