Thanks for the responses to my problem below... fortunately it was resolved by
issuing the following cmd;
#cp vi vmsg 1 dasd=100 root=/dev/dasdd1
on the 3270 session as the linux instance was booting up.
I have built a SLES10 instance under z/VM 5.2 and had it up and running
successfully
It works in 2.6.9 in RHEL4 using ext2online.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Kyle Smith
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 10:34 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] LVM/Ext3 extend
Now that I think about it, it was after
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 20:36:51 -0600 Mark Post said:
-snip-
Sorry Mark if I was unclear. I mean to say upgrading from SLES10 to
SLES10-SP1. A new install of SLES10-SP1 can be done as you said but
an upgrade from base release to SP1 can't be done via FTP (like it
could in SLES9).
That's not
http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/17998
--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
HealthMarkets
Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage
Administrative Services Group
Information Technology
The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged
and/or confidential. It is
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 04:25:29PM -0600, Jerry Whitteridge wrote:
resize2fs on my system will only work on unmounted filesystems -- I find
references to ext2online and other utilities on the web -- is there
anything equivalent for us -- Running SLES9 SP3 currently ?
I've had good luck with
On Wed, Aug 1, 2007 at 8:53 AM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], McKown,
John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/17998
It's too bad the article repeats the idea that's going around that Red Hat's
recent agreement with IBM is something new. Red Hat was later to
On Wed, Aug 1, 2007 at 8:46 AM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Aria Bamdad
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-snip-
Mark, with SLES10 to install the SP1 update, as you said, you have to setup
a YUM repository **On another server** and then yes, you can upgrade using
No, it doesn't have to be on
Hi,
Ok... We have the copying function to Linux 90% done but now they are
asking more questions :
A) Can we fire/spawn the MySQl load on the Linux side, after
downloading the data from zOS
They are doing an Unload from Adabas in zOS and then they OCOPY the
file to Linux but then they want to
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 11:48 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Marcy
Cortes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, Mark,
Do you have URL's to the docs that make all of this work?
That's coming before too long, I hope. (If I don't get it out before SHARE, it
will be a while longer.)
Mark Post
Keep to the conceptual ideas and ignore the possibly inaccurate details.
I am looking for more customers on Linux here at ITEC.
Lea Stahr
Linux and zLinux Administrator
630-753-5445
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mark
A) Can we fire/spawn the MySQl load on the Linux side, after
downloading the data from zOS
If you have the z/OS ported tools package or BSI's NJE Bridge, you can
trigger remote execution safely. You could do it with REXEC, but most
companies don't like REXEC for security reasons.
B) We are
We are running into these errors with Horde email on SUSE linux on 390.
These messages are from the apache2 error log. The login screen comes up
but it never comes back. Log below
linux-vm:/var/log # cd apache2/
linux-vm:/var/log/apache2 # ls
access_log error_log rcapache2.out
On Wed, Aug 1, 2007 at 1:31 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are running into these errors with Horde email on SUSE linux on 390.
These messages are from the apache2 error log. The login screen comes up
but it never comes back. Log below
How much memory does it have? What does the free command tell you?
Marcy Cortes
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you
are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you
must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this
This story is popping up all over the net.
Money Magazine
http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/marketwire/0284973.htm
PC World - no less
http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,135331-c,servers/article.html
Tom Kelman
Commerce Bank of Kansas City
(816) 760-7632
-Original Message-
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 13:02:16 -0400,
David Boyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should also use cio_ignore= to ignore all devices you might want
to
use later but not now. The major issue (besides regulating access) is
not IPL time (though applications like HAL are extremely slow to start
Just curious, because I don't know how the hardware works, if 30
mainframes do the work of 3,900 servers, that means 1 mainframe does
130.
Does that mean that potentially that 1 mainframe has the equivalent of
at least 130 network cards? I can see how most of the hardware is
virtualized, but the
Linux on 390 Port LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 08/01/2007 05:22:23
PM:
SNIP
Does that mean that potentially that 1 mainframe has the equivalent of
at least 130 network cards? I can see how most of the hardware is
virtualized, but the networking I don't quite see, yet. How does that
Hi Rich,
So 3 OSA express ports can do the same work as 130 Linux servers ?
Anton Britz
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Rich Smrcina
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 4:21 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: FW: IBM saves $250
z/VM simulates the function of a hardware switch (called the Virtual
Switch). Each virtual machine (and even TCP/IP on VM itself) can use
the virtual switch to access the 'real' network. The traffic from the
machines on the virtual switch can be load balanced (as of z/VM 5.3)
over 3 OSA Express
That's a totally it depends answer or YMMV.
I have 100 test/dev servers on a 2 engine z9 EC. If I extrapolated that out
I could have 2700 of them on 1 54 way (max # of z9 engines in a box today)..
Cool. I could take IBM's 4000 and put on 2 mainframes boxes and have a some
room for growth even !
It is unlikely that 130 servers would have 130 independent network connections.
So in reality 130 servers would be sharing a 1G connection. So if you connect
that 1G connection to the mainframe you still have the same bandwidth.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port
Does that mean that potentially that 1 mainframe has the equivalent of
at least 130 network cards? I can see how most of the hardware is
virtualized, but the networking I don't quite see, yet. How does that
part work?
They are virtual - how many network cards do want - just write some more
Just curious, because I don't know how the hardware works, if
30 mainframes do the work of 3,900 servers, that means 1
mainframe does 130.
Does that mean that potentially that 1 mainframe has the
equivalent of at least 130 network cards? I can see how most of
the hardware is virtualized,
That will greatly depend upon the amount of traffic generated by those
virtual machines. There could conceivably be a number of virtual
switches defined spread out over a number of OSA ports (or just one, as
I described earlier). We're not privy to the actual network configuration.
Britz,
Just curious, because I don't know how the hardware works, if 30 mainframes do
the work of 3,900 servers, that means 1 mainframe does 130.
The big difference is that servers are running under 20% (in general).
The mainframe is running at 100%.
Does that mean that potentially that 1 mainframe
On Wed, Aug 1, 2007 at 6:22 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Lindy
Mayfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just curious, because I don't know how the hardware works, if 30
mainframes do the work of 3,900 servers, that means 1 mainframe does
130.
Does that mean that potentially that 1 mainframe
On Wed, Aug 1, 2007 at 6:22 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Lindy
Mayfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just curious, because I don't know how the hardware works, if 30
mainframes do the work of 3,900 servers, that means 1 mainframe does
130.
Does that mean that potentially that 1 mainframe
On Wed, Aug 1, 2007 at 6:41 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Alan Cox
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-snip-
Now does anyone know what percentage of the IBM saving is computed by
calculating the saved advertising expenditure created by the story 8)
It's probably largely offset by the bonuses the
On Wednesday, 08/01/2007 at 06:43 EDT, Mark Post [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In addition to the VSWITCH that Rich talked about, each port on an OSA
card
provides between 15 and 48 network interfaces (depending on the model),
and you
can have multiple OSA cards. All but the OSA-Express2 10 GbE
Ahhh I was wondering how that worked since the DEFINE VSWITCH
command still only allowed three device numbers to be coded. Then I saw
the doc on the SET PORT GROUP command.
So 8 it is...
Alan Altmark wrote:
On a z9 with z/VM 5.3, a single VSWITCH can aggregate up to 8 dedicated
OSA ports
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 11:48 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Marcy
Cortes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, Mark,
Do you have URL's to the docs that make all of this work?
Wouldn't you know it, I just found this:
http://www.novell.com/coolsolutions/feature/19279.html
To do it without YUP
Running z/OS 1.7 I created a file EBCDIC.USERDATA and I would like to
transfer to an AIX server that only accepts Secured FTP connections.
I can NFS mount the file system and list the file with my Linux
mainframe system and use Linux sftp to send the file to the AIX server
but it does not convert
On Wed, Aug 1, 2007 at 7:34 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Clark,
Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-snip-
I don't
care where the translation takes place but I am looking for some
documented utility that converts ebcdic text file to ASCII. Can someone
point me in the right direction?
OpenSSH's scp always transfers files as text that may be true but it
is still EBCDIC text and I need it to be ASCII text.
The iconv command worked fine. For what it is worth out of the many
different protocols available I used.
iconv -f EBCDICUS -t US-ASCII ebcdic.input -o ascii.output
Don't know from binary / text but plain ftp use to convert EBCDIC text
files to ASCII text files. With sftp that is not the case. Again they
may be text files but I needed the additional translation from EBCDIC to
ASCII.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL
That was the information we got from Erin Farr [efarr at us ibm com]
that ported OpenSSH to z/OS. This was on the MVS-OE list (MVS
OpenEdition [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 08/05/2005 02:29:00 AM).
You are saying that both scp and sftp only do binary ? (Not disputing it
just clearing my understanding
You might need to check your NFS mount to do the conversion. I have
linux mounting a z/OS export and read and write files backwards and
forwards with no issues. When you are on your linux box can you read
the file correctly ? If so then the EBDCIC/ASCII conversion is taking
place. Otherwise
On Wed, Aug 1, 2007 at 8:27 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Clark,
Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't know from binary / text but plain ftp use to convert EBCDIC text
files to ASCII text files.
Correct. It still does. And vice versa when going the other direction.
Mark Post
On Wed, Aug 1, 2007 at 8:08 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
, Jerry Whitteridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-snip-
OpenSSH's scp always transfers files as text.
Umm, no. It is always binary. Otherwise, half the things I do during the day
would fail miserably. (A lot of them do anyway, but
40 matches
Mail list logo
