Re: New qeth failure message

2007-12-18 Thread Ursula Braun1
Mark, On Thursday, 12/06/2007 at 12:59 EST, Alan Altmark wrote: Hmmm... 0x08 means invalid request which has nothing to do with even/odd addresses. IMO it points to a buggy device driver. If Alan is right with a buggy device driver, we should have a look at this problem. Could you please come

Re: Bugzilla anyone?

2007-12-18 Thread Alan Cox
Both. Bugzilla is enormously end-user-hostile, and difficult to manage. It is also primarily written in Perl, making heavy use of arrays in memory, which makes it somewhat of a pig. The user hostility is really down to the UI, some of the bugzillas have very nice front ends. On a PC it runs

Re: Bugzilla anyone?

2007-12-18 Thread Phil Smith III
David Boyes wrote: Hi... Is anyone running Bugzilla on Z? We tried it and abandoned it in favor of RT. Note that RT and Bugzilla are different tools, aimed at different targets; both have their strengths. I, too, find RT preferable for the problems I tend to need it for, but RT is a

INFO LINUX-390

2007-12-18 Thread Steve Dover
INFO LINUX-390 -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

FW: SIGNOFF LINUX-390

2007-12-18 Thread Martin, Larry D
Why do I get the attached response when I attempt to withdraw from the list server? From: MARIST LISTSERV Server (14.4) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 8:52 AM To: Martin, Larry D Subject: Re: SIGNOFF LINUX-390 SIGNOFF

Re: SIGNOFF LINUX-390

2007-12-18 Thread RPN01
Because your e-mail system puts the huge disclaimer at the bottom of your message, and the listserver has no idea how to process it. -- .~.Robert P. Nix Mayo Foundation /V\RO-OE-5-55200 First Street SW /( )\ 507-284-0844 Rochester, MN

Re: Bugzilla anyone?

2007-12-18 Thread David Boyes
Both. Bugzilla is enormously end-user-hostile, and difficult to manage. It is also primarily written in Perl, making heavy use of arrays in memory, which makes it somewhat of a pig. The user hostility is really down to the UI, some of the bugzillas have very nice front ends. Someone

Re: SIGNOFF LINUX-390

2007-12-18 Thread David Boyes
Why do I get the attached response when I attempt to withdraw from the list server? Either your mail tool, the widget that inserts the disclaimer, or the mail gateway that transfers your messages to the Internet doesn't properly insert or manage line end characters -- most common problem is

Re: SIGNOFF LINUX-390

2007-12-18 Thread RPN01
Would a line w/ -- (dash-dash-space) before the signature and disclaimer cause the command scanner to cease parsing the commands? It's supposed to be an introduction to the signature, and most other things ignore everything below it -- .~.Robert P. Nix Mayo Foundation

Re: SIGNOFF LINUX-390

2007-12-18 Thread David Boyes
Would a line w/ -- (dash-dash-space) before the signature and disclaimer cause the command scanner to cease parsing the commands? It's supposed to be an introduction to the signature, and most other things ignore everything below it It might, but //EOJ always works (both in the classic

Re: Bugzilla anyone?

2007-12-18 Thread David Boyes
But when I was messing with trackers on Intel a few years ago, I chose Roundup over both Bugzilla and RT. It was clean, easier to understand, easier to use, and easier to customize. We used it for both development problem tracking and customer problems. The source for Roundup is available

Re: Bugzilla anyone?

2007-12-18 Thread John Summerfield
David Boyes wrote: But when I was messing with trackers on Intel a few years ago, I chose Roundup over both Bugzilla and RT. It was clean, easier to understand, easier to use, and easier to customize. We used it for both development problem tracking and customer problems. The source for

SLES 8 on z9 in LPAR mode

2007-12-18 Thread Steve Langlo
We're replacing our z800 (2066-003) with a z9 (2096-Q03) and have several SLES 8 LPAR's. Is there any chance of SLES 8 running on the z9 or will I have to upgrade to SLES 10 before the z9 installation. Thanks, Steve -- For

Re: SLES 8 on z9 in LPAR mode

2007-12-18 Thread Mark Post
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 6:40 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steve Langlo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We're replacing our z800 (2066-003) with a z9 (2096-Q03) and have several SLES 8 LPAR's. Is there any chance of SLES 8 running on the z9 or will I have to upgrade to SLES 10 before the z9