Dear all,
I have some questions regarding the use of IPTABLES in SLES 10:
SLES10 provides the SuSEfirewall2 but I am not sure if I do understand the
configuration correctly.
In my special case, I would need only that two addresses are natted from one
network to another. No DMZ or other rules
The -k option doesn't work.
fdasd -k -c /opt/fdrupstream/fdasdb.conf /dev/dasdb
fdasd error: parser error
Option 'auto' required when specifying 'keep_volser'
Same for -l
fdasd -lUPST01 -c /opt/fdrupstream/fdasdb.conf /dev/dasdb
fdasd error: parser error
Option 'auto' required when
Hello Samir,
Thank you very much indeed.
BR Florian
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Samir Reddahi samir.redd...@securex.bewrote:
Hi Florian,
You can use the boot.local (/etc/init.d/boot.local) to add the commands.
The boot.local is executed right before the runlevel change.
*Samir
This is a bit revisionist, methinks. At best, this statement needs a
big where IBM's involvement began, but it's just not true that Marist
started it all. The Bigfoot project came before it, and there were no
Marist participants to be seen there.
Citation notwithstanding. I open the
First running Bigfoot kernel was July 1999, I recall. Neale had a mostly
running libc and some userspace apps along with that mid-August.
Fall, 1999: IBM releases joint study technology preview project with
Marist (late Sept/October, IIRC)
About a week after I announced I was going to merge
This historical discussion prompted me to look online at
http://www2.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-VM, where I see the earliest
monthly logs of this list, LINUX-390, start in Dec 1998 as a list named
LINUX-VM which Marist apparently hosted specifically for the Bigfoot
participants' use.
Yeah, it had outgrown the use of NAMES files by then. 8-)
Alan has it exactly right, though -- a lot of things unhappened in that
few weeks. I remember a few meetings where most of the attendees were
officially somewhere else.
-- db
On 9/28/09 10:35 AM, Romanowski, John (OFT)
On 9/28/2009 at 4:48 AM, Florian Bilek florian.bi...@gmail.com wrote:
-snip-
I am not sure where I should put those four iptable statements in the boot
sequence that they don't interfere with the normal startup of the system. Do
you have any suggestions?
Have you tried YaST - Security -
How do you ensure I/O write order when performing fast copy backups for z/Linux
under z/VM?
Our environment:
- z/VM 5.3
- z/Linux SuSE SLES 9
- DB/2 9.0
- Oracle 10g
- EMC DASD with TimeFinder SNAP capability
As a secondary means to recovery data in event
On Sep 28, 2009, at 12:05 PM, Hallock, Arthur T arthur.hall...@opm.gov
wrote:
Since we can perform a consistency snap, that is a point in time
copy of the source volumes, we're considering leaving VM and the
Linux servers up while the snap occurs.
Bad idea. Snap/flash can only copy
On 9/28/2009 at 12:05 PM, Hallock, Arthur T arthur.hall...@opm.gov
wrote:
-snip-
Since we can perform a consistency snap, that is a point in time copy of the
source volumes, we're considering leaving VM and the Linux servers up while
the snap occurs.
For the Linux piece, at least, that
What's a consisteny option? Does it go across all LCU's and file systems?
Linux does timestamp its i/o. VM does not (currently - see IBM). I'm not
familiar with the EMC's consistency. We do use GDPS/XRC for our recovery,
giving a recovery point of less than a minute. Does this EMC
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 10:45:33 -0400 David Boyes said:
Yeah, it had outgrown the use of NAMES files by then. 8-)
Alan has it exactly right, though -- a lot of things unhappened in that
few weeks. I remember a few meetings where most of the attendees were
officially somewhere else.
-- db
On 9/28/09
I like how the wiki is beginning to take shape. But I do have a request.
Can the content of the Disaster Recovery subpage be moved down in a hierarchy
so that alternatives to FDR/Upstream can be documented at the same level of
hierarchy? We use DFSMS's ADRDSSU utility under z/OS for our full
A. Harry Williams wrote:
[snip]
I missed this note last week. I don't claim anything for Marist other than
being in the right place at the right time and knowing the right people
involved. When I talk history, I reference bigfoot, but I also reference
others that I believe helped spawn
I'm pretty sure it was Rick.
On 9/28/09 1:02 PM, Dave Jones d...@vsoft-software.com wrote:
It was an email with no subject. Any ideas who wrote those prophetic words?
This, as well as the first note below, certainly sounds like something
Rick Troth would write, but I don't know that for
On 9/28/2009 at 12:49 PM, Kern, Thomas thomas.k...@hq.doe.gov wrote:
I like how the wiki is beginning to take shape. But I do have a request.
Can the content of the Disaster Recovery subpage be moved down in a
hierarchy so that alternatives to FDR/Upstream can be documented at the same
Look at it now. Is this what you had in mind?
Ron
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 28, 2009, at 11:51 AM, Kern, Thomas thomas.k...@hq.doe.gov
wrote:
I like how the wiki is beginning to take shape. But I do have a
request.
Can the content of the Disaster Recovery subpage be moved down in a
Must be Rick Troth .
I thought of Jeff Savitt or Arty Ecock as well.
Are all email posts from the same person?
By the way, in June 1998 the VM workshop took place at Marist.
I think I have a T shirt that says so.
So discussions of linux under VM did take place at Marist in 1998.
-Original
From Marcy:
What's a consisteny option? Does it go across all LCU's and file systems?
Linux does timestamp its i/o. VM does not (currently - see IBM). I'm not
familiar with the EMC's consistency. We do use GDPS/XRC for our recovery,
giving a recovery point of less than a minute. Does
If indeed all of your i/o is a consistent copy across that DMX 1000, then I
think you could do it while they are up.
It would be no different than a VM abend or other failure. You might get some
file system errors that should be correctable with fsck (you are running a
journaled FS
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:50:48 -0400 Smith, Ann (ISD, IT) said:
Must be Rick Troth .
I thought of Jeff Savitt or Arty Ecock as well.
Are all email posts from the same person?
It's actually 3 different people. The first is Rick, the second Terrence
Zellers and the third Greg Levine.
By the way,
Yes, that works.
Thanks.
/Tom Kern
Ron Foster at Baldor-IS wrote:
Look at it now. Is this what you had in mind?
Ron
Sent from my iPhone
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Hello!
I confess the e-mail records from that time may be lost, but, ah... I spell
my first name as it's indicated on the signature there, Harry.
Besides I didn't join the list until it was officially announced, that is
when the first announcements of the Marist distribution were announced.
But
24 matches
Mail list logo
