On 4/3/07, shogunx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That sounds like a recipe for disaster unless you have the tightest of
physical security.
As Mark points out, physical security is not really the issue here. In
most mainframe installations you will find that physical access to the
hardware is very
McKown, John wrote:
This is more generic to Linux than specific to z/Linux, but perhaps you
will indulge me. I am curious as to the best practice to allow a user
to connect to a Linux server.
1) Telnet and use a normal userid/password - nope, ain't gonna happen.
2) SSH and use a normal
On 4/2/07, Stephen Frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On my browser I type in the URL. The first page comes up. I click on a link on
that page the page
come up. However, the browser shows the IP address and not the URL.
http://###.##.##.###/login/index.php and not
On my browser I type in the URL. The first page comes up. I click on a
link on that page the page
come up. However, the browser shows the IP address and not the URL.
http://###.##.##.###/login/index.php and not
http://doctrgtest.doc.state.ok.us/login/index.php as I
expected.
What else do
On Apr 3, 2007, at 10:25 AM, David Boyes wrote:
On my browser I type in the URL. The first page comes up. I click
on a
link on that page the page
come up. However, the browser shows the IP address and not the URL.
http://###.##.##.###/login/index.php and not
That sounds like a recipe for disaster unless you have the tightest of
physical security.
Not in a virtual machine. Access to the console is protected by the VM
security management system, which is usually well-monitored and
well-instrumented. If you can get to the console, the machine is
Hi,
Our vservers setup was mostly done using the procedures described in
From LPAR to Virtual Servers in 2 Days by Michael MacIsaac, et al. So
currently we have a cloning controller server and about a dozen cloned
vservers all current to SLES9 SP3 + patches. We have been applying
patches using
Is anyone running Moodle?
Moodle is a course management system (CMS) - a free, Open Source software
package designed using
sound pedagogical principles, to help educators create effective online
learning communities.
--
Stephen Frazier
Information Technology Unit
Oklahoma Department of
Upgrades do not work so well going from SLES9 to SLES10 as you are probably
talking about 32bit SLES9 and SLES10 is 64bit only. Your best solution is a
fresh install.
--
Mark Pace
Mainline Information Systems
--
For LINUX-390
Linux on 390 Port LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 04/03/2007 02:09:07
PM:
Hi,
Our vservers setup was mostly done using the procedures described in
From LPAR to Virtual Servers in 2 Days by Michael MacIsaac, et al. So
currently we have a cloning controller server and about a dozen cloned
Stephen Frazier writes:
Is anyone running Moodle?
Moodle is a course management system (CMS) - a free, Open Source software
package designed using
sound pedagogical principles, to help educators create effective online
learning communities.
Yes, I use it on Zeus (the hub supporting the
The perfect beer for Linux/390 Systems Administrators
http://linuxvm.org/Info/l390beer.html
Mark Post
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO
On 4/3/07, Mark Post [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The perfect beer for Linux/390 Systems Administrators
http://linuxvm.org/Info/l390beer.html
Mark Post
I would LOVE to have one of those beer glasses!
Mark Pace
Mainline Information Systems
Particularly if it happened to be full!
Steve Mitchell
Sr Systems Software Specialist
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Kansas
(785) 291-8885
'There are no degrees of Honesty-you're either Honest or you're not!
Mark Pace
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
m
I am going from SLES9 64bit to SLES10. This will be an LPAR only
update/install. Does the SuSE documentation adequately describe this
process? Does anyone have any tips before I begin this effort.
Thanks
Doug
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
I am going from SLES9 64bit to SLES10. This will be an LPAR only
update/install.
Does the SuSE documentation adequately describe this
process?
No. It doesn't really get updated much for specific platforms, and
LPAR/bare metal is *very* rare. Any docs that might exist will probably
be in
On Tue, Apr 3, 2007 at 4:26 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Clark,
Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am going from SLES9 64bit to SLES10. This will be an LPAR only
update/install. Does the SuSE documentation adequately describe this
process? Does anyone have any tips before I begin
Point Babel Fish to translate the following page from German to English:
http://www.schoenbuchbraeu.de/abholmarkt.php3
Read the 2nd last bullet point: now here's a store servicing all your
vices.
(http://babelfish.altavista.com/)
Hey cool. It worked. Thanks Mark.
I replaced the other 1: line with this line below.
But it doesn't have the little line in the console that makes us feel
all warm and fuzzy that the service finished booting correctly:
That is Welcome to SUSE LINUX Enterprise Server 9 (s390x) - Kernel
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007, Marcy Cortes wrote:
Hey cool. It worked. Thanks Mark.
I replaced the other 1: line with this line below.
But it doesn't have the little line in the console that makes us feel
all warm and fuzzy that the service finished booting correctly:
That is Welcome to SUSE LINUX
On Tue, Apr 3, 2007 at 5:14 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Marcy
Cortes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey cool. It worked. Thanks Mark.
I replaced the other 1: line with this line below.
But it doesn't have the little line in the console that makes us feel
all warm and fuzzy that the
delurk
Ich will das trinken!
/delurk
--
M. Ray Mullins
Roseville, CA, USA
http://www.catherdersoftware.com/
http://www.mrmullins.big-bear-city.ca.us/
http://www.the-bus-stops-here.org/
German is essentially a form of assembly language consisting entirely of far
calls heavily accented with
On Apr 3, 2007, at 4:26 PM, Mark Post wrote:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2007 at 5:14 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
, Marcy
Cortes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey cool. It worked. Thanks Mark.
I replaced the other 1: line with this line below.
But it doesn't have the little line in the console that
On Apr 3, 2007, at 5:17 PM, Adam Thornton wrote:
Seriously, folks. It's Linux, not Solaris: /bin/sh is POSIX-
compliant (boy, was I surprised last week when some of my POSIX
scripts barfed-and-died on.
Er, I seem to have forgotten what I was doing there.
barfed-and-died on Solaris 10)
is
Is it me, or does the update from one release of SuSE Enterprise Linux
to another version via fresh install seem strange to anyone else?
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mark Post
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 1:42 PM
To:
That's because on Linux, /bin/sh is typically just a symlink to
/bin/bash. I would imagine if you were to use bash on your Solaris
machine the result would be what you were expecting. And vice versa, if
you were to actually use the real bourne shell on Linux, it would fail.
-Sam
-Original
oh, and by the way, thakns for the censorship, and snarfing my script as
your own. dick.
sleekfreak pirate broadcast
http://sleekfreak.ath.cx:81/
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 17:48:24 -0400 (EDT)
From: shogunx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Linux on 390 Port
On Apr 3, 2007, at 5:43 PM, Kielek, Samuel wrote:
That's because on Linux, /bin/sh is typically just a symlink to
/bin/bash. I would imagine if you were to use bash on your Solaris
machine the result would be what you were expecting. And vice
versa, if
you were to actually use the real bourne
On Tue, Apr 3, 2007 at 6:56 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], shogunx
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
oh, and by the way, thakns for the censorship, and snarfing my script as
your own. dick.
Were you directing this vitriol at anyone in particular? I can't say I've seen
anyone engaging in
On Tue, Apr 3, 2007 at 6:34 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Clark,
Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it me, or does the update from one release of SuSE Enterprise Linux
to another version via fresh install seem strange to anyone else?
Not to me, since you're not doing a fresh install.
That's the second obtuse comment I've seen out of you today. Clearly
uncalled for.
shogunx wrote:
oh, and by the way, thakns for the censorship, and snarfing my script as
your own. dick.
sleekfreak pirate broadcast
http://sleekfreak.ath.cx:81/
--
Rich Smrcina
VM Assist, Inc.
Phone:
I guess all I was trying to indirectly point out was that this behaviour
is caused by the fact that Solaris has the heirloom Bourne shell as
/bin/sh (which existed prior to POSIX.2). By the way, the XPG version
(/usr/xpg4/bin/sh) on Solaris does support $().
I do agree and wonder why at this
On Apr 3, 2007, at 6:46 PM, Kielek, Samuel wrote:
I guess all I was trying to indirectly point out was that this
behaviour
is caused by the fact that Solaris has the heirloom Bourne shell as
/bin/sh (which existed prior to POSIX.2). By the way, the XPG version
(/usr/xpg4/bin/sh) on Solaris does
Oh my. If this list is set to not echo posts back to the sender, then you
all have my sincerest apologies. When I did not see my post, I assumed
someone did not like my commentary, and I saw a similar script as the one
I posted. Given that assumption, I assumed I was speaking to whomever did
On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 16:11 +0200, Rob van der Heij wrote:
We did it slightly different with an experimental patch to OpenSSH
that allows for the public keys to be kept in LDAP. That means there's
only one place where the public key is held. That LDAP server would
allow the end-user to upload
On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 16:11 +0200, Rob van der Heij wrote:
We did it slightly different with an experimental patch to OpenSSH
that allows for the public keys to be kept in LDAP. That means there's
only one place where the public key is held. That LDAP server would
allow the end-user to upload
On Apr 3, 2007, at 7:10 PM, shogunx wrote:
Oh my. If this list is set to not echo posts back to the sender,
then you
all have my sincerest apologies. When I did not see my post, I
assumed
someone did not like my commentary, and I saw a similar script as
the one
I posted. Given that
I just noticed there is a man page on solaris that details its standards
compliance. Try 'man standards' for the somewhat lengthy details. Here
is the bit I found most relevant:
If the behavior required by POSIX.2, POSIX.2a, XPG4, SUS, or
SUSv2 conflicts with historical Solaris
On Apr 3, 2007, at 8:46 PM, Kielek, Samuel wrote:
I just noticed there is a man page on solaris that details its
standards
compliance. Try 'man standards' for the somewhat lengthy details. Here
is the bit I found most relevant:
If the behavior required by POSIX.2, POSIX.2a, XPG4, SUS, or
39 matches
Mail list logo
