Le 29 janv. 08 à 06:11, Nedko Arnaudov a écrit :
Stéphane Letz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Could JackEngine here be renamed JackServer? I think It would
correspond more to what engine and server are internally.
Now that we are on this, please tell me what server and engine are
internally,
On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 10:42 +, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
Am Dienstag, 29. Januar 2008 06:25:31 schrieben Sie:
On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 03:16 +, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
So get it: there is NOT only one definition of the term open source
when standing alone. Like with many
Am Dienstag, 29. Januar 2008 06:25:31 schrieben Sie:
On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 03:16 +, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
So get it: there is NOT only one definition of the term open source
when standing alone. Like with many unspecific short terms, different
people have different opinions of
On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 14:00 +, pete shorthose wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 01:25:31 -0500
Dave Robillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and it just so happens that
this arbitrary definiton matches exactly your
software which you wish to call 'open source'
for PR reasons.
virtually nobody
Dave Robillard wrote:
This is utterly false, and completely contrary to the entire purpose of
Free Software, and the GPL. It's the very first 'freedom' (out of four)
in the definition of Free Software, which was written by the same person
as the GPL, for the same reasons.
Okay. Now let me
Paul,
I'll be the first to admit i know little about Pulseaudio, and what it can
do. And i mean no offence or dismissal of Alsa and it's role.
So where will Pulse Audio take us in the future? Jack's been outstanding for
me, and as a means of porting and moving audio, and i hope midi around, i've
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 05:42:24PM -0500, Dave Robillard wrote:
So we'd be better off with no definition of open source or free
software at all?
I didn't say that. But there is a problem with such a
definition.
When the words 'round table' are used to mean 'a meeting
of all concerned parties,
Dear all,
The Linux Audio Conference 2008 in Cologne (Feb 28th - Mar 2nd 2008)
is just one month away now. The programme is shaping up, concerts are
being organized and coffee is about to be ordered.
To help us with planning the LAC2008 we kindly ask you to register now
at the conference
Dave Robillard wrote:
I'm not sure if this is what Juuso meant, but Jack definitely needs
something like a simple key/value metadata system for ports.
I second that. Especially if some of the metadata could be user-assigned
(via configuration or otherwise).
Example use - to mark the MIDI
On Sunday 27 January 2008 23:57:27 Marek wrote:
What does that matter? You mean someone should pay me for this?
I'll pay you to shut up about the GPL...
Seriously, you don't appear to understand what you're talking about. You keep
making the same nonsensical point over and over again.
If
Hehe, succinctly put Christian.
Just doing a quick count of all the lines that have been written about this,
and the sometime belligerent enthusiasm attacking LS and questioning their
integrity because they're perceived as not being 'pure' by interpretation,
by some of you, and just since i've
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 12:57:19PM -0500, Stephen Sinclair wrote:
Also, nice in the fact that you can do per-sample computations easily,
How ? I seem to have missed something...
Because you can wait in a 1-sample loop?
Yes, it will use your whole CPU for a loop like that, but this
Hallo!
- a delay line,
- allowing high-quality fractional-sample delays,
- at least 12 outputs, for each two controls: delay, gain,
- smooth 'crossfading' between two control sets, both delay
and gain, controlled by a GUI or by OSC.
It should not take more than 20% CPU on a 2G P4
On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 15:44 +0300, alex stone wrote:
To offer a counterweight to this, have all you craftsmen considered
getting together in a concentrated team effort, free of politics, and
indulge in an intense push to expand Jack and Jackdmp (for example) to
incorporate kernel level
Paul Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At this time, it doesn't offer what JACK offers (and it may never do
that).
There is the talk about moving jack into pulse;).
--
Esben Stien is [EMAIL PROTECTED] s a
http://www. s tn m
irc://irc. b - i
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:41:39 -0500
Dave Robillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 14:00 +, pete
shorthose wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 01:25:31 -0500
Dave Robillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yours just coincidentally is shared by
virtually nobody
did you just
On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 14:00 +, pete shorthose wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 01:25:31 -0500
Dave Robillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yours just coincidentally is shared by
virtually nobody
did you just presume to speak for virtually
everybody?
I suppose it's also presumptuous to say that
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 15:13:02 -0500
Dave Robillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 19:28 +, pete
shorthose wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:44:46 -0500
Dave Robillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 18:22 +, pete
shorthose wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jan
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
To run it, just paste the text below into the terminal snd-ls
was started from.
Or not. snd-ls hasn't the define-rt-vector-struct macro yet.
To run it, start latest snd and then evaluate (load-from-path
snd_conffile.scm) and after that the
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:44:46 -0500
Dave Robillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 18:22 +, pete
shorthose wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:41:39 -0500
Dave Robillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 14:00 +, pete
shorthose wrote:
virtually
On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 18:22 +, pete shorthose wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:41:39 -0500
Dave Robillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 14:00 +, pete
shorthose wrote:
virtually nobody cares what you think.
how's that?
Virtually nobody even knows who you
I'm attaching the plain C variant of the API. Please comment if you find
something that cannot be implemented in jack server code. It is not
yet fully doxygenized but things should be obvious.
/* -*- Mode: C ; c-basic-offset: 2 -*- */
Fons Adriaensen:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 12:57:19PM -0500, Stephen Sinclair wrote:
Also, nice in the fact that you can do per-sample computations easily,
How ? I seem to have missed something...
Because you can wait in a 1-sample loop?
Yes, it will use your whole CPU for a loop like
Le 29 janv. 08 à 19:42, Nedko Arnaudov a écrit :
I'm attaching the plain C variant of the API. Please comment if you
find
something that cannot be implemented in jack server code. It is not
yet fully doxygenized but things should be obvious.
jackctl.h
Seems ok for me. Having this
Hi Fons,
Here is a quick solution using Faust :
import(filter.lib);
line(i) = vgroup(line %i, *(g) : fdelay2(1024, d))
with { g = vslider(gain (dB), -60, -60, 4, 0.1) : db2linear :
smooth(0.995);
d = nentry(delay (samp), 0, 0, 1000, 0.1) :
smooth(0.995); };
On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 21:39 +, pete shorthose wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 15:13:02 -0500
Dave Robillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 19:28 +, pete
shorthose wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:44:46 -0500
Dave Robillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue,
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:18:00 -0500
Dave Robillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 21:39 +, pete shorthose wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 15:13:02 -0500
Dave Robillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 19:28 +, pete
shorthose wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jan
Gesendet: Mi 30 Jan 2008 03:25:17 CET
Von: pete shorthose[EMAIL PROTECTED]
i even said virtually no one welcomes drobilla
when you joined #lad on freenode.
it was TEH FUNNEZ!
Ah, so that what was funny. But nothing from Dave or me was funny.
So apparently you have humour, but we don't.
Now
28 matches
Mail list logo
