On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 07:36:04PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
On Saturday 03 January 2009 06:28:22 Ingo Oeser wrote:
+for i in MSEC 1000 USEC 100
+do
+ NAME=$(echo $i | awk '{print $1}')
cut -d' ' -f1 does the same
+ PERIOD=$(echo $i | awk '{print $2}')
cut -d' ' -f2
On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 07:45:34PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
With respect to your three patches the plan is to:
- add the updated timeconst patch to kbuild-next
- add the updated cpu-feature patch to kbuild-next
- the patch touching headers_install will not be merged.
The way forward
I note that sed and printf and such are all susv3. I have an explicit test
for 32 bit math in the script that cares, and this worked in Red Hat 9 circa
2003.
If you are trying to do arbitary precision maths using standard posix
tools just use dc. That way the standard is explicit about what
Alan Cox wrote:
I note that sed and printf and such are all susv3. I have an explicit test
for 32 bit math in the script that cares, and this worked in Red Hat 9 circa
2003.
If you are trying to do arbitary precision maths using standard posix
tools just use dc. That way the standard is
Hello,
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 4:06 AM, Paul Mundt let...@linux-sh.org wrote:
Let's look at the rationale presented so far in this thread:
1 - Being able to build the kernel natively on a constrained
target is useful, regardless of whether it is being used for
Hello,
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Phillip Lougher
phil...@lougher.demon.co.uk wrote:
- what are the limitations of squashfs (please add this to the
changelog of patch #1 or something). Does it support nfsd? (yes, it
does!) xatrs and acls? File size limits, entries-per-directory,
On Sunday 04 January 2009 06:07:35 Alan Cox wrote:
I note that sed and printf and such are all susv3. I have an explicit
test for 32 bit math in the script that cares, and this worked in Red Hat
9 circa 2003.
If you are trying to do arbitary precision maths using standard posix
tools
On Saturday 03 January 2009 20:48:21 David Vrabel wrote:
Rob Landley wrote:
From: Rob Landley r...@landley.net
Replace kernel/timeconst.pl with kernel/timeconst.sh. The new shell
script is much simpler, about 1/4 the size, and runs on Red Hat 9 from
2003.
It requires a shell which
Rob Landley wrote:
C) The only calculation which can overflow 64 bits (the ADJ32 one) turns out
not to need arbitrary precision math, just 72 bits, and if it ever uses more
than 32 then bottom 32 are all zero before the divide so you can do it in
three lines.
... for the current code
Rob Landley wrote:
In a private email, Bernd Petrovitsch suggested set -- $i and then
using NAME=$1; PERIOD=$2. (I keep getting private email responses
to these sort of threads, and then getting dismissed as the only one
who cares about the issue. Less so this time around, but still...)
On Son, 2009-01-04 at 22:13 +, Jamie Lokier wrote:
Rob Landley wrote:
In a private email, Bernd Petrovitsch suggested set -- $i and then
using NAME=$1; PERIOD=$2. (I keep getting private email responses
to these sort of threads, and then getting dismissed as the only one
who cares
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 12:13 AM, Rob Landley r...@landley.net wrote:
Replace kernel/timeconst.pl with kernel/timeconst.sh. The new shell script
is much simpler, about 1/4 the size, and runs on Red Hat 9 from 2003.
Peter Anvin added this perl to 2.6.25. Before that, the kernel had never
Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
(I have 850 Linux boxes on my network with a bourne shell which
doesn't do $((...)). I won't be building kernels on them though :-)
Believe it or not, but there are folks out there who build the firmware
on ARM 200 MHz NFS-mounted systems natively (and not simply
On Sunday 04 January 2009 18:15:30 Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
On Son, 2009-01-04 at 22:13 +, Jamie Lokier wrote:
Rob Landley wrote:
In a private email, Bernd Petrovitsch suggested set -- $i and then
using NAME=$1; PERIOD=$2. (I keep getting private email responses
to these sort of
On Sunday 04 January 2009 18:41:15 Ray Lee wrote:
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 12:13 AM, Rob Landley r...@landley.net wrote:
Replace kernel/timeconst.pl with kernel/timeconst.sh. The new shell
script is much simpler, about 1/4 the size, and runs on Red Hat 9 from
2003.
Peter Anvin added this
15 matches
Mail list logo
