On 5/23/07, Jacob Leaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
I am using heartbeat 2 with crm, since it seemed to be the thing to do. I'm
only using a small fraction of the feature set, since this is my
loadbalancer, heartbeat2 handles failover and ldirectord is managing the ipvs
stuff.
My
On 5/23/07, Tao Yu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it a practical way to call cibadmin/crm_resource/etc.. from the other
program?
sure.
or you can connect directly to the CIB (from any host over a TLS
connection) and send XML instructions
On 5/23/07, Tao Yu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I
On 5/23/07, Dejan Muhamedagic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 04:43:49PM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I'm trying to add monitor operations for some resources I've configured in
the cib.xml, but when I try to do it using the GUI, I'm getting some
errors:
On 5/23/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Dejan,
Thanks for your help!
I've tried to add the monitor operation as you explained, but got the
following error:
1) cibadmin -Q -o resources rsc.xml
s0580crmdb2pr1:~ # cat rsc.xml
resources
group ordered=true description=Grupo
Brian Reichert wrote:
What I tracked down was that if the box powered down too quickly
for heartbeat to clean up, a PID file was left in place:
...
But, there's no check to assure the recorded PID is not stale.
Have others seen this? This code seems to be in 2.0.8 as well...
FYI, I filed
On 5/24/07, Max Hofer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 23 May 2007, Tao Yu wrote:
Is it a practical way to call cibadmin/crm_resource/etc.. from the other
program?
On 5/23/07, Tao Yu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to write some thirdparty programs to manage heartbeat.
On 5/24/07, Kevin Jamieson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brian Reichert wrote:
What I tracked down was that if the box powered down too quickly
for heartbeat to clean up, a PID file was left in place:
...
But, there's no check to assure the recorded PID is not stale.
Have others seen this?
On Tue, 22 May 2007, jake brown wrote:
Is there a way to manually tell it not to install the quorumd?
That ought not to be necessary.
I have been trying to build linux-ha 2.0.8 under solaris10 x86 and
everytime I build it I get this error any clue?
gnutls_x509_crt_init
Hi,everybody,pI've studied heartbeat for several weeks, and
found it has perfect and overall functions. But it is a little big for
/ppme./ppSystem discription: Two node, Redhat EL4,
heartbeat-2.0.8,/ppsame hardware and software configure, same processes
running, but different
my eyes! my eyes!
please, no html emails :-)
On 5/24/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,everybody,pI've studied heartbeat for several weeks, and found it has perfect and overall functions. But it is a little big for /ppme./ppSystem discription: Two node, Redhat
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 12:21:13AM -0700, Kevin Jamieson wrote:
Brian Reichert wrote:
What I tracked down was that if the box powered down too quickly
for heartbeat to clean up, a PID file was left in place:
...
But, there's no check to assure the recorded PID is not stale.
Have
On 5/24/07, Brian Reichert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 12:21:13AM -0700, Kevin Jamieson wrote:
Brian Reichert wrote:
What I tracked down was that if the box powered down too quickly
for heartbeat to clean up, a PID file was left in place:
...
But, there's no check
David Lee wrote:
Andrew: Thanks for doing that, especially the concern for the non-Linux
systems. That concern is much appreciated.
Alas: The test -e that attempts to do this is itself non-portable
(so bad shell syntax etc.).
I think the relevant (for this context) flags that seem to be
On 5/24/07, Carson Gaspar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Lee wrote:
Andrew: Thanks for doing that, especially the concern for the non-Linux
systems. That concern is much appreciated.
Alas: The test -e that attempts to do this is itself non-portable
(so bad shell syntax etc.).
I think
Hi Andrew!!
Thanks a lot for the tip. I thought we did not have any update to
heartbeat from Novell, but looking at Yast online update (
https://you.novell.com/update/x86_64/update/SUSE-SLES/10/rpm/src/) I could
find the heartbeat 2.0.7 available for download.
After updating it and setting the
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 06:05:27PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
I don't see what the checks in /proc gets you at this point; how
is that different than
( kill(pid,0) != -1 ) pid !=getpid() )
I'm not used to using /proc for this stuff
it tells you if the pid has been reused by
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 05:26:04PM -0400, Brian Reichert wrote:
I've been testing auto_failback in our 2.0.7-based lcuster, and
have found sometimes failback doesn't occur.
We're managing a virtual IP via a haresources file on a Red Hat 4
box.
What I tracked down was that if the box
Re-sending, this time without the large attachements that blocked it's
posting. I can provide those straces, if folks want.
- Forwarded message from Brian Reichert [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 15:24:45 -0400
From: Brian Reichert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: General Linux-HA
Hi Andrew!! Hi Dejan!!
Thanks a lot for the help! As I said in another topic I've posted, Novell
has made available an update for heartbeat from 2.0.5 to 2.0.7. After
updating the package this problem was solved too, now I can add it usign
the GUI! :)
Thanks a lot for the help!
Best Regards,
Hi,everybody,
I've studied heartbeat for several weeks, and found it has perfect and
overall functions. But it is a little big for me.
System description: Two node, Redhat EL4, heartbeat-2.0.8,
same hardware and software configure, same processes running, but
different behavior(active node
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 03:29:45PM -0400, Brian Reichert wrote:
This is the patch to 2.0.8 that I'm testing:
# diff -U3 heartbeat/heartbeat.c.orig heartbeat/heartbeat.c
--- heartbeat/heartbeat.c.orig 2007-01-11 21:57:05.0 -0500
+++ heartbeat/heartbeat.c 2007-05-23
a v2-style cluster with a 19200bps serial link? I think that
in itself is an interesting attempt ;-)
I left it at default (from RPM) figuring that was safest. I understand
now this is recommended to be maximum speed. However, it is not
obvious. I am using supermicro 6015p-8TR servers. No
a v2-style cluster with a 19200bps serial link? I think that
in itself is an interesting attempt ;-)
baud 230400 now. Thnx for documentation
http://www.linux-ha.org/ha.cf#baud.
I don't really see a recommendation for higher baud in documentation for
crm=yes clusters. Is this a good place to
23 matches
Mail list logo
