[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Could you try bisecting it down to the guilty commit using git-bisect?
[ the old stuff got few hundred commits in 2.6.25 ]
Thanks, Bart
Will do. It'll take a while though. Not a fast machine and used by the
household...
/A
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
Since it is not a switch on and see problem, I'm not in too good
position, so unless someone have a really great idea or observation,
I seriously have to consider to replace the MB and probably add
some extra sata controllers.
If you can still do some testing, what happens if you unplug power
On Saturday 23 February 2008, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
hpt366: fix section mismatch warnings
Fix following warnings:
WARNING: o-sparc64/vmlinux.o(.data+0x195a38): Section mismatch in reference
from the variable hpt37x_info.0 to the variable .devinit.data:hpt370
WARNING:
On Saturday 23 February 2008, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote:
Hi Bartlomiej,
The following 10 patches remove a huge number of errors and warnings
reported by checkpatch.pl from the IDE subsystem.
[...]
Thanks!
I applied everything (patch #8 with fixes based on comments from
Adrian Cyrill + patches
On Saturday 23 February 2008, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote:
Bart,
here is a new series of patches that remove some errors
and warnings reported by checkpatch.pl from the IDE subsystem.
All the patches have been compile tested and are against this morning (CET
time :-)
linux-next
Paolo
On Sunday 24 February 2008, Jeff Garzik wrote:
[...]
Alan Cox (1):
pata_atiixp: Use 255 sector limit
AHCI needs sorting too but this deals with the old interface
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
diff --git
From the patch description it can't be told whether the patch itself is
correct and only the patch description is bogus...
zero length PRD misparsing. If I remember rightly old IDE never generates
64K PRD slots because other hardware can't handle it either (CS5520/30
etc)
-
To unsubscribe from
On Sunday 24 February 2008, Alan Cox wrote:
From the patch description it can't be told whether the patch itself is
correct and only the patch description is bogus...
zero length PRD misparsing. If I remember rightly old IDE never generates
64K PRD slots because other hardware can't handle
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 03:38:34PM +1000, Brad Rosser wrote:
[ Added Bart to CC: ]
Hi Brad,
Borislav Petkov wrote:
Feb 14 00:18:18 kernel: hde: cdrom_pc_intr: The drive appears confused
(ireason = 0x01).
Trying to recover by ending request.
Feb 14 00:27:27 kernel: hdc:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 03:33:51PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On Saturday 23 February 2008, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
hpt366: fix section mismatch warnings
Fix following warnings:
WARNING: o-sparc64/vmlinux.o(.data+0x195a38): Section mismatch in reference
from the variable
On Sunday 24 February 2008, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 03:38:34PM +1000, Brad Rosser wrote:
[...]
kernel: hda: cdrom_pc_intr: The drive appears confused (ireason =
0x01). Trying to recover by ending request.
last message repeated 3 times
kernel: ide: failed opcode
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 5:38 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 23 February 2008, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote:
Bart,
here is a new series of patches that remove some errors
and warnings reported by checkpatch.pl from the IDE subsystem.
All the patches
File is now error free, only a few
WARNING: line over 80 characters
are left.
Compile tested.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Ciarrocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/ide/pci/it8213.c |9 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ide/pci/it8213.c
Before:
total: 43 errors, 66 warnings, 2183 lines checked
After:
total: 0 errors, 36 warnings, 2192 lines checked
I didn't (and I don't plan to) fix the warnings:
WARNING: line over 80 characters
Signed-off-by: Paolo Ciarrocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/ide/ide-cd.c | 245
Before:
total: 34 errors, 14 warnings, 456 lines checked
After:
total: 0 errors, 8 warnings, 456 lines checked
Signed-off-by: Paolo Ciarrocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/ide/pci/cy82c693.c | 74 ++--
1 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 37
Hi Bart,
three more patches, all are compile tested and against yesterday linux-next
IDE: Replace __FUNCTION__ with __func__ depends
on IDE: Coding Style fixes to drivers/ide/ide-cd.c
Paolo Ciarrocchi (3):
IDE: Coding Style fixes to drivers/ide/ide-cd.c
IDE: Replace __FUNCTION__
I keep hearing that we need to convert libsas to use libata's new error
handling. Unfortunately, I have very little conception of what that
means. Right at the moment, libsas doesn't use any error handling
functions of libata at all.
I've looked through the libata-eh functions, and I find them
Hi there,
I got the above mentioned board [1] two weeks ago with a Q6600 cpu. I am running
Fedora 8 x86_64. While using 2.6.23, the attached cdrom/dvd drives went all
crazy together with a nice error message of the hdd from time to time.
After switching to 2.6.24 the cd drives were useful again
On Sun, 2008-02-24 at 22:11 +0100, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote:
- driver.\n, __FUNCTION__, drive-name);
+ driver.\n, __func__, drive-name);
Is there consensus on this style conversion?
Right now, there's 629 uses of __FUNCTION__ and 439 uses
atapi_dmadir can now become static.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/ata/libata-core.c |2 +-
drivers/ata/libata.h |1 -
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
ad621a905275c744307cdb9bb4bab47a187a477b diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 3:34 AM, Borislav Petkov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 03:38:34PM +1000, Brad Rosser wrote:
There's nothing in the bios that allows me to move one away from
the other. I can 'reserve' or block IRQs, but that only shifts them
both to another
Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello, Mark.
Mark Lord wrote:
Mark Lord wrote:
An alternative to all this, might be to expose the select_pmp()
function shown in the sample code, and have libata-pmp.c call that,
instead of having the new new .pmp_{read,write} functions.
..
I wonder if this might be more
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Tejun Heo wrote:
Yeah, exactly. I think what needs to be done is to separate out SFF
assumptions from core layer, factor out SFF-proper helpers and use them
to implement LLDs for quasi-SFF controllers.
Thinking long term, I continue to hope that SFF support can eventually
Mark Lord wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Tejun Heo wrote:
Yeah, exactly. I think what needs to be done is to separate out SFF
assumptions from core layer, factor out SFF-proper helpers and use them
to implement LLDs for quasi-SFF controllers.
Thinking long term, I continue to hope that SFF
Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello, Mark.
Mark Lord wrote:
Mark Lord wrote:
An alternative to all this, might be to expose the select_pmp()
function shown in the sample code, and have libata-pmp.c call that,
instead of having the new new .pmp_{read,write} functions.
..
I wonder if this might be more
To repeat myself from threads past...
In particular with the Marvell 6440 (SATA/SAS, drivers/scsi/mvsas.c)
when SATA PMP support is completed, we will want to look at passing
things other than normal ATA commands via -qc_issue.
Although selection isn't necessarily, talking to a PMP is
Mark Lord wrote:
No, the quickest solution for sata_mv, the one I apparently will now be
using,
is to just clone about 250 lines of reset/debouce/probe code from
libata-core
and change perhaps five lines of it to work around this issue plus some
chipset errata.
What I was thinking of,
Hi Boris,
Well, this sounds strange. Are you sure you're entering the boot options
correctly on the kernel command line? Which is your boot loader? I just
booted
my machine with 'hdc=noprobe' (hdc is my cdrom drive) and here's what i get:
...
[0.304774] Probing IDE interface
On 2/25/08, Joe Perches [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2008-02-24 at 22:11 +0100, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote:
- driver.\n, __FUNCTION__, drive-name);
+ driver.\n, __func__, drive-name);
Is there consensus on this style conversion?
I did that in a separate patch because i'm not sure about
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 3:15 AM, Kamalesh Babulal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for pointing the patch, I do not have the SES config option enabled,
then too i tried your patch, but that does not solve the panic. The kernel
panic's with the same panic message as before. I have attached
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 15:23:24 -0800 (PST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10091
Summary: GGW-H10N SATA DVD drive write errors using AHCI driver
with nForce 630a chipset
Product: IO/Storage
Version: 2.5
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 11:05 PM, Yinghai Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 3:15 AM, Kamalesh Babulal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for pointing the patch, I do not have the SES config option enabled,
then too i tried your patch, but that does not solve the
* Paolo Ciarrocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Before:
total: 34 errors, 14 warnings, 456 lines checked
After:
total: 0 errors, 8 warnings, 456 lines checked
sidenote: please also indicate to maintainers that the cleanup causes no
change in generated code. Find below of how one of your
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10086
Summary: 2.6.25-rc2 + smartd = hang
Product: IO/Storage
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.25-rc2
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
34 matches
Mail list logo
