Hey! I know you from the Areivim/Avodah list! I didn't know you were also
into linux.
I've been trying to run Bar-Ilan version 3 (five years old) on wine, but I
never get past the 'No response from NetHASP server' dialog. (It could be
just a problem with accessing the parallel port itself from
hello, linuxers,
anyone knows a good mailer, command line based, which can handle very
large mailboxes? on the order of thousands and tens of thousands
of messages (think lkml archive).
mailers i'm not interested in: pine (i'm using it right now, doesnt cut
it above several hundred messages),
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002, mulix wrote about mua which handles very large mailboxes:
...
anyone knows a good mailer, command line based, which can handle very
large mailboxes? on the order of thousands and tens of thousands
of messages (think lkml archive).
...
i'll be checking out mutt very
On Sun 2002-02-24, mulix wrote:
hello, linuxers,
anyone knows a good mailer, command line based, which can handle very
large mailboxes? on the order of thousands and tens of thousands
of messages (think lkml archive).
I'm using mutt. mutt supports many mailbox formats, but I use the
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 12:24:15PM +0200, Christoph Bugel wrote:
On Sun 2002-02-24, mulix wrote:
hello, linuxers,
anyone knows a good mailer, command line based, which can handle very
large mailboxes? on the order of thousands and tens of thousands
of messages (think lkml archive).
mulix [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
anyone knows a good mailer, command line based, which can handle very
large mailboxes? on the order of thousands and tens of thousands
of messages (think lkml archive).
What do you mean by handle? Like actually reading mail using it? I
use GNUS, which can
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 12:40:46PM +0200, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
mulix [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
anyone knows a good mailer, command line based, which can handle very
large mailboxes? on the order of thousands and tens of thousands
of messages (think lkml archive).
What do you mean by
mulix wrote:
mailers i'm not interested in: pine (i'm using it right now, doesnt cut
it above several hundred messages), evolution, kmail, mozilla, any other
x based mailer. i read my mail over ssh frequently, and an x mua is not
feasible.
Have you looked into IMAP? IMAP is a protocol that
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 03:20:37PM +0200, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
mulix wrote:
mailers i'm not interested in: pine (i'm using it right now, doesnt cut
it above several hundred messages), evolution, kmail, mozilla, any other
x based mailer. i read my mail over ssh frequently, and an
Geoffrey S. Mendelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Have you looked into IMAP? IMAP is a protocol that keeps mail on the
server.
I never bothered exploring IMAP as an alternative to POP from my own
mail reading. While mostly it was due to unwillingness to invest time
and effort into this, part of
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002, mulix wrote about Re: mua which handles very large mailboxes:
imap is also *plain text*. need i say any more?
Ah? What do you mean imap is plain text?
IMAP is just a protocol for remote access to mail messages (IMAP=Internet
Message Access Protocol). These mail messages
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote about Re: mua which handles very large
mailboxes:
I never bothered exploring IMAP as an alternative to POP from my own
mail reading. While mostly it was due to unwillingness to invest time
and effort into this, part of the reason was that I learned
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002, mulix wrote about Re: mua which handles very large mailboxes:
imap is also *plain text*. need i say any more?
Ah? What do you mean imap is plain text?
IMAP is just a protocol for remote access to mail messages (IMAP=Internet
On Sun 2002-02-24, Nadav Har'El wrote:
I use mutt too, by the way. It has no problems readying a 1000-mail folder,
but it still takes quite a few seconds (because the folder is a sequencial
file that needs to be read entirely - there's no index associated with the
standard Unix mbox format).
Orr Dunkelman wrote:
I believe that mulix talked about encryption (plain text = not encrypted).
Thus, all the messages can be understood by the entire network.
It depends upon how paranoid you are. In some cases encryption is not
need and it does slow things down a bit. If you want it, you
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002, Orr Dunkelman wrote about Re: mua which handles very large
mailboxes:
I believe that mulix talked about encryption (plain text = not encrypted).
Thus, all the messages can be understood by the entire network.
Oh :)
Most IMAP clients/servers support SSL (including mutt
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 04:16:10PM +0200, Orr Dunkelman wrote:
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002, mulix wrote about Re: mua which handles very large
mailboxes:
imap is also *plain text*. need i say any more?
Ah? What do you mean imap is plain text?
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Orr Dunkelman wrote:
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002, mulix wrote about Re: mua which handles very large
mailboxes:
imap is also *plain text*. need i say any more?
Ah? What do you mean imap is plain text?
IMAP is just a protocol
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, mulix wrote:
hello, linuxers,
anyone knows a good mailer, command line based, which can handle very
large mailboxes? on the order of thousands and tens of thousands
of messages (think lkml archive).
mailers i'm not interested in: pine (i'm using it right now,doesnt
Nadav Har'El [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, imagine your mail not being on a sleazy ISP, but rather on a server
you trust (your own Internet-connected machine, you company's
server, etc.).
I was thinking in terms of reading my mail off a server belonging to
an ISP, hopefully not sleazy, but
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, mulix wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 04:16:10PM +0200, Orr Dunkelman wrote:
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002, mulix wrote about Re: mua which handles very large
mailboxes:
imap is also *plain text*. need i say any more?
Ah?
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, mulix wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 12:24:15PM +0200, Christoph Bugel wrote:
On Sun 2002-02-24, mulix wrote:
hello, linuxers,
anyone knows a good mailer, command line based, which can handle very
large mailboxes? on the order of thousands andtens of thousands
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 05:34:11PM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, mulix wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 12:24:15PM +0200, Christoph Bugel wrote:
On Sun 2002-02-24, mulix wrote:
hello, linuxers,
anyone knows a good mailer, command line based, which can handle
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, mulix wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 05:34:11PM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, mulix wrote:
if you'll look at my headers, you'll see that i'm using mutt as well
as of now. its handling of large mailboxes does leave something to be
desired, but
Hi,
After several attempts, I haven't been able to set the printer font size on my
box. I use CUPS and have an Epson 670 USB. The print quality is very good, but
when I try to print a plain text file, the fonts are much too big. I think
this is a KDE problem since it happens in KWrite and Kate
Well here's another chapter in the endless pathetic saga of fonts/bidi in
abiword...
I have downloaded the latest source (version 0.99.2) and compiled with bidi
and gnome support. To compile it, I used the instructions from the BUILD
(not BUILD.TXT !) file. I did
/autogen.sh
/configure
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Itai Arad wrote:
[... complete and clear description of what he did - was snipped ...]
P.S.: I am a semi-newbie. Please try to be as clear and as unambiguous as
possible.
No, Itai is not a semi-newbie, as far as Linux-IL netiquette is concerned.
His question fully
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Itai Arad wrote:
Well here's another chapter in the endless pathetic saga of fonts/bidi in
abiword...
I have downloaded the latest source (version 0.99.2) and compiled with bidi
and gnome support. To compile it, I used the instructions from the BUILD
(not BUILD.TXT !)
Hi People,
I'm re-installing my truetype fonts and mkfontdir doesn't give me a single
ISO10646-1 line in fonts.dir or fonts.scale...
Of course - I could add manually them, but I don't know which of those fonts
actually has them and which one doesn't - which doesn't...
Any suggestion? another
I'm wondering if anyone saw this coming :
sun said that star office is no longer under GPL for linux\windows users.
ver 6.0 final (upcoming in this may) will be distributed free only for sun
solaris.
back to MS office, anyone ??
http://whatsup.homelinux.com/article.php?sid=12
tal.
syscalltrack-0.7, the 6th _alpha_ release of the linux kernel system call
tracker, is available. syscalltrack supports both versions 2.2.x and 2.4.x
of the linux kernel. The current release contains some major enhancements,
and various bug fixes and code cleanups. See details below.
* What is
Sun distinguishes between star office and open office. Is this just about
the former or about both?
Thanks,
Uri
http://translation.israel.net
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, tal amir wrote:
I'm wondering if anyone saw this coming :
sun said that star office is no longer under GPL for linux\windows
i made a mistake with the URL for downloading the file. it is:
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/syscalltrack/syscalltrack-0.70.tar.gz
(i.e. '70', not '7').
sorry,
--
guy
For world domination - press 1,
or dial 0, and please hold, for the creator. -- nob o. dy
ftp.linux.org.il is terribly slow here. It was not like that in the
last few weeks. Is there some temporary problem?
Am I right that it is again not routed through IIX?
It was not routed through IIX in the past and Amir has changed that.
Until some time (days ?) ago it was routed through IIX.
Still with Nautilus?
Whats up with the gnome people Nautilus actually? from my tests on RH 7.2
and Ximian gnome - it took about 3 minutes to me to see nautilus crashes -
and that with GNOME 1.4 latest stable from Ximian...
I thought I was alone on this one, but amazingly enough, I
35 matches
Mail list logo
