ram
Was it a laptop? Laptops have tendency to contain special and
nouvelle
hardware, the kind that requires special vendor CD with addition
hardware
drivers when re-installing windows and kept Linux away from laptops
back in
the bad old days.
Are you afraid to try
On 24/01/07, Yedidyah Bar-David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/1/24, Amos Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've just realized that maybe the original subject was wrong and
therefore pointed repliers to the wrong direction. What I was after is to
actually be able to run something under Win98 which
On 24/01/07, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ha :) This laptop is so old that it doesn't have an integrated network
card - the net card is a PCMCIA 10/100 addition I bought her around 2003.
No- Ha ;) I did not write this. I am not the guy with the laptop
Peter
2007/1/24, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 24/01/07, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ha :) This laptop is so old that it doesn't have an integrated
network
card - the net card is a PCMCIA 10/100 addition I bought her around
2003.
No- Ha ;) I did not write this. I am not the guy with the
to contain special and
nouvelle
hardware, the kind that requires special vendor CD with addition
hardware
drivers when re-installing windows and kept Linux away from laptops
back in
the bad old days.
Are you afraid to try ? ;-) It was not a laptop, it was a bare board in
Yes, certainly. I don't have
On 16/01/07, Amit Aronovitch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
btw, seems that there's an alpha version of QEMU for windows (don't
know about it's usability status).
Works great. I've got it running DSL in a windows on any winbox I sit
down to. It's not too slow, and network connections, printers,
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 10:50:10AM +0200, Dotan Cohen wrote:
On 16/01/07, Amit Aronovitch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
btw, seems that there's an alpha version of QEMU for windows (don't
know about it's usability status).
Works great. I've got it running DSL in a windows on any winbox I sit
On 16/01/07, Geoffrey S. Mendelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 10:50:10AM +0200, Dotan Cohen wrote:
On 16/01/07, Amit Aronovitch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
btw, seems that there's an alpha version of QEMU for windows (don't
know about it's usability status).
Works
On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 07:06 +, Oded Arbel wrote:
On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 08:51 +0200, doron wrote:
Gabor Szabo wrote:
I have a Windows Machine I would like to install Linux over that.
What are my options?
Does VMware have a free (and unlimited in time) version that I can
use
On 15/01/07, Gabor Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a Windows Machine I would like to install Linux over that.
What are my options?
Does VMware have a free (and unlimited in time) version that I can use
to install Linux on it?
Is there any other solution?
VMWare Player is free as in
Linux *over* Windows ;-)
couldn't resist...
--
Oron Peled Voice/Fax: +972-4-8228492
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.actcom.co.il/~oron
ICQ UIN: 16527398
The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is probably the day
they start making vacuum
Oren Held wrote:
A. VMware Server (formerly GSX) which is free for use.
B. Dan Aloni's coLinux (Not full virtualization but very interesting
and good for some purposes) - http://colinux.sf.net . However you need
a windows X Server (i.e. Hummingbird Exceed or Cygwin Xorg) to get the
GUI.
I found Cooperative Linux (http://www.colinux.org/) fast and with
small overhead.
On 1/15/07, Gabor Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a Windows Machine I would like to install Linux over that.
What are my options?
Does VMware have a free (and unlimited in time) version that I can use
to
Gabor Szabo wrote:
I have a Windows Machine I would like to install Linux over that.
What are my options?
Does VMware have a free (and unlimited in time) version that I can use
to install Linux on it?
Yes, VNware server (was VMware GSX) it's free of charge but not free
as a free software.
Is
On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 08:51 +0200, doron wrote:
Gabor Szabo wrote:
I have a Windows Machine I would like to install Linux over that.
What are my options?
Does VMware have a free (and unlimited in time) version that I can
use
to install Linux on it?
Yes, VNware server (was VMware
Cool...
You run 1 OS (the emulated one) under a 2nd OS (WINE/WIN32) under a 3rd
OS (Linux)...
Actually, I'm doing a similar thing (WIN32 apps under WINE under a
LiveCD Linux as a guest of VMware under XP)...
The performance are weak, but not because of the double emulation, but
because of other
Hello,
While not exactly hopeful, I wonder whether anyone has successfully ran one
of the following under Linux/Wine (the order listed being the order of
preference):
Atmel AVR Studio
Zilog ZDS II
Microchip MPLAB
Note that I _did_ get ZDS to run, but not to actually
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 12:06:56PM +0200, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
No, you don't need to buy a seperate CD.
The partBE installation uses your machine's XP to create the bootable
CD. You cannot install any programs on top of it after you burned it.
Heck, you cannot even use internet explorer, or
Hello,
A friend will bring his PC tonight to my place so I can
cleanup and try to speedup his Windows XP until his new
one arrives.
I plan to search-n-destroy viruses and spy-ware and try to
make his machine more secure by installing Firefox/Thunderbird
and maybe tweak IE/Outlook.
His windows
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 03:39:09PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
A friend will bring his PC tonight to my place so I can
cleanup and try to speedup his Windows XP until his new
one arrives.
I plan to search-n-destroy viruses and spy-ware and try to
make his machine more secure
I belive in: use the best tool for your job.
What I would recommend is not a Linux solution, but sort of mini
windows solution.
It's called: bartPE, it's GPL'd, and it creates an ISO image from your
current Windows XP installation. Prior to making the ISO, you can add
few programs (antivirus,
On 9/16/05, Hetz Ben Hamo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I would recommend is not a Linux solution, but sort of mini
windows solution.
Thanks to both of you for your suggestions.
Eventually it turned out that our friend listened to my advise from a few
months ago and viruses and ad-wares aren't
Hello,
We are looking for a system administrator with experience
with Linux (mostly Red Hat) and UNIX, but who can also maintain
integration with a Windows network and Microsoft Exchange server.
Candidates can e-mail ella.davidson at optier.com. If you have
questions then I'll try to answer them
Hi,
I am planning to buy a laptop soon, and I will install linux
on it.
Unfortunately it seems to be impossible to buy a brand-name
laptop that doesn't come with windows. This means that I am
being forced, more or less, to pay a sum of money to
microsoft.
rant I feel very strong against paying
Christoph Bugel wrote on 2003-06-22:
Unfortunately it seems to be impossible to buy a brand-name
laptop that doesn't come with windows. This means that I am
being forced, more or less, to pay a sum of money to
microsoft.
Nasty :-(.
I know that at least one person succeeded in getting his
AFAIK most attempts at getting the refund were made in the US and
Australia. Check out
http://windowsrefund.net
in particular the (US-specific) HOWTO
http://windowsrefund.net/modules.php?op=modloadname=Newsfile=articlesid=19mode=threadorder=1thold=0
I have no idea if there have been
thought you might find this interesting :
http://people.freebsd.org/~murray/bsd_flier.html
--
==
Amir Tal
Founder, Owner
Whatsup, Hebrew Linux Portal
Voice:+972-8-9363164
Fax: +972-8-9363164
Cell:
At 11:56 +0200 on 14/12/2002, Amir Tal wrote:
thought you might find this interesting :
http://people.freebsd.org/~murray/bsd_flier.html
A bit out of date, isn't it? It talks about Linux 2.4 in future
tense, also on journalling FS.
Herouth
--
EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HOME PAGE:
On Saturday 14 December 2002 11:56 am, you wrote:
thought you might find this interesting :
http://people.freebsd.org/~murray/bsd_flier.html
Too much in favour of BSD as compared to Linux...:). Almost all the points are
history today and it only goes to show the fast rate of Linux progress...
On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 12:49:01PM +0200, Mark Veltzer wrote:
The BSD people are in a real dilemma as I can see it: They do have a more
secure and reviewed system but they fail to understand that the Wild Wild
West nature of Linux, while maybe lowering the OS security some, is causing
the
On Saturday 14 December 2002 01:00 pm, you wrote:
Not expressing any constructive opinion, your paragraph here is just saying
that BSD guys are more professional.
That depends on your definition of professional. If professional is careful
up to the point of stagnation then professional is a
On Sat, 14 Dec 2002, Mark Veltzer wrote:
On Saturday 14 December 2002 11:56 am, you wrote:
thought you might find this interesting :
http://people.freebsd.org/~murray/bsd_flier.html
Too much in favour of BSD as compared to Linux...:). Almost all the points are
history today and it only
On Sat, 14 Dec 2002, Max K. wrote:
FreeBSD has a.f.a.i.k. no marketing departaments, and linux, in each
distro has... don't you think that if (although all the marketing effort
of linux) FreeBSD still is alive, advances and kicking...it is a warning
sign for linux ?
i think it is.
Sure it
At 13:16 +0200 on 14/12/2002, Max K. wrote:
i hope you know that Apple's Mac OS 10 (or OS X) - is FreeBSD kernel with
some additions...
Actually, it is said to be something between FreeBSD and NetBSD...
Anyway, this connects to the thread about professional maintenance of
backwards
On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 08:17:38PM +0200, Herouth Maoz wrote:
Point being - since I'm sure my lecture is not easy on the ears of
the free-software junkies, MacOS being a proprietary piece of
software (with all the drawbacks) - you can be both professional in
maintaining your user base and
Hi
The problem of sharing files between Windows Linux is more complicated
than "use samba"
Windows Linux have different file security.
Windows file names are not case sensitive.
Some Windows versions support file names in Hebrew.
and there may be other differences that I am not awa
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 04:02:02PM +0200, Shahar Dag wrote:
Hi
The problem of sharing files between Windows Linux is more complicated
than "use samba"
Windows Linux have different file security.
SAMBA, in it's latest version, claims to provide the UNIX list to the
Windows mac
Hi There.
Can You Please Tell Me Can I Get Any Directory In Linux To Be Shared And
Avilable For Windows Network Neighborhood ?
Sorry If My Question Is Stupid :-(
"X-Kent"
"Computer Is Almost Man, But Without A Fantacy"
You have to use 'samba' to do that.
- Original Message -
From: "Stiven Andre" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 2:59 AM
Subject: Linux And Windows File Sharring Question.
Hi There.
Can You Please Tell Me Can I Get Any Director
Any Request for Comments ?
http://www.winlinux.net/
Mike
--
Michael Almogy.
System Administrator
Mofet Institute.
Cel : 972-052-562237
Tel : 972-03-6901415
Fax : 972-03-6901414
So it is basically a distro which has a Windows-based
install app which assumes about installed hardware
from Windows registry and installs into a UMSDOS
partition as a regular Linux distro?
All that in case you have a ready Windows machine
already (hmm, remind of Windows upgrades which search
On Tue, 28 Sep 1999, Or Sagi wrote:
Relax Or. No need to be cynical
--Ariel
Thank you, michael.
now the entire world can sleep soundly tonight, knowing that _you_, above
all people, are going to download it.
Who's the next person to go "Me too ! Me too!" ?
For those of you that
I wonder when they'll do a Linux 4 NT.
That might even be good for the NT.
Mike
Ilya Konstantinov wrote:
So it is basically a distro which has a Windows-based
install app which assumes about installed hardware
from Windows registry and installs into a UMSDOS
partition as a regular Linux
As Ilya Konstantinov pointed it, this is nothing new. The purpose, imo,
of the WinLinux distribution is it's ease of installation. For the time
being, one of the scariest things that a new wannabee Linux user run's
into first is the Installation.
Correct, they could install one of the other
44 matches
Mail list logo
