On Wednesday June 14 2006 00:16, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Marc A. Volovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And that goes to show that flash attracts flash :-)...
I am sorry, I use FC4 on x86_64 on my home machine, and flash is one
thing that is repelled because there is no x86_86 player for
Linux...
Marc A. Volovic wrote:
Quoth Marc A. Volovic:
I use Xen with Debian (woody, sarge and etch) with not problem whatsoever.
The dom0 is etch, domUs are a mix, all very very small (sub 60MB).
That is - xen 2.4. All my attempts to build xen 3 so far fail - I can not
seem to be able to
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 08:20:20AM +0300, Marc A. Volovic wrote:
Quoth Marc A. Volovic:
I use Xen with Debian (woody, sarge and etch) with not problem whatsoever.
The dom0 is etch, domUs are a mix, all very very small (sub 60MB).
That is - xen 2.4. All my attempts to build xen 3 so far
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 09:12:44AM +0300, Marc A. Volovic wrote:
Quoth Muli Ben-Yehuda:
More details please... with xen3 we switched to a single kernel for
both dom0 and domU, the -xen kernel. Are you passing
'KERNELS=...-domU' perchance? I wouldn't expect that to work.
Duh! I am.
Quoth Muli Ben-Yehuda:
Ok, since I hit it in one, here's another gotcha free of charge - with
I looked at the docs, thought - hmmm... no xen0 and xenU, weird, let's
look at the Makefile... Ah - here they are, the references to xenU and
xen0, everything is as it used to be...
Hehe. Thanks!
Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 06:00:39PM +0300, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
The Fedora Core line is a non production distribution *by design*.
Since when has this ever stopped a customer from actually using it in
exactly that capacity. I heard a talk at USENIX last
Quoth Muli Ben-Yehuda:
More details please... with xen3 we switched to a single kernel for
both dom0 and domU, the -xen kernel. Are you passing
Unsurprisingly whatsoever, it bloody works. Why do I bother reading
Makefiles is beyond me.
Attached is the kernel config I am using which works
Howdie guys!
Last week I installed VMware server for another happy customer. As you
may recall from an earlier post, it's a porting farm, the Host is a
Centos4, and the guessts are RH7.2, 7.3, RHEL3 and another Centos4. all
four VMs mount /home from an NFS export on the host, and all is fine.
Quoting Ira Abramov, from the post of Tue, 13 Jun:
also rsync pulls files at a crappy 15-20KB per second from the host to
the guest, which is a really low speed.
no iptables, AFAIK no traffic shaping. what am I missing?!
oh, for completeness: VMwareTools are installed, I am working with
Quoth Ira Abramov:
Today I installed a similar setup on a faster machine, host is FC4,
Not that I am casting the first stone, but anyone using FC as a production
machine should have his orchideae removed.
guest is RHEL4, and the speed is frightfully slow. I thought I had an
NFS problem but
Marc A. Volovic wrote:
Quoth Ira Abramov:
Today I installed a similar setup on a faster machine, host is FC4,
Not that I am casting the first stone, but anyone using FC as a production
machine should have his orchideae removed.
I wrote an email saying the same thing (although the word
Quoth Gilad Ben-Yossef:
Marc A. Volovic wrote:
Quoth Ira Abramov:
Today I installed a similar setup on a faster machine, host is FC4,
Not that I am casting the first stone, but anyone using FC as a production
machine should have his orchideae removed.
The Fedora Core line is a non production
Quoth Gilad Ben-Yossef:
The journey of a thousand miles begins with a single oy.
And it continues with numerous other pitiful cries, groans, ejaculations
and grimaces!
--
---MAV
Marc A. Volovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Swiftouch, LTD
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 06:00:39PM +0300, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
The Fedora Core line is a non production distribution *by design*.
Since when has this ever stopped a customer from actually using it in
exactly that capacity. I heard a talk at USENIX last week[1] where
Pixar's VP of Technology
Quoth Muli Ben-Yehuda:
Pixar's VP of Technology mentioned that their new movie Cars was
rendered on a farm of x86-64 Linux machines running ... you guessed it
... Fedora Core.
And that goes to show that flash attracts flash :-)...
Speaking of which - whoever among you people is responsible
Quoting Gilad Ben-Yossef, from the post of Tue, 13 Jun:
Not that I am casting the first stone, but anyone using FC as a production
machine should have his orchideae removed.
The Fedora Core line is a non production distribution *by design*.
calm down, will you? it's not a production
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 06:41:37PM +0300, Marc A. Volovic wrote:
Speaking of which - whoever among you people is responsible for Xen's build
system should be compelled to use FC.
That would be the Cambridge folks. They've proven remarkably resistant
to attempts to fix it.
Cheers,
Muli
Suppose your eyesight is failing you and you are going to a clinic to
have your eyes fixed by laser.
If they find that you have retinal degradation in your eyes, you deny
this and insist upon getting laser - what should an ethical clinic do?
Should this answer be any different if the clinic are
Quoth Gilad Ben-Yossef:
Marc A. Volovic wrote:
I wrote an email saying the same thing (although the word orchideae
was missing from it for some reason ;-) and then decided Ira knew better
already.
Must have been an oversight. I know (by dint of deduction) that you 'havem.
The Fedora
On Tuesday, 13 בJune 2006 18:33, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 06:00:39PM +0300, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
The Fedora Core line is a non production distribution *by design*.
I heard a talk at USENIX last week[1] where Pixar's VP of Technology
mentioned that their new movie Cars
On 6/13/06, Ira Abramov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Gilad Ben-Yossef, from the post of Tue, 13 Jun:
However, it still won't explain how the net link between my host and my
guest was a puny 20KB/sec, less than half of my cable uplink at home!
What NIC do you use? What driver? What does
Marc A. Volovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And that goes to show that flash attracts flash :-)...
I am sorry, I use FC4 on x86_64 on my home machine, and flash is one
thing that is repelled because there is no x86_86 player for
Linux... ;-)
Speaking of which - whoever among you people is
Quoting Gil Freund, from the post of Tue, 13 Jun:
However, it still won't explain how the net link between my host and my
guest was a puny 20KB/sec, less than half of my cable uplink at home!
What NIC do you use? What driver? What does ethtool say?
Is the switch smart enough to report to
Quoth Oleg Goldshmidt:
I will not defend the Xen build system, but FC is one of the platforms
(RHEL is another) that Xen can actually live with. So far I cannot say
the same about, say, SuSE (never heard of anyone who managed to have a
working network in a SuSE domU - has anyone here made
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 12:16:44AM +0300, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
I will not defend the Xen build system, but FC is one of the platforms
(RHEL is another) that Xen can actually live with. So far I cannot say
the same about, say, SuSE (never heard of anyone who managed to have a
working network
Quoth Marc A. Volovic:
I use Xen with Debian (woody, sarge and etch) with not problem whatsoever.
The dom0 is etch, domUs are a mix, all very very small (sub 60MB).
That is - xen 2.4. All my attempts to build xen 3 so far fail - I can not
seem to be able to build a xenU kernel correctly.
26 matches
Mail list logo
