RE: upcoming java ssh2?

2002-10-31 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Tzahi Fadida wrote: this just show how naive are administrators today. anyway, as u know or not know u don't have to be a hacker today to do what the hell u want. if I wanna surf whatever the bleeping I want, I can do it and be sure every person who know how to operate a

RE: upcoming java ssh2?

2002-10-31 Thread Tzahi Fadida
;technion.ac.il] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:16 AM To: Tzahi Fadida Cc: Robert Wallner; Linux-IL mailing list Subject: RE: upcoming java ssh2? On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Tzahi Fadida wrote: this just show how naive are administrators today. anyway, as u know or not know u don't have

Re: upcoming java ssh2?

2002-10-31 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Tzahi Fadida wrote: i disagree, since as long that there will be free access to internet nodes, i.e: unlike some cellular companies that provide WAP services do(they only allow you to surf their internal wap pages). you can find a way to access these resources, since inside the definition of

RE: upcoming java ssh2?

2002-10-31 Thread Tzahi Fadida
/spamwarning.html -Original Message- From: Shachar Shemesh [mailto:linuxil;consumer.org.il] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 2:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: upcoming java ssh2? Tzahi Fadida wrote: i disagree, since as long that there will be free access

Re: upcoming java ssh2?

2002-10-30 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Eli Marmor wrote: Tzafrir Cohen wrote: From the creators of WeirdX: http://www.jcraft.com/jsch/ version 0.0.6 of a java implementation of ssh2. I think it's great that these people port to Java applets any client of any client-server protocol (X, SSH, etc.). .. So the big

Re: upcoming java ssh2?

2002-10-30 Thread Ira Abramov
Quoting Eli Marmor, from the post of Wed, 30 Oct: So the big question: Why, when it comes to important protocols such as SSH, X, IRC, VNC, etc., the applets must speak those protocols directly with the backend, and can't speak it over HTTP/HTTPS? Eli, you have been doing HTTP work in the past,

Re: upcoming java ssh2?

2002-10-30 Thread Yedidyah Bar-David
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 10:04:36AM +0200, Ira Abramov wrote: Quoting Eli Marmor, from the post of Wed, 30 Oct: So the big question: Why, when it comes to important protocols such as SSH, X, IRC, VNC, etc., the applets must speak those protocols directly with the backend, and can't speak it

Re: upcoming java ssh2?

2002-10-30 Thread Ira Abramov
Quoting Yedidyah Bar-David, from the post of Wed, 30 Oct: Sometimes you'd rather that over nothing. I know at least two places (and guess there are thousands) that do not permit any outgoing traffic except http over their proxy (so that running sshd on port 80 won't work either). If you had a

Re: upcoming java ssh2?

2002-10-30 Thread Eli Marmor
Shachar Shemesh wrote: It's certanly possible, but I believe you are missing some important point here. The purpose of these applets is not to get easy access to the machine using a new and innovative technique. The purpose is to provide clientless SSH. For example, I am one of the admins

Re: upcoming java ssh2?

2002-10-30 Thread Nadav Har'El
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002, Eli Marmor wrote about Re: upcoming java ssh2?: But your response answered my question. I asked why all those Java applets use only their own protocol instead of using HTTP/HTTPS, and thanks to your response I know the answer: Their developer just don't know this trick

Re: upcoming java ssh2?

2002-10-30 Thread Eli Marmor
Nadav Har'El wrote: Does your trick work well over HTTP proxies? Some HTTP proxies (e.g., consider Apache's proxy, Squid, etc.) aren't as generic as your trick might assume. They may not work full-duplex (e.g., when the proxy is reading the response from the server it doesn't try to read

Re: upcoming java ssh2?

2002-10-30 Thread Oron Peled
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002 10:25:31 +0200 Yedidyah Bar-David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sometimes you'd rather that over nothing. I know at least two places (and guess there are thousands) that do not permit any outgoing traffic except http over their proxy (so that running sshd on port 80 won't work

RE: upcoming java ssh2?

2002-10-30 Thread Tzahi Fadida
its all in the eye of the beholder, read ahead. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-il-bounce;cs.huji.ac.il]On Behalf Of Oron Peled Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 12:42 PM To: Yedidyah Bar-David Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: upcoming java ssh2

RE: upcoming java ssh2?

2002-10-30 Thread Tzahi Fadida
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Eli Marmor Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 9:33 AM To: Linux-IL mailing list Subject: Re: upcoming java ssh2? Tzafrir Cohen wrote: From the creators of WeirdX: http://www.jcraft.com/jsch/ version 0.0.6 of a java implementation

RE: upcoming java ssh2?

2002-10-30 Thread Aviram Jenik
What you describe just proves how clueless many corporations are. First they overload any concievable service on port 80 (what happend to the other 16K tcp/udp ports?) than they find that they need to make content filtering so only good http goes in. The main idea behind a firewall is not

Re: upcoming java ssh2?

2002-10-30 Thread Ira Abramov
Quoting Eli Marmor, from the post of Wed, 30 Oct: There are actually 3 methods, and not one. The main one doesn't work well with some of the proxies, and is probably exactly what you guessed. I don't speak about black-magics, well, do share, and stop talking in riddles like you invented

Re: upcoming java ssh2?

2002-10-30 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Aviram Jenik wrote: The main idea behind a firewall is not to prevent rogue outgoing communication (this is usually pointless; you can do full IP tunneling over ICMP packets if you wish) but to prevent incoming traffic to various services. For example, you may have an Intranet web server that

RE: upcoming java ssh2?

2002-10-30 Thread Tzahi Fadida
-bounce;cs.huji.ac.il]On Behalf Of Shachar Shemesh Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 6:22 PM To: Aviram Jenik Cc: 'Oron Peled'; 'Yedidyah Bar-David'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: upcoming java ssh2? Aviram Jenik wrote: The main idea behind a firewall is not to prevent rogue outgoing

Re: upcoming java ssh2?

2002-10-30 Thread Robert Wallner
On Wednesday 30 October 2002 17:20, Tzahi Fadida wrote: i disagree, since as long that there will be free access to internet I don't think corporate employees using their windoze box to run kazaa and other crap can be called free internet access. AAMOF, I run several networks full of idiots

RE: upcoming java ssh2?

2002-10-30 Thread Tzahi Fadida
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: upcoming java ssh2? On Wednesday 30 October 2002 17:20, Tzahi Fadida wrote: i disagree, since as long that there will be free access to internet I don't think corporate employees using their windoze box to run kazaa and other crap can

upcoming java ssh2?

2002-10-29 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
From the creators of WeirdX: http://www.jcraft.com/jsch/ version 0.0.6 of a java implementation of ssh2. -- Tzafrir Cohen mailto:tzafrir;technion.ac.il http://www.technion.ac.il/~tzafrir = To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL

Re: upcoming java ssh2?

2002-10-29 Thread Eli Marmor
Tzafrir Cohen wrote: From the creators of WeirdX: http://www.jcraft.com/jsch/ version 0.0.6 of a java implementation of ssh2. I think it's great that these people port to Java applets any client of any client-server protocol (X, SSH, etc.). But there is still something that concerns