, Sep 28, 2010, Nadav Har'El wrote about Re: CPU RAM in a storage
box:
Thanks for the recommendation, I'll look into it. Their price is a bit of
a turn-off, though - at $0.80 GB/mo, backing up 20 GB costs $16 a month,
..
I wonder what is rsync.net's discount for open source developers
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010, Michael Tewner wrote about Re: CPU RAM in a storage
box:
Have you seen this?
...
At Backblaze, we provide unlimited storage to our customers for only $5 per
month, so we had to figure out how to store hundreds of petabytes of
...
Looking at their site, it appears
wrote about Re: CPU RAM in a
storage box:
Have you seen this?
...
At Backblaze, we provide unlimited storage to our customers for only $5
per
month, so we had to figure out how to store hundreds of petabytes of
...
Looking at their site, it appears that while their systems run
27, 2010, Michael Tewner wrote about Re: CPU RAM in a storage
box:
Have you seen this?
...
At Backblaze, we provide unlimited storage to our customers for only $5
per
month, so we had to figure out how to store hundreds of petabytes of
...
Looking at their site, it appears that while
*Subject:* Re: CPU RAM in a storage box
I think dropbox.com can be used as a backup system to Linux.
It has a daemon for Linux, however the daemon itself is propriatry, the
GNOME Nautilus extension is not.
--
Ori Idan
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Nadav Har'El n
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010, ronys wrote about RE: CPU RAM in a storage box:
For Linux-friendliness, I don't think that you can find something better
than http://rsync.net/ http://rsync.net/, but I'd be happy to be proven
wrong. Note that they have discounts for Open Source developers. Disclaimer
On Sep 28, 2010, at 1:18 PM, Nadav Har'El wrote:
so in theory I could back
up a terabyte of movies for the same price (of course, it would
probably take
a year to upload a terabyte ;-)).
If my arithmetic and assumptions are correct, you can upload a
megabyte in 8 seconds with an 800k
Nadav Har'El wrote:
At Backblaze, we provide unlimited storage to our customers for only $5 per
month, so we had to figure out how to store hundreds of petabytes of
Looking at their site, it appears that while their systems run on Linux,
they don't give service to Linux machines. Is that true?
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010, Nadav Har'El wrote about Re: CPU RAM in a storage box:
Thanks for the recommendation, I'll look into it. Their price is a bit of
a turn-off, though - at $0.80 GB/mo, backing up 20 GB costs $16 a month,
..
I wonder what is rsync.net's discount for open source developers
Have you seen this?
http://www.backblaze.com/petabytes-on-a-budget-how-to-build-cheap-cloud-storage.html
At Backblaze, we provide unlimited storage to our customers for only $5 per
month, so we had to figure out how to store hundreds of petabytes of
customer data in a reliable, scalable
here is my 3 cents:
In two companies i worked for, i designed similiar servers.
1. i wanted to have as less as a down time, and i didn't want to buy another
server just to sit and wait for a failure, so i decided it should work on
any pc with any raid controller - i decided to do the raid in
Linux LVM2 has been around for several years now. It can take and use
snapshots, and I do it for the last three or so years on *production*
sites.
There are limitations, such as space utilization and performance, but the
most significant one is that LVM snapshots are nowhere near NetApp
2010/9/10 Etzion Bar-Noy eza...@tournament.org.il:
Linux LVM2 has been around for several years now. It can take and use
snapshots, and I do it for the last three or so years on production sites.
There are limitations, such as space utilization and performance, but the
most significant one is
Nope. I did not say production. I said that if you want NetApp-style
snapshots, use one of the mentioned file systems. I never said I actually
used them for production, nor for anything at all (I don't)
Ez
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Amos Shapira amos.shap...@gmail.comwrote:
2010/9/10
Hi people,
I'm planning to add some big storage solution to my VPS
businesshttp://hetz.biz.
I did some checking and calculated the costs, and figured out that if I want
to have a decent 12TB solution NAS box, it would be best if I would roll my
own. (12 TB before all the RAID stuff, after that it
On Sep 9, 2010, at 6:35 PM, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
I'm planning to add some big storage solution to my VPS business. I
did some checking and calculated the costs, and figured out that if
I want to have a decent 12TB solution NAS box, it would be best if I
would roll my own. (12 TB before
Hi Hetz,
My experience is with raid backup servers, that need to keep data but don't
have to be the fastest.
I wouldn't go so far with it at the start.
Take some old server box.
Buy a killer power supply for hard drives stability.
Now test the setup using mdadm as raid.
This will most likely be
is old, you
can get newer and better similar cards.. so do the math
Shana tova to all
_
From: linux-il-boun...@cs.huji.ac.il [mailto:linux-il-boun...@cs.huji.ac.il]
On Behalf Of Hetz Ben Hamo
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 18:36
To: linux-il
Subject: CPU RAM in a storage box
Hi
Hi,
2010/9/9 geoffrey mendelson geoffreymendel...@gmail.com
On Sep 9, 2010, at 6:35 PM, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
I'm planning to add some big storage solution to my VPS business. I did
some checking and calculated the costs, and figured out that if I want to
have a decent 12TB solution NAS
This is a joke, right? You want someone to host your system, which, by
design, will not be rack-mountable, and would be large, due to the amount of
disks you are to place there. It is possible, but extremely expensive to
host a non-1-U server nowadays. Who would give it to you?
An
Hi,
2010/9/9 Etzion Bar-Noy eza...@tournament.org.il
This is a joke, right? You want someone to host your system, which, by
design, will not be rack-mountable, and would be large, due to the amount of
disks you are to place there. It is possible, but extremely expensive to
host a non-1-U
2010/9/10 Hetz Ben Hamo het...@gmail.com
Hi people,
I'm planning to add some big storage solution to my VPS business. I did some
checking and calculated the costs, and figured out that if I want to have a
decent 12TB solution NAS box, it would be best if I would roll my own. (12 TB
before
On top of rpath Linux, which is the root of all evil. Also - although I have
implemented quite a few of these, OpenFiler suffers from various bugs
and shortcomings. Still - in the free like beer area - it is good enough
for most purposes.
Ez
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:08 AM, Amos Shapira
I happen to have an IBM SAN storage at home, so I am familiar with IBM line
of storage products. The EXP3000 is an expansion to IBM storage, which can
perform for itself (JBoD), however - it contains no CPU, or RAID abilities
internally. You will have to connect it to an additional server (1U, I
24 matches
Mail list logo
