I apologize about the subject. Feel free to change it. The main post was
about almost crashing my computer with the command _py -c
"print(2**64**3)".
אורי
u...@speedy.net
On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 8:01 AM Michael Shiloh
wrote:
> Interesting discussion, but the subject seems quite wrong.
>
> On
Interesting discussion, but the subject seems quite wrong.
On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 9:32 AM אורי wrote:
> From checking also powers of 3, I can't find more than c==5 (for 3**20 and
> 3**124).
>
> אורי
> u...@speedy.net
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 7:24 AM אורי wrote:
>
>> Thank you,
>From checking also powers of 3, I can't find more than c==5 (for 3**20 and
3**124).
אורי
u...@speedy.net
On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 7:24 AM אורי wrote:
> Thank you, that's interesting. So all such numbers are divisible by 9. I
> didn't think about it.
>
> You might be interested in my
Thank you, that's interesting. So all such numbers are divisible by 9. I
didn't think about it.
You might be interested in my related question:
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/4348279/what-is-the-highest-number-of-digits-so-that-this-number-of-digits-in-a-specific
>From checking about
אורי wrote on Tue, 04 Jan 2022 04:07 +00:00:
> Are there powers of 2 which give exactly 10% of each of the digits 0 to 9 (in
> decimal form)?
No, because then the sum of the digits would be a multiple of nine, so the
number wouldn't be a power of two.
NOT an answer to your question, but instead of a link to python3.8, I
added 2 lines to .bash_aliases:
alias p="python3.8"
alias p2="python2.7"
On Tue, 4 Jan 2022 06:07:43 +0200
אורי wrote:
> Hi,
>
> /usr/bin/python is defined on my server as a link to the
> deprecated python2.7, and I
Hi,
/usr/bin/python is defined on my server as a link to the
deprecated python2.7, and I didn't want to break anything, so I
defined /usr/bin/_py as a link to python3.8. I wanted to check how many
bytes a giga and tera is, so I ran _py -c "print(1024**3)" and _py -c
"print(1024**4)". Then I
>> I have a production server with Ubuntu 18.04 LTS (currently upgraded
>> to Ubuntu 18.04.5 LTS) and I use Python in virtualenv - currently Python
>> 3.6.9. I'm using Django and I read that from Django 4.0, a minimal version
>> of Python 3.8 will be required. I would like t
You can download it's source compile and install wherever you want in your
system.
Then refer your django to it.
On Fri, Jul 23, 2021, 05:53 אורי wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a production server with Ubuntu 18.04 LTS (currently upgraded
> to Ubuntu 18.04.5 LTS) and I use Python i
on server with Ubuntu 18.04 LTS (currently upgraded
> to Ubuntu 18.04.5 LTS) and I use Python in virtualenv - currently Python
> 3.6.9. I'm using Django and I read that from Django 4.0, a minimal version
> of Python 3.8 will be required. I would like to know how I use the latest
> version o
Hi,
I have a production server with Ubuntu 18.04 LTS (currently upgraded
to Ubuntu 18.04.5 LTS) and I use Python in virtualenv - currently Python
3.6.9. I'm using Django and I read that from Django 4.0, a minimal version
of Python 3.8 will be required. I would like to know how I use the latest
ar no good responses.
>
>
> https://askubuntu.com/questions/1338970/copy-paste-from-firefox-88-0-1-not-working-properly-on-ubuntu-21-04-hirsute-hip
>
> Have any of you encountered it?
> Do you have a similar environment and it works for you?
>
> Gabor
>
>
FF to a terminal and to email seems to
> work fine.
>
> Probably unrelated, but I first upgraded from 20.10 to 21.04. Everything
> seemed fine until I tried to use my Arduino, and found that the serial
> ports no longer worked. After some discussion with Arduino and Ubuntu
> forums I
https://askubuntu.com/questions/1338970/copy-paste-from-firefox-88-0-1-not-working-properly-on-ubuntu-21-04-hirsute-hip
>
> Have any of you encountered it?
> Do you have a similar environment and it works for you?
>
I'm not using Ubuntu ATM but I found when I switched from X11 to way
I'm also on 21.04. Copying from FF to a terminal and to email seems to work
fine.
Probably unrelated, but I first upgraded from 20.10 to 21.04. Everything
seemed fine until I tried to use my Arduino, and found that the serial
ports no longer worked. After some discussion with Arduino and Ubuntu
it seems to work sometimes from Firefox to other
apps as well, but only a few times and then it stops working.)
I also posted it on AskUbuntu, but so far no good responses.
https://askubuntu.com/questions/1338970/copy-paste-from-firefox-88-0-1-not-working-properly-on-ubuntu-21-04-hirsute-hip
Have
Hi,
Somebody knows how to have Supertux working with Hebrew fonts in Ubuntu?
Best,
Julian
--
Julian
___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
Thanks for all the replies so far.
So if I understand correctly I might buy a docking station similar to this
one:
Lenovo Powered USB-C Travel Hub - Docking station - USB-C - VGA, HDMI -
Worldwide - for ThinkPad L14 Gen 1, P14s Gen 1,
Hello Gabor,
I use a Lenovo Ideapad Y700 to which are connected two displays in
addition to its native display.
You may find the following blog article to be of some use:
https://tddpirate.zak.co.il/2019/10/13/displaylink-y700-debianbuster/
(Get DisplayLink to work on Lenovo Y700 after upgrade
Docking station probably.
On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 2:31 PM Gabor Szabo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a Thinkpad (
> https://www.lenovo.com/il/en/laptops/thinkpad/13-series/ThinkPad-13-Windows-2nd-Gen/p/22TP2TX133E
> ). It has a single HDMI slot but when I run xrandr I get:
>
> Screen 0: minimum 320 x
I answered a similar question by finding this:
https://forums.lenovo.com/t5/ThinkPad-X-Series-Laptops/X380-USB-C-Dock-2-external-monitors/td-p/4309124
I hope it at least points you in the right direction.
Geoff
--
Geoffrey S. Mendelson, N3OWJ/4X1GM/KBUH7245/KBUW5379 Jerusalem, Israel
On Jun
Hi,
I have a Thinkpad (
https://www.lenovo.com/il/en/laptops/thinkpad/13-series/ThinkPad-13-Windows-2nd-Gen/p/22TP2TX133E
). It has a single HDMI slot but when I run xrandr I get:
Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1920 x 2160, maximum 16384 x 16384
eDP-1 connected 1920x1080+0+1080 (normal
gt; 3.13.0-52-generic
>
> And the kernel version is still 3.13.0.
>
> How do I upgrade to 4.15.0?
>
> אורי
> u...@speedy.net
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 9:23 AM אורי wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I want to upgrade my Ubuntu Linux kernel from 3.13.0-5
And then:
# uname -r
3.13.0-52-generic
And the kernel version is still 3.13.0.
How do I upgrade to 4.15.0?
אורי
u...@speedy.net
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 9:23 AM אורי wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to upgrade my Ubuntu Linux kernel from 3.13.0-52-generic
> to 4.15.0-106-generic.
Hi,
I want to upgrade my Ubuntu Linux kernel from 3.13.0-52-generic
to 4.15.0-106-generic. How do I do it? I searched on Google and found a few
websites, but it doesn't work - I get error messages:
https://linuxhint.com/upgrade-kernel-ubuntu-1804/
# sudo apt-get install ukuu
Reading package
for the reason why
this server's apache and mysql don't restart after a reboot.
אורי
u...@speedy.net
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 5:33 PM Geoff Shang wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jun 2020, אורי wrote:
>
> > Err:4 http://ppa.launchpad.net/jonathonf/python-3.6/ubuntu bionic
> InRelease
> >
On Thu, 11 Jun 2020, אורי wrote:
Err:4 http://ppa.launchpad.net/jonathonf/python-3.6/ubuntu bionic InRelease
403 Forbidden [IP: 91.189.95.83 80]
E: Failed to fetch
http://ppa.launchpad.net/jonathonf/python-3.6/ubuntu/dists/bionic/InRelease
403 Forbidden [IP: 91.189.95.83 80]
E
Hi,
I have errors when running *sudo apt update*:
# sudo apt update
Hit:1 http://ppa.launchpad.net/certbot/certbot/ubuntu bionic InRelease
Hit:2 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-security InRelease
Hit:3 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic InRelease
Err:4 http://ppa.launchpad.net
On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 07:27:50 +0300
אורי wrote:
> Website is working now. But if I reboot the server again, I expect it
> to stop working.
After you've rebooted and it's stopped working:
View the unit file for apache2. Verify the user and group, and su to
that user. Verify any stated current
AM אורי wrote:
>>>
>>>> # cat /var/log/apache2/error.log
>>>> [Thu Jun 11 06:25:05.426924 2020] [mpm_prefork:notice] [pid 1154]
>>>> AH00163: Apache/2.4.29 (Ubuntu) OpenSSL/1.1.1g configured -- resuming
>>>> normal operations
>>
AM אורי wrote:
>>>
>>>> # cat /var/log/apache2/error.log
>>>> [Thu Jun 11 06:25:05.426924 2020] [mpm_prefork:notice] [pid 1154]
>>>> AH00163: Apache/2.4.29 (Ubuntu) OpenSSL/1.1.1g configured -- resuming
>>>> normal operations
>>
gt;
>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 9:52 AM אורי wrote:
>>
>>> # cat /var/log/apache2/error.log
>>> [Thu Jun 11 06:25:05.426924 2020] [mpm_prefork:notice] [pid 1154]
>>> AH00163: Apache/2.4.29 (Ubuntu) OpenSSL/1.1.1g configured -- resuming
>>> normal
11 06:25:05.426924 2020] [mpm_prefork:notice] [pid 1154]
>> AH00163: Apache/2.4.29 (Ubuntu) OpenSSL/1.1.1g configured -- resuming
>> normal operations
>> [Thu Jun 11 06:25:05.427080 2020] [core:notice] [pid 1154] AH00094:
>> Command line: '/usr/sbin/apache2'
>> [Thu
refork:notice] [pid 1154]
>> AH00163: Apache/2.4.29 (Ubuntu) OpenSSL/1.1.1g configured -- resuming
>> normal operations
>> [Thu Jun 11 06:25:05.427080 2020] [core:notice] [pid 1154] AH00094:
>> Command line: '/usr/sbin/apache2'
>> [Thu Jun 11 06:27:29.459759 2020] [mpm
Anything related in journalctl?
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 9:52 AM אורי wrote:
> # cat /var/log/apache2/error.log
> [Thu Jun 11 06:25:05.426924 2020] [mpm_prefork:notice] [pid 1154] AH00163:
> Apache/2.4.29 (Ubuntu) OpenSSL/1.1.1g configured -- resuming normal
> operations
> [T
# cat /var/log/apache2/error.log
[Thu Jun 11 06:25:05.426924 2020] [mpm_prefork:notice] [pid 1154] AH00163:
Apache/2.4.29 (Ubuntu) OpenSSL/1.1.1g configured -- resuming normal
operations
[Thu Jun 11 06:25:05.427080 2020] [core:notice] [pid 1154] AH00094: Command
line: '/usr/sbin/apache2'
[Thu Jun
estart apache2" - it's not responding) and
>> the
>> > >>> website is not working. How can I fix it now?
>> > >>>
>> > >>> The server didn't respond after reboot once (after 2 reboots) and I
>> had
>> > >>> to
>> The server didn't respond after reboot once (after 2 reboots) and I
> had
> > >>> to shut it down and restart it again.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>> Uri
> > >>> אורי
> > >>> u...@speedy.net
2" - it's not responding) and the
> > >>> website is not working. How can I fix it now?
> > >>>
> > >>> The server didn't respond after reboot once (after 2 reboots) and I
> had
> > >>> to shut it down and restart it again.
> >
start apache2" - it's not responding) and the
> > >>> website is not working. How can I fix it now?
> > >>>
> > >>> The server didn't respond after reboot once (after 2 reboots) and I
> had
> > >>> to shut it down and restart
- it's not responding) and the
> > >>> website is not working. How can I fix it now?
> > >>>
> > >>> The server didn't respond after reboot once (after 2 reboots) and I
> had
> > >>> to shut it down and restart it again.
> > >>
ww:~# sudo apt-get update
> > Hit:1 http://ppa.launchpad.net/certbot/certbot/ubuntu bionic InRelease
> > Get:2 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-security InRelease [88.7
> kB]
> > Err:3 http://ppa.launchpad.net/jonathonf/python-3.6/ubuntu bionic
> InRelease
> >
do apt-get update
> > Hit:1 http://ppa.launchpad.net/certbot/certbot/ubuntu bionic InRelease
> > Get:2 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-security InRelease [88.7
> kB]
> > Err:3 http://ppa.launchpad.net/jonathonf/python-3.6/ubuntu bionic
> InRelease
> > 403 F
dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
> root@www:~# sudo apt-get update
> Hit:1 http://ppa.launchpad.net/certbot/certbot/ubuntu bionic InRelease
> Get:2 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-security In
t; >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 10:29 PM Micha Bailey
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Regarding the upgrade to Focal (20.04): There’s no reason to rush.
> >>>> Bionic (18.04) is supported, if I’m n
Hi,
I ran autoremove both before and after the upgrade.
אורי
u...@speedy.net
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 8:43 AM Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On 11/06/2020 6:29, אורי wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for your suggestion, I decided to upgrade to 18.04.4 and I ran a
> > few times the following commands
On 11/06/2020 6:29, אורי wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your suggestion, I decided to upgrade to 18.04.4 and I ran a
> few times the following commands (from root):
>
> sudo apt autoremove
> sudo apt-get update
> sudo apt-get upgrade
> sudo apt update
> sudo apt upgrade
apt is basically a wrapper
://ppa.launchpad.net/certbot/certbot/ubuntu bionic InRelease
Get:2 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-security InRelease [88.7 kB]
Err:3 http://ppa.launchpad.net/jonathonf/python-3.6/ubuntu bionic InRelease
403 Forbidden [IP: 91.189.95.83 80]
Hit:4 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic InRelease
Hit:5
wn and restart it again.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Uri
>>> אורי
>>> u...@speedy.net
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 10:29 PM Micha Bailey
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Regarding the upgrade to Focal (20.04
t;> Thanks,
>>> Uri
>>> אורי
>>> u...@speedy.net
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 10:29 PM Micha Bailey
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Regarding the upgrade to Focal (20.04): There’s no reason to rush.
>>>&g
t;>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Uri
>>> אורי
>>> u...@speedy.net
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 10:29 PM Micha Bailey
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Regarding the upgrade to Focal (20.04): There’s no reason to rush
>> Bionic (LTS) users aren’t even offered the upgrade (i.e. you need to go out
>>> of your way to get it) until 20.04.1 is out in a few months.
>>>
>>> Regarding the upgrade to 18.04.4, I could be mistaken, but my
>>> understanding is that point releases aren’t n
t) until 20.04.1 is out in a few months.
>>
>> Regarding the upgrade to 18.04.4, I could be mistaken, but my
>> understanding is that point releases aren’t new versions of Ubuntu per se.
>> At point releases, new isos are spun with up-to-date packages, but it’s
>> still
i.e. you need to go out of
> your way to get it) until 20.04.1 is out in a few months.
>
> Regarding the upgrade to 18.04.4, I could be mistaken, but my
> understanding is that point releases aren’t new versions of Ubuntu per se.
> At point releases, new isos are spun with up-to-date p
to 18.04.4, I could be mistaken, but my understanding
is that point releases aren’t new versions of Ubuntu per se. At point
releases, new isos are spun with up-to-date packages, but it’s still the
same version. Assuming you make a habit of installing updates regularly
(which you obviously should
Hi,
Actually I have a staging server which I can upgrade first to 18.04.4 to
see if it works, or if something breaks. But I didn't find it on Google -
how do I upgrade an OS to Ubuntu 18.04.4 (from 18.04.*) without upgrading
it to 20.04?
אורי
u...@speedy.net
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 6:19 PM
e day to the same mailing list. But
>> I have a question: I'm using Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS for a few production
>> servers (one of them I upgraded a few months ago from 14.04). How important
>> it is to upgrade the OS version, or can I keep it like this? I'm afraid
>> that things
Hi Uri!
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 5:30 PM אורי wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm sorry for posting twice in the same day to the same mailing list. But
> I have a question: I'm using Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS for a few production
> servers (one of them I upgraded a few months ago from 14.04)
Hi,
Actually I had a website running on Ubuntu 10.04 LTS from 2012 to 2019 and
it didn't break, and I didn't upgrade.
אורי
u...@speedy.net
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 5:34 PM Geoffrey Mendelson <
geoffreymendel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am running ubuntu lts 10.something on a server I
I am running ubuntu lts 10.something on a server I am afraid will break.
Geoff.
--
Geoffrey S. Mendelson, N3OWJ/4X1GM/KBUH7245/KBUW5379 Jerusalem, Israel
On Jun 10, 2020, 5:30 PM +0300, אורי , wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm sorry for posting twice in the same day to the same mailing list. But
Hi,
I'm sorry for posting twice in the same day to the same mailing list. But I
have a question: I'm using Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS for a few production servers
(one of them I upgraded a few months ago from 14.04). How important it is
to upgrade the OS version, or can I keep it like this? I'm afraid
There are 2 toolchain available in Ubuntu 16 :
gcc-arm-linux-androideabi and
gcc-arm-linux-gnueabihf
I confess I do not understand which is correct one for ARMv7.1 level 10 when
compiling kernel
Clearly gcc-arm-linux-androideabi is built with Bionic libc so it must be used
to compile
On 18/11/2018 20:13, Geoffrey Mendelson
wrote:
I have an Ubuntu 15.10 system. When I installed
it, it defaulted to a regular ext(something) boot partition, and
an lvm partition with everything else on it.
There now
On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 8:14 PM Geoffrey Mendelson <
geoffreymendel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The lvm volume is something I dont understand.
>
Essentially LVM creates an abstraction layer between the actual block
device and your filesystems. Usually, your filesystems are written directly
on the
details for how to do it, just let me know, i will be
happy to help.
--
Rabin
On Sun, 18 Nov 2018 at 20:14, Geoffrey Mendelson <
geoffreymendel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have an Ubuntu 15.10 system. When I installed it, it defaulted to a
> regular ext(something) boot partition, and an l
I have an Ubuntu 15.10 system. When I installed it, it defaulted to a
regular ext(something) boot partition, and an lvm partition with everything
else on it.
There now is a bad spot in the lvm partition. fsck with a read check does
not find it. I have moved enough data off of it, so it wont show
Very interesting. Thanks Yuval.
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 8:06 PM, Yuval Adam <_...@yuv.al> wrote:
> This might help:
>
> http://linrunner.de/en/tlp/docs/tlp-configuration.html#usb
>
> On 11/24/2017 05:51 PM, Michael Shiloh wrote:
> > Very interesting. After removing TLP the problem seems to have
This might help:
http://linrunner.de/en/tlp/docs/tlp-configuration.html#usb
On 11/24/2017 05:51 PM, Michael Shiloh wrote:
> Very interesting. After removing TLP the problem seems to have gone
> away. I am now able to enjoy USB peripherals again. Thanks!
>
> I'd love to understand why, though.
>
Very interesting. After removing TLP the problem seems to have gone away. I
am now able to enjoy USB peripherals again. Thanks!
I'd love to understand why, though.
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Michael Shiloh <
michaelshiloh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Not powertop, but yes tlp. Very
Not powertop, but yes tlp. Very interesting. I will uninstall and see if
that solves the problem.
Another observation I just made: If I suspend the laptop with USB devices
plugged in, they are still detected when I restart.
I guess I could work around by leaving some small USB device plugged in
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 06:15:03PM +0400, Michael Shiloh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that my old mouse didn't work all the time, and figured it was
> time to replace the mouse. Then I had trouble programming some Arduinos,
> and figured I had a bad Arduino. It wasn't until my system failed to see
waking
from suspend, no devices plugged in to the USB ports are recognized.
$ uname -a
Linux x1 4.13.0-16-generic #19-Ubuntu SMP Wed Oct 11 18:35:14 UTC 2017
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Hardware details are at the end of this mail.
Here is the system in its failed state:
$ lsusb
Bus 002 Device 001
If anyone else received a 550 error when trying to send Amichai a
response, the email address that worked for me is
poder.pingu...@gmail.com, as buried in the email header.
@Amichai: if people tell you that they are having trouble sending you
email, it may be because your outgoing configuration
On 2017-07-03 16:56, Amichai Rotman wrote:
>Can any of you do the magic so this package becomes available for
>installation from the Ubuntu Repos?
With the circulating claim that my work is inferior, I don't feel
comfortable recommending it be packaged for a distribution, especially
Can any of you do the magic so this package becomes available for
installation from the Ubuntu Repos?
Thanks!
Amichai
2017-06-27 20:14 GMT+03:00 Boruch Baum <boruch_b...@gmx.com>:
> If Dov is correct and your results are superior, let me know when you
> upload yours for public
If Dov is correct and your results are superior, let me know when you
upload yours for public distribution and I'll immediately delete my
repository with a link to yours.
On 2017-06-27 19:28, E.S. Rosenberg wrote:
> I converted to OpenType using Adobe FDK and the fonts work in LibreOffice.
>
>
Though I haven't followed the story closely, you should note that this
conversion is problematic. Converting to OpenType while retaining the Type1
outlines would have been a better idea, if OpenOffice supports it.
Here's a relevant link that describes the problem in Type1→TTF conversion:
On 2017-06-27 12:59, Rabin Yasharzadehe wrote:
>Thanks.
>Q1: can you share show did you converted the fonts (manually/script),
#+BEGIN_SRC sh
#!/usr/bin/fontforge -lang=ff
#
#
# Accepts args *.pfa or *.pfb
i=1
while ( i < $argc )
Open( $argv[i] )
Generate(
If just uploaded TTF versions of the fonts to:
https://github.com/Boruch-Baum/culmus-fancy-ttf
Please let me know if:
a] This is packaged for a distribution, so I can link to it.
b] The original package is updated to include TrueType fonts, so I can
delete the repository.
c] Some
than converting a Type1 PostScript font (a pfb/afm
combination) into a TrueType font! I didn't play with that.
References:
[1] https://www.maketecheasier.com/how-to-convert-fonts-to-ttf-format-in-ubuntu/
[2] https://fontforge.github.io/scripting-tutorial.html
--
hkp://keys.gnupg.net
CA45 09B5
On Fri, Jun 02, 2017, E.S. Rosenberg wrote about "Re: [LibreOffice
> 5.3/Ubuntu 17.04] Culmus Fonts not detected":
> >> For those of you who are interested:
> >> As of 5.3 LO no longer supports Type1 fonts which is how the
> >> culmus-fancy font set ships.
>
2017-06-22 11:53 GMT+03:00 Nadav Har'El <n...@math.technion.ac.il>:
> On Fri, Jun 02, 2017, E.S. Rosenberg wrote about "Re: [LibreOffice 5.3/Ubuntu
> 17.04] Culmus Fonts not detected":
>> For those of you who are interested:
>> As of 5.3 LO no longer
On Fri, Jun 02, 2017, E.S. Rosenberg wrote about "Re: [LibreOffice 5.3/Ubuntu
17.04] Culmus Fonts not detected":
> For those of you who are interested:
> As of 5.3 LO no longer supports Type1 fonts which is how the
> culmus-fancy font set ships.
> The best solution is to co
:
> Hi everyone,
> I just noticed that LibreOffice on Ubuntu 17.04 seems to be
> ignoring/not detecting fonts that are part of the culmus- packages.
> Abiword does detect the fonts.
> Has anyone else had issues like this? Know how to solve this?
> T
Hi everyone,
I just noticed that LibreOffice on Ubuntu 17.04 seems to be
ignoring/not detecting fonts that are part of the culmus- packages.
Abiword does detect the fonts.
Has anyone else had issues like this? Know how to solve this?
Thanks,
Eliyahu - אליהו
wrote:
Him
Its unity.
Rami
On 04/17/2016 11:01 AM, Lior Kaplan
wrote:
Hi Rami,
I can confirm that with Ubuntu 14.04
age Settings ->
Languages, check the Ignore
system input language option
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1246583/comments/63
2016-04-17 13:08 GMT+03:00 Sh
> Languages, check the Ignore
> system input language option
>
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1246583/comments/63
>
> 2016-04-17 13:08 GMT+03:00 Shlomi Fish <shlo...@gmail.com>:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > On Sun, Apr
For libreoffice (other applications differently)
Tools -> Options -> Language Settings -> Languages, check the Ignore
system input language option
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1246583/comments/63
2016-04-17 13:08 GMT+03:00 Shlomi Fish <shlo...@gmail.co
The problem is with Unity's text entry, not LibreOffice.
Can someone tell us how to change it effectively for Hebrew?
Amichai
On Apr 17, 2016 1:09 PM, "Shlomi Fish" wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Kobi Zamir wrote:
>
>> On fedora
Hi all,
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Kobi Zamir wrote:
> On fedora 23 with libre office 5.0.5.2 copy/paste on hebrew keyboard works
> without problems.
>
>
Ctrl+C and Ctrl+V work without problems in libreoffice-5.1.2.2-3.mga6 while
using the Lyx Hebrew keyboard on
On fedora 23 with libre office 5.0.5.2 copy/paste on hebrew keyboard works
without problems.
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Rami Addady <r...@active.co.il> wrote:
> Him
>
> Its unity.
>
> Rami
>
>
>
>
> On 04/17/2016 11:01 AM, Lior Kaplan wrote:
>
> H
Him
Its unity.
Rami
On 04/17/2016 11:01 AM, Lior Kaplan
wrote:
Hi Rami,
I can confirm that with Ubuntu 14.04 and LibreOffice 5.1.
Which graphical
Hi Rami,
I can confirm that with Ubuntu 14.04 and LibreOffice 5.1.
Which graphical env are you using ?
On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Rami Addady <r...@active.co.il> wrote:
>
> I don't any any issues with LibrePffice 5.0.x on Debian testing (tried
> CTRL+B, CTRL+C and CTRL+V
I don't any any issues with LibrePffice 5.0.x on Debian testing (tried
CTRL+B, CTRL+C and CTRL+V while in Hebrew layout).
Kaplan
I install on ubuntu 14.04 libreoffice5.1 in parallel following:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Installing_in_parallel
he root volume onto another,
> live, machine) made the upgraded-ubuntu-machine bootable.
>
> The solution was taken from this link (which also details the diagnosis):
>
> http://www.nicksherlock.com/2015/01/my-ec2-server-wouldnt-boot-after-apt-get-dist-upgrade-i-fixed-it/
>
> T
away (by attaching and mounting the root volume onto another,
live, machine) made the upgraded-ubuntu-machine bootable.
The solution was taken from this link (which also details the diagnosis):
http://www.nicksherlock.com/2015/01/my-ec2-server-wouldnt-boot-after-apt-get-dist-upgrade-i-fixed
16777216 sectors of 0 bytes
**
[H[J Booting 'Ubuntu 14.04.3 LTS, kernel 3.13.0-77-generic'
root (hd0)
Filesystem type is ext2fs, using whole disk
kernel /boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-77-generic root=LABEL=cloudimg-rootfs ro
console=h
vc0
initrd /boot/initrd.img-3.13.0-77
Hi list,
I have an Ubuntu machine on EC2, which I have been trying to upgrade from
12.04 to 14.04 using the do-release-upgrade command.
This seemed to work well, but when it finally rebooted, it became
unreachable (shows 1/2 checks passed in the EC2 management console, does
not respond to ssh).
I
the "Ignore System Language Input" in the Language settings.
No
cigar...
I
also noticed people report the bug still exists.
I
am using Ubuntu 14.04 with Unity DE. I think it
1 - 100 of 581 matches
Mail list logo