After sixteen years of faithful use of Red Hat, it's
time to switch. May I have opinions as to which to
choose for a home desktop?
My criteria include hassle-free installation, similar
look-and-feel to Red Hat, and full support of
rhythmbox, ffmpeg, perhaps realplayer, and generally
good
Here's something.
Following up a suspicion, I entered from root
(which, by the way, I've had no difficulty ssh'ing
into):
setenforce 0
Everything instantly starting working on /home. I
can now do a passwordless login, run X apps
remotely (which previously were giving xauth locking
I want to select every line from a csv file which has
the literal 201110 in the third field. Neither of
the following do it.
egrep -e '^{.*;}{2}201110' filename.csv
egrep -E '^{.*;}{2}201110' filename.csv
I haven't really figured out the use of curly braces.
It seems that they're for both
I think that this was last discussed long enough ago
that the information ought to be updated.
I want to establish a shell account accessible by
ssh, somewhat preferably offering a RHEL-6 command
line and the stock applications that come with
RHEL-5, 6, Fedora, or something reasonably close.
The vacation autoresponder suite came with rhel3
and 4, but it's omitted from 5. My el5 box uses
sendmail-8.13.8-8.el5, which is what yum gives you,
and I don't want to switch to another mailhandler.
I grabbed the binary for vacation 1.2.7 from an
rhel4 box and it runs with no apparent error on
I just got a Touch, which at least at first I don't
want to jailbreak. It's the 8 GB model, so it has the
second-generation firmware.
It looks like tools like amarok can't use this model
at all, and it looks like gtkpod can't mount it
without jailbreaking.
Is there any possibility of making it
In, at least, RHEL 4 with a 2.6 kernel, when does
one choose ramfs instead of tmpfs, or vice versa?
They both enforce a maximum memory usage, don't
they?
One difference I see is that by default, userland
has write permission with tmpfs, but not ramfs. I'm
not sure what to conclude from that.
I did see the Debian article, but then I saw that
ramfs now provides for a maximum size. I'm not a
sysadmin and I don't know what backing store is, but
it sounded like both ramfs and tmpfs restrict the
size that the mounted ram can grow to.
It does look like tmpfs suits me well and I'm happy
to
