Hi,
On 09/13/2009 05:59 PM, Thomas Kaiser wrote:
I thought Hans will come in, in this discussion...
Hey hey, its weekend, give me some time to respond already :)
See my reply higher up in the thread.
Regards,
Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media
Hi,
On 09/13/2009 09:20 AM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:09:20 +0200
Németh Márton wrote:
You can find my results at
http://v4l-test.sourceforge.net/results/test-20090911/index.html
There are three types of problems: a) Sometimes the picture contains
a 8x8 pixel error, li
On 09/13/2009 04:42 PM, leandro Costantino wrote:
Actually it based on pac7302. Pac7311/02 also has support ( since gspca1 ).
I checked some old logs of the pac, and the driver init for 7302 seems ok.
The "ff ff ff" sequence, seems to been taken in account on conversion.
(libv4lconvert)
/* Spe
Actually it based on pac7302. Pac7311/02 also has support ( since gspca1 ).
I checked some old logs of the pac, and the driver init for 7302 seems ok.
The "ff ff ff" sequence, seems to been taken in account on conversion.
(libv4lconvert)
/* Special Pixart versions of the *_nbits functions, these
Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:09:20 +0200
> Németh Márton wrote:
>
>> You can find my results at
>> http://v4l-test.sourceforge.net/results/test-20090911/index.html
>> There are three types of problems: a) Sometimes the picture contains
>> a 8x8 pixel error, like in image #9
On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:09:20 +0200
Németh Márton wrote:
> You can find my results at
> http://v4l-test.sourceforge.net/results/test-20090911/index.html
> There are three types of problems: a) Sometimes the picture contains
> a 8x8 pixel error, like in image #9
> http://v4l-test.sourceforge.net/re
leandro Costantino wrote:
> Nice, i will take a look.
> Anyway, be aware, that the "conversion error", is something expected
> on pac7311, in fact, Hans have commented that on the libv4lconvert.
> ..
> if (result) {
> /* Pixart webcam's seem to regulary generate corrupt frames, whic
Nice, i will take a look.
Anyway, be aware, that the "conversion error", is something expected
on pac7311, in fact, Hans have commented that on the libv4lconvert.
..
if (result) {
/* Pixart webcam's seem to regulary generate corrupt frames, which
are best thrown away to a
Also , about the negative value. It happens to when using Pac7311 on
libv4l_convert. Usually it an -EAGAIN, that should be ignored.
svv application, just ignore that, and another apps take in account.
But would be nice to re test your webcam to find where the real problem is.
Best Regards
2009/9/
Hi ,
i tested it with 2.6.31-rc9 & libvl 0.6.1 + svv and cannot reproduce.
301147.626826] gspca: probing 093a:2626
[301147.641578] gspca: probe ok
[301147.641607] gspca: probing 093a:2626
[301147.641770] gspca: probing 093a:2626
[301147.641829] usbcore: registered new interface driver pac7311
[30
Márton Németh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a Labtec Webcam 2200 and I have problems with the image quality
> with Linux 2.6.31 + libv4l 0.6.1. I made some experiments and stored
> each captured image as raw data and when libv4l was able to convert
> then I also stored the result as bmp.
>
> You can fi
Hi,
I have a Labtec Webcam 2200 and I have problems with the image quality
with Linux 2.6.31 + libv4l 0.6.1. I made some experiments and stored
each captured image as raw data and when libv4l was able to convert
then I also stored the result as bmp.
You can find my results at
http://v4l-test.sou
12 matches
Mail list logo