Aw: Re: What ever happened to standardizing signal level?

2010-06-07 Thread hermann-pitton
Hi Manu, - Original Nachricht Von: Manu Abraham An: hermann pitton Datum: 07.06.2010 05:04 Betreff: Re: What ever happened to standardizing signal level? > On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 2:01 AM, hermann pitton > wrote: > > > > Am Donnerstag, den 03.06.2010, 2

Re: What ever happened to standardizing signal level?

2010-06-06 Thread Jed
Pot, meet kettle... That's a bit rich accusing others of flaming when you've been exposing the entire list to your rants, ever heard of emailing users directly? You really think this list is you personal support mail-list don't you. On 7/06/10 8:12 AM, Lars Schotte wrote: stop flaming all th

Re: What ever happened to standardizing signal level?

2010-06-06 Thread Manu Abraham
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 2:01 AM, hermann pitton wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, den 03.06.2010, 22:18 -0700 schrieb VDR User: >> hermann pitton , you are contributing >> absolutely nothing to this thread aside of annoying people with your >> by trolling and half incoherent nonsense.  It's quite ironic yo

Re: What ever happened to standardizing signal level?

2010-06-06 Thread Lars Schotte
of course, that one is cleared On Mon, 07 Jun 2010 01:33:49 +0200 hermann pitton wrote: > > Am Montag, den 07.06.2010, 00:12 +0200 schrieb Lars Schotte: > > stop flaming all the time, there are ppl out there like me who have > > some problems w/ their HW, and you are arguing here about nothing.

Re: What ever happened to standardizing signal level?

2010-06-06 Thread hermann pitton
Am Montag, den 07.06.2010, 00:12 +0200 schrieb Lars Schotte: > stop flaming all the time, there are ppl out there like me who have > some problems w/ their HW, and you are arguing here about nothing. > > On Mon, 07 Jun 2010 00:01:22 +0200 > hermann pitton wrote: > > > > > If your name is tr

Re: What ever happened to standardizing signal level?

2010-06-06 Thread VDR User
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Lars Schotte wrote: > stop flaming all the time, there are ppl out there like me who have > some problems w/ their HW, and you are arguing here about nothing. Hence why I've asked that kid several times to stop it but yet he refuses to respect this mailing list and

Re: What ever happened to standardizing signal level?

2010-06-06 Thread Lars Schotte
stop flaming all the time, there are ppl out there like me who have some problems w/ their HW, and you are arguing here about nothing. On Mon, 07 Jun 2010 00:01:22 +0200 hermann pitton wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, den 03.06.2010, 22:18 -0700 schrieb VDR User: > > hermann pitton , you are contribut

Re: What ever happened to standardizing signal level?

2010-06-06 Thread hermann pitton
Am Donnerstag, den 03.06.2010, 22:18 -0700 schrieb VDR User: > hermann pitton , you are contributing > absolutely nothing to this thread aside of annoying people with your > by trolling and half incoherent nonsense. It's quite ironic you > suggest _I_ am the one trolling when this is a thread _I_

Re: What ever happened to standardizing signal level?

2010-06-03 Thread VDR User
hermann pitton , you are contributing absolutely nothing to this thread aside of annoying people with your by trolling and half incoherent nonsense. It's quite ironic you suggest _I_ am the one trolling when this is a thread _I_ created. And further, several people have posted legitimate responses

Re: What ever happened to standardizing signal level?

2010-06-03 Thread hermann pitton
Hi, Am Sonntag, den 30.05.2010, 00:01 -0700 schrieb VDR User: > On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 10:52 PM, hermann pitton > wrote: > > > ...troll spam removed... > > > > Hermann, you're a known troll with clearly nothing to contribute to > this thread therefore you're comments are unwelcome. Your mostly

Re: What ever happened to standardizing signal level?

2010-05-30 Thread hermann pitton
Hi, Am Sonntag, den 30.05.2010, 23:02 -0400 schrieb Michael Krufky: > Markus Rechberger wrote: > > On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Michael Krufky wrote: > >> Markus Rechberger wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> A little bit more "ontopic", did anyone get around to read the > >>> signallevel of the tda

Re: What ever happened to standardizing signal level?

2010-05-30 Thread Michael Krufky
Markus Rechberger wrote: On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Michael Krufky wrote: Markus Rechberger wrote: Hi, A little bit more "ontopic", did anyone get around to read the signallevel of the tda18721? I wonder the register does not return any signallevel as indicated in the specifications. M

Re: What ever happened to standardizing signal level?

2010-05-30 Thread Markus Rechberger
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Michael Krufky wrote: > Markus Rechberger wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> A little bit more "ontopic", did anyone get around to read the >> signallevel of the tda18721? >> I wonder the register does not return any signallevel as indicated in >> the specifications. >> >> Mar

Re: What ever happened to standardizing signal level?

2010-05-30 Thread hermann-pitton
- Original Nachricht Von: VDR User An: hermann pitton Datum: 30.05.2010 09:01 Betreff: Re: What ever happened to standardizing signal level? > On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 10:52 PM, hermann pitton > wrote: > > > ...troll spam removed... > > > > He

Re: What ever happened to standardizing signal level?

2010-05-30 Thread Michael Krufky
Markus Rechberger wrote: Hi, A little bit more "ontopic", did anyone get around to read the signallevel of the tda18721? I wonder the register does not return any signallevel as indicated in the specifications. Markus There is a "power level" value that can be read from the tda18271 -- I had

Re: What ever happened to standardizing signal level?

2010-05-30 Thread Michael Krufky
Hans Verkuil wrote: On Sunday 30 May 2010 09:07:46 VDR User wrote: On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 2:09 AM, Mike Booth wrote: i think someone is too concerned about being precisely accurate. So much so that no-one can see the woods for the trees any more. Its not important to me that accuracy is spot

Re: What ever happened to standardizing signal level?

2010-05-30 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Sunday 30 May 2010 17:18:25 Michael Krufky wrote: > Hans Verkuil wrote: > > On Sunday 30 May 2010 09:07:46 VDR User wrote: > >> On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 2:09 AM, Mike Booth > >> wrote: > >>> i think someone is too concerned about being precisely accurate. So much > >>> so > >>> that no-one can

Re: What ever happened to standardizing signal level?

2010-05-30 Thread Markus Rechberger
Hi, A little bit more "ontopic", did anyone get around to read the signallevel of the tda18721? I wonder the register does not return any signallevel as indicated in the specifications. Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to ma

Re: What ever happened to standardizing signal level?

2010-05-30 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Sunday 30 May 2010 09:07:46 VDR User wrote: > On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 2:09 AM, Mike Booth > wrote: > > i think someone is too concerned about being precisely accurate. So much so > > that no-one can see the woods for the trees any more. > > > > Its not important to me that accuracy is spot on.

Re: What ever happened to standardizing signal level?

2010-05-30 Thread VDR User
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 2:09 AM, Mike Booth wrote: > i think someone is too concerned about being precisely accurate. So much so > that no-one can see the woods for the trees any more. > > Its not important to me that accuracy is spot on. I only want to know that > when tuning the dish I'm getting

Re: What ever happened to standardizing signal level?

2010-05-30 Thread VDR User
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 10:52 PM, hermann pitton wrote: > ...troll spam removed... > Hermann, you're a known troll with clearly nothing to contribute to this thread therefore you're comments are unwelcome. Your mostly incoherent rant sounds like the ramblings of somebody who has consumed too muc

Re: What ever happened to standardizing signal level?

2010-05-29 Thread hermann pitton
Am Freitag, den 28.05.2010, 20:09 -0700 schrieb VDR User: > A lot of people were anticipating this happening but it seems to have > stalled out. Does anyone know what the intentions are? Many users > were also hoping to _finally_ get a good signal meter for linux as > well. If anyone has any in

Re: What ever happened to standardizing signal level?

2010-05-29 Thread Mike Booth
On Saturday 29 May 2010 14:45:40 Konstantin Dimitrov wrote: > at least in driver for the frontend found on TBS 6980 Dual DVB-S2 card > i added options "esno" and "dbm" respectively for reporting SNR > (actually C/N) in EsNo dB and signal strength in dBm, which is at > least real statistics about th

Re: What ever happened to standardizing signal level?

2010-05-28 Thread Konstantin Dimitrov
at least in driver for the frontend found on TBS 6980 Dual DVB-S2 card i added options "esno" and "dbm" respectively for reporting SNR (actually C/N) in EsNo dB and signal strength in dBm, which is at least real statistics about the signal and not like almost meaningless percents. so, that's one wa

What ever happened to standardizing signal level?

2010-05-28 Thread VDR User
A lot of people were anticipating this happening but it seems to have stalled out. Does anyone know what the intentions are? Many users were also hoping to _finally_ get a good signal meter for linux as well. If anyone has any info, please share! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "