Dosemu 1.2.0 kernel 2.6 crash

2004-01-24 Thread Disnel
Thanks for new dosemu. It works for me with 2.4 kernel. But I'am unable to run it with 2.6 kernel, it crashes every time when I try to start it. Setting mapping to mapfile in dosemu.conf does not help. Here is what it writes to console: [EMAIL PROTECTED] disnel]$ xdosemu ERROR: unexpected CPU

Re: Dosemu 1.2.0 kernel 2.6 crash

2004-01-24 Thread Bart Oldeman
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004, Disnel wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] disnel]$ xdosemu ERROR: unexpected CPU exception 0x0e err=0x0006 cr2=000279fe while in vm86 (DOS) means your DOS code went into zombie land. Strange. DOSEMU-1.2.0.0 is coming up on Linux version 2.6.0-1.104custom well I don't know

Re: 1.2.0 binary install

2004-01-24 Thread Ged Haywood
Hi all, On Sat, 24 Jan 2004, Bart Oldeman wrote: Then I booted Linux, started 1.0.2.? and - on same hardware, same disk, using same program and same data set ran it again. right at 20 minutes. sure, Linux is good at disk caching ... And it can use a few gigabytes. DOS has trouble with

Re: ERROR: BUG: dosemu touched the protected video memory!!!

2004-01-24 Thread Julius Schwartzenberg
Bart Oldeman schreef: Were you talking about duke nukem 3d or some earlier duke? It still doesn't work with version 1.2.0 :( You can download the Duke Nukem I was talking about here btw: ftp://ftp.3drealms.com/share/1duke.zip Julius - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe

Re: 1.2.0 binary install

2004-01-24 Thread Jan Willem Stumpel
Bart Oldeman wrote: But.. DOSEMU isn't as important anymore as it used to be and some distributions no longer have it. Shame on them! I suppose it is inevitable as newer generations of computer users have never heard of DOS. If another DOS is used; yes it's a bit of a waste of bandwidth but

Re: 1.2.0 binary install

2004-01-24 Thread Bart Oldeman
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004, Jan Willem Stumpel wrote: No, I am not worried about the bandwidth, it's probably more my feeling that the dosemu C drive should be set up in a user's home directory with its own DOS in it. that's what the dosemu script does (optionally) -- it sets up a bunch of symbolic

Re: 1.2.0 binary install

2004-01-24 Thread Jan Willem Stumpel
Bart Oldeman wrote: that's what the dosemu script does (optionally) -- it sets up a bunch of symbolic links and a private copy of config.sys/ autoexec.bat. So you set some kind of option on running the script? [at this point I thought of trying man dosemu]. I tried xdosemu -install

Re: 1.2.0 binary install

2004-01-24 Thread Bart Oldeman
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004, Jan Willem Stumpel wrote: Bart Oldeman wrote: that's what the dosemu script does (optionally) -- it sets up a bunch of symbolic links and a private copy of config.sys/ autoexec.bat. So you set some kind of option on running the script? [at this point I thought of

Re: 1.2.0 binary install

2004-01-24 Thread norseman
Bart Oldeman wrote: On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, norseman wrote: again: /usr/local/share/dosemu is just more typing. /usr/local/dosemusee? I know, but I'm trying to follow a standard, the FHS, which may be different from the norseman standard. I guess the questions are:

Re: ERROR: BUG: dosemu touched the protected video memory!!!

2004-01-24 Thread Bart Oldeman
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004, Julius Schwartzenberg wrote: Bart Oldeman schreef: Were you talking about duke nukem 3d or some earlier duke? It still doesn't work with version 1.2.0 :( yes, I know, noone has tried to fix it so far, and I didn't want to do it myself because that would just delay

Re: 1.2.0 binary install

2004-01-24 Thread Bart Oldeman
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004, norseman wrote: Bart Oldeman wrote: On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, norseman wrote: MSDOS does not do network. it sure does. Think about multiple DOSEMUs running at the same time as multiple DOS clients sitting on a LAN. The lredir'ed drives look to DOS and DOS

Re: 1.2.0 binary install

2004-01-24 Thread norseman
Justin Zygmont wrote: NO IT DON'T. IT NEVER DID. There were/are add-ons that alow network, but MSDOS as shipped by MicroSoft NEVER had network buit-in. Truth! Your version might, but MSDOS doesn't. i remember msdos 6 had it, they removed it after I checked the shelf. I have 3.2 but