Re: [PATCH v2] gpio/omap: add *remove* callback in platform_driver

2012-08-10 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 8:28 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com writes: On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com writes: Add *remove* callback so that necessary cleanup operations

Re: [PATCH v2] gpio/omap: add *remove* callback in platform_driver

2012-08-08 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Shilimkar, Santosh santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com wrote: Add *remove* callback so that necessary cleanup operations are performed when device is unregistered. The device is deleted from

Re: [PATCH v2] gpio/omap: add *remove* callback in platform_driver

2012-08-08 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com writes: Add *remove* callback so that necessary cleanup operations are performed when device is unregistered. The device is deleted from the list and associated clock handle is released

Re: [GPIO] Crashed when not using

2012-07-30 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
Sourav, On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Poddar, Sourav sourav.pod...@ti.com wrote: Hi All, I tried using gpio as an interrupt line for my driver (drivers/staging/iio/light/tsl2x7x_core.c) for omap5. The interrupt line number was directly passed to the driver using device tree. But what I

Re: [PATCH v4 04/12] gpio/omap: remove saved_wakeup field from struct gpio_bank

2012-07-26 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
Hi Roger, On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 4:46 PM, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com wrote: Hi Roger, On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Roger Quadros rog...@ti.com wrote: Hi, Just bumped across this patch and have a query. On 03/16/2012 04:05 PM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma wrote: There is no more

Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio/omap: move bank-dbck initialization to omap_gpio_mod_init()

2012-07-11 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote: On Wed, 11 Jul 2012, Tarun Kanti DebBarma wrote: Since the bank-dbck initialization in a one time operation there is no need to keep this within gpio_debounce(). Therefore, moving clk_get(bank-dbck) to omap_gpio_mod_init().

Re: [PATCH v4 04/12] gpio/omap: remove saved_wakeup field from struct gpio_bank

2012-07-09 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
Hi Roger, On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Roger Quadros rog...@ti.com wrote: Hi, Just bumped across this patch and have a query. On 03/16/2012 04:05 PM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma wrote: There is no more need to have saved_wakeup because bank-context.wake_en already holds that value. So getting

Re: [PATCH v4 04/12] gpio/omap: remove saved_wakeup field from struct gpio_bank

2012-07-09 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Roger Quadros rog...@ti.com wrote: Tarun, On 07/09/2012 02:16 PM, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti wrote: Hi Roger, On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Roger Quadros rog...@ti.com wrote: Hi, Just bumped across this patch and have a query. On 03/16/2012 04:05 PM, Tarun

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] ARM: OMAP2+: dmtimer: cleanup related to devm API and clk usage

2012-07-05 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
Hi Tony, On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote: * DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com [120704 21:07]: On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Shilimkar, Santosh santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote: Just to let you know that this cleanup is essential for Benoit's

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] ARM: OMAP2+: dmtimer: cleanup related to devm API and clk usage

2012-07-04 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
Hi Tony, On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Shilimkar, Santosh santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote: Tony, On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:24 PM, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com wrote: The devm API usage in probe

Re: Panda ES board hang when using GPIO as interrupt

2012-06-28 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 6:29 AM, Franky Lin fran...@broadcom.com wrote: On 06/28/2012 04:54 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: I am wondering if this could be the bug ... on start-up I see that we do a context restore on bank1 during the probe which is before we have done the first suspend! In other

Re: Panda ES board hang when using GPIO as interrupt

2012-06-27 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:50 PM, Franky Lin fran...@broadcom.com wrote: On 06/26/2012 12:21 AM, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti wrote: On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Franky Lin fran...@broadcom.com wrote: Hi Kevin, Tarun, We are using the expansion connector A on Panda board to mount a SDIO WiFi

Re: Panda ES board hang when using GPIO as interrupt

2012-06-26 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Franky Lin fran...@broadcom.com wrote: Hi Kevin, Tarun, We are using the expansion connector A on Panda board to mount a SDIO WiFi dongle on MMC2 with a level triggered interrupt signal connected to GPIO 138. It's been working fine until 3.5 rc1. The board

Re: [PATCH 06/11] gpio/omap: add clk_prepare and clk_unprepare

2012-06-25 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Rajendra Nayak rna...@ti.com wrote: On Saturday 23 June 2012 12:47 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote: Hi On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, Rajendra Nayak wrote: In preparation of OMAP moving to Common Clk Framework(CCF) add clk_prepare() for omap gpio debounce clock.

Re: [GIT PULL] gpio/omap: cleanups for v3.5

2012-06-25 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:48 AM, NeilBrown ne...@suse.de wrote: On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:04:26 +0530 DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com wrote: On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 8:46 AM, NeilBrown ne...@suse.de wrote: On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 23:24:10 +0530 DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com

Re: [PATCH 06/11] gpio/omap: add clk_prepare and clk_unprepare

2012-06-25 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Rajendra Nayak rna...@ti.com wrote: On Monday 25 June 2012 11:41 AM, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti wrote: On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Rajendra Nayakrna...@ti.com  wrote: On Saturday 23 June 2012 12:47 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote: Hi On Fri, 22 Jun 2012

Re: [GIT PULL] gpio/omap: cleanups for v3.5

2012-06-21 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 8:46 AM, NeilBrown ne...@suse.de wrote: On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 23:24:10 +0530 DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com wrote: On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 5:45 AM, NeilBrown ne...@suse.de wrote: On Fri, 11 May 2012 17:30:48 -0700 Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: Hi

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] ARM: OMAP2+: dmtimer: cleanup related to devm API and clk usage

2012-06-14 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com wrote: The devm API usage in probe() simplifies error handling operation. Since iclk is not used in the driver it is removed from wherever not needed. Corrected the timer fck name mis-match between clock44xx_data.c and

Re: [GIT PULL] gpio/omap: cleanups for v3.5

2012-06-14 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 5:45 AM, NeilBrown ne...@suse.de wrote: On Fri, 11 May 2012 17:30:48 -0700 Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: Hi Grant, Here's the final round of GPIO cleanups for v3.5.  This branch is based on my for_3.5/fixes/gpio branch you just pulled. Kevin Hi.  I'm not

Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: omap: dmtimer: set non-posted mode if iclk less than 4*fck

2012-06-06 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 2:51 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com writes: Timers in PER domain periodically report old time from TCRR in posted mode if ick 4*fck. Therefore, set timer to non-posted whenever ick 4*fck for all timers. Is there an

Re: [PATCH 8/8] gpio/omap: fix missing check in *_runtime_suspend()

2012-05-18 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 3:51 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: Tarun, Santosh, Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com writes: We do checking for bank-enabled_non_wakeup_gpios in order to skip redundant operations. Somehow, the check got missed while doing the cleanup series. Just to

Re: [PATCH 8/8] gpio/omap: fix missing check in *_runtime_suspend()

2012-05-17 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 5:26 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com writes: * Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com [120517 15:29]: I just noticed that this patch has caused some strange problems, notably with the GPIO IRQ used by smsc911x NIC (Overo, Zoom3, 2430SDP,

Re: [PATCH 8/8] gpio/omap: fix missing check in *_runtime_suspend()

2012-05-17 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 3:51 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: Tarun, Santosh, Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com writes: We do checking for bank-enabled_non_wakeup_gpios in order to skip redundant operations. Somehow, the check got missed while doing the cleanup series. Just to

Re: [PATCH 0/9] ARM: OMAP: DMTIMER clean-up in preparation for device-tree

2012-05-16 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 1:44 AM, Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com wrote: Hi Benoit, On 05/16/2012 04:28 AM, Cousson, Benoit wrote: Hi Jon, On 5/16/2012 1:35 AM, Jon Hunter wrote: From: Jon Hunterjon-hun...@ti.com In order to migrate the dmtimer driver to support device-tree I found that it

Re: [PATCH v2] gpio/omap: fix incorrect initialization of omap_gpio_mod_init

2012-05-09 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
Hi, On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 3:06 AM, Janusz Krzysztofik jkrzy...@tis.icnet.pl wrote: On Mon, 7 May 2012 10:52:28 DebBarma, Tarun Kanti wrote: On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 3:25 AM, Grazvydas Ignotas nota...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com

Re: [PATCH v2] gpio/omap: fix incorrect initialization of omap_gpio_mod_init

2012-05-06 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
Hi, On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 3:25 AM, Grazvydas Ignotas nota...@gmail.com wrote: I've noticed that current mainline enables _all_ possible GPIO interrupts, this patch fixes that problem. OK, thanks. Also Grant doesn't seem to be on CC so might not be able to pick this up. I have added Cc: in

Re: [PATCH] gpio/omap: fix incorrect initialization of omap_gpio_mod_init

2012-04-29 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com writes: Breaking commit: ab985f0f7c2c0ef90b7c832f0c04f470dda0593d Initialization of irqenable, irqstatus registers is the common operation done in this function for all OMAP platforms,

Re: [PATCH v9 11/25] gpio/omap: cleanup omap_gpio_mod_init function

2012-04-25 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Shilimkar, Santosh santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:04 AM, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote: * DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com [120424 08:40

Re: [PATCH v9 11/25] gpio/omap: cleanup omap_gpio_mod_init function

2012-04-25 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote: On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 06:24:14PM +0530, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti wrote: On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Shilimkar, Santosh santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:04 AM, DebBarma, Tarun

Re: [PATCH v9 11/25] gpio/omap: cleanup omap_gpio_mod_init function

2012-04-24 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
Hi Janusz, On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:24 AM, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com wrote: On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Janusz Krzysztofik jkrzy...@tis.icnet.pl wrote: On Thursday 02 of February 2012 23:00:37 Tarun Kanti DebBarma wrote: With register offsets now defined for respective

Re: [PATCH v9 11/25] gpio/omap: cleanup omap_gpio_mod_init function

2012-04-24 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote: * DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com [120424 08:40]: Hi Janusz, On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:24 AM, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com wrote: On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Janusz Krzysztofik jkrzy

Re: [PATCH v9 11/25] gpio/omap: cleanup omap_gpio_mod_init function

2012-04-23 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Janusz Krzysztofik jkrzy...@tis.icnet.pl wrote: On Thursday 02 of February 2012 23:00:37 Tarun Kanti DebBarma wrote: With register offsets now defined for respective OMAP versions we can get rid of cpu_class_* checks. This function now has common initialization

Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] ARM: OMAP2+: dmtimer: cleanup iclk usage

2012-04-23 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com writes: We do not use iclk anywhere in the dmtimer driver and so removing it. Hence removing the timer iclk entries from OMAP4 clkdev table as well. What about the OMAP2/3 clkdev

Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: OMAP2+: dmtimer: cleanup fclk usage

2012-04-18 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote: Hi Tarun On Wed, 18 Apr 2012, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti wrote: That' right, I confirmed that clk_get(NULL, fck) does not work. Yes, you and Benoît are right, I should have looked more closely at what was being patched

Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: OMAP2+: dmtimer: cleanup iclk usage

2012-04-16 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Hiremath, Vaibhav hvaib...@ti.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 17:55:24, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti wrote: We do not use iclk anywhere in the dmtimer driver and so removing it. Hence removing the timer iclk entries from OMAP4 clkdev table as well. Signed-off

Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: OMAP2+: dmtimer: cleanup iclk usage

2012-04-16 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote: Hi Tarun, by the way, On Mon, 16 Apr 2012, Tarun Kanti DebBarma wrote: We do not use iclk anywhere in the dmtimer driver and so removing it. Hence removing the timer iclk entries from OMAP4 clkdev table as well.

Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: OMAP2+: dmtimer: cleanup related to devm API and clk usage

2012-04-16 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Hiremath, Vaibhav hvaib...@ti.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 17:55:22, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti wrote: The devm API usage in probe() simplifies error handling operation. Since iclk is not used in the driver it is removed from wherever not needed. The fclk

Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: OMAP: dmtimer: Use devm_ API and do some cleanup in probe()

2012-04-16 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 8:32 PM, Shubhrajyoti shubhrajy...@ti.com wrote: On Monday 16 April 2012 05:55 PM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma wrote: Replace the regular kzalloc and ioremap with the devm_ equivalent to simplify error handling. We don't need kree() anymore in omap_dm_timer_remove(). Also

Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: remove redundant sysconfig context restore

2012-04-11 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 6:04 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com writes: Since hwmod framework now manages sysconfig context save/restore there is no more need to touch this register in driver. Hence, remove restore of sysconfig register in

Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] spi/omap: Remove bus_num usage for instance index

2012-03-28 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Shubhrajyoti D shubhrajy...@ti.com wrote: From: Benoit Cousson b-cous...@ti.com bus_num was used to reference the mcspi controller instance in a fixed array. Remove this array and store this information directly inside drvdata structure. bus_num is now just

Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] ARM: OMAP1: boards: Fix OMAP_GPIO_IRQ usage with gpio_to_irq()

2012-03-28 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Olof Johansson o...@lixom.net wrote: Hi, Sorry for the slow reply, I noticed this when dealing with merge conflicts pulling in this patch and others from Tony. On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:06 AM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com wrote: With dynamic

Re: [PATCH v4 RESEND 6/7] gpio/omap: fix incorrect update to context.irqenable1

2012-03-21 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com writes: On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:10 AM, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: Tarun Kanti DebBarma

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] ARM: OMAP: boards: changes to support dynamic irq alloc

2012-03-20 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Cousson, Benoit b-cous...@ti.com wrote: On 3/20/2012 12:39 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: * Cousson, Benoitb-cous...@ti.com  [120319 16:00]: Hi Tony, On 3/19/2012 8:17 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: * Tarun Kanti DebBarmatarun.ka...@ti.com   [120319 05:09]: These

Re: [PATCH v4 RESEND 6/7] gpio/omap: fix incorrect update to context.irqenable1

2012-03-20 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com writes: In _enable_gpio_irqbank() when bank-regs-set_irqenable is valid, gpio_mask can be directly set by writing to set_irqenable register without overwriting current value. In order

Re: [PATCH v4 RESEND 6/7] gpio/omap: fix incorrect update to context.irqenable1

2012-03-20 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:10 AM, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com writes: In _enable_gpio_irqbank() when bank-regs-set_irqenable is valid, gpio_mask can be directly set

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] ARM: OMAP: boards: changes to support dynamic irq alloc

2012-03-19 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Shilimkar, Santosh santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com wrote: These two patches incorporate changes to OMAP1 and OMAP2 platforms s/two/four I guess that's what you mean since there are 4

Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] gpio/omap: Some more driver cleanup and fixes

2012-03-19 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 6:07 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com writes: The cleanup is mostly getting rid of redundant fields in struct gpio_bank{} as we already have them as part of bank-context now. Also, remove un-used variable from

Re: [PATCH 0/2] omap: board file changes to support dynamic irq alloc

2012-03-16 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Cousson, Benoit b-cous...@ti.com wrote: Hi Tarun, On 3/16/2012 1:24 PM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma wrote: These two patches incorporate changes to OMAP1 and OMAP2 platforms board files whereby older references to OMAP_GPIO_IRQ macro are now replaced with

Re: GPIO abort on 3630/Zoom3

2012-03-14 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 3:35 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: Tarun, Can you investigate an abort during boot on 3630/Zoom3? Both Tony and I are seeing the abort below on 3630/Zoom3.  I'm using arm-soc/for-next and Tony is using linux-next, but we see the same abort. The crash looks

Re: [PATCH v3 11/13] gpio/omap: fix dataout register overwrite in _set_gpio_dataout_*

2012-03-13 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:24 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com writes: In the existing _set_gpio_dataout_*() implementation, the dataout register is overwritten every time the function is called. This is not intended behavior because that would end

Re: [PATCH v3 11/13] gpio/omap: fix dataout register overwrite in _set_gpio_dataout_*

2012-03-13 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:33 AM, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:24 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com writes: In the existing _set_gpio_dataout_*() implementation, the dataout register is overwritten every

Re: [PATCH v3 11/13] gpio/omap: fix dataout register overwrite in _set_gpio_dataout_*

2012-03-13 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:03 PM, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:33 AM, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:24 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com writes

Re: [PATCH v3 11/13] gpio/omap: fix dataout register overwrite in _set_gpio_dataout_*

2012-03-13 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com writes: On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:03 PM, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:33 AM, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com wrote: On Tue

Re: [PATCH v3 00/13] gpio/omap: Some more driver cleanup and fixes

2012-03-12 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com writes: The cleanup is mostly getting rid of redundant fields in struct gpio_bank{} as we already have them as part of bank-context now. Also, remove un-used variable from

Re: [PATCH v3 00/13] gpio/omap: Some more driver cleanup and fixes

2012-03-12 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 1:23 AM, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com writes: The cleanup is mostly getting rid of redundant fields in struct gpio_bank{} as we already have

Re: [PATCH v3 00/13] gpio/omap: Some more driver cleanup and fixes

2012-03-12 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 1:38 AM, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 1:23 AM, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com writes: The cleanup

Re: [PATCH v3 00/13] gpio/omap: Some more driver cleanup and fixes

2012-03-12 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote: On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:28:42 -0700, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com writes: [...] Oops... I am sorry. I was in the process of updating the branch with latest comments

Re: [PATCH v3 13/13] gpio/omap: fix incorrect update to context.irqenable1

2012-03-12 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:39 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com writes: In _enable_gpio_irqbank() when bank-regs-set_irqenable is valid, gpio_mask can be directly set by writing to set_irqenable register without overwriting current value. Ouch.  

Re: [PATCH v3 05/13] gpio/omap: get rid of retrigger variable in gpio_irq_handler

2012-03-09 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com wrote: This local variable is just assigned zero and then OR'ed with isr. It does not appear to serve any purpose and so removing it. Missed following comments from Kevin given in v2. Sorry about that. I have updated the

Re: [PATCH v3 12/13] gpio/omap: fix incorrect context restore logic in omap_gpio_runtime_resume

2012-03-09 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Shilimkar, Santosh santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 4:58 AM, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Santosh Shilimkar santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote: On Wednesday 07 March 2012 12:16 PM, Tarun

Re: [PATCH v3 10/13] gpio/omap: fix missing dataout context save in _set_gpio_dataout_reg

2012-03-07 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Santosh Shilimkar santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote: On Wednesday 07 March 2012 12:16 PM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma wrote: There are two functions, _set_gpio_dataout_reg() and _set_gpio_dataout_mask() which writes to dataout register and the dataout context must be

Re: [PATCH v3 12/13] gpio/omap: fix incorrect context restore logic in omap_gpio_runtime_resume

2012-03-07 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Santosh Shilimkar santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote: On Wednesday 07 March 2012 12:16 PM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma wrote: In omap_gpio_runtime_resume() the context restore should be independent of bank-enabled_non_wakeup_gpios. This was preventing context restore of

Re: [PATCH 3/6] gpio/omap: remove suspend_wakeup field from struct gpio_bank

2012-02-28 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 5:24 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com writes: Since we already have bank-context.wake_en to keep track of gpios which are wakeup enabled, there is no need to have this field any more. Signed-off-by: Tarun Kanti DebBarma

Re: [PATCH 3/6] gpio/omap: remove suspend_wakeup field from struct gpio_bank

2012-02-28 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 3:09 PM, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 5:24 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com writes: Since we already have bank-context.wake_en to keep track of gpios which are wakeup enabled

Re: OMAP gpio handling

2012-02-28 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 1:59 AM, Cousson, Benoit b-cous...@ti.com wrote: + Kevin Hi Tarun, On 2/27/2012 8:11 AM, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti wrote: On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk  wrote: Can someone explain to me this: #define GPIO_INDEX

Re: [PATCH 3/6] gpio/omap: remove suspend_wakeup field from struct gpio_bank

2012-02-28 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com writes: On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 5:24 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com writes: Since we already have bank-context.wake_en to keep track

Re: [PATCH 2/6] gpio/omap: remove saved_wakeup field from struct gpio_bank

2012-02-27 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 5:20 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com writes: There is no more need to have saved_wakeup. Instead we can use context.wake_en which holds the current wakeup enable register context. This also means that the read from wakeup

Re: [PATCH 4/6] gpio/omap: get rid of retrigger variable in gpio_irq_handler

2012-02-27 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com writes: This local variable is just assigned zero and then OR'ed with isr. It does not appear to serve any purpose and so removing it. Signed-off-by: Tarun Kanti DebBarma

Re: OMAP gpio handling

2012-02-26 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote: Can someone explain to me this: #define GPIO_INDEX(bank, gpio) (gpio % bank-width) #define GPIO_BIT(bank, gpio) (1 GPIO_INDEX(bank, gpio)) static int _get_gpio_datain(struct gpio_bank *bank, int gpio) {

Re: [RFC PATCH] gpio/omap: Fix IRQ handling for SPARSE_IRQ

2012-02-24 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Cousson, Benoit b-cous...@ti.com wrote: + Tarun On 2/24/2012 12:08 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: * Cousson, Benoitb-cous...@ti.com  [120223 14:14]: The GPIO driver is still relying on internal OMAP IRQ defines that are not relevant anymore if OMAP is built with

Re: [RFC PATCH] gpio/omap: Fix IRQ handling for SPARSE_IRQ

2012-02-24 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
Hi Benoit, On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 4:07 PM, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com wrote: On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Cousson, Benoit b-cous...@ti.com wrote: + Tarun On 2/24/2012 12:08 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: * Cousson, Benoitb-cous...@ti.com  [120223 14:14]: The GPIO driver

Re: [RFC PATCH] gpio/omap: Fix IRQ handling for SPARSE_IRQ

2012-02-24 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Cousson, Benoit b-cous...@ti.com wrote: On 2/24/2012 2:24 PM, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti wrote: Hi Benoit, On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 4:07 PM, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com  wrote: On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Cousson, Benoitb-cous...@ti.com  wrote

Re: [RFC PATCH] gpio/omap: Fix IRQ handling for SPARSE_IRQ

2012-02-24 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
Hi Benoit, On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Cousson, Benoit b-cous...@ti.com wrote: On 2/24/2012 2:53 PM, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti wrote: On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Cousson, Benoitb-cous...@ti.com  wrote: On 2/24/2012 2:24 PM, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti wrote: Hi Benoit, On Fri, Feb 24

Re: [PATCH] gpio/omap: fix wakeups on level-triggered GPIOs

2012-02-22 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:31 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: While both level- and edge-triggered GPIOs are capable of generating interrupts, only edge-triggered GPIOs are capable of generating a module-level wakeup to the PRCM (c.f. 34xx NDA TRM section 25.5.3.2.) In order to ensure

Re: [PATCH 2/5] gpio/omap: Use devm_ API and add request_mem_region

2012-02-15 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
Hi Benoit, On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Benoit Cousson b-cous...@ti.com wrote: Replace the regular kzalloc and ioremap with the devm_ equivalent to simplify error handling. Add the missing devm_request_mem_region to reserve the region used by the driver. Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson

Re: [PATCH 1/5] gpio/omap: Remove bank-id information and misc cleanup

2012-02-15 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Benoit Cousson b-cous...@ti.com wrote: The driver does not need anymore any id to identify the GPIO instance. Remove every occurence of the bank-id inside the driver. Remove two trailing spaces. Add a dev variable for better readability in probe. Remove

Re: [PATCH 2/5] gpio/omap: Use devm_ API and add request_mem_region

2012-02-15 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote: On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:11:52AM +0530, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti wrote: Hi Benoit, On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Benoit Cousson b-cous...@ti.com wrote: Replace the regular kzalloc and ioremap with the devm_

Re: [PATCH v9 00/25] gpio/omap: driver cleanup and fixes

2012-02-12 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 1:25 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com writes: [...] ..but are there also some patches in your series that should also be applied separately as fixes for the -rc cycle? IMO, there aren't any things in this series that fall into

Re: [PATCH v9 00/25] gpio/omap: driver cleanup and fixes

2012-02-06 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
Kevin, On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 2:31 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: Hi Tarun, Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com writes: The following changes since commit 62aa2b537c6f5957afd98e29f96897419ed5ebab:   Linus Torvalds (1):         Linux 3.3-rc2 are available in the git

Re: [PATCH v9 00/31] gpio/omap: driver cleanup and fixes

2011-12-16 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Shilimkar, Santosh santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote: Tarun, On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 1:50 AM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com wrote: This series is continuation of cleanup of OMAP GPIO driver and fixes. The cleanup include getting rid of cpu_is_* checks

Re: [PATCH v8 REPOST 17/24] gpio/omap: fix debounce clock handling

2011-12-10 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 7:27 PM, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 7:19 PM, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com wrote: On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com writes: Currently

Re: [PATCH v8 REPOST 17/24] gpio/omap: fix debounce clock handling

2011-12-05 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 7:19 PM, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com wrote: On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com writes: Currently debounce clock state is not tracked in the system. ?? bank-dbck_enable_mask ? As I

Re: [PATCH v8 00/24] gpio/omap: driver cleanup and fixes

2011-11-28 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 3:14 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com writes: This series is continuation of cleanup of OMAP GPIO driver and fixes. Using this series on 3630/Zoom3, UART wakeups no longer work from suspend.  That suggests that GPIO wakeups

Re: [PATCH v8 00/24] gpio/omap: driver cleanup and fixes

2011-11-25 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 2:57 PM, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com wrote: On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 3:14 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com writes: This series is continuation of cleanup of OMAP GPIO driver and fixes. Using this series on 3630

Re: [PATCH v8 24/24] gpio/omap: handle set_dataout reg capable IP on restore

2011-11-23 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 5:35 PM, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com wrote: On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com writes: From: Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com GPIO IP revisions such as those used in OMAP4 have

Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: dmtimer: fix missing content/correction in low-power mode support

2011-11-23 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:12 PM, Ramirez Luna, Omar omar.rami...@ti.com wrote: Hi, On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com wrote: Since omap_dm_timer_write_reg/__omap_dm_timer_write is now modified to use timer-func_base OCP_CFG should not use this wrapper

Re: [PATCH v8 24/24] gpio/omap: handle set_dataout reg capable IP on restore

2011-11-23 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com writes: On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 5:35 PM, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com wrote: On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: Tarun Kanti DebBarma

Re: [PATCH v16 09/12] OMAP: dmtimer: low-power mode support

2011-11-17 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 6:23 AM, Omar Ramirez Luna or.r...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:18 AM, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com wrote: ... My use case is as follows: DSP sends a mailbox message to ARM, this triggers a tasklet in mailbox for processing the message

Re: [PATCH v16 09/12] OMAP: dmtimer: low-power mode support

2011-11-15 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:27 PM, Omar Ramirez Luna or.r...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Tarun, On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 6:30 AM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com wrote: Clock is enabled only when timer is started and disabled when the the timer is stopped. Therefore before accessing registers

Re: [PATCH v8 16/24] gpio/omap: use pm-runtime framework

2011-11-07 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com writes: Call runtime pm APIs pm_runtime_get_sync() and pm_runtime_put_sync() for enabling/disabling clocks appropriately. Remove syscore_ops and instead use SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS macro.

Re: [PATCH v8 REPOST 21/24] gpio/omap: save and restore debounce registers

2011-11-07 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com writes: From: Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com GPIO debounce registers need to be saved and restored for proper functioning of driver. OK. To save the registers, we cannot cut the clock

Re: [PATCH v8 24/24] gpio/omap: handle set_dataout reg capable IP on restore

2011-11-07 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com writes: From: Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com GPIO IP revisions such as those used in OMAP4 have a set_dataout while the previous revisions used a single dataout register. Depending on

Re: [PATCH v8 REPOST 17/24] gpio/omap: fix debounce clock handling

2011-11-07 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com writes: Currently debounce clock state is not tracked in the system. ?? bank-dbck_enable_mask ? As I understand, this only tells which all GPIOs have debounce timeout enabled. But,

Re: [PATCH v8 00/24] gpio/omap: driver cleanup and fixes

2011-11-04 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 3:14 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com writes: This series is continuation of cleanup of OMAP GPIO driver and fixes. Using this series on 3630/Zoom3, UART wakeups no longer work from suspend.  That suggests that GPIO wakeups

Re: [PATCH 0/2] ARM: OMAP2+: timer fixes / cleanup

2011-10-10 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 11:10 AM, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com wrote: On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Cousson, Benoit b-cous...@ti.com wrote: Hi Tarun, On 10/4/2011 11:20 PM, Cousson, Benoit wrote: Hi Tony, Here is the series to fix the warning and remove the redundant latency

Re: [PATCH 0/2] ARM: OMAP2+: timer fixes / cleanup

2011-10-09 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Cousson, Benoit b-cous...@ti.com wrote: Hi Tarun, On 10/4/2011 11:20 PM, Cousson, Benoit wrote: Hi Tony, Here is the series to fix the warning and remove the redundant latency structure that be removed since the timer runtime PM adaptation was just pulled.

Re: [PATCH v7 00/26] gpio/omap: driver cleanup and fixes

2011-09-27 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 4:40 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com writes: [...] As pointed out by Kevin, debounce clock was not getting disabled. In my testing I was somehow grepping CORE power domain instead of PER power domain and hence missed

Re: [PATCH v7 00/26] gpio/omap: driver cleanup and fixes

2011-09-27 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com writes: On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 4:40 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote: DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com writes: [...] As pointed out by Kevin, debounce clock

Re: [PATCH v16 00/12] OMAP: dmtimer: adaptation to platform_driver

2011-09-26 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote: * DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com [110923 01:54]: Hi Tony, [...] I've applied these into dmtimer branch with some changes to simplify things further. I've also merged it into linux-omap master branch

Re: [PATCH v7 00/26] gpio/omap: driver cleanup and fixes

2011-09-26 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
[...] - Added the debounce clock fix in the end. Thanks.  Glad you found and fixed it. Rather than add this patch as a fix at the end, I prefer if the problem is fixed in the original patches that added/created the problem. Sure. I will put the changes in respective patches. -- Tarun [...]

  1   2   3   4   >