This patch updates the virtual root hub code, resolving a small
feature omission and making further use of those new feature bit
declarations in .
Please merge.
- Dave
The patch lets HCDs report the root hub remote wakeup feature to usbcore
through config descriptors, and lets usbcore say whether
To whom it may concern,
When plugging in a SoundBlaster Audigy 2NX into my USB port in kernel
2.4.21 I receive the following messages from dmesg. Any help would be
greatly appreciated.
Thank you
Evan
hub.c: new USB device 00:07.2-1, assigned address 2
usbaudio: device 2 audiocontrol interface 0
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, David Brownell wrote:
> And maybe I'll have a chance to look at the patch, not just
> that one issue you raised? :)
Please do! The more eyes, the better. (And don't forget the other issues
I raised.)
> Alan Stern wrote:
> > Isn't that one of the major functions of the b
I got the following in my dmesg with 2.6.5-mm5, I don't think I got this
in 2.6.4 kernels. The camera is a Casio EXslim, EX-M1, 1.2 Megapixel
Camera.
It seems to work ok, I can download pics no prob, but message in dmesg
said to send it in, so here it is, hope it helps.
usb 2-1: new full speed
> Well, maybe not "necessary" ... if every reference to registers or
> the in-memory data structures could be switched at compile time
> from normal to big-endian, it could also be done at run-time.
With a signicant runtime cost & ugliness, but yes
> But given what you said about chip errata and
On Tuesday 13 April 2004 20:58, David Brownell wrote:
> wim delvaux wrote:
> > The Ipaq runs the familiar 0.7.2 version.
>
> Did that work well for you in some earlier configuration?
Yes it did but I had problems with USB and insertion of devices.
Sometimes it worked sometimes it d
Hi,
> 2. What precisely are you doing to cause this? Merely loading the
> driver?Ifconfig?
> I called the FILL_BULK_URB, then I called the submit_urb function. After
> that, I got the error.
In which function? Do you submit the URB in probe() ?
What does usb_submit_urb() return?
> 4. Did you try
Dear Oliver,
1. please don't send zipped attachments to the list
Ok. I am so sorry about it.
2. What precisely are you doing to cause this? Merely loading the
driver?Ifconfig?
I called the FILL_BULK_URB, then I called the submit_urb function. After
that, I got the error.
3. Which kernel version?
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 12:35:45 +0200
Duncan Sands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Greg, here is the same thing for 2.4.
Looks OK although it's not in 2.6 yet. I'll keep around in my tree.
-- Pete
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux
tj wrote:
If usb-uhci is not going to be 2.6, I guess the Saitek joy stick will
not be supported in 2.6.
Guessing is a bad idea. Try it on 2.6.5-mm, then see if it works; and
report your results.
Is this done just to totally confuse and bewilder poor souls like me? :-)
Actually, the idea is that
Duncan Sands wrote:
proc_setintf contains the following line:
if (interface->dev.driver) {
Doesn't that mean that a lock needs to be
taken to protect against a change in the driver?
Looks like it. The patches I sent in (now in Greg's tree and -mm)
didn't cover all the missing locks in us
If usb-uhci is not going to be 2.6, I guess the Saitek joy stick will
not be supported in 2.6.
IHMO differences like this are what is causing Linux to have problems
cracking the desktop
Randy.Dunlap wrote:
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 13:45:47 -0400 tj wrote:
| Well, I finally got the damn Saitek work
And maybe I'll have a chance to look at the patch, not just
that one issue you raised? :)
Alan Stern wrote:
On Mon, 12 Apr 2004, David Brownell wrote:
Hmm, could you elaborate? The bus rwsem is only to protect
Capsule summary: you're assuming a "topology change lock".
Isn't that one of the majo
Matthias Saou wrote:
Hi,
I reported this problem on the fedora-devel-list, but someone suggested I
should also here, as I would probably get more information about it.
The kernel mentioned is in fact based on 2.6.3-bk5 with a few Red Hat
specific patches.
Does 2.6.5-mm behave?
Matthias
--
From
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
In order to deal with both a PCI OHCI and the on-chip one, it would
be necessary to have 2 instances of the driver built with different
register access macros (and different macros for accessing in-memory
data structures as well since those are big endian with that ch
wim delvaux wrote:
The Ipaq runs the familiar 0.7.2 version.
Did that work well for you in some earlier configuration?
When the system boots (system being any of the above) the usb0 is properly set
up (ifconfig shows nice info)
When I up the interface (usbf) on my ipaq (which uses dns and dhcp)
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, Matthew Dharm wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 12:39:32PM +0200, Johan Braeken wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I was investigating very slow USB speed from my digital camera (24MB in 30
> > minutes) and stumbled upon this message in the logs:
> >
> > usb-storage: This device (
Am Dienstag, 13. April 2004 12:21 schrieb LEUNG Kin Yip:
> Dear Sir/Madam,
>
> I am a student in Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. I am
> so sorry to bother all of you. But I face a problem that I can't solve a
> long time and I would really want to get some help. I am doing a project
Hi, All,
I hope I can get some help on this one:
I successfully configure the kernel to support usb keyboard on an embedded
device.
I put printk in the function handle_scancode() in keyboard.c and it prints
everytime when I push a key on the usb keyboard.
I try to write an application monitor t
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 13:45:47 -0400 tj wrote:
| Well, I finally got the damn Saitek working. In looking at module files
| I noticed one called usb-uhci and loaded it instead of uhci and lo and
| behold the damn Saitek worked.
Good to hear it.
| Now, hot plug originally loaded uhci, so kept loa
Well, I finally got the damn Saitek working. In looking at module files
I noticed one called usb-uhci and loaded it instead of uhci and lo and
behold the damn Saitek worked.
Now, hot plug originally loaded uhci, so kept loading it. So, my
questions now are:
What is the difference between usb-
The info I read about it being supported was from a year or two ago. So,
this is a newer kernel then would have been used back then. If it is not
working with this kernel, 2.4.22, what would cause it to work with a
newer kernel. Which newer kernel supports it exactly?
tj
Duncan Sands wrote:
w
> work under Linux, Slackware 9.1 kernel 2.4.22. I tested it under XP and
> it works fine. I also have an old Thrustmaster Top Gun USB working under
> Linux, so I know my Linux USB is working. Here are the details.
Try a more recent kernel.
Duncan.
-
proc_setintf contains the following line:
if (interface->dev.driver) {
Doesn't that mean that a lock needs to be
taken to protect against a change in the driver?
Thanks,
Duncan.
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutori
On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 12:39:32PM +0200, Johan Braeken wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I was investigating very slow USB speed from my digital camera (24MB in 30
> minutes) and stumbled upon this message in the logs:
>
> usb-storage: This device (0686,4006,0001 S 06 P 50) has an unneeded SubClass
> ent
I hope I can be helped here on teh developers list because I have
already tried the users list with no success.
I have acquired a Saitek Cyborg USB Gold joystick and I cannot get it to
work under Linux, Slackware 9.1 kernel 2.4.22. I tested it under XP and
it works fine. I also have an old Thru
Hi All,
Be honest, I am new to USB stuff on Linux.
Here is the problem I run into:
I try to compile USB Keyboard Support into Kernel for an embedded device.
So I turn on the following options:
1. CONFIG_USB_HID
2. CONFIG_USB_HIDDEV
3. CONFIG_INPUT
4. CONFIG_INPUT_KEYBDEV
* CONFIG_INPUT_EVDE
On Mon, 12 Apr 2004, David Brownell wrote:
> >>Hmm, could you elaborate? The bus rwsem is only to protect
>
> Capsule summary: you're assuming a "topology change lock".
Isn't that one of the major functions of the bus rwsem?
> OK, you're strictly correct from the driver model perspective,
> b
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
Delivery failed for the following recipients(s):
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The message you sent contained an attachment which the recipient has chosen to block.
Usually these sort of attachments are blocked to prevent malicious sof
Hi Greg, this patch bumps the speedtouch driver's version number.
It also adds the version number to the module description, so people
can see it with modinfo. I also added a MODULE_VERSION line (why?
because it was there...) The patch is against your 2.6 kernel tree.
speedtch.c |5 +++--
1
Hi Greg, this patch fixes a memory leak in the speedtouch driver.
The leak occurs when the ATM layer submits a skbuff for transmission,
but the driver rejects it (because the device has been unplugged for
example). The ATM layer requires the driver to free the skbuff in this
case. The patch is ag
Hi Greg, this causes the speedtouch driver to output non-verbose
debugging messages if the kernel was configured with CONFIG_USB_DEBUG.
The patch is against your 2.6 kernel tree.
speedtch.c |4
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff -Nru a/drivers/usb/misc/speedtch.c b/drivers/usb/misc/
Hi Greg, here is the same thing for 2.4 (without the MODULE_VERSION
line).
speedtch.c |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff -Nru a/drivers/usb/speedtch.c b/drivers/usb/speedtch.c
--- a/drivers/usb/speedtch.cTue Apr 13 12:32:27 2004
+++ b/drivers/usb/speedtch.c
Hi Greg, here is the same thing for 2.4.
speedtch.c |4
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff -Nru a/drivers/usb/speedtch.c b/drivers/usb/speedtch.c
--- a/drivers/usb/speedtch.cTue Apr 13 12:32:11 2004
+++ b/drivers/usb/speedtch.cTue Apr 13 12:32:11 2004
@@ -83,6 +83,10 @@
#de
Hi Greg, here is the same thing for 2.4.
speedtch.c | 42 +++---
1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff -Nru a/drivers/usb/speedtch.c b/drivers/usb/speedtch.c
--- a/drivers/usb/speedtch.cTue Apr 13 12:32:18 2004
+++ b/drivers/usb/speedt
i use zyxel uno modem (usb 56k cdc-acm modem, i think it present only
on russian market). after two or more hours of connection this modem
can hang-up - all leds are on and modem don't respond. i need do power
off to reset modem.
question - it's possible do software turn power off/on on usb device
Dear all,
I was investigating very slow USB speed from my digital camera (24MB in 30
minutes) and stumbled upon this message in the logs:
usb-storage: This device (0686,4006,0001 S 06 P 50) has an unneeded SubClass
entry in unusual_devs.h
Please send a copy of this message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
37 matches
Mail list logo
