://lkml.org/lkml/2006/2/18/204
Submitter : Tom Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Handled-By : Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Status : unknown
Jiri, why did you create a kernel.org bugzilla bug with almost no
information in it?
Anyway, this is th
- Original Message -
From: "Alan Stern" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 10:26 AM
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] question about gadget file storage
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005, tom wrote:
Hi all,
I a
it didn't not support this
configuration. The gadget will ignore this request but the host is still
waiting for the finish of status stage. So , is this file storage of gadget
be implemented more perfectly ?
Regards,
TOM
---
This
Thanks so much! I think 'gadget' is the keyword I was looking for here;
it has made my google searches a lot more productive.
Best regards,
Tom
- --
Centre for Electronic Nano-Systems (CENS)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: U
ta
between the busses)?
Thanks in advance for any pointers!
Regards,
Tom
- --
Centre for Electronic Nano-Systems (CENS)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
i
inish this driver to a high standard but would
need renumeration for their time then that may be possible (stress on
the word 'may'), they should contact me directly.
Tom.
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read hones
Trying to bring a UDP driver I've been developing on 2.4 up to date on
the 2.6 line, however I am encountering some errors when usb_gadget.h
is imported:
CC drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.o
In file included from drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c:21:
include/linux/usb_gadget.h:517: error: field `de
g sent and
received by the host? I'd prefer some software solution of this kind
as opposed to buying an expensive bus analyser.
Thanks,
Tom.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your bu
linux branch or should i beworking against the usb-gadget
branch?
Any help as to the process I should use for development and submission
would be much appreciated.
Thanks, Tom.
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on
Could someone please please please explain what the proper exit procedure is
for the usb disconnect function.
By the way Im using a 2.4.x kernel at the moment.
Thanks in advance
Tom.
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux
over 2.4/2.5/2.6 kernels?
Tom Mander
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at
Hello List!
My experience with 2.6.0 is a nearly success story but I'm stuck with
printer fault.
I've installed lexmark drivers for Z35 - everything works with 2.4.20
kernel. But with 2.6.0 printer is strangely behaving - when I start
print job the printer powers on, gets paper, and starts t
0, lun 0
--
Tom Felker
"Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about
Exchange Server next.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a si
t == -ECONNRESET) {
ret = USB_STOR_TRANSPORT_ABORTED;
goto out;
}
@@ -1213,7 +1213,7 @@
result = usb_stor_clear_halt(us, pipe);
/* if the command was aborted, indicate that */
- if (result == -ENOENT) {
+ if (result == -ECONNRESET) {
ret = USB_STOR_TRANSPORT_ABORTED;
} else {
ret = USB_STOR_TRANSPORT_ERROR;
--
Tom Collins
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on 2/13/03 4:50 PM, David Brownell at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Tom Clark wrote:
>> Hi Dave, et al.,
>> I'm using this patch and while I've seen a little bit of improvement with
>> the VT6202, it still hangs fairly often while doing sustained mass storage
>
>
Hi Dave, et al.,
I'm using this patch and while I've seen a little bit of improvement with
the VT6202, it still hangs fairly often while doing sustained mass storage
transactions. On the other hand, my NEC and Philips boards haven't hiccuped
once. I'm wondering if we should hold out hope that the
know what to do with that result code?
Any ideas why the error handling for unexpected errors isn't able to
reset the device?
--
Tom Collins
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies!
Can't aff
d
drives mount just fine (Spd=480) under the EHCI driver.
--
Tom Collins
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte
are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE
Thawte SSL guide
far drivers/usb reaches out of its directory
and impacts other drivers? I'll probably start experimenting later
tomorrow, but thought I'd seek out some advice before doing so.
--
Tom Collins
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.NET ema
generic_ffs was undefined, including linux/bitops.h solved that. Don't
know if this is the best place/way to do it, but it works. I'm
cross-compiling for MIPS, so let me know if it's actually an error in
include/asm-mips.
--- drivers/usb/hcd/ehci-hcd-orig.c Tue Jan 14 16:52:53 2003
+++ dr
not. Alan's change solves that. Stripping the 2.5.50
kernel check isn't necessary.
-Tom
http://www.kernel.org/diff/
diffview.cgi?css=%2Fdiff%2Fdiff.css;file=%2Fpub%2Flinux%2Fkernel%2Fpeopl
e%2Falan%2Flinux-2.4%2F2.4.21%2Fpatch-2.4.21-pre3-ac4.gz;z=347
--- linux.21pre3/drivers/usb
es.
With some quick grep'ing, I think this patch is wrong, since only PPC
doesn't have its ide_fix_driveid() as a non-inline. Paul, what do you
think about moving ppc_generic_fix_driveid() out of
arch/ppc/kernel/setup.c and into include/asm-ppc/ide.h ?
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
h
activity for a period of time. This is quite easy to see as I
>have distributed net running so my CPU usage is always near 100%.
>
>I have been seeing this behaviour for a while but seems easiest to reproduce
>when I do alot of IO over the USB.
At 3:23 PM -0700 7/10/02, Tom Collins
At 9:58 AM -0700 7/11/02, David Brownell wrote:
>Tom Collins wrote:
>>I'm working with some USB drives and trying to troubleshoot a few
>>problems. MIPS hardware, kernel 2.4.19-rc1 (for the EHCI driver).
>
>Out of curiousity -- big-endian or little-endian MIPS?
>(O
t port number am I
actually plugging into? It's not in the kernel messages, but my
serial console reported "hub.c: port 3 over-current change" followed
by "hub.c: port 2 over-current change".
Does the drive draw too much power to use
at Dave M has said
about it tho.
But if someone needs to have this working for them right now, this
shoudl tell you what you need. :)
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Stuff,
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 03:26:24PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 03:18:52PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 03:09:53PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 11:42:14AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > Since I'
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 10:29:42AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 09:36:42AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 09:29:47AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 12:02:52AM +0200, Jeroen Vreeken wrote:
> > > > Is
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 03:09:53PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 11:42:14AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > Since I've been looking at the serial stuff again, I just remembered
> > that the USB serial stuff has similar (ab)uses of dep_mbool/dep_tristate
> >
Since I've been looking at the serial stuff again, I just remembered
that the USB serial stuff has similar (ab)uses of dep_mbool/dep_tristate
that drivers/usb/Config.in used to have.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
= drivers/usb/serial/Config.in 1.13 vs e
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 11:05:00AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 11:04:04AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 10:29:42AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 09:36:42AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jun 12,
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 10:29:42AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 09:36:42AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 09:29:47AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 12:02:52AM +0200, Jeroen Vreeken wrote:
> > > > Is
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 09:29:47AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 12:02:52AM +0200, Jeroen Vreeken wrote:
> > Is it possible to add some printk() calls in the probe function to
> > determine where it goes wrong?
[snip]
> And the prink I inserted at the top of
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 12:02:52AM +0200, Jeroen Vreeken wrote:
> On 2002.06.11 23:54:42 +0200 Tom Rini wrote:
> > I'm seeing the following oops when I plug in my old Kensington video cam
> > (se401 driver used to work, but it's been 6+ months since I tried):
[sni
SE401 usb camera driver version 0.23 registering
usb.c: registered new driver se401
mice: PS/2 mouse device common for all mice
This is all from 2.4.19-pre10,
o test the se401 driver. I think this
isn't quite right. The MODULE tests should go, but the PROC_FS &&
VIDEO_PROC_FS tests should be moved up to catch videodev_proc_create().
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 08:00:11PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Montag, 10. Juni 2002 19:46 schrieb Tom Rini:
> > On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 07:33:18PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > > this change set against 2.4 introduces a #define to be used by the
> > > drive
27;t do SMP. And this isn't
just a USB problem either, USB is just the current good example.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
Currently, drivers/usb/core/drivers.c includes to get at
. The following includes directly.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
= drivers/usb/core/drivers.c 1.7 vs edited =
--- 1.7/drivers/usb/core/drivers.c Fri Apr 19 00:35:36 2002
+++ edited/drivers/usb/core
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 12:53:33PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> Tom Rini wrote:
> >Hello. I'm having a problem with 2.5.18, OHCI-HCD and the ACM driver on
> >PPC.
> >Right now my Elsa Microlink 56k modem isn't recognized again after it's
> >unplugged
ortstatus [1] = 0x00020100 PESC PPS
hub.c: port 1, portstatus 100, change 2, 12 Mb/s
hub.c: hub / port 1 enable change, status 100
hub.c: port 2, portstatus 303, change 0, 1.5 Mb/s
# Finally unplug ACM again.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http:
Brad Hards wrote:
> On Tue, 7 May 2002 04:21, ..tom wrote:
>> Brad Hards wrote:
>>> The ifeel mouse is not boot protoocol compatible (unlike most other
>>> mice - look closely at the descriptors in each case)
>>
>> So what is this, then? (from Evgeniy&#
--
Tom Rushworth
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
ultiple platforms.
And, ick, arch/$(ARCH)/drivers is OK now? We do that on PPC right now
for 8xx/82xx, and I'm going to try and get rid of that in 2.5.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
*
*
* USB port drivers
*
*
* USB Serial Converter support
*
*
* USB Miscellaneous drivers
*
> Your option (b) used to be the way the file was, before we started
> having better dependancy usage in the Config.in file :)
Better, but more annoying, depe
ng is possible for both cases, the host controller
driver just picks the next transfer in the queue when the first
completes.
Just my $0.0001
..tom
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
ith VIA boards
in all revisions of Windows, there's always a few of them which *don't
work* (in my particular case, Interrupt out, but it seems that "it"
happens with all kinds of transfers). If you have some time to waste,
take a l
t go and break
things like ARM and PPC 8xx USB which work outside the kernel and aren't
in the slightest like x86, but can be made to work now. I was just
making sure no one forgot about 'em :)
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
_
e with 2.5 and 2.4 being
different regardless. This happend (generically) in 2.2 a few times to
make backporting easier, yes?
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 10:16:32PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 11. Dezember 2001 21:53 schrieb Tom Rini:
> > On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 09:42:02PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > > > IMHO, since the only safe thing to do across all architectures is to
> >
et. So perhaps
we shouldn't do anything to 2.4 and backport what 2.5 has when it's
stable.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
on 12/3/01 3:53 PM, David Brownell at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Actually, it's more along the lines of what Johannes outlined. Running the
>> same transfers through a CATC USB Chief, I can see that a successful
>> transfer looks like this :
>>
>> SETUP
>> OUT
>
> That's what I was hoping did
Actually, it's more along the lines of what Johannes outlined. Running the
same transfers through a CATC USB Chief, I can see that a successful
transfer looks like this :
SETUP
OUT
This looks the exact same way when using a Linux box w/ OHCI and on a
Macintosh (OHCI also).
Using the Linux UHC
I changed uhci.c to not check the size of the transfer buffer before
constructing the status TD (around line 872), so an "out" would be generated
instead, and it works fine now. This doesn't seem like the right fix
though...
Comments?
-tom
_
rs, but not out
yet. I'd be more than happy to try and test these changes, if they go
in.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/list
On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 06:40:36PM -0400, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> Of course, uhci is only used on x86, so all is fine here,
Keep in mind there were (and probably still are) PCI-based UHCI cards.
I've got one around here w/ a VIA chip on it.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.or
heers,
..tom
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
rrupt out is.
Here are two of my old posts which explain things a bit better:
http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/2571/2000/7/0/4005253/
http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/2571/2000/6/0/3966384/
Hope this helps,
..tom
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscrib
main reason for that
is that what used to be TopOfStack isn't the PDO anymore. See details in the
Windows DDK if you are interested.
The only way out is patience, a hex editor and a disassembler to fix the
driver ;)
..tom
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
) Hopefully this
one will get picked up.. BTW, it sort of looks like yours misses a few
things, look at the attached.. (I basically took what printer.c did and
moved it into scanner.[ch]
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
= scanner.c 1.4 vs edited =
--- 1.4/drivers/us
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 04:25:11PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 03:39:11PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > + if (scn->devfs == NULL)
> > + err("scanner%d: device node registration failed", scn_minor);
>
> Make this a "dbg&q
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 04:46:11PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 04:42:45PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > I changed that in the version I use but forgot to do that here as well,
> > sorry. Want me to re-sent w/o this or can you just edit it out? It woul
w-rw1 lp lp 180, 0 Dec 31 1969 /dev/usb/lp0
> >
> > I think the comment is wrong :)
>
> I saw it and thought that allowing users to steal status from
> bidirectional printers is not such a swell idea, s
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 09:01:17PM -0700, Mark McClelland wrote:
> Tom Rini wrote:
>
> > Hello. The attached patch makes the 'normal' USB scanner register w/ devfs.
> > Comments/questions/et al? Thanks..
>
> IIRC, people who had devfs disabled were complaini
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 02:40:08PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> On Monday, 14. May 2001 23:31, Tom Rini wrote:
> > Hello. The attached patch makes the 'normal' USB scanner register w/
> > devfs. Comments/questions/et al? Thanks..
>
> You may pass a null
I was looking at the USB printer driver for a quick how-to on devfs'ing
a driver, and in usblp_probe, the comments above devfs_reigster say:
"Create with perms=664", but there's a missing | S_IROTH in the call so
it creates with 660. So either the comment or the code is wron
Hello. The attached patch makes the 'normal' USB scanner register w/ devfs.
Comments/questions/et al? Thanks..
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
= scanner.c 1.4 vs edited =
--- 1.4/drivers/usb/scanner.c Fri Apr 20 10:17:25 2001
+++ edited/scanner.c
in above mentioned document,
run-time firmware upgrade interface descriptor
> > unknown descriptor type: 07 21 01 13 05 00 04
Table 4.2 in above mentioned document: DFU Functional Descriptor:
0: bLength: 0x07
1: bDescriptorType: 0x21 (DFU Functional)
2: bmAttributes: 0x01 (bit 0 set: bCanDow
Title: FW: [linux-usb-devel] Device availability - seeking contributions and requests
FYI: On USB 2.0 Cards and hubs,
I found two controllers available from IOGear and Belkin. I ordered the
the IOgear card (gic250U, $79.99) last week. It was back ordered but then the
distributor got their
n't
be working?
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
for my own debugging purposes. If you look at the filter's code now,
it determines whether the user data is copied using "Buffered IO" or refered
to using "Direct IO", and retrieves the data using either one or the other
method and prints it in the buffer contents field whic
interface.
Hope this helps,
..tom
- Original Message -
From: "Andy Armstrong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2001 2:36 PM
Subject: [linux-usb-devel] Anyone know what
URB_FUNCTION_SELECT_CONFIGURATION corresponds to
> I'm cur
Title: ehci devel
Hi,
Searching the archives did not reveal a lot for EHCI.
Is there any development going on in this area?
I'd like to provide testing help. I have access to a pdk, an Advisor(soon, waiting for trade in), and a cypress fx2 development kit.
Regards,
TomH
73 matches
Mail list logo
