Re: [linux-usb-devel] BACKPACK USB Adapter

2001-11-16 Thread Wolfgang Mües
On Friday, 16. November 2001 09:36, Brad Hards wrote: [USB device no accepting new address] > Err, some detail? > What kernel, what architecture, what device, what behaviour with the > retries set to 2, what behaviour with the retries set to 3? Sorry Brad, I have to correct myself. I got the s

Re: [linux-usb-devel] BACKPACK USB Adapter

2001-11-16 Thread Brad Hards
Wolfgang Mües wrote: > > On Thursday, 15. November 2001 16:08, Ken Hahn wrote: > > > Brad Hards wrote: > > Yeah, it's about what you are describing. > > > > Something to the effect of: > > usb.c: USB device no accepting new address=6 > > usb.c: USB device no accepting new address=7 > > > > You g

Re: [linux-usb-devel] BACKPACK USB Adapter

2001-11-15 Thread Wolfgang Mües
On Thursday, 15. November 2001 16:08, Ken Hahn wrote: > Brad Hards wrote: > Yeah, it's about what you are describing. > > Something to the effect of: > usb.c: USB device no accepting new address=6 > usb.c: USB device no accepting new address=7 > > You get to see the same thing with the retry's in

Re: [linux-usb-devel] BACKPACK USB Adapter

2001-11-15 Thread Ken Hahn
Brad Hards wrote: > Just a thought: the place where HUB_PROBE_TRIES is used is > usb_hub_port_connect_change(), which calls usb_hub_port_reset(), which in turn > is the source of the "USB device not accepting new address" error. Could we be > falling foul of some marginal condition that is masked

Re: [linux-usb-devel] BACKPACK USB Adapter

2001-11-15 Thread Brad Hards
Ken Hahn wrote: > > Cool, I had wondered if that kinda thing could be/was done (makes much more > sense), but there remains one thing to be resolved. The device still isn't > recognized as I described in the last e-mail unless we up the retrys to 3. > Is it possible to get that changed? I just h

Re: [linux-usb-devel] BACKPACK USB Adapter

2001-11-14 Thread Ken Hahn
Micro Solutions - Original Message - From: "Brad Hards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ken Hahn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 2:14 PM Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] BACKPACK USB Adapter > > Ken Hah

Re: [linux-usb-devel] BACKPACK USB Adapter

2001-11-14 Thread Brad Hards
> Ken Hahn wrote: > I just looked at the usb code and it's changed a little while I was gone. > So, I have a few questions. Some of this was in flux when I was around > before. I was just cleaning up before I got this message, and found a print of your original code. I never managed to make it wo

[linux-usb-devel] BACKPACK USB Adapter

2001-11-14 Thread Ken Hahn
Howdy,Sorry this e-mail is a bit long, but hopefully I'll get all my issues in one e-mail and not have to spam the list with a bunch of questions.Last April (the fourth of April to be exact), I posted some code here that allowed a BACKPACK USB adapter to be used  under Linux.  I began to try