Re: [linux-usb-devel] Much better behaviour with a hub

2005-03-08 Thread Alan Stern
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005, Samuel Colin wrote: > I finally found the source of the error. > Yesterday I made a test by copying a bunch of datas from lacie1 to > lacieroot, and I noticed that this time the errors did not came from > lacieroot as it happened before, but from lacie1... > So today I decided

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Much better behaviour with a hub

2005-03-07 Thread Samuel Colin
The Thu, 3 Mar 2005 22:50:34 +0100 "Gerd v. Egidy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Samuel, > Hello again, > > When issuing a command which I knew produced the errors, I got the > > surprise to see that no usb reset happened when the transfers were made > > through the hub. I tested it several ti

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Much better behaviour with a hub

2005-03-04 Thread Gerd v. Egidy
Hi Samuel, > When issuing a command which I knew produced the errors, I got the surprise > to see that no usb reset happened when the transfers were made through the > hub. I tested it several times, enough so that in the previous > configuration it would have made at least an error, and nothing.

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Much better behaviour with a hub

2005-03-03 Thread Samuel Colin
The Thu, 3 Mar 2005 22:50:34 +0100 "Gerd v. Egidy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Samuel, > Hello, > as you might have seen on this list (subject: "usb-storage: speed > inconsistent, disconnect, oops") I have problems with my usb frame too. I > get a lot of usb resets during the transfer and a

[linux-usb-devel] Much better behaviour with a hub

2005-03-01 Thread Samuel Colin
Hello list, I had reported some errors (and addressed some thanks) a while ago about some issues I had with some usb external hard drives. Tonight I had some minutes to spend trying one or two things regarding one of the previous problems that had been solved through an experimental patch. The kern