On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 12:16:01PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jun 2003, Matthew Dharm wrote:
If the files are the same now, then you should be able to apply this patch
to 2.4 -- that's one of the reasons Alan sent you a 2.4 patch to support
the US_*_DEVICE codes.
Matt
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 12:16:01PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
Perhaps they should be. One patch I sent in not too long ago removed some
flag bits that are completely unused in 2.5 and almost, but not quite,
entirely unused in 2.4. I believe the two
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 03:10:56PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Greg KH wrote:
It looks like drivers/usb/storage/usb.c still checks for that value and
does something. Is that not needed anymore? If so, can we fix this up?
Yes, it still does check for that value and
If the files are the same now, then you should be able to apply this patch
to 2.4 -- that's one of the reasons Alan sent you a 2.4 patch to support
the US_*_DEVICE codes.
Matt
On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 10:39:03PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 10:36:37PM -0700, Matthew Dharm wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jun 2003, Matthew Dharm wrote:
If the files are the same now, then you should be able to apply this patch
to 2.4 -- that's one of the reasons Alan sent you a 2.4 patch to support
the US_*_DEVICE codes.
Matt
On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 10:39:03PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Jun
