Re: [linux-usb-devel] pl2303 question

2004-02-02 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 02:32:45PM +, Paulo Marques wrote: > > It also as a "Linux driver" on the download page, that is a driver written > a million years ago by prolific. I think (although I'm not sure) that the > original drivers for Linux were written based on the one from prolific, but

Re: [linux-usb-devel] pl2303 question

2004-02-02 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 02 February 2004 12:46, Bruno THOMAS wrote: >Paulo Marques wrote: >> It also as a "Linux driver" on the download page, that is a driver >> written a million years ago by prolific. I think (although I'm not >> sure) that the original drivers for Linux were written based on >> the one from

Re: [linux-usb-devel] pl2303 question

2004-02-02 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 02 February 2004 09:32, Paulo Marques wrote: >Gene Heskett wrote: >> On Thursday 29 January 2004 19:01, Greg KH wrote: >>>On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 06:51:34PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: It just seems that the pl2303's seriel side/end should respond to a cts drop right at the end of

Re: [linux-usb-devel] pl2303 question

2004-02-02 Thread Bruno THOMAS
Paulo Marques wrote: It also as a "Linux driver" on the download page, that is a driver written a million years ago by prolific. I think (although I'm not sure) that the original drivers for Linux were written based on the one from prolific, but Greg can tell you for sure. Yes, I'm interested i

Re: [linux-usb-devel] pl2303 question

2004-02-02 Thread Paulo Marques
Gene Heskett wrote: On Thursday 29 January 2004 19:01, Greg KH wrote: On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 06:51:34PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: It just seems that the pl2303's seriel side/end should respond to a cts drop right at the end of the currently being sent char, instead of blindly sending the next

Re: [linux-usb-devel] pl2303 question

2004-01-30 Thread Gene Heskett
On Thursday 29 January 2004 19:01, Greg KH wrote: >On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 06:51:34PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: >> It just seems that the pl2303's seriel side/end should respond to >> a cts drop right at the end of the currently being sent char, >> instead of blindly sending the next x bytes into

Re: [linux-usb-devel] pl2303 question

2004-01-30 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 09:47:11PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > --- > hub 3-2:1.0: new USB device on port 3, assigned address 4 > drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial.c: descriptor matches > drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial.c: found interrupt in > drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial.c: found bulk out > drivers/usb

Re: [linux-usb-devel] pl2303 question

2004-01-29 Thread Gene Heskett
On Wednesday 28 January 2004 17:56, Greg KH wrote: >On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 08:02:42AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: >> Comments? > >On what? The driver loaded successfully. But do you really have a >pl2303 device plugged in? The log messages do not show that. > >greg k-h Yes, its plugged in, and

Re: [linux-usb-devel] pl2303 question

2004-01-28 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 08:02:42AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > Comments? On what? The driver loaded successfully. But do you really have a pl2303 device plugged in? The log messages do not show that. greg k-h --- The SF.Net email is spo

[linux-usb-devel] pl2303 question

2004-01-28 Thread Gene Heskett
Greg; I've noted that the dmesg contains a couple of lines regarding the pl2303 I have, and which is normally hooked up to an old trs-80 color computer in the basement. Its unusable due to problems in the rts/cts emulation (I think), which may not be related to this from dmesg: drivers/usb/c