On Tuesday July 1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was trying to teach mousedev to bind to new synaptics driver. This
> may be useful for gpm and other programs that don't have native event
> processing module written yet. Unfortunately absolute to relative
> conversion in mousedev only sui
On Tuesday July 1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Apologies if you seen this already but it seems the list ate my previous
> replies...
>
> On Tuesday 01 July 2003 04:40 am, Neil Brown wrote:
> > On Tuesday July 1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ... skip ...
> > >
> >
Hi,
I got a new HP 1022 USB printer and found it didn't work real well
with Linux - Took forever (3min) to print a page, and sometimes gave
up half way through.
Google found suggestions that it works better with USB2 (my desktop
only had USB1) and indeed it works fine on my notebook.
So I go
On Saturday July 30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> What I would do would be to install Snoopy on Windows, get that trace,
> then get usbmon trace on Linux and compare the two. It's bound a tedious
> process, but like I said, no quick solution...
>
I cannot seem to find a definitive usbmon patch f
On Sunday July 31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Jul 2005 16:38:45 +1000, Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Saturday July 30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I cannot seem to find a definitive usbmon patch for 2.6.
>
> Start with {/usr/src/linux
On Monday August 1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'll double check what happens under windows, look through the trace
> data I'm collecting, and get back to you.
So... three months later.
I lost interest in this problem because I plugged the printer into an
old notebook and it seemed to work alm
On Tuesday November 8, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> A tough case, I'm afraid.
>
> I'd try an OHCI add-on card.
On a notebook??
I did try an add-on on the desktop I had it plugged into before, and
that didn't help much. I think there is something really weird about
this printer (Google helped me
On Tuesday November 8, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:11:12 -0500 (EST), Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > If you start experimenting, try to set the NO_FSBR flag in usblp.c
> > > to writeurb->transfer_flags.
> >
> > Good Lord, no, don't do that! With NO_FSBR set, t
from 250 to 1000 and see if it changes the
resolution of these numbers at all.
Thanks for your time, and any suggestions.
BTW, there is a minor typo in usblp.c
NeilBrown
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
### Diffstat output
./drivers/usb/class/usblp.c |2 +-
1 file chan
On Thursday November 10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Neil Brown wrote:
>
> > It cannot be a page-feed thing, as the file is one page, and the page
> > doesn't come out until after the 'dd' completes.
>
> Then do you have any idea what
nefit in switching
off FSBE if there are any outstanding bulk URBs at all.
Anyway, the code where I think there is a typo, and my proposed
correction, is below.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
### Diffstat output
./drivers/usb/host/uhci-q.c |2 +-
1 file ch
On Saturday November 12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Maybe the printer is very sensitive to timing and the extra time it
> > takes the HC to walk this pointers makes a difference??? I'm not sure
> > I believe that, but it is the only explanation I can come up with so
> > far. Unfortunately it do
On Tuesday November 15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > I'll leave it up to you to decide if it should be submitted to
> > mainline.
>
> Not just now.
Fine.
>
> Can you get a usbmon log showing your change in action? It would be
> interesting to see the time intervals involved.
I've got pi
On Wednesday November 16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, Neil Brown wrote:
>
> > I've got piles of usbmon logs, and I'm happy to create more. Could
> > you be specific about that would help, and different setting show
> > different things diffe
On Wednesday November 16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> 64 bytes is probably best. You don't lose any FSBR performance, because
> FSBR isn't turned off immediately when an URB completes.
Ok, I'll get some new clean traces, but probably not until some time
next week.
>
> That's what I'd like to
On Wednesday November 16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 09:54:41 +1100, Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > It would also be worthwhile to see if you can get more or less the same
> > > effect without all those changes, just by increasing
On Tuesday January 24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 11:15:38 -0500 (EST), Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Have you tried using the driver in Greg KH's development tree? It
> > probably doesn't need any of these changes.
>
> Does it fix Neil's printer and iLO? I
17 matches
Mail list logo
