I burned a CD at work and could not read it at home on any computer.
(XP home, XP pro, Caldera 2.4, lindows 3.0, lindows 4.0). Everytime the
first big jpeg file gets accessed (6 million bytes), everybody just hangs.
Windows explorer won't even shut down, requiring a reboot.
I dual boot lindows
Well, I booted back into XP Pro, and both those problem devices work fine.
So, I must conclude that when XP Pro went down, it damaged the lindows
partition, even though lindows resides on a different drive and this drive was
removed from the device list in XP.
Joel
Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 08:02:00 -0400
Keith Antoine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 25 July 2003 12:07 pm, David A. Bandel wrote:
Actually, mrproper is still there and has its utility. Try `make
help` to see how things have changed. I'm writing a document on all
this to post on my
I'm seeing the following error message about every 30 min in
/var/log/samba/log/smbd. This is on a RH 9 system that was recently
upgraded from 7.3. I'm not sure if they were appearing before or not?
Any idea what this is trying to tell me???
[2003/07/26 09:31:27, 0]
Thanks for all the inputs. Slackware ordered.
In Harmony's Way and In A Chord,
Tom ;-})
Tom. Condon
Barbershop Bass Singer
Registered Linux User #154358
A Jester Unemployed
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
Anyone know the meaning of this junk in my access.log?
216.252.226.94 - - [26/Jul/2003:07:34:28 -0700] GET
/default.ida?XX
On 07/26/03 07:58, Ken Moffat wrote:
Anyone know the meaning of this junk in my access.log?
216.252.226.94 - - [26/Jul/2003:07:34:28 -0700] GET
/default.ida?XX
On 07/26/03 08:03, Ken Moffat wrote:
Interesting. I inadvertantly sent this message from my compuserve pop
account, which is not subscribed, but it came through anyway. Sorry
about the double post.
This list does not require membership to allow postings.
--
Tom Condon wrote:
Thanks for all the inputs. Slackware ordered.
Make a note to have a look at swaret, which is a package manager that
will help with updates. It updated my slackware 9.0 system to current
with 2 commands. Downloaded and updated a zillion packages without
error. Better have
I finally bit the bullet, and decided to give Gentoo a whirl. I opted to
build everything from scratch. Stage1 went fine, however Stage2 completed
1 with one error, however I can't figure out what that error is. As a
result, I don't know if its safe to continue. I'm also puzzled how
Just a couple of comments for David:
I hope you again cover the virtual console issue. I followed what you
wrote about enabling a virtual terminal and still didn't get any boot
lines... I was able to get the dmesg output after the fact and the boot
went ok anyway. But I'll be damned if I
On 07/26/03 09:48, Bruce Marshall wrote:
Just a couple of comments for David:
I hope you again cover the virtual console issue. I followed what you
wrote about enabling a virtual terminal and still didn't get any boot
lines... I was able to get the dmesg output after the fact and the boot
On Saturday 26 July 2003 12:55 pm, Net Llama! wrote:
On 07/26/03 09:48, Bruce Marshall wrote:
Just a couple of comments for David:
I hope you again cover the virtual console issue. I followed what
you wrote about enabling a virtual terminal and still didn't get any
boot lines... I was
Quoth Tom Condon:
Thanks for all the inputs. Slackware ordered.
Woot!
Kurt
--
Mandrell: You know what I think?
Doctor: Ah, ah that's a catch question. With a brain your size you
don't think, right?
-- Dr. Who
___
On 07/26/03 13:29, Joel Hammer wrote:
Well, I am not in lindows right now, so I cannot give you the exact
error. (It is amazing how useless a computer becomes when it can't be
networked), but:
The bios finds it and XP finds it.
When I put in a cd, the automounter doesn't do anything, whereas
Joel Hammer wrote:
Well, I am not in lindows right now, so I cannot give you the exact
error. (It is amazing how useless a computer becomes when it can't be
networked), but:
The bios finds it and XP finds it.
When I put in a cd, the automounter doesn't do anything, whereas before
it would
On 07/26/03 14:03, Kurt Wall wrote:
Quoth Net Llama!:
Anyone have any experience with Rackable's product line
(http://rackable.com)? I'm interested in hearing about experiences, good
or bad.
We had a hard time getting actual pricing information from them.
They kept trying to sell us things
Quoth Net Llama!:
On 07/26/03 14:03, Kurt Wall wrote:
Quoth Net Llama!:
Anyone have any experience with Rackable's product line
(http://rackable.com)? I'm interested in hearing about experiences, good
or bad.
We had a hard time getting actual pricing information from them.
They
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 12:48:31 -0400
Bruce Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a couple of comments for David:
I hope you again cover the virtual console issue. I followed what you
wrote about enabling a virtual terminal and still didn't get any boot
lines... I was able to get the
On 25 Jul 2003 at 14:10, Net Llama! boldly uttered:
On 07/25/03 12:11, Philip J. Koenig wrote:
Version 8.0 (the only somewhat recent non-enterprise version Compaq
supports) was not available on Redhat's ftp site.
Funny how its there now:
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/8.0
On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 10:32, Net Llama! wrote:
I finally bit the bullet, and decided to give Gentoo a whirl. I opted to
build everything from scratch. Stage1 went fine, however Stage2 completed
1 with one error, however I can't figure out what that error is. As a
result, I don't know if
On 07/26/03 16:27, Philip J. Koenig wrote:
On 25 Jul 2003 at 14:10, Net Llama! boldly uttered:
On 07/25/03 12:11, Philip J. Koenig wrote:
Version 8.0 (the only somewhat recent non-enterprise version Compaq
supports) was not available on Redhat's ftp site.
Funny how its there now:
On Saturday 26 July 2003 08:44 am, David A. Bandel wrote:
Will post the URL when it's ready. I'm shooting for finishing it this
weekend.
Ciao,
David A. Bandel
Great! Will hold my breath g
--
Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'SKIPPY'
18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061, Australia::
On Saturday 26 July 2003 05:35 pm, David A. Bandel wrote:
Might try http://linuxbooks.pananix.com/kernel2.6.html for my stab at
2.6 gotcha documentation.
Ciao,
David A. Bandel
Phewww!! I could breathe again at last: Many thanks.
--
Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'SKIPPY'
18 Arkana St, The
On Saturday 26 July 2003 08:00 am, Joel Hammer wrote:
I burned a CD at work and could not read it at home on any computer.
(XP home, XP pro, Caldera 2.4, lindows 3.0, lindows 4.0). Everytime the
first big jpeg file gets accessed (6 million bytes), everybody just hangs.
Windows explorer won't
Quoth Keith Antoine:
On Saturday 26 July 2003 05:35 pm, David A. Bandel wrote:
Might try http://linuxbooks.pananix.com/kernel2.6.html for my stab at
2.6 gotcha documentation.
Ciao,
David A. Bandel
Phewww!! I could breathe again at last: Many thanks.
Another helpful doc, although
On Saturday 26 July 2003 08:23 am, Joel Hammer wrote:
Well, I booted back into XP Pro, and both those problem devices work fine.
So, I must conclude that when XP Pro went down, it damaged the lindows
partition, even though lindows resides on a different drive and this drive
was removed from
On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 21:32, Kurt Wall wrote:
Another helpful doc, although a little bit dated, is
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/post-halloween-2.5.txt.
However, just now, I'm gettin Connection Refused errors. Anyone else?
Kurt
Same story here in South Dakota.
--
Tom Jandl
Powered by
On 26 Jul 2003 19:18:26 -0500
Tom Jandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 10:32, Net Llama! wrote:
I finally bit the bullet, and decided to give Gentoo a whirl. I
opted to build everything from scratch. Stage1 went fine, however
Stage2 completed 1 with one error, however I
On 26 Jul 2003 19:18:26 -0500
Tom Jandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 10:32, Net Llama! wrote:
I finally bit the bullet, and decided to give Gentoo a whirl. I
opted to build everything from scratch. Stage1 went fine, however
Stage2 completed 1 with one error, however I
On 07/26/03 20:06, Collins Richey wrote:
On 26 Jul 2003 19:18:26 -0500
Tom Jandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 10:32, Net Llama! wrote:
I finally bit the bullet, and decided to give Gentoo a whirl. I
opted to build everything from scratch. Stage1 went fine, however
Stage2
On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 20:32, Kurt Wall wrote:
Quoth Keith Antoine:
On Saturday 26 July 2003 05:35 pm, David A. Bandel wrote:
Might try http://linuxbooks.pananix.com/kernel2.6.html for my stab at
2.6 gotcha documentation.
Ciao,
David A. Bandel
Phewww!! I could breathe
On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 22:12, Net Llama! wrote:
Hrmmm. THat's not what the documentation on gentoo's website suggests. My
reading of their dox indicate that stage 1 compiles the basic tools of the
OS (glibc, binutils, gcc, and a few others) from source, and stage 2 then
compiles just
On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 21:54, Tom Jandl wrote:
On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 22:12, Net Llama! wrote:
Hrmmm. THat's not what the documentation on gentoo's website suggests. My
reading of their dox indicate that stage 1 compiles the basic tools of the
OS (glibc, binutils, gcc, and a few
On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 23:24, Myles Green wrote:
But... I have an ISO image here of 1.4rc4 with stage 1, 2 3 tarballs
contained within. If you start with a stage 1 tarball you must still
build the system (stage one is just the packages needed to bootstrap the
system) by going through stage
On 07/26/03 21:24, Myles Green wrote:
But... I have an ISO image here of 1.4rc4 with stage 1, 2 3 tarballs
contained within. If you start with a stage 1 tarball you must still
build the system (stage one is just the packages needed to bootstrap the
system) by going through stage 2 and stage three
On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 22:54, Tom Jandl wrote:
On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 23:24, Myles Green wrote:
But... I have an ISO image here of 1.4rc4 with stage 1, 2 3 tarballs
contained within. If you start with a stage 1 tarball you must still
build the system (stage one is just the packages
On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 23:16, Net Llama! wrote:
On 07/26/03 21:24, Myles Green wrote:
But... I have an ISO image here of 1.4rc4 with stage 1, 2 3 tarballs
contained within. If you start with a stage 1 tarball you must still
build the system (stage one is just the packages needed to
38 matches
Mail list logo
