I need to run ksh93 on Caldera 3.1.1. The pdksh that comes with 3.1.1 lacks
features used in some test scripts that we want to run on Linux.
I downloaded the compiled ksh93 for Linux from ATT, only to see that it
uses glibc 2.3, which I do not have installed.
My question is, would I be able to
Don't know, but a pox on all of them! We even had this crap on this
list back when Doug experimented with that type of service.
Which is why black lists are hopefully going to be superceded by the newer
statistical and bayesian spam filtering style of control...
I got a bounce the other day
I'm starting to get a handle on using the command line, but the book I
have fails to answer a few questions:
1. How can you open a program like OpenOffice from the command line?
2. using just the command line, how do you install a program from the
.tar or .gz file you get from the download?
On Tue, 01 Jul 2003 01:22:02 -0700
Tom Lombardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] insightfully noted:
I'm starting to get a handle on using the command line, but the book I
have fails to answer a few questions:
1. How can you open a program like OpenOffice from the command line?
==
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 0:13 am, Shawn Tayler wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 08:40:55 -0700 Tony Alfrey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] professed:
- . - -. . . . . - . - .. . -. - .
.
- . ...- . -
Yes are al deek?
Yes a real deek
--
quoth Tom Condon:
there's one more: if a guy gets all liquored up and runs his car into
someone, it's an alcohol-related incident, but if he gets all
liquored up and shoots someone, it's a gun-related incident.
--
dep
http://www.linuxandmain.com -- outside the box, barely within
the envelope,
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 06:51:04 -0400
dep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quoth Tom Condon:
there's one more: if a guy gets all liquored up and runs his car into
someone, it's an alcohol-related incident, but if he gets all
liquored up and shoots someone, it's a gun-related incident.
Let's not
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 22:27:51 -0700 Ted Ozolins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
professed:
Shawn Tayler wrote:
Now that morse command is pretty cool Kurt,
Where'd you get it?
Shawn
Same place I did, comes with Slackware and probably many other
distro's. Open a terminal and type morse then any
Shawn Tayler wrote:
Not Slackware version 8.1! That's what I am running here and no joy.
I'll dig in the CD.
You can get it from sourceforge at
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=34241
Run make install to put it into /usr/local/bin.
Or at least it did for Red Hat 7.3
Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
I need to run ksh93 on Caldera 3.1.1. The pdksh that comes with 3.1.1 lacks
features used in some test scripts that we want to run on Linux.
I downloaded the compiled ksh93 for Linux from ATT, only to see that it
uses glibc 2.3, which I do not have installed.
My question
On Monday 30 June 2003 06:00 pm, Bruce Marshall wrote:
On Monday 30 June 2003 18:14 pm, Tony Alfrey wrote:
On Monday 30 June 2003 10:55 am, David A. Bandel wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 08:40:55 -0700
Tony Alfrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 30 June 2003 06:41 am, Bruce Marshall
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 09:27:36 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
I need to run ksh93 on Caldera 3.1.1. The pdksh that comes with 3.1.1
lacks features used in some test scripts that we want to run on Linux.
I downloaded the compiled
On Monday 30 June 2003 06:16 pm, Kurt Wall wrote:
Quoth Bruce Marshall:
Didn't you mis-spell geek? (deek) (if I'm wrong on that I'm
going to chop off my right hand)
$ morse -s geek | tr -d '\n' | tr , ' ' ; echo
--. . . -.-
;-)
Kurt
Another Test Winner! And the crowd goes wild
On Monday 30 June 2003 09:13 pm, Shawn Tayler wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 08:40:55 -0700 Tony Alfrey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] professed:
- . - -. . . . . - . - .. . -. -
. .
- . ...- . -
Yes are al deek?
Oh, now YOU don't get the geek award. Any
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 02:39 am, Bruce Marshall wrote:
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 0:13 am, Shawn Tayler wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 08:40:55 -0700 Tony Alfrey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] professed:
- . - -. . . . . - . - .. . -.
- . .
- . ...- .
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
Upgrading glibc to 2.3 shouldn't be hard. I've done it several times
withou any problems. Going to 3.x is another story altogether. If you
plan to maintain this box for a long time, you'll be saving youself a ton
of grief by upgrading glibc.
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 21:05:59 -0400
Bruce Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 30 June 2003 18:20 pm, David A. Bandel wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 14:52:54 -0400
[snip]
2650? mhz? Don't even have that on my freq-cheat-sheet..
um, no -- Khz (2.650MHz), I usually work in kHz or
You can get the source code here (linux) ...
http://www.linuxhq.com/kernel/v2.5/65-ac2/kernel/morse.c
or here (openbsd) ... http://openbsd.secsup.org/src/games/morse/morse.c
At 0838 AM 7/1/2003, you wrote
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 222751 -0700 Ted Ozolins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
professed
Shawn Tayler
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 10:49 am, David A. Bandel wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 21:05:59 -0400
Bruce Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 30 June 2003 18:20 pm, David A. Bandel wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 14:52:54 -0400
[snip]
2650? mhz? Don't even have that on my
James McDonald wrote:
Address blocks are more popular/easier to apply policies on than
single addresses. So the tendency is for us to get tarred with the
same brush as a spammer on the same network as us.
I'll second that. There are Australian sites I can't visit from work
because they are in
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 06:19:24AM -0500, David A. Bandel wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 06:51:04 -0400
dep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quoth Tom Condon:
there's one more: if a guy gets all liquored up and runs his car into
someone, it's an alcohol-related incident, but if he gets all
liquored up
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Bill Campbell wrote:
Could we do editor wars again then (emacs sucks :-).
No war there, emacs does suck. Pico is superior to all others.
--
~~
Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 09:28:44AM -0700, Condon Thomas A KPWA wrote:
James McDonald wrote:
Address blocks are more popular/easier to apply policies on than
single addresses. So the tendency is for us to get tarred with the
same brush as a spammer on the same network as us.
I'll second that.
I wonder if I could talk any of you folks into going to:
http://www.cds-inc.com/vote/linux.html
and taking the 5-question survey on linux backup.
BackAgain II is a very nice backup program (many types of devices and
also network backups), and easy to use. It originally was written for
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Bruce Marshall wrote:
I wonder if I could talk any of you folks into going to:
http://www.cds-inc.com/vote/linux.html
and taking the 5-question survey on linux backup.
BackAgain II is a very nice backup program (many types of devices and
also network backups), and easy
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 09:46:41 -0700
Bill Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
On the other hand, there are serious problems with open relays and
open proxies on major cable providers such as Comcast, Road Runner, et
al caused by clueless folks who just plug in their Windows viruses
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 12:39:12 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled furiously:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Bill Campbell wrote:
Could we do editor wars again then (emacs sucks :-).
No war there, emacs does suck. Pico is superior to all others.
==
`cept
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Michael Scottaline wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 12:39:12 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled furiously:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Bill Campbell wrote:
Could we do editor wars again then (emacs sucks :-).
No war there, emacs does suck. Pico is superior to
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 13:58:27 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Michael Scottaline wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 12:39:12 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled furiously:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Bill Campbell wrote:
Could we do editor wars
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 13:45:32 -0400 (EDT), Net Llama! wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Bruce Marshall wrote:
I wonder if I could talk any of you folks into going to:
http://www.cds-inc.com/vote/linux.html
and taking the 5-question survey on linux
On Tue, 2003-07-01 at 13:54, Michael Scottaline wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 12:39:12 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled furiously:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Bill Campbell wrote:
Could we do editor wars again then (emacs sucks :-).
No war there, emacs does suck. Pico is
Shawn Tayler wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 22:27:51 -0700 Ted Ozolins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
professed:
Shawn Tayler wrote:
Now that morse command is pretty cool Kurt,
Where'd you get it?
Shawn
Same place I did, comes with Slackware and probably many other
distro's. Open a terminal and type morse
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 12:50:28PM -0500, David A. Bandel wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 09:46:41 -0700
...
We had a little debate going over Internet Service Deniers on the
ISP-Linux list. A number of ISPs supported denying outgoing ports
(mostly 25). While I don't like some traffic, denying ports
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 11:34:29 -0700
Bill Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 12:50:28PM -0500, David A. Bandel wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 09:46:41 -0700
...
We had a little debate going over Internet Service Deniers on the
ISP-Linux list. A number of ISPs supported
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 11:11 am, Tom Wilson wrote:
On Tue, 2003-07-01 at 13:54, Michael Scottaline wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 12:39:12 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled furiously:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Bill Campbell wrote:
Could we do editor wars again then (emacs
You're awesome, Mike - thank you very much!
Michael Scottaline wrote:
On Tue, 01 Jul 2003 01:22:02 -0700
Tom Lombardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] insightfully noted:
I'm starting to get a handle on using the command line, but the book I
have fails to answer a few questions:
1. How can you open a
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Aaron Grewell wrote:
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 11:11 am, Tom Wilson wrote:
On Tue, 2003-07-01 at 13:54, Michael Scottaline wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 12:39:12 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled furiously:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Bill Campbell wrote:
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 01:52:19PM -0500, David A. Bandel wrote:
...
The above notwithstanding:
1. blocking is denying a service, not providing it
Blocking a service that's prohibited in their Terms of Service.
2. travelers who go to a hotel often don't know the mail servers of
whatever
Aha! Desktop wars! My desktop is the best ever... as long as you've got
512MB RAM!
KWrite Rulez! :)
yea, but its embedded in that virus called KDE.
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Aaron Grewell wrote:
Aha! Desktop wars! My desktop is the best ever... as long as you've got
512MB RAM!
KWrite Rulez! :)
yea, but its embedded in that virus called KDE.
I've got 1GB, and i still run XFCE. I'd rather use my hardware for
something other than
On 7/1/2003 3:18 PM, someone claiming to be Aaron Grewell wrote:
Aha! Desktop wars! My desktop is the best ever... as long as you've got
512MB RAM!
KWrite Rulez! :)
yea, but its embedded in that virus called KDE.
Top posting sux! Bottom post, or reply in line ;-)
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 14:52 pm, David A. Bandel wrote:
Spam is a byproduct of stupidity and laziness. Some
stupid/lazy companies include Norton. I get spam from them regularly
about how they can help keep my Windoze systems virus free (didn't
know X windows had viruses).
Hmmm... I
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Tim Wunder wrote:
On 7/1/2003 3:18 PM, someone claiming to be Aaron Grewell wrote:
Aha! Desktop wars! My desktop is the best ever... as long as you've got
512MB RAM!
KWrite Rulez! :)
yea, but its embedded in that virus called KDE.
Top posting sux! Bottom
I think having to scroll down through 500 lines of crap to find a one line
answer sucks.
On Tue, 01 Jul 2003 15:43:35 -0400 - Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote the
following
Re: Re: Blame [OT]
On 7/1/2003 3:18 PM, someone claiming to be Aaron Grewell wrote:
Aha! Desktop wars! My desktop is
quoth ronnie gauthier:
| I think having to scroll down through 500 lines of crap to find a
| one line answer sucks.
and i think that inasmuch as one cannot subscribe to every-other
message or every-10th message or merely the occasional random
message, that absent any poetic purpose in having
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 4:07 pm, someone claiming to be Net Llama! wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Tim Wunder wrote:
On 7/1/2003 3:18 PM, someone claiming to be Aaron Grewell wrote:
Aha! Desktop wars! My desktop is the best ever... as long as you've
got 512MB RAM!
KWrite Rulez! :)
It depends. If I'm doing stuff where I need the whole context (helping with
technical problems or whatever) then top replying and leaving the whole thing
can be the best thing. For other stuff, not so much. So I randomize,
inevitably picking whatever will get the most tomatoes thrown my way
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 02:07 pm, Aaron Grewell wrote:
snip
that having been said, top replying does suck -- it smacks of the
overbearing fourth-grade teacher. or a lawyer or something.
snip
I believe that this thread could easily take over the entire world, now
that we've included
Bruce Marshall wrote:
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 10:49 am, David A. Bandel wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 21:05:59 -0400
Bruce Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 30 June 2003 18:20 pm, David A. Bandel wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 14:52:54 -0400
[snip]
2650? mhz? Don't even have that on my
Tony Alfrey wrote:
I believe that this thread could easily take over the entire world,
now that we've included 'lawyers' in the subject. I think it's time
for a thread OTLawyer Jokes.
Q. What do you call three lawyers at the bottom of the ocean?
Half a deep six?
In Harmony's Way, and In A
Quoth Net Llama!:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Bill Campbell wrote:
Could we do editor wars again then (emacs sucks :-).
No war there, emacs does suck. Pico is superior to all others.
Except vi. ;-)
Kurt
--
Scott's first Law:
No matter what goes wrong, it will probably look right.
Quoth Tom Wilson:
On Tue, 2003-07-01 at 13:54, Michael Scottaline wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 12:39:12 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled furiously:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Bill Campbell wrote:
Could we do editor wars again then (emacs sucks :-).
No war there,
Quoth dep:
quoth ronnie gauthier:
| I think having to scroll down through 500 lines of crap to find a
| one line answer sucks.
and i think that inasmuch as one cannot subscribe to every-other
message or every-10th message or merely the occasional random
message, that absent any poetic
Quoth Tony Alfrey:
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 02:07 pm, Aaron Grewell wrote:
snip
that having been said, top replying does suck -- it smacks of the
overbearing fourth-grade teacher. or a lawyer or something.
snip
I believe that this thread could easily take over the entire world, now
Quoth Shawn Tayler:
Now that morse command is pretty cool Kurt,
Where'd you get it?
Slackware's BSD games package:
$ grep bsd-games /var/log/packages/bsd-games-2.13-i386-6
bsd-games: bsd-games (Classic BSD text games collection)
bsd-games:
bsd-games: Games that go in /usr/games:
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 06:13 pm, Kurt Wall's voice rose above the ones
in my head and stated:
No war there, emacs does suck. Pico is superior to all others.
==
`cept *Nedit* ;o)
It's all about Joe.
I had several cups of Joe before I left for
Am I the only one that finds a whole bunch of these non-linux related emails in my
inbox annoying?
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 14:57:56 -0700
Condon Thomas A KPWA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tony Alfrey wrote:
I believe that this thread could easily take over the entire world,
now that we've
n 07/01/03 15:58, Bill Campbell wrote:
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 03:23:49PM -0700, Vern W Heesch wrote:
Am I the only one that finds a whole bunch of these non-linux related
emails in my inbox annoying?
The subject says OT (Off Topic) for a reason.
So does the general list.
--
Vern, I can call you Vern, Can't I? Good. Vern, listen. Grab a beer and I'll
spell it out for you.
Off topic and other such stuff is as common as notes in a third grade class.
Most of us wouldnt have it any other way.
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 15:23:49 -0700 - Vern W Heesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
the
Who died and voted you list bully?
On 07/01/03 16:21, ronnie gauthier wrote:
Vern, I can call you Vern, Can't I? Good. Vern, listen. Grab a beer and I'll
spell it out for you.
Off topic and other such stuff is as common as notes in a third grade class.
Most of us wouldnt have it any other way.
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 07:00:23 -0700 Tony Alfrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
professed:
Oh, now YOU don't get the geek award. Any TRUE code geek has had the
experience of deciphering where to parse the stream.
--
Tony Alfrey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd Rather Be Sailing
Lol
Its a bit different when the
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 09:49:26 -0500 David A. Bandel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
professed:
um, no -- Khz (2.650MHz), I usually work in kHz or GHz.
Ciao,
David A. Bandel
or Kilo-Megahertz?
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 03:16 pm, Kurt Wall wrote:
Quoth Tony Alfrey:
snip
Q. What do you call three lawyers at the bottom of the ocean?
A start.
Bingo. Actually, the way I've heard it is A good start.
- . -
--
Tony Alfrey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd Rather Be Sailing
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 18:23:19 -0400
Kurt Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoth Shawn Tayler:
Now that morse command is pretty cool Kurt,
Where'd you get it?
Slackware's BSD games package:
$ grep bsd-games /var/log/packages/bsd-games-2.13-i386-6
bsd-games: bsd-games (Classic BSD
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 14:23:55 -0700
Tony Alfrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] insightfully noted:
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 02:07 pm, Aaron Grewell wrote:
snip
that having been said, top replying does suck -- it smacks of the
overbearing fourth-grade teacher. or a lawyer or something.
snip
I believe that
On Tue, 01 Jul 2003 12:06:07 -0700
Tom Lombardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] insightfully noted:
You're awesome, Mike - thank you very much!
You're most welcome, Tom. Stick around on this list. Some of the most
knowledgable linux folks *anywhere* are on this list as
Quoth Michael Scottaline:
Wait a minute.., isn't a thread considered dead once someone brings up
lawyers???
Oh, no..., wait, that's Nazis or Hitler. Sigh I guess all the bottom
feeders could be lumped together, huh? chuckle...
Moreover, you can't deliberately mention Hitler just to kill
Quoth Net Llama!:
Almost 3 years ago
http://web.archive.org/web/2829044720/http://linux.nf/stepbystep.htm
My goodness. I haven't seen *that* in a long time. We've come a long
way, yes?
Kurt
--
Jenkinson's Law:
It won't work.
___
Quoth David A. Bandel:
yeah, yeah, or better:
[56 ham toys snipped]
Yeah, whatever. Showoff. Hmph.
Kurt
--
Spirtle, n.:
The fine stream from a grapefruit that always lands right in
your eye.
-- Sniglets, Rich Hall Friends
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 06:01 pm, Michael Scottaline wrote:
snip
Sigh I guess all the
bottom feeders could be lumped together, huh? chuckle...
ROTFLOL Bottom feeders ! ! ! !
Gives the poor fish a bad name.
--
Tony Alfrey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd Rather Be Sailing
OK, I need someone more familiar w/ Red Crap to give me a clue on this
one. This is 7.3 running kernel 2.4.18-3.
Needed to replace the kernel and iptables (2.4.18 lacks htb3 support and
ip_nat_h323/ip_conntrack_h323 among other things, such as xfs).
Anyway, d/l, patched, installed new kernel.
On 07/01/03 18:58, David A. Bandel wrote:
OK, I need someone more familiar w/ Red Crap to give me a clue on this
Ahhh..insult my preferred distro, and then ask for help with it, that's
a good tactic. ;)
one. This is 7.3 running kernel 2.4.18-3.
Needed to replace the kernel and iptables
On Tue, 01 Jul 2003 19:15:55 -0700
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
What are the exact error? I'm using 8139too under 2.4.21-pre2-xfs on
RH9 without any problems.
Jul 1 09:04:57 proxy kernel: 8K byte-wide RAM 5:3 Rx:Tx split,
autoselect/Autonegotiate interface.
Jul 1
On 07/01/03 19:25, David A. Bandel wrote:
On Tue, 01 Jul 2003 19:15:55 -0700
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
What are the exact error? I'm using 8139too under 2.4.21-pre2-xfs on
RH9 without any problems.
Jul 1 09:04:57 proxy kernel: 8K byte-wide RAM 5:3 Rx:Tx split,
Fine, I have my beer, I read what you had to say.
If most of us wouldn't have it any other way, why was the General list created? I
still remember because I was a member of this list when General was created. I could
dig through my logs, as I seem to remember seeing your name on this list back
I'll hope that you reconsider. Ronnie does not speak for everyone else
on this list.
On 07/01/03 19:36, Vern W Heesch wrote:
Fine, I have my beer, I read what you had to say.
If most of us wouldn't have it any other way, why was the General list created? I still remember because I was a
I just purchased the GF4Ti4200 with my new machine (which I'm most pleased with)
I'd like some input on tricks to get this sucker working the best. I knew it had
video out. Video In was a bonus I didn't expect (if only it works).
Video Out shows up my boot to the TV... But as soon as X
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 10:39, Net Llama! wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Bill Campbell wrote:
Could we do editor wars again then (emacs sucks :-).
No war there, emacs does suck. Pico is superior to all others.
pft... nano rawx ;)
--
Myles Green [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 12:03, David A. Bandel wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 13:58:27 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Michael Scottaline wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 12:39:12 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled furiously:
On Tue, 1 Jul
Nobody, Just thought I'd share a beer, want one?
On Tue, 01 Jul 2003 16:32:14
-0700
-
Net
Llama!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
the following
Re: Re: Blame [OT]
Who died and voted you list bully?
On 07/01/03 16:21, ronnie gauthier wrote:
Vern, I can call you Vern, Can't I? Good. Vern, listen. Grab a
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 19:36:23 -0700 - Vern W Heesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
the following
Re: Re: Blame [OT]
Fine, I have my beer, I read what you had to say.
If most of us wouldn't have it any other way, why was the General list
created? I still remember because I was a member of this list when
81 matches
Mail list logo
