ronnie gauthier wrote:
anyone home?
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Just got home but I was at work about 15 mins ago. But glad to be home now.
But did
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 21:54:33 -0400
Wil McGilvery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was reading this article on greylisting and I find the premise to be
interesting.
http://projects.puremagic.com/greylisting/
Has anyone tried greylisting? Any experiences worth sharing?
Ok, I do now have an
I missed the long thread. I guess I should try older versions.
I am still using the old glibc-2.2.1 that came with COL 3.1
Net Llama! wrote:
probe.c:250:1: directives may not be used inside a macro argument
probe.c:249:15: unterminated argument list invoking macro printf
probe.c: In function
are these options available from make menuconfig?
James McDonald wrote:
# CONFIG_NOHIGHMEM is not set
CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G=y
# CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G is not set
The standard /boot/config-2.4.20-8 contains the above settings which is
fine what your problem is
--
.~.Might, Courage,
forget it. I found it.
M.W. Chang wrote:
are these options available from make menuconfig?
James McDonald wrote:
# CONFIG_NOHIGHMEM is not set
CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G=y
# CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G is not set
The standard /boot/config-2.4.20-8 contains the above settings which is
fine what your
On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 07:36, David A. Bandel wrote:
Two anti-spam programs working at cross purposes. So unless one of us
manually white-lists the other, we'll never be able to correspond.
Greylisting, in general, and especially if widely adopted and
imperfectly implemented, has the
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, M.W. Chang wrote:
are these options available from make menuconfig?
Yes. I'm not aware of any options that aren't.
James McDonald wrote:
# CONFIG_NOHIGHMEM is not set
CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G=y
# CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G is not set
The standard /boot/config-2.4.20-8 contains
Thanks.
I exported my current address book to ldif, studied that format, then
ran this script against my mutt aliases, and it actually worked. I
attach it here in case anyone would fine it useful.
This is quick and dirty, YMMV.
s/alias /dn: cn\=/
s//,mail\=/
s///
s/ ,/,/
s/$/\nobjectclass:
Net Llama! wrote:
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Vu Pham wrote:
I am installing Frontpage extenstion on Redhat 9 with apache 1.3.28, and get
the following error:
Creating web http://.
./fp_install.sh: line 2237: 5544 Segmentation fault
${FPDIR}/bin/owsadm.exe -o install -p $port $web
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 22:44:43 -0400
dep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quoth Rick Sivernell:
| DEP your right that if no print she will not be totally happy.
|
| Good news here - last weekend we had our 1st Sat computer sale. I
| bought 2 scsi HP6100c scanners for $5.00 total. I have one on
I found the reason. it's the apache-toolbox that created a redhat
directory in /usr/src. checkinstall's script scanned the redhat
directory first before OpenLInux. I removed the directory and everything
is fine now.
M.W. Chang wrote:
I don't have the error with other packages. that's really
M W Chang has just updated http://www.linux-sxs.org/internet_serving/proftpd.html to
incorporate the following:
Updated for latest version
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
There's an oops!
Regards,
Wil McGilvery
Manager
Lynch Digital Media Inc
416-744-7949
416-716-3964 (cell)
1-866-314-4678
416-744-0406 FAX
www.LynchDigital.com
-Original Message-
From: David A. Bandel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 7:36 AM
To:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
SCO Woes III: 6 weeks later. I still can't buy a license from SCO.
by Drew
It has been six weeks since my initial contact with SCO regarding getting
a license for my Linux appliance server business, and SCO's apathy towards
the sale is as great as it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Today's fun SEC filing:
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1102542/90630403000292/scox.txt
It would appear that, as of September 30, Royce Associates LLC holds over
1.4 million shares of SCO. There are 13.5M shares outstanding, so
On Thursday 09 October 2003 10:57 am, M. Drew Streib wrote:
SCO Woes III: 6 weeks later. I still can't buy a license from SCO.
by Drew
It has been six weeks since my initial contact with SCO regarding
getting a license for my Linux appliance server business, and SCO's
apathy towards the sale
My best guess is its related to the NPTL stuff in the RH9 kernel. Have
you tried exporting LD_KERNEL_ASSUME=2.2.5 first?
Thanks. I've just tried LD_KERNEL_ASSUME and export it, but still have
the same problem.
Have you downloaded the latest FPSE from MS? The one that comes with
the CD's is
step 7.Build the sendmail daemon
# cd sendmail
# if [ ! -e /usr/share/man ] ; then ln -s /usr/man /usr/share/man; fi
# sh Build -f /etc/mail/site.config.m4 sh Build install
* you should see '-DMILTER' periodically during the compile
step 10.The supporting tools are now built and installed
* cd
Now that I've started to deploy RH9 on several boxes, the lack of xedit
has started to annoy me a lot. I like xedit, because its a bare bones X
text editor. Anyone know why RH9 doesn't include xedit (which i thought
was part of XFree86)? Anyone know how i could get xedit without building
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 10:57:53 -0400 M. Drew Streib [EMAIL PROTECTED] (by way of
Douglas J Hunley[EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
SCO Woes III: 6 weeks later. I still can't buy a license from SCO.
by Drew
I can't believe that a sales force
On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 11:22, Bruce Marshall wrote:
On Thursday 09 October 2003 10:57 am, M. Drew Streib wrote:
I have a request of Linux (or really any) news organizations. Find two
or three of your best reporters and have them try, in the nicest way
possible, to buy a Linux license from
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Michael Hipp wrote:
Net Llama! wrote:
Now that I've started to deploy RH9 on several boxes, the lack of xedit
has started to annoy me a lot. I like xedit, because its a bare bones X
text editor. Anyone know why RH9 doesn't include xedit (which i thought
was part of
On 10/9/2003 1:13 PM, I believe that Net Llama! wrote:
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Michael Hipp wrote:
Net Llama! wrote:
Now that I've started to deploy RH9 on several boxes, the lack of xedit
has started to annoy me a lot. I like xedit, because its a bare bones X
text editor. Anyone know why RH9
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Tim Wunder wrote:
On 10/9/2003 1:13 PM, I believe that Net Llama! wrote:
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Michael Hipp wrote:
Net Llama! wrote:
Now that I've started to deploy RH9 on several boxes, the lack of xedit
has started to annoy me a lot. I like xedit, because its a
I've somehow lost something which causes X not to
start when I boot (from HD or from Boot Floppy). After all the normal boot
messages, apparently X tries to start, but I get only the quick CL prompt, and
then X appears to try to start again, then the prompt, over and over.
Booting into
Which distro is this? I managed to cause similar horkage when i mesed up
permissions/onwership on a bunch of directories. if you've got sshd
running on th ebox, you can try running _any_ X app remotely, which should
help to determine whether its X that is brooken, or something else.
On Thu, 9
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 13:30:09 -0400 (EDT) Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Tim Wunder wrote:
On 10/9/2003 1:13 PM, I believe that Net Llama! wrote:
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Michael Hipp wrote:
Net Llama! wrote:
Now that I've started to deploy RH9 on several
On 10/9/2003 2:25 PM, I believe that Allan Rabenau wrote:
I've somehow lost something which causes X not to start when I boot
(from HD or from Boot Floppy). After all the normal boot messages,
apparently X tries to start, but I get only the quick CL prompt, and
then X appears to try to start
I'm running RH9; ps ax|grep shows xfs running ans does /sbin/service xfs
status. This is after I log in at run level 3 and operate CLI.
-Al
- Original Message -
From: Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 8:21 PM
Subject: Re: X won't
On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 12:22, Bruce Marshall wrote:
Hasn't it occurred to you that they don't want to sell you a license
because if their IP claims are proven false... they could be charged
with fraud?? It's just more smoke and mirrors.
Fraud is a criminal charge. It would only be fraud
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 19:25:11 +0100
Allan Rabenau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've somehow lost something which causes X not to start when I boot
(from HD or from Boot Floppy). After all the normal boot messages,
apparently X tries to start, but I get only the quick CL prompt, and
then X appears
Hasn't it occurred to you that they don't want to sell you
a license
because if their IP claims are proven false... they could
be charged
with fraud?? It's just more smoke and mirrors.
Fraud is a criminal charge. It would only be fraud if it
could be proven
that they had
On Mon, 06 Oct 2003 12:16:59 -0500, Michael Hipp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
If you could beg / borrow / steal :-) another sound card just for
temporary testing would be a logical next step.
Finally gave up on Knoppix when the hard drive installed version wouldn't
record at all !
(It didn't
- Original Message -
From: Aaron Grewell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 11:30 AM
Subject: Re: FrontPage 2002 extension and Redhat 9
My best guess is its related to the NPTL stuff in the RH9 kernel. Have
you tried exporting
Net Llama! wrote:
Now that I've started to deploy RH9 on several boxes, the lack of xedit
has started to annoy me a lot. I like xedit, because its a bare bones X
text editor. Anyone know why RH9 doesn't include xedit (which i thought
was part of XFree86)? Anyone know how i could get xedit
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, James McDonald wrote:
To compile mplayer mean't a search of the web for many supporting
libraries that came standard with Mandrake.
That wasn't my experience. mplayer build on both of my RH9 systems
without a single problem.
So my opinion is that Redhat, in the quest for
I had been giving that quite a bit of thought as well...
Doing some looking into Greylisting as well as Milter-Sender, I was considering that
they would work opposite each other.
Back to the drawing board. Nothing is perfect. I like a healthy combination of
blacklisting and filtering.
I don't seem to understand the IFS variable in bash. I know it's the
internal field separator and it defaults to SPACE TAB NEWLINE. But I
want to set it to just NEWLINE.
I've tried \n '\n' and just \n all to no avail. Those mostly seem to
change it to backslash enn. Surely there is some way to
Anyone using kernel 2.4.6 with Nvidia drivers? Just wonder if it works
Thanks.
--
Ken
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Who needs a salesforce where they are going?
On 09 Oct 2003 12:41:35 -0500
Shawn L Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I don't think that its a concern over fraud. I think its more likely
that they've gutted their sales force. I called them last week about a
product and was unable to speak
I show: IFS=$' \t\n'
Try IFS=$'\n'
On Thu, 09 Oct 2003 20:36:47 -0500
Michael Hipp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't seem to understand the IFS variable in bash. I know it's the
internal field separator and it defaults to SPACE TAB NEWLINE. But I
want to set it to just NEWLINE.
I've
No but I'm using them with 2.4.20 from SuSE.
They're pretty good, but it took a while for them to get a good version, and there are
still some tradeoffs (like switching to console mode doesn't scroll lines correctly
for me).
On Thu, 09 Oct 2003 19:33:21 -0700
Ken Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
42 matches
Mail list logo
