On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 10:06:22 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Feigning erudition, Net Llama! wrote:
% On Tue, 31 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
% Feigning erudition, Net Llama! wrote:
%
% [distribution and window manager preferences]
%
% % I can post screenshots of both XFCE-3.8.18
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003 11:31:19 -0700
begin Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003 08:37:36 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Feigning erudition, Net Llama! wrote:
% On 12/31/02 20:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
% Feigning
Feigning erudition, David A. Bandel wrote:
%
% And I _hate_ session managers -- that's why I dumped XFCE for Blackbox.
% Every XFCE upgrade was a nightmare because session manglement was default
% ON regardless of my previous setting for it. I have a couple of apps
% (xconsole and xdaliclock)
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Feigning erudition, Net Llama! wrote:
[distribution and window manager preferences]
% I can post screenshots of both XFCE-3.8.18 XFCE-4.x (from yesterday's
% cvs checkout) if anyone is interested.
I'd be interested in the XFCE version 4 stuff.
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, David A. Bandel wrote:
And I _hate_ session managers -- that's why I dumped XFCE for Blackbox.
Every XFCE upgrade was a nightmare because session manglement was default
ON regardless of my previous setting for it. I have a couple of apps
(xconsole and xdaliclock) that run
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 10:06:22 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Feigning erudition, Net Llama! wrote:
% On Tue, 31 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
% Feigning erudition, Net Llama! wrote:
%
% [distribution and window manager preferences]
%
% %
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Feigning erudition, Net Llama! wrote:
% On Tue, 31 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
% Feigning erudition, Net Llama! wrote:
%
% [distribution and window manager preferences]
%
% % I can post screenshots of both XFCE-3.8.18 XFCE-4.x (from
Feigning erudition, Net Llama! wrote:
% On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
% Hmm. It just stalls while loading.
%
% Works now. *shrug*
Go figger.
Kurt
--
I have discovered the art of deceiving diplomats. I tell them the truth
and they never believe me.
--
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 13:21:33 -0500
David A. Bandel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 09:35:40 -0500 (EST)
begin Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, David A. Bandel wrote:
And I _hate_ session managers
Feigning erudition, Net Llama! wrote:
% On 12/31/02 20:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
% Feigning erudition, Net Llama! wrote:
%
% [distribution and window manager preferences]
%
% % I can post screenshots of both XFCE-3.8.18 XFCE-4.x (from yesterday's
% % cvs checkout) if anyone is interested.
%
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003 08:37:36 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Feigning erudition, Net Llama! wrote:
% On 12/31/02 20:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
% Feigning erudition, Net Llama! wrote:
%
% [distribution and window manager preferences]
%
% % I can post screenshots of both XFCE-3.8.18
begin Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Tue, 31 Dec 2002 21:53:30 -0800)
On 12/31/02 21:33, Matthew Carpenter wrote:
begin Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Tue, 31 Dec 2002 13:58:06 -0500 (EST))
snip
What kinda redhat quirks? I've always felt that SuSE had the quirks
(like the rather unusual
On 01/01/03 12:56, Matthew Carpenter wrote:
begin Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Tue, 31 Dec 2002 21:53:30 -0800)
the machine name that I typed in was maintained after install... The
biggest annoyance was just how difficult it was to configure printing. I
had a very difficult time encouraging
Net Llama! wrote:
On 01/01/03 12:56, Matthew Carpenter wrote:
begin Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Tue, 31 Dec 2002 21:53:30 -0800)
the machine name that I typed in was maintained after install... The
biggest annoyance was just how difficult it was to configure printing. I
had a very
begin Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Wed, 25 Dec 2002 15:31:27 -0800)
For servers, Redhat-7.3(XFS). I have no favorite for desktops, since i
use XFCE which is distro agnostic.
No offense, but that sounds more like you don't understand why people would use
something other than RedHat... :)
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Matthew Carpenter wrote:
begin Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Wed, 25 Dec 2002 15:31:27 -0800)
For servers, Redhat-7.3(XFS). I have no favorite for desktops, since i
use XFCE which is distro agnostic.
No offense, but that sounds more like you don't understand why
On 12/31/2002 10:56 AM, Matthew Carpenter wrote:
snippage
I'm not proposing marriage yet, but in the wake of the bitter divorce
that SCO forced upon me by discontinuing OpenLinux, it looks hop!
eful. [sic]
Yup. I hadn't intended to switch either, but the kinda forced me to.
Most
begin Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Tue, 31 Dec 2002 11:31:53 -0500 (EST))
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Matthew Carpenter wrote:
SNIP
No offense, but that sounds more like you don't understand why people
would use something other than RedHat... :)
How so?
Just that when comparing the different
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Matthew Carpenter wrote:
begin Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Tue, 31 Dec 2002 11:31:53 -0500 (EST))
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Matthew Carpenter wrote:
SNIP
No offense, but that sounds more like you don't understand why people
would use something other than RedHat...
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 11:46:37AM -0500, John Voigt wrote:
On 12/31/2002 10:56 AM, Matthew Carpenter wrote:
..
and a little disappointed that I had to install a couple packages
that I'm used to in a standard install (like KDE Graphics Extras
package for ksnapshot) IFUP and IFDOWN are
Feigning erudition, Net Llama! wrote:
[distribution and window manager preferences]
% I can post screenshots of both XFCE-3.8.18 XFCE-4.x (from yesterday's
% cvs checkout) if anyone is interested.
I'd be interested in the XFCE version 4 stuff.
Kurt
--
Politicians are the same all over. They
On 12/31/02 20:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Feigning erudition, Net Llama! wrote:
[distribution and window manager preferences]
% I can post screenshots of both XFCE-3.8.18 XFCE-4.x (from yesterday's
% cvs checkout) if anyone is interested.
I'd be interested in the XFCE version 4 stuff.
begin Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Tue, 31 Dec 2002 13:58:06 -0500 (EST))
That's because i don't care about 90% of the precompiled packages that
come with a distro. I build my own version of most things, and rarely
use any of the extras that come preinstalled. What I want is a distro
that
On 12/31/02 21:33, Matthew Carpenter wrote:
begin Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Tue, 31 Dec 2002 13:58:06 -0500 (EST))
That's because i don't care about 90% of the precompiled packages that
come with a distro. I build my own version of most things, and rarely
use any of the extras that come
Feigning erudition, Marvin Dickens wrote:
% I would like to see a form on the steps that counted what distributions
% are in use by the users of this list. You can't trust what the marketing
% guys say or the claims of the pollster morons. It would be
% interesting What do the editors
Feigning erudition, Marvin Dickens wrote:
% I would like to see a form on the steps that counted what distributions
% are in use by the users of this list. You can't trust what the marketing
% guys say or the claims of the pollster morons. It would be
% interesting What do the editors
You might look at what http://stats.gentoo.org has. They have a
gentoo-stats that you can install and it sends the info to the gentoo stats
site.
Feigning erudition, Marvin Dickens wrote:
% I would like to see a form on the steps that counted what distributions
% are in use by the users
I would like to see a form on the steps that counted what distributions
are in use by the users of this list. You can't trust what the marketing
guys say or the claims of the pollster morons. It would be
interesting What do the editors think?
Best
Peck
On 12/23/02 19:55, Marvin Dickens wrote:
I would like to see a form on the steps that counted what distributions
are in use by the users of this list. You can't trust what the marketing
guys say or the claims of the pollster morons. It would be
interesting What do the editors think?
On Mon, 23 Dec 2002 20:26:03 -0800 Net Llama!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ snipped ]
But for what its worth, here's my data for the boxes where i have
root: 1 RH-7.2
3 RH-7.2 (XFS)
2 RH-6.2
1 RHAS-2.1
4 RH-7.3 (XFS)
1 COL-3.11
1 COL-2.4
2 RH-7.1
Wow, the COL-2.4 box must be almost as
On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 09:33:51PM -0700, Collins wrote:
On Mon, 23 Dec 2002 20:26:03 -0800 Net Llama!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ snipped ]
But for what its worth, here's my data for the boxes where i have
root: 1 RH-7.2
3 RH-7.2 (XFS)
2 RH-6.2
1 RHAS-2.1
4 RH-7.3 (XFS)
1 COL-3.11
1
On 12/23/02 20:33, Collins wrote:
On Mon, 23 Dec 2002 20:26:03 -0800 Net Llama!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ snipped ]
But for what its worth, here's my data for the boxes where i have
root: 1 RH-7.2
3 RH-7.2 (XFS)
2 RH-6.2
1 RHAS-2.1
4 RH-7.3 (XFS)
1 COL-3.11
1 COL-2.4
2 RH-7.1
Wow, the
32 matches
Mail list logo
