On Wednesday 21 November 2001 19:37, Kurt Wall enunciated:
> Keith Antoine wrote:
> > Do not think so mate, I use just the IP but cannot use a hostname.
>
> Thanks, Skippy. It looks like you were right. Naytheless, I found a
> way around that.
>
> K
Like to know if you are successful as I could
Keith Antoine wrote:
>
> Do not think so mate, I use just the IP but cannot use a hostname.
Thanks, Skippy. It looks like you were right. Naytheless, I found a
way around that.
K
--
Some people only open up to tell you that they're closed.
___
Linu
Kurt Wall wrote:
>
> dyndns.org is looking like the easier way. Do you use the MyDynDNS
> Custom DNS service? I want to use my own domain name and host my own
> services.
>
Yes, I use MyDynDNS.
> It looks like what I need to do is:
>
> 1. Set up an account wtih dyndyns.org
> 2. Delegate
Tim Wunder wrote:
>
> If it's @home, it's most likely just your account #. You can connect linux to
> it by passing the hostname with the dhcpcd request, dhcpcd -h eth?
I opted for static IP, so I'm not using dhcpcd.
> I'm really using dyndns.org to do it. That way, if @home ever does change m
On Tuesday 20 November 2001 08:48, Kurt Wall enunciated:
> Okay, so now I have cable access -- it's a beautiful thing after
> dial-up purgatory -- with a static IP. Theoretically, even though it
> isn't permitted, I can run server services. The installer set up one
> of my Windows boxes and gave i
On Mon, 19 Nov 2001 17:07:02 -0600 John Hiemenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Monday 19 November 2001 04:48 pm, you stated :
> > Okay, so now I have cable access -- it's a beautiful thing after
> > dial-up purgatory -- with a static IP. Theoretically, even though
> it
> > isn't permitted, I can
Previously, Kurt Wall chose to write:
> Okay, so now I have cable access -- it's a beautiful thing after
> dial-up purgatory -- with a static IP. Theoretically, even though it
> isn't permitted, I can run server services. The installer set up one
> of my Windows boxes and gave it this truly byzant
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 05:48:10PM -0500, Kurt Wall wrote:
>Okay, so now I have cable access -- it's a beautiful thing after
>dial-up purgatory -- with a static IP. Theoretically, even though it
>isn't permitted, I can run server services. The installer set up one
>of my Windows boxes and gave it
Quoting Kurt Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Okay, so now I have cable access -- it's a beautiful thing after
> dial-up purgatory -- with a static IP. Theoretically, even though it
> isn't permitted, I can run server services. The installer set up one
> of my Windows boxes and gave it this truly byza
On Monday 19 November 2001 04:48 pm, you stated :
> Okay, so now I have cable access -- it's a beautiful thing after
> dial-up purgatory -- with a static IP. Theoretically, even though it
> isn't permitted, I can run server services. The installer set up one
> of my Windows boxes and gave it this
Okay, so now I have cable access -- it's a beautiful thing after
dial-up purgatory -- with a static IP. Theoretically, even though it
isn't permitted, I can run server services. The installer set up one
of my Windows boxes and gave it this truly byzantine hostname but it
seems to me that I should
11 matches
Mail list logo
