each time I connect to the corporate wpa-enterprise network, iwlmvm crashes
distro is ArchLinux
- kernel is 4.19.0-rc8+
- networkmanager 1.14.1dev+13+g0d3234478-1
- wpa_supplicant 1:2.6-12
[ 1257.940526] BUG: scheduling while atomic: irq/133-iwlwifi/388/0x0403
[ 1257.940535] Modules linked
Hi All,
We use the mwifiex driver for wifi from kernel-backports-4.2.6.1 for
kernel version 3.2.26 and mwifiex driver from kernel tree 4.1.8
without backporting for kernel 4.1.8.
We are having issues connecting to the access point and looks like
authenticating issues during the initial
From: Emmanuel Grumbach
In BSS mode in the disconnection flow, mac80211 removes
the AP station before the vif is set to unassociated.
Our firmware wants it the other way around: first set
the vif as unassociated, and then remove the AP station.
In order to bridge
On Sat, 2016-07-23 at 06:26 -0700, Christopher Williamson wrote:
> Quick follow-up - I suspected the issue may be with wpa_supplicant
> rather than udev / kernel config.
>
> Since this does connect properly on open wireless networks the issue
> is now only with WPA/WPA2.
>
> It seems even the
Quick follow-up - I suspected the issue may be with wpa_supplicant
rather than udev / kernel config.
Since this does connect properly on open wireless networks the issue
is now only with WPA/WPA2.
It seems even the latest dev builds of Ubuntu are still stuck using
wpa_supplicant 2.4.x rather
Just to follow up on this - I performed a minimal ubuntu server
install (16.04.1), commented out the crda udev rule (since that was
setting the weird country: 98 issue) and tried again and it still
didn’t work.
I did confirm that the md5 sums for the firmware included with Arch is
the exact same
Hi all,
So I decided to have another fiddle with this and managed to get the
WiFi working perfectly first time on an ArchLinux LiveCD so it looks
like this issue is Ubuntu specific.
I’m going to copy the firmware files and check if they’re responsible
and work my way through the various
I haven’t managed to get connected to a WPA network either so it looks
like open only at the moment but I fear that may just have been a
fluke.
A big problem I’m facing is that editing /etc/default/crda to
REGDOMAIN=GB wasn’t enough to set the wifi regulation mode to GB and I
have to set it
Disregard - I have actually managed to get this to connect to a open network!
# iw reg set GB
# iw reg get
country GB: DFS-ETSI
(2402 - 2482 @ 40), (N/A, 20), (N/A)
(5170 - 5250 @ 80), (N/A, 20), (N/A)
(5250 - 5330 @ 80), (N/A, 20), (0 ms), DFS
(5490 - 5710 @ 160),
Ok so I created a guest wifi network without any encryption enabled at
all and the client still refuses to connect.
Again, the connection is made perfectly using the USB dongle I have
but not the built in libertas sd8686 chipset.
I do currently use pfSense as a firewall box behind my wireless
Hi Dan,
I will check out the WPA2 vs WPA vs open wireless thing in a few mins.
For now though - the iwlist scan results for both a USB device and the
libertas device:
USB: http://termbin.com/hdwl
Libertas: http://termbin.com/jxh7
Will follow up shortly with WPA and Open network configs.
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > following results:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > http://termbin.com/j8ea
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > &
irectly and get
> > >>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>> following results:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> http://termbin.com/j8ea
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>&g
gt; Can you try with "-D nl80211" instead of using the WEXT
> >>>>>> supplicant
> >>>>>> driver? NM is likely going to use nl80211 since the driver has
> >>>>>> some
> >>>>>> support
>>> support for cfg80211/nl80211 and only does WEXT through the glue
>>>>>> layer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dan
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Christopher Williamson
>>>>>>>
; > >
> > > > > > On 20 July 2016 at 22:50:34, Dan Williams
> > > > > > (d...@redhat.com(mailto:d...@redhat.com)) wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, 2016-07-20 at 13:06 -0700, Christopher Williamson
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Dan,
&
> Hi Dan,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ah - yeah I hadn’t thought it may be a kernel build option.
> > > > > > I’ve
> > > > > > now
> > > > > > built that and dmesg is a much more lively place!
> > > >
> > > > now
> > > > > built that and dmesg is a much more lively place!
> > > > >
> > > > > I’ve provided output logs for both when the device is connected
> > > > > and
> > > > > when a connection attempt is
n’t thought it may be a kernel build option. I’ve
> > > > now
> > > > built that and dmesg is a much more lively place!
> > > >
> > > > I’ve provided output logs for both when the device is connected
> > > > and
> > > > when a connec
is useful.
> >
> >
> > The card is scanning and only finds 'shaunthesheep' 20 seconds
> > after
> > you "connect for the first time". The logs stop 3 seconds later.
> > Are
> > you connecting with wicd or something else?
> >
> >
Tried a few more things worth mentioning:
- Tried connecting with wpa_supplicant & dhclient only but sadly
wpa_supplicant still cannot seem to hold a connection to the base
station.
It looks like the relevant errors here may be:
ioctl[SIOCSIWENCODEEXT]: Invalid argument
wlan0: Tr
I’ve provided output logs for both when the device is connected and
> > when a connection attempt is made - hopefully this is useful.
>
>
>
> The card is scanning and only finds 'shaunthesheep' 20 seconds after
> you "connect for the first time". The logs stop 3 second
gt; when a connection attempt is made - hopefully this is useful.
The card is scanning and only finds 'shaunthesheep' 20 seconds after
you "connect for the first time". The logs stop 3 seconds later. Are
you connecting with wicd or something else?
Can you run wpa_supplicant with the &quo
Hi Dan,
Ah - yeah I hadn’t thought it may be a kernel build option. I’ve now
built that and dmesg is a much more lively place!
I’ve provided output logs for both when the device is connected and
when a connection attempt is made - hopefully this is useful.
When I first connect the device:
oing something more than
> > just asking for the password again like it did with NetworkManager
> > but so far no further progress on getting this working properly.
> >
> > Christopher Williamson
> >
> >
> >
> > On 19 July 2016 at 18:03:16, Christop
gt; on getting this working properly.
>
> Christopher Williamson
>
>
>
> On 19 July 2016 at 18:03:16, Christopher Williamson
> (h...@chrisaw.com(mailto:h...@chrisaw.com)) wrote:
>
> > Absolutely!
> >
> > With the debug logging enabled I got the
but so far no
further progress on getting this working properly.
Christopher Williamson
On 19 July 2016 at 18:03:16, Christopher Williamson
(h...@chrisaw.com(mailto:h...@chrisaw.com)) wrote:
> Absolutely!
>
> With the debug logging enabled I got the following:
>
> Connecting the d
Absolutely!
With the debug logging enabled I got the following:
Connecting the device initially with debug enabled:
[ 205.302685] libertas_sdio: Libertas SDIO driver
[ 205.302698] libertas_sdio: Copyright Pierre Ossman
[ 205.503465] cfg80211: World regulatory domain updated:
[ 205.503478
On Tue, 2016-07-19 at 12:06 -0400, Christopher Williamson wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>
> I’ve just got myself a Viliv N5 and am trying to get the integrated
> Wifi chipset working on it.
>
> I am able to see networks around me but any attempts to connect them
> appear to time out and fail.
>
> I
Hi everyone!
I’ve just got myself a Viliv N5 and am trying to get the integrated
Wifi chipset working on it.
I am able to see networks around me but any attempts to connect them
appear to time out and fail.
I have filed a linux kernel bug related to this issue:
Vishal Thanki wrote on 27 April 2016:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 02:21:36PM +1000, Craig McQueen wrote:
> > I have a D-Link DWA-140 USB Wi-Fi device which is rt2800 based (5392
> chipset). I've been testing it on a BeagleBone Black running an Ubuntu 16.04
> image (4.4.6 kernel).
> >
> > 1) Install
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 2:02 AM, Belisko Marek wrote:
>
> Hi Krishna,
>
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 10:21 PM, Krishna Chaitanya
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Belisko Marek
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
>
Hi Krishna,
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 10:21 PM, Krishna Chaitanya
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Belisko Marek wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm using kernel 4.1 with option CONFIG_CFG80211_INTERNAL_REGDB
>> enabled. I have set one country
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Belisko Marek wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm using kernel 4.1 with option CONFIG_CFG80211_INTERNAL_REGDB
> enabled. I have set one country in db.txt which during startup I set
> via 'iw reg set XX'. When connected to some AP which sends country
Hello,
I'm using kernel 4.1 with option CONFIG_CFG80211_INTERNAL_REGDB
enabled. I have set one country in db.txt which during startup I set
via 'iw reg set XX'. When connected to some AP which sends country
code (e.g. SK) region is overwritten to 00 (in kernel log there is
some timeout message -
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 1:23 AM, Craig McQueen
wrote:
> Vishal Thanki wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 7:56 AM, Craig McQueen
>> wrote:
>> > Vishal Thanki wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 02:21:36PM +1000, Craig
Vishal Thanki wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 7:56 AM, Craig McQueen
> wrote:
> > Vishal Thanki wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 02:21:36PM +1000, Craig McQueen wrote:
> >> > I have a D-Link DWA-140 USB Wi-Fi device which is rt2800 based
> >> >
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 7:56 AM, Craig McQueen
wrote:
> Vishal Thanki wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 02:21:36PM +1000, Craig McQueen wrote:
>> > I have a D-Link DWA-140 USB Wi-Fi device which is rt2800 based (5392
>> chipset). I've been testing it on a
Vishal Thanki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 02:21:36PM +1000, Craig McQueen wrote:
> > I have a D-Link DWA-140 USB Wi-Fi device which is rt2800 based (5392
> chipset). I've been testing it on a BeagleBone Black running an Ubuntu 16.04
> image (4.4.6 kernel).
> >
> > 1) Install Ubuntu
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 02:21:36PM +1000, Craig McQueen wrote:
> I have a D-Link DWA-140 USB Wi-Fi device which is rt2800 based (5392
> chipset). I've been testing it on a BeagleBone Black running an Ubuntu 16.04
> image (4.4.6 kernel).
>
> 1) Install Ubuntu 16.04 on a BeagleBone Black.
>
I previously wrote:
>
> I have a D-Link DWA-140 USB Wi-Fi device which is rt2800 based (5392
> chipset). I've been testing it on a BeagleBone Black running an Ubuntu 16.04
> image (4.4.6 kernel).
>
> 1) Install Ubuntu 16.04 on a BeagleBone Black.
> 2) Add lines to /etc/network/interfaces for the
I have a D-Link DWA-140 USB Wi-Fi device which is rt2800 based (5392 chipset).
I've been testing it on a BeagleBone Black running an Ubuntu 16.04 image (4.4.6
kernel).
1) Install Ubuntu 16.04 on a BeagleBone Black.
2) Add lines to /etc/network/interfaces for the device to connect to a WPA2
Alex writes:
> Apr 01 11:33:24 arch kernel: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer
> dereference at 0003
> Apr 01 11:33:24 arch kernel: IP: []
> usbnet_generic_cdc_bind+0x171/0x710 [cdc_ether]
..
> Apr 01 11:33:24 arch kernel: Call Trace:
> Apr 01 11:33:24
wmi_evt_connect doesn't check if the connect event is received for
an already connected station.
This can lead to memory leak as a new vring is allocated without
freeing the previously allocated vring and to unexpected behavior
of nl80211 layer due to unexpected notification of a new station.
Add
wmi_evt_connect doesn't check if the connect event is received for
an already connected station.
This can lead to memory leak as a new vring is allocated without
freeing the previously allocated vring and to unexpected behavior
of nl80211 layer due to unexpected notification of a new station.
Add
If connection fails, wilc1000_connecting needs to be set false also and return
immediately because goto lable 'done' doesn't do anything. Remove lable 'done'
as well.
Signed-off-by: Glen Lee
---
drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c | 13 ++---
1 file
If connection fails, wilc1000_connecting needs to be set false also and return
immediately because goto lable 'done' doesn't do anything. Remove lable 'done'
as well.
Signed-off-by: Glen Lee
---
drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c | 13 ++---
1 file
Connecting GNUnet with Openwrt
Is this the right place to forward this email?
Kind regards
Demos
Weitergeleitete Nachricht
Betreff: Re: [GNUnet-developers] EDN
Datum: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 22:33:50 +0200
Von: Christian Grothoff groth...@gnunet.org
An: demos de...@posteo.de, gnunet
On Sun, 2015-02-08 at 15:52 +0200, Dedy Lansky wrote:
@@ -961,6 +961,12 @@ int cfg80211_connect(struct cfg80211_registered_device
*rdev,
memcpy(wdev-ssid, connect-ssid, connect-ssid_len);
wdev-ssid_len = connect-ssid_len;
+ wdev-conn_bss_type = IEEE80211_BSS_TYPE_ESS;
+
Jouni Malinen wrote:
punishing the vast majority of cases where the AP is perfectly fine
with higher MCS rates
First make it work (everywhere), then make it fast (where possible).
//Peter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-wireless in
the body of a message to
On 26 February 2015 at 02:20, Jouni Malinen j...@w1.fi wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:14:45AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
While I realize that people may disagree about the exact details of
how to fix this in the long run, may I suggest that in the meantime we
at least get the two
On 02/26/15 06:55, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Because it looks like the brcmsmac driver has*exactly* the same
behavior with this AP (in an Apple Macbook air). I assume brcmsmac
uses the net/80211/tx.c logic too.
That makes sense as brcmsmac is a mac80211 driver that uses the
minstrel-ht rate
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:14:45AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
While I realize that people may disagree about the exact details of
how to fix this in the long run, may I suggest that in the meantime we
at least get the two workaround patches applied?
Does anybody hate Jouni's two patches
from both probing
and aggregation, it should be safe. While it's connecting, that leaves
in low rates in the retry chain anyway.
Not low enough IMHO. EAPOL is a special case and needs to be addressed
as such. It is special for at least two reasons: being very early in the
association (well, the very
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:38:02PM +0100, Thomas Hühn wrote:
Minstrel_HT does only set mrr[0..2] and does not touch the fourth mrr[3],
assumed chips with 4 mrr stages.
In function minstrel_ht_update_rates() the rate table struct
ieee80211_sta_rates is set for the first 3 out of 4 rates and
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Jouni Malinen j...@w1.fi wrote:
There may be something else wrong (say, some kind of interference), but
there is no way we can assume normal users to be able to fix such
issues. If we make EAPOL frames go through more robustly, the connection
can be
Linus Torvalds wrote:
Last time I had connection issues with this laptop, nothing ended up
happening in the end, and I had people pipe up saying they had had
similar problems. I'd hate for the same nothing to happen this time
just because people aren't 100% sure what the final right thing is
On 25 February 2015 at 10:14, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
While I realize that people may disagree about the exact details of
how to fix this in the long run, may I suggest that in the meantime we
at least get the two workaround patches applied?
I'm talking about the
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 7:22 AM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 25 February 2015 at 10:14, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
While I realize that people may disagree about the exact details of
how to fix this in the long run, may I suggest that in the meantime we
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
I'm talking about the two from Jouni - the don't encrypt EAPOL
frames one, and the one-liner that makes all EAPOL frames go at the
lowest data rate.
So I just found out and confirmed that this is not
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 01:29:27PM +1100, Andrew McGregor wrote:
Over the weekend I found a bug in minstrel-ht that might well be
implicated here.
The last retransmit rate is meant to be a 'get the packet there
reliably' rate; minstrel-ht doesn't do that right, and can pick a
fairly flaky
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 2:26 AM, Jouni Malinen j...@w1.fi wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 01:29:27PM +1100, Andrew McGregor wrote:
Over the weekend I found a bug in minstrel-ht that might well be
implicated here.
The last retransmit rate is meant to be a 'get the packet there
reliably' rate;
Hi Jouni,
Currently Minstrel_HT just skips EAPOL packets for its rate sampling on non-mrr
chips by testing: (info-control.flags IEEE80211_TX_CTRL_PORT_CTRL_PROTO)
On mrr hardware it uses them for probing.
But the general MRR-chain should look like this for ath5k and ath9k chips that
support 4
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 06:54:47PM +0100, Thomas Hühn wrote:
Currently Minstrel_HT just skips EAPOL packets for its rate sampling on
non-mrr chips by testing: (info-control.flags
IEEE80211_TX_CTRL_PORT_CTRL_PROTO)
Yeah, I noticed that when going through the implementation, but it was
indeed
Hi,
I thought about doing this for rate probing with FreeBSD's sample rate
algorithm, but after actually having to use the damned thing in noisy
environments I realised that it just wasn't worth the effort to
optimise rate control selection whilst doing EAPOL frames.
If we did more useful
Hi Jouni,
Where is that mrr[3] part implemented? I did not find it when reviewing
the design (hw-max_rates = 3 is used, but not = 4) and this does not
match my experiments either when printing out all four values from
ath9k. In every single case I observed, the last entry was unused (idx =
connecting, that leaves
in low rates in the retry chain anyway.
If it still fails often enough to be noticeable under normal conditions,
there must be something seriously wrong outside of rate control, and we
should not paper over it with a crude band-aid workaround.
- Felix
--
To unsubscribe from
If it is the case that the 4-way handshake fails, then I have seen this
issue before. The problem is that messages 1 to 4 are sent with the
previous key. However, right after sending message 4/4, does
wpa_supplicant set the new key. In some cases, such as in a high
throughput environment, this
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:55:30AM +0100, wim torfs wrote:
If it is the case that the 4-way handshake fails, then I have seen
this issue before. The problem is that messages 1 to 4 are sent with
the previous key. However, right after sending message 4/4, does
wpa_supplicant set the new key. In
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 05:41:25PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Nope, everything else I have seems to be intel wireless. I think one
of the kids machines is a Mac Mini with an ath5k thing, but I'm hoping
the wpa_supplicant.log is sufficient to give somebody an idea.
It looks like there are two
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 05:41:25PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Ok. Attached is what seems to be the relevant part of the
wpa_supplicant.log file.
The datestamp has been changed so that it can be matched up with the
dmesg, and I added empty lines for pauses when I was trying to figure
out
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 12:06:09PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Jouni Malinen j...@w1.fi wrote:
mac80211: Do not encrypt EAPOL frames before peer has used the key
Hmm. This patch does not seem to make a difference. I thought it did
at first, but then removed
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Jouni Malinen j...@w1.fi wrote:
mac80211: Do not encrypt EAPOL frames before peer has used the key
Hmm. This patch does not seem to make a difference. I thought it did
at first, but then removed the wpa_supplicant debugging, and got the
same failures.
On Sun,
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
This machine has a fairly minimal kernel config. Does that type
monitor interface perhaps need some debug infrastructure that I
haven't added?
Nope. Same behavior with a F21 kernel (which means that the
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Jouni Malinen j...@w1.fi wrote:
How far is the station from the AP? Would it be possible to see whether
the behavior changes if you were within, say, five meters or so?
Well, it was pretty much within five meters already, but there was a
thin wall in between
On 23 February 2015 at 13:53, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Jouni Malinen j...@w1.fi wrote:
How far is the station from the AP? Would it be possible to see whether
the behavior changes if you were within, say, five meters or so?
Well, it
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 02:22:32PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 23 February 2015 at 13:53, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
So the theory that the driver starts at too high a transmit rate, and
then does not handle failures well, might be true. Of course, not
handle
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Jouni Malinen j...@w1.fi wrote:
This did not get exactly supportive response when this was proposed last
time (Sep 2013). Anyway, for a quick test, this can be done with the
following one-liner:
fwiw, that one-liner seems to work fine for me.
Which I guess is
Jouni Malinen wrote:
Even I think that this goes a bit too far especially on 2.4 GHz band,
but I would actually consider limiting EAPOL frames to using non-HT/VHT
(e.g., 6 Mbps OFDM at least for EAPOL-Key frames) to avoid some
interoperability issues. I would say that the current minstrel_ht
(sorry to send HTML the first time... oops)
Over the weekend I found a bug in minstrel-ht that might well be
implicated here.
The last retransmit rate is meant to be a 'get the packet there
reliably' rate; minstrel-ht doesn't do that right, and can pick a
fairly flaky rate instead.
Can't
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 03:00:39PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Jouni Malinen j...@w1.fi wrote:
This did not get exactly supportive response when this was proposed last
time (Sep 2013). Anyway, for a quick test, this can be done with the
following
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 10:50 PM, Sujith Manoharan suj...@msujith.org wrote:
Can you please post the output of 'iw dev wlp1s0 scan' ?
Attached.
It's the UniFi-home SSID that doesn't work. The 1gnoraNT one is the
old working one that I'm obviously associated with, and that has
multiple AP's.
recall having issues with fast_reauth once, but I never stuck around
that location long enough to debug it.
Nope. Did that, killed wpa_supplicant (which restarts it), tried
connecting, still failed.
Hint: Several unifi (and most ubnt) products are well supported by
openwrt directly, which
having issues with fast_reauth once, but I never stuck around
that location long enough to debug it.
Nope. Did that, killed wpa_supplicant (which restarts it), tried
connecting, still failed.
Hm, can you enable wpa debugging to log everything whilst it's
associating / reassociating?
(maybe
enough to debug it.
Nope. Did that, killed wpa_supplicant (which restarts it), tried
connecting, still failed.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-wireless in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info
On 21 February 2015 at 15:34, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
So I've had problems connecting to some networks before on my
Chromebook Pixel, but now I'm testing a new Ubiquiti network at home,
and can see this issue at home too.
I know the wireless works, because other
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hm, can you enable wpa debugging to log everything whilst it's
associating / reassociating?
Ugh. When I add -dd to the command line, it has now worked three
times in a row, when before it worked once out of ten tries.
So
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Kyle Bassett kylebass...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
Hint: Several unifi (and most ubnt) products are well
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
Hint: Several unifi (and most ubnt) products are well supported by
openwrt directly,
I want Linux to just work. None of this oh, you can change
something else and it probably works. I want to fix the problem in
*linux*.
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
Ugh. When I add -dd to the command line, it has now worked three
times in a row, when before it worked once out of ten tries.
So my guess is that it's something timing-dependent.
So it stays working with
Linus Torvalds wrote:
14:07:23.542927: wlp1s0: Event DEAUTH (12) received
14:07:23.542946: wlp1s0: Deauthentication notification
14:07:23.542964: wlp1s0: * reason 2
14:07:23.542982: wlp1s0: * address 20:9f:db:e7:80:80
14:07:23.542997: Deauthentication frame IE(s) - hexdump(len=0): [NULL]
Sujith Manoharan wrote:
'iw dev wlp1s0 set bitrates ht-mcs-2.4 1' would choose a lower
rate for the key-exchange frames.
Or 'iw dev wlp1s0 set bitrates ht-mcs-2.4 0' to choose the lowest
HT rate.
Sujith
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-wireless in
the body of a
Linus Torvalds wrote:
I've got the wpa supplicant log for this timeframe, but I'd rather not
send it out in public. I see [REMOVED] for what looks like the key
data, but there's a lot of other hex data. Is any of it sensitive?
Unless the '-K' option is used with wpa_s, the keys are not
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Do you have a 5GHz SSID setup on this access point? Is this kind of
messed up diassociation-to-steer-you-to-another-band thing?
Nope. That's the older single-band UniFi UAP - 2.4GHz only.
Linus
--
: External notification - portEnabled=1
14:07:19.503818: EAPOL: SUPP_PAE entering state CONNECTING
14:07:19.503828: EAPOL: enable timer tick
14:07:19.503838: EAPOL: SUPP_BE entering state IDLE
14:07:19.503852: wlp1s0: Setting authentication timeout: 10 sec 0 usec
14:07:19.503864: wlp1s0: Cancelling scan
So the interesting part thus far:
14:07:23.513500: RTM_NEWLINK: operstate=1 ifi_flags=0x1003 ([UP])
14:07:23.513662: RTM_NEWLINK, IFLA_IFNAME: Interface 'wlp1s0' added
14:07:23.513842: nl80211: if_removed already cleared - ignore event
14:07:23.536309: nl80211: Event message available
On 22 February 2015 at 15:00, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
Ugh. When I add -dd to the command line, it has now worked three
times in a row, when before it worked once out of ten tries.
in wdev
(conn_bss_type). This field is used later (e.g. in __cfg80211_connect_result)
when calling cfg80211_get_bss() for finding the BSS we are connecting to.
Signed-off-by: Dedy Lansky dlan...@codeaurora.org
---
include/net/cfg80211.h | 2 ++
net/wireless/sme.c | 12 +---
2 files
when connecting, print some info about BSS
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Kondratiev qca_vkond...@qca.qualcomm.com
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/cfg80211.c | 18 ++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/cfg80211.c
b/drivers/net/wireless
100 matches
Mail list logo