On Sunday 04 July 2010 11:25:11 Raj Mathur (राज माथुर) wrote:
On Saturday 03 Jul 2010, jtd wrote:
On Saturday 03 July 2010 18:51:28 Raj Mathur (राज माथुर) wrote:
Ah, long time since we had a BSD vs GPL flamewar!
/me gets the popcorn and sells tickets to the show at the door.
BSD is
On Sunday 04 Jul 2010, jtd wrote:
Hmm... Looks like the world cup is more interesting.
I agree. Kids today... don't even know how to have a proper flame-war.
Hell, when we were young by this time we'd have had 3 broken kneecaps, 4
seven-generation vendettas, 15 unsubscriptions from the
On 07/04/2010 05:42 PM, Raj Mathur (राज माथुर) wrote:
On Sunday 04 Jul 2010, jtd wrote:
Hmm... Looks like the world cup is more interesting.
I agree. Kids today... don't even know how to have a proper flame-war.
So true :-) ...I think part of the problem is that the kids these days are just
On Friday 02 July 2010 22:55:27 narendra sisodiya wrote:
I don't think the app can be both GPL and in public domain. but then
INAL.
As per my knowledge, I may be wrong,
you are wrong
If something is not copyrighted then it becomes public domain.
the moment you publish anything, you
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.org wrote:
On Friday 02 July 2010 22:55:27 narendra sisodiya wrote:
I don't think the app can be both GPL and in public domain. but then
INAL.
As per my knowledge, I may be wrong,
you are wrong
If something is not
On Saturday 03 July 2010 4:33:30 pm narendra sisodiya wrote:
We cannot say like this. which license has more freedom.
Well actually you can, the GPL limits you to release your derivative work
under the same license, whereas the BSD license dosnt have such a restriction.
and is therefore offers
2010/7/3 narendra sisodiya naren...@narendrasisodiya.com:
We cannot say like this. which license has more freedom. If you think a
developer who want social work then BSD is best option. Let you develop
something and throw to the whole world irrespective of the fact that world
is not good as
On Saturday 03 Jul 2010, narendra sisodiya wrote:
We cannot say like this. which license has more freedom. If you think
a developer who want social work then BSD is best option. Let you
develop something and throw to the whole world irrespective of the
fact that world is not good as you are. I
Hi Pratik,
On 07/02/2010 02:35 PM, Pratik Anand wrote:
ok,
regarding all the confusion related to licensing . I am going to include
gnu/gpl v3 with the src code and mention it in every file.
and the app is in public domain, free to use, redistribute,modify and
improve.
As others have
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Anurag anu...@gnuer.org wrote:
2010/7/3 narendra sisodiya naren...@narendrasisodiya.com:
We cannot say like this. which license has more freedom. If you think a
developer who want social work then BSD is best option. Let you develop
something and throw to
On Saturday 03 July 2010 18:51:28 Raj Mathur (राज माथुर) wrote:
On Saturday 03 Jul 2010, narendra sisodiya wrote:
We cannot say like this. which license has more freedom. If you
think a developer who want social work then BSD is best option.
Let you develop something and throw to the whole
On Friday 02 July 2010 22:55:27 narendra sisodiya wrote:
As KG said, in Indian Law, we must tell that some page/software is
under public domain. If somebody is not including copyright notice
then it is not under private domain, nor it is under public domain
then where it will fall?
Exactly
http://copyright.gov.in/Documents/handbook.html
--
Rgds
JTD
--
http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
On Saturday 03 Jul 2010, jtd wrote:
On Saturday 03 July 2010 18:51:28 Raj Mathur (राज माथुर) wrote:
Ah, long time since we had a BSD vs GPL flamewar!
/me gets the popcorn and sells tickets to the show at the door.
BSD is devilish.
Will the BSD advocates in the Blue corner please stand
On 02-Jul-2010, at 10:22 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
On Thursday 01 July 2010 18:45:28 Saswata Banerjee Associates wrote:
no - according to Indian law, one has to explicitly throw the work into
public domain. At present he has the copyright to the application, and
since he has not
On Friday 02 July 2010 13:45:45 Saswata Banerjee Associates wrote:
On 02-Jul-2010, at 10:22 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
On Thursday 01 July 2010 18:45:28 Saswata Banerjee Associates
wrote:
no - according to Indian law, one has to explicitly throw the
work into public domain. At present
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Saswata Banerjee Associates
scr...@saswatabanerjee.com wrote:
On 02-Jul-2010, at 10:22 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
On Thursday 01 July 2010 18:45:28 Saswata Banerjee Associates wrote:
no - according to Indian law, one has to explicitly throw the work
ok,
regarding all the confusion related to licensing . I am going to include
gnu/gpl v3 with the src code and mention it in every file.
and the app is in public domain, free to use, redistribute,modify and
improve.
Anyways,, one can always test it online on the link I had provided earlier
2010/7/2 Pratik Anand pratik.pr...@gmail.com:
ok,
regarding all the confusion related to licensing . I am going to include
gnu/gpl v3 with the src code and mention it in every file.
and the app is in public domain, free to use, redistribute,modify and
improve.
I don't think the app can be
On Friday 02 Jul 2010, Pratik Anand wrote:
regarding all the confusion related to licensing . I am going to
include gnu/gpl v3 with the src code and mention it in every file.
and the app is in public domain, free to use, redistribute,modify and
improve.
This is excellent. However, as Anurag
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Anurag anu...@gnuer.org wrote:
2010/7/2 Pratik Anand pratik.pr...@gmail.com:
ok,
regarding all the confusion related to licensing .
chill, We were just discussing.. to explore more...
I am going to include
gnu/gpl v3 with the src code and mention it in
2010/7/2 Raj Mathur (राज माथुर) r...@linux-delhi.org
On Friday 02 Jul 2010, Pratik Anand wrote:
regarding all the confusion related to licensing . I am going to
include gnu/gpl v3 with the src code and mention it in every file.
and the app is in public domain, free to use,
On Friday 02 July 2010 14:35:59 Pratik Anand wrote:
regarding all the confusion related to licensing . I am going to include
gnu/gpl v3 with the src code and mention it in every file.
and the app is in public domain, free to use, redistribute,modify and
improve.
please do not confuse
On Friday 02 July 2010 23:02:03 narendra sisodiya wrote:
If you would like to contribute towards reducing the noise on this list,
Noise !!! I do not think so. we were just discussing about the
possibilities and corresponding laws. This discussion is more productive
then end-less flame
On Friday 02 July 2010 14:13:00 jtd wrote:
In any case, no court in India will accept the statement saying
they were asked to preview and not to use. Specially not in the
light of the contents of the mail he had sent and the fact that he
sent it to ILUG
Afaik preview means that you have
hello all,
This is my twitter web app on which I have been working for about a month.
It is coded entirely in php-curl.It can be used to post tweets, see received
tweets,followers, replies etc. of the person whose login name is provided
(for posting tweets and seeing replies, one will have to
On Thursday 01 July 2010 02:05:11 Pratik Anand wrote:
Please have a look and give reviews. this is my first attempt at making a
functional web application.
good - keep it up. Only one thing - I cannot find any license information. What
license is it released under? or is it in public domain?
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.org wrote:
On Thursday 01 July 2010 02:05:11 Pratik Anand wrote:
Please have a look and give reviews. this is my first attempt at making a
functional web application.
good - keep it up. Only one thing - I cannot find any license
On Thursday 01 July 2010 13:26:55 Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
good - keep it up. Only one thing - I cannot find any license
information. What license is it released under? or is it in public
domain?
Pratik, here's a good place to start if you don't know much about
licensing:
Sorry, I totally forgot to add license information. Since it is still under
development so haven't given much thought about it.
I was originally thinking to release it under gnu/gpl v3 but thanx to links
provided by you ppl, will first have a look at all the available licenses
and then put up.
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Pratik Anand pratik.pr...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry, I totally forgot to add license information.
Does it mean the current version is under public domain ?
As per my knowledge, if you forget to add license information then the work
goes to public domain.
Any
On Thursday 01 July 2010 15:14:03 narendra sisodiya wrote:
Sorry, I totally forgot to add license information.
Does it mean the current version is under public domain ?
As per my knowledge, if you forget to add license information then the work
goes to public domain.
no - according to
ok, so for making it publicly available, I have to include a license file
(say gpl v3) with the soure at github and mention it on the app's website?
no - according to Indian law, one has to explicitly throw the work into
public
domain. At present he has the copyright to the application, and
2010/7/1 Pratik Anand pratik.pr...@gmail.com:
ok, so for making it publicly available, I have to include a license file
(say gpl v3) with the soure at github and mention it on the app's website?
you'll also need to put a mini gpl(or other) license statement, and
mention your copyright notice at
On 01-Jul-2010, at 3:21 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
On Thursday 01 July 2010 15:14:03 narendra sisodiya wrote:
Sorry, I totally forgot to add license information.
Does it mean the current version is under public domain ?
As per my knowledge, if you forget to add license information then
He has said, please have a look and give reviews - nothing implicit
about it. I would say that that was a pretty explicit invitation.
Sanjay
On 1 July 2010 18:45, Saswata Banerjee Associates
scr...@saswatabanerjee.com wrote:
On 01-Jul-2010, at 3:21 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
On Thursday
On Thursday 01 July 2010 15:55:48 Pratik Anand wrote:
ok, so for making it publicly available, I have to include a license file
(say gpl v3) with the soure at github and mention it on the app's website?
for BSD type licenses, yes - I think GPL you have to put it in every file of
the site
On Thursday 01 July 2010 18:45:28 Saswata Banerjee Associates wrote:
no - according to Indian law, one has to explicitly throw the work into
public domain. At present he has the copyright to the application, and
since he has not licensed it and given permission for people to download,
On Thursday 01 July 2010 20:20:08 Sanjay Singhvi wrote:
He has said, please have a look and give reviews - nothing implicit
about it. I would say that that was a pretty explicit invitation.
precisely - he says, have a look, give reviews - he does not say that you are
free to download, use,
39 matches
Mail list logo
