On Oct 14, 2011, at 1:31 PM, Hans J. Koch wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:50:58AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
From: Kai Jiang kai.ji...@freescale.com
To support 32-bit physical addresses for UIO_MEM_PHYS type we need to
extend the width of 'addr' in struct uio_mem. Numerous platforms like
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:00:55AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Oct 14, 2011, at 1:31 PM, Hans J. Koch wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:50:58AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
From: Kai Jiang kai.ji...@freescale.com
To support 32-bit physical addresses for UIO_MEM_PHYS type we need to
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 07:18:59PM +0200, Hans J. Koch wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:00:55AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Oct 14, 2011, at 1:31 PM, Hans J. Koch wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:50:58AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
From: Kai Jiang kai.ji...@freescale.com
To
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 08:03:51PM +0200, Hans J. Koch wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 07:18:59PM +0200, Hans J. Koch wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:00:55AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Oct 14, 2011, at 1:31 PM, Hans J. Koch wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:50:58AM -0500, Kumar
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:23:45AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 08:03:51PM +0200, Hans J. Koch wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 07:18:59PM +0200, Hans J. Koch wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:00:55AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Oct 14, 2011, at 1:31 PM, Hans J. Koch
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:50:58AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
From: Kai Jiang kai.ji...@freescale.com
To support 32-bit physical addresses for UIO_MEM_PHYS type we need to
extend the width of 'addr' in struct uio_mem. Numerous platforms like
embedded PPC, ARM, and X86 have support for systems
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 08:31:45PM +0200, Hans J. Koch wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:50:58AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
From: Kai Jiang kai.ji...@freescale.com
To support 32-bit physical addresses for UIO_MEM_PHYS type we need to
extend the width of 'addr' in struct uio_mem. Numerous
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:36:33PM -0600, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 08:31:45PM +0200, Hans J. Koch wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:50:58AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
From: Kai Jiang kai.ji...@freescale.com
To support 32-bit physical addresses for UIO_MEM_PHYS type we need
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
ge...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
Do we believe phys_addr_t is always greater than or equal to size need for
logical virtual addresses?
Yes:
#ifdef CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT
typedef u64 phys_addr_t;
#else
typedef u32 phys_addr_t;
#endif
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 16:10, Tabi Timur-B04825 b04...@freescale.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
ge...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
Do we believe phys_addr_t is always greater than or equal to size need for
logical virtual addresses?
Yes:
#ifdef
Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
You deleted this part:
config PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT
def_bool 64BIT || ARCH_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT
which enforces that PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT is enabled if 64BIT is set.
Ok, I didn't catch that before, but it makes sense now. Thanks.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel
From: Kai Jiang kai.ji...@freescale.com
To support 32-bit physical addresses for UIO_MEM_PHYS type we need to
extend the width of 'addr' in struct uio_mem. Numerous platforms like
embedded PPC, ARM, and X86 have support for systems with larger physical
address than logical.
Since 'addr' may
From: Kai Jiang kai.ji...@freescale.com
To support 32-bit physical addresses for UIO_MEM_PHYS type we need to
extend the width of 'addr' in struct uio_mem. Numerous platforms like
embedded PPC, ARM, and X86 have support for systems with larger physical
address than logical.
Since 'addr' may
On Oct 12, 2011, at 10:32 AM, Hans J. Koch wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 09:35:45AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
From: Kai Jiang kai.ji...@freescale.com
To support 32-bit physical addresses for UIO_MEM_PHYS type we need to
extend the width of 'addr' in struct uio_mem. Numerous platforms like
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 18:07, Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Oct 12, 2011, at 10:32 AM, Hans J. Koch wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 09:35:45AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
From: Kai Jiang kai.ji...@freescale.com
To support 32-bit physical addresses for UIO_MEM_PHYS type we need
On Oct 12, 2011, at 11:19 AM, Hans J. Koch wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 05:32:29PM +0200, Hans J. Koch wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 09:35:45AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
From: Kai Jiang kai.ji...@freescale.com
To support 32-bit physical addresses for UIO_MEM_PHYS type we need to
extend
On Oct 12, 2011, at 3:23 PM, Hans J. Koch wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 01:40:22PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Oct 12, 2011, at 11:19 AM, Hans J. Koch wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 05:32:29PM +0200, Hans J. Koch wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 09:35:45AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
From:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:07:09AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Oct 12, 2011, at 10:32 AM, Hans J. Koch wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 09:35:45AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
From: Kai Jiang kai.ji...@freescale.com
To support 32-bit physical addresses for UIO_MEM_PHYS type we need to
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 09:35:45AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
From: Kai Jiang kai.ji...@freescale.com
To support 32-bit physical addresses for UIO_MEM_PHYS type we need to
extend the width of 'addr' in struct uio_mem. Numerous platforms like
embedded PPC, ARM, and X86 have support for systems
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 05:32:29PM +0200, Hans J. Koch wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 09:35:45AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
From: Kai Jiang kai.ji...@freescale.com
To support 32-bit physical addresses for UIO_MEM_PHYS type we need to
extend the width of 'addr' in struct uio_mem. Numerous
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 01:40:22PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Oct 12, 2011, at 11:19 AM, Hans J. Koch wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 05:32:29PM +0200, Hans J. Koch wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 09:35:45AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
From: Kai Jiang kai.ji...@freescale.com
To support
21 matches
Mail list logo
