Hi All,
This call is now closed.
In the last two weeks several emails have shown support in moving the document
to standard track.
As such it seems that the WG has consensus on this change.
The authors are invited to submit a new revision of the document and change
intended status.
The new
Support.
-Prakash
From: lisp on behalf of Lori Jakab
Date: Tuesday, January 23, 2024 at 2:02 AM
To: lisp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [lisp] Moving draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding to standard track?
Support.
-Lori
On 1/22/24 11:55 PM, Marc Portoles Comeras (mportole) wrote:
I also support moving
draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding to standard
track?
I support moving this document to the standards track.
Victor
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 3:51 AM Jordi Paillissé
wrote:
Support!
Jordi
El 11/1/24 a les 18:34, Fabio Maino (fmaino) ha escrit:
I support moving this document
I also support moving this document to Standard track
From: lisp on behalf of Victor Moreno
Date: Friday, January 12, 2024 at 7:57 AM
To: Jordi Paillissé
Cc: lisp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [lisp] Moving draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding to standard track?
I support moving this document
gt; Fabio
>
>
>
> *From: *lisp on behalf of
> Luigi Iannone
> *Date: *Thursday, January 11, 2024 at 4:53 AM
> *To: *LISP mailing list list
> *Cc: *lisp-cha...@ietf.org
> *Subject: *[lisp] Moving draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding to standard track?
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
] Moving draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding to standard track?
Hi All,
Happy new year!
As you may have seen from Alberto’s shepherd review of the name
encoding document, it is suggested to move the document to standard track.
Jim Guichard (our AD) is OK as long as the WG is OK with this change
I support moving this document to standard track
Fabio
From: lisp on behalf of Luigi Iannone
Date: Thursday, January 11, 2024 at 4:53 AM
To: LISP mailing list list
Cc: lisp-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [lisp] Moving draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding to standard track?
Hi All,
Happy new year
In favor.
Dino
> On Jan 11, 2024, at 7:52 AM, Luigi Iannone wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Happy new year!
>
> As you may have seen from Alberto’s shepherd review of the name encoding
> document, it is suggested to move the document to standard track.
>
> Jim Guichard (our AD) is OK as long as
Hi All,
Happy new year!
As you may have seen from Alberto’s shepherd review of the name encoding
document, it is suggested to move the document to standard track.
Jim Guichard (our AD) is OK as long as the WG is OK with this change and that
deployment experience is added to the document.
