[pfSense] Some upgrades from 2.4.2-1 to 2.4.3-1 failed at reboot

2018-05-24 Thread Odette Nsaka
Hi all, I upgraded some pfSense on APU CPU Type AMD GX-412TC SOC 4 CPUs: 1 package(s) x 4 core(s) AES-NI CPU Crypto: Yes (active) from 2.4.2-1 to 2.4.3-1 The first one via cmd-line (VPN - SSH). It was installed with the default single disk ZFS option on SD, then set up (via GUI) to use

Re: [pfSense] Upgrade nanobsd 2.3.4 to 2.4.x

2017-10-27 Thread Odette Nsaka
Yes, just to try it before upgrading some production installations. Odette > Did you do this for experimental purposes? > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Odette Nsaka wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I tried to upgrade some pfSense 2.3.4-x amd64 on nanobsd runn

[pfSense] Upgrade nanobsd 2.3.4 to 2.4.x

2017-10-26 Thread Odette Nsaka
Hi, I tried to upgrade some pfSense 2.3.4-x amd64 on nanobsd running on PC-engines APU2 and APU3, to 2.4.x full install following the guide https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Upgrading_64-bit_NanoBSD_2.3_to_2.4 I've collected a good number of failures (100%) related to the inconsistency of

Re: [pfSense] Update to 2.3.4(_1) fails (Not Found)

2017-07-25 Thread Odette Nsaka
In the afternoon some Alix failed. Then, in the evening they updated correctly from 2.3.3_1 to 2.3.4_1. Odette > Hmm, has anyone been able to upgrade from 2.3.x or earlier to 2.3.4_1 since > its release Thursday? Or perhaps everyone on this list was on 2.3.4 > already... :) ___

Re: [pfSense] ✉news on the deal

2017-06-29 Thread Odette Nsaka
itto: > Hi! > > Here is the latest news on deal we've discussed yesterday, please read > them here http://bit.do/dxAad > > > Odette Nsaka > > > > From: pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing List > [mailto:list@lists.pfsense.org] Sent: Wednesday,

Re: [pfSense] Continuous crashes on a couple of 2.2.6 amd64

2016-02-17 Thread Odette Nsaka
amd64), all on version 2.2.6 are working fine. Does anyone have any advise? Thanks in advance Odette Nsaka ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

[pfSense] Continuous crashes on a couple of 2.2.6 amd64

2016-02-17 Thread Odette Nsaka
Hi all, I've got a couple of Pf servers running: 2.2.6-RELEASE (amd64) built on Mon Dec 21 14:50:08 CST 2015 FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p25 on Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 5130 @ 2.00GHz 4 CPUs: 2 package(s) x 2 core(s) Memory usage 5% of 4059 MB (fw1) Memory usa

Re: [pfSense] client VPN on IOS

2015-09-15 Thread Odette Nsaka
sk also for the user password (Remote SSL/TLS+User Auth) and instructed users to non flag "remember the password". Bye -- */Odette Nsaka/* In data martedì 15 settembre 2015 08:18:21, Ray Bagby ha scritto: > Greetings, > > Anyone hav

Re: [pfSense] Issues with 2.2.x and Alix devices

2015-07-08 Thread Odette Nsaka
I've successfully upgraded 5 Alix 2D3 fron 2.2.2 to 2.2.3 Everything OK Odette In data martedì 7 luglio 2015 09:45:38, Микаел Бак ha scritto: > Hi Kostas, > > On 2015-07-06 18:53, Kostas Backas wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I had no success restoring 2.2.x (2.2.2 or 2.2.3) proper installers or

[pfSense] PCengine APU sleepness

2014-11-26 Thread Odette Nsaka
Hi there finally (see the thread "[pfSense] APU and SSD: full install or NanoBSD" on this mailing list ) I opted for a full install with /var anf /tmp on ramdisk on one APU and an ebbedded one fon another APU. They are both working fine. But, on both, I have some issues with the web interfac

[pfSense] APU and SSD: full install or NanoBSD

2014-10-29 Thread Odette Nsaka
Hi all I'm going to switch from MMC/SD to SSD on APU. Does anyone have any suggestion or experience? Are SSD drives on PC engines shop reliable to make a full install or do you suggest to stay on NanoBSD install? Thanks in advance, Odette ___ L

Re: [pfSense] States Issue with Asterisk behind pfSense

2014-09-26 Thread Odette Nsaka
m. O. -- In data venerdì 26 settembre 2014 20:00:59, Hannes Werner ha scritto: > Thank you very much Odette, > > what type of router do you use? Those who are doing the PPPoA? So you > use pfSense as a strict Firewall? > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Odette Nsaka wrote: > &

Re: [pfSense] States Issue with Asterisk behind pfSense

2014-09-26 Thread Odette Nsaka
Not too much related, but I am. I'm using a multi-wan connection to different ISP who give me dynamic IP address. I set up the Internet connection via a couple of different routers, one for each ISP. The difference in my configuration is that the routers connect to the ISP via PPPoA and PF is

Re: [pfSense] [SOT] apu1c4/apu1d4 stability

2014-09-22 Thread Odette Nsaka
Not 20 but just 1 (at the moment), working as espected 24/7 since when installed (a couple of months). The environmet temperature is between 20°C and 27°C. Odette */In data lunedì 22 settembre 2014 18:10:55, mayak ha scritto:/* */> hi all,/* */> /* */> in an earlier thread, i recounted issues

Re: [pfSense] Upgrade to 2.1.5 looses packages

2014-09-11 Thread Odette Nsaka
How much space is free on this that did and those that did not? You only get/* */> 2GB of that 4./* */> > On Sep 10, 2014, at 14:49, Odette Nsaka wrote:/* */> > /* */> > Storage: 4GB/* */> > RAM: 256 MB/* */> > /* */> > To me, this will not explain wh

Re: [pfSense] menu bar in safari on 2.1.5

2014-09-11 Thread Odette Nsaka
Cleaning the chace and restarting the browser does not solve the problem Tried even in Firefox and Rekonq -- */Odette/* In data mercoledì 10 settembre 2014 12:40:02, Jim Thompson ha scritto: > More properly, the CSS file was updated, but we didn’t change the name (or > ‘version’), so your brow

Re: [pfSense] Upgrade to 2.1.5 looses packages

2014-09-10 Thread Odette Nsaka
Storage: 4GB RAM: 256 MB To me, this will not explain why, on similar configurations, most of the ALIX did not reinstall packages, while the last one did. -- */Odette Nsaka/* In data mercoledì 10 settembre 2014 13:13:58, Ryan Coleman ha scritto: > Somewhere in the mailing list archive ther

Re: [pfSense] Upgrade to 2.1.5 looses packages

2014-09-10 Thread Odette Nsaka
ALIX 2D13 LX800 256MB In data martedì 9 settembre 2014 17:57:51, Ryan Coleman ha scritto: > I suspect it might be your specific configuration - all 8 of mine > automatically patched the packages. > > What specific ALIX hardware are you using? > > On Sep 9, 2014, at 16:10, O

Re: [pfSense] Upgrade to 2.1.5 looses packages

2014-09-10 Thread Odette Nsaka
hed the packages./* */> /* */> What specific ALIX hardware are you using?/* */> /* */> On Sep 9, 2014, at 16:10, Odette Nsaka wrote:/* */> > Hi all,/* */> > /* */> > I've found that on all the ALIXs I'm upgrading from 2.1.4 to 2.1.5, the/* */> > /* */> &g

Re: [pfSense] menu bar in safari on 2.1.5

2014-09-10 Thread Odette Nsaka
It seems to be a known bug. The same to me, on my laptop (Linux-Kde-Firefox, screen resolution 1600x900) with the latest 2.1.5 release. On an other PC with the same configuration and versions (Linux-Kde- Firefox) , but different screen resolution (1280x1024), the menù is correct even on 2.1.5

[pfSense] Upgrade to 2.1.5 looses packages

2014-09-09 Thread Odette Nsaka
Hi all, I've found that on all the ALIXs I'm upgrading from 2.1.4 to 2.1.5, the packages are not reinstalled. This certanly does not mean that the project is not growing better than one could expect. Thank you again! -- Odette Nsaka __

Re: [pfSense] 2.1.3 Release Now Available

2014-05-06 Thread Odette Nsaka
do I have to change the CF? Thanks in advance Odette -- Odette Nsaka In data sabato 3 maggio 2014 02:52:06, Chris Buechler ha scritto: > pfSense 2.1.3 release is now available. You can find the details on our > blog. https://blog.pfsense.

Re: [pfSense] 2.1 on WRAP

2013-09-20 Thread Odette Nsaka
> Keep your eye on this one, too: > > http://www.pcengines.ch/apu.htm The ALIX doughter... Great, already waiting for it, thanks Jim ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list

Re: [pfSense] 2.1 on WRAP

2013-09-20 Thread Odette Nsaka
*/In data venerdì 20 settembre 2013 09:54:17, Seth Mos ha scritto:/* */> On 20-9-2013 9:45, Odette Nsaka wrote:/* */> > First of all, thanks to the developers for the new fantastic 2.1 release./* */> > /* */> > /* */> > /* */> > I've been using Alix by PC

Re: [pfSense] 2.1 on WRAP

2013-09-20 Thread Odette Nsaka
First of all, thanks to the developers for the new fantastic 2.1 release. I've been using Alix by PC Engines (WRAP's successor) succesfully for a lot of time. I was just wandering about PC Engines not releasing new versions of Alix. And it seems to me they are going to be soon too old for next

Re: [pfSense] pfSense vs JunOS

2012-07-04 Thread Odette Nsaka
I confirm too: excellent support! Odette -- Odette Nsaka Il giorno mar, 03/07/2012 alle 15.26 -0600, James Caldwell ha scritto: > Absolutely, some of the best support I've had for a software solution to date. > > James ... ___ Lis

Re: [pfSense] Unable to route traffic between bridged interfaces

2012-01-26 Thread Odette Nsaka
Hi Ryan, just to be sure: take a look to the check box "Block Private Networks" in the section "Private networks" at the bottom of the page "Interfaces==>" and verify it's NOT checked Bye Odette -- Odette Nsaka Il giorno

Re: [pfSense] [pfSense-discussion] Strange 2.0-RC3 behaviour with Lotus Domino

2011-09-27 Thread Odette Nsaka
Sorry, I can't publish the pcap files. I could just deliver them to someone who could analyse them to help me in identifying the problem. Who can I send the pcap files to? Thanks in advance Odette -- Odette Nsaka Il giorno lun, 19/09/2011 alle 21.27 +0200, Odette Nsaka ha scritto: &g

Re: [pfSense] [pfSense-discussion] Strange 2.0-RC3 behaviour with Lotus Domino

2011-09-19 Thread Odette Nsaka
dress. The private communication will be used just for the pcap delivery, if this is not against the rules of the list. Odette On Mon, 09/12/2011, 16.15 -0400, Chris Buechler wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Odette Nsaka > wrote: > > Please,

Re: [pfSense] [pfSense-discussion] Strange 2.0-RC3 behaviour with Lotus Domino

2011-09-19 Thread Odette Nsaka
On Mon, 09/12/2011, 14.45 +0200, Frank Heydlauf wrote: > Hi Odette, > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 02:32:10PM +0200, Odette Nsaka wrote: > > bg image(file:///home/tecnico) > > Please, did anybody experience any similar behaviour? > > Suggestions? Shoud I stay on 1.2.3?

Re: [pfSense] [pfSense-discussion] Strange 2.0-RC3 behaviour with Lotus Domino

2011-09-19 Thread Odette Nsaka
Thanks Christian in my case, we tried to use more than one postfix, sometimes restarting it, every time with the same issue. Odette -- Odette Nsaka ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list

Re: [pfSense] 2.0-RELEASE now available!

2011-09-19 Thread Odette Nsaka
Thank you guys. Great work, great release, great day! -- Odette Nsaka Il giorno sab, 17/09/2011 alle 14.58 -0400, Chris Buechler ha scritto: > for those who don't watch the blog: > http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=598 > ___ > List ma

Re: [pfSense] [pfSense-discussion] Strange 2.0-RC3 behaviour with Lotus Domino

2011-09-12 Thread Odette Nsaka
Please, did anybody experience any similar behaviour? Suggestions? Shoud I stay on 1.2.3? Thanks Odette -- Odette Nsaka Il giorno gio, 25/08/2011 alle 22.00 +0200, Odette Nsaka ha scritto: > It's a lot of time I'm using PF and I really appreciate it. Guys > you are doing