Oi vey...it's actually been a litte while since I've had to tackle a
table inside of a div (percentage width) in IE. All the various IE's
hate what I'm trying to do here. Are there any new techniques for
pulling this off?
http://www.vaska.com/a/test/
All I see is a paragraph inside
Sorry Steve, I wasn't intentionally referring your point, I was just
dismissing any general idea that it was bad design visual design. I
need to be more discriminatory with my use of quotation marks next time.
Nick
Just by way of clarification, when I said it _looks_ bad I wasn't
Yes...I took it down.
Solved it by avoiding table use completely (even though I'm
technically using tabular data).
v
On 06 Oct 2006, at 08:25, Kepler Gelotte wrote:
All I see is a paragraph inside the body in the above example
and the
text color is the same as the background. Am I
At 10/4/2006 08:49 AM, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
I'd appreciate any comment that would help me improve this article:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/the_perfect_image_replacement_technique.asp
and
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/the_perfect_drop_cap.asp
Thierry,
While of course I agree
On 6 Oct 2006, at 10:19, Paul Novitski wrote:
At 10/4/2006 08:49 AM, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
I'd appreciate any comment that would help me improve this article:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/the_perfect_image_replacement_technique.asp
and
I'd appreciate any comment that would help me improve this article:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/the_perfect_image_replacement_technique.asp
and
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/the_perfect_drop_cap.asp
Thierry,
The most obvious disadvantage of using JavaScript to modify markup is
the
thanx
On 10/5/06, Lachlan Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Taco Fleur wrote: Is there a way to apply a style to the li tag only?Yes.li { /* Styles for li elements */ }
For example; when I have an ordered list, I would like the numbers to have the same font type as the paragraphs p, to do so I apply
Paul Novitski wrote:
At 10/4/2006 08:49 AM, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
I'd appreciate any comment that would help me improve this article:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/the_perfect_image_replacement_technique.asp
and http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/the_perfect_drop_cap.asp
While of course
I'd appreciate any comment that would help me improve this menu:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/new_drop_down/AB.asp
I'd also appreciate feedback on browsers support as so far I've only tested
in:
- ie7,
- ie6,
- ie5 (Win and Mac),
- FF 0.8,
- FF 1.5,
- Opera 9,
- Safari 2
---
Regards,
Re:
http://tjkdesign.com/articles/a_perfect_Image_Replacement_technique.asp
I wrote:
The most obvious disadvantage of using JavaScript to modify markup is
the inevitable delay: scripts of this nature wait till download is
complete before manipulating the DOM.
At 10/6/2006 03:00 AM, Christian
I'd appreciate any comment that would help me improve this menu:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/new_drop_down/AB.asp
I really like this menu - it works well in all the browsers I have installed
( Opera, IE 6, IE 7, FF, etc. ).
I look forward to it's release as I would love the
-Original Message-
From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thierry Koblentz
Sent: 06 October 2006 16:40
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] *Pure* CSS drop down menu
I'd appreciate any comment that would help me improve this menu:
On 10/6/06, Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd appreciate any comment that would help me improve this menu:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/new_drop_down/AB.asp
I would recommend somehow positioning the sub-list to line up with the
upper link that makes it appear. As it is, all
I'd appreciate any comment that would help me improve this menu:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/new_drop_down/AB.asp
It's functional enough from what I can tell (been playing with it in
FF), but not terribly user-friendly.
I wouldn't use it. It requires some serious dexterity and hand-eye
Paul Novitski wrote:
Re:
http://tjkdesign.com/articles/a_perfect_Image_Replacement_technique.asp
I wrote:
The most obvious disadvantage of using JavaScript to modify markup
is the inevitable delay: scripts of this nature wait till download
is complete before manipulating the DOM.
Maybe I'm
And I should have titled this thread better as well. Not that the design is
bad, but the build process is lacking IMHO.
Jeff
Doc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nick,
Just by way of clarification, when I said it _looks_ bad I wasn't
referring to the visual aspect of the design, but
And I should have titled this thread better as well. Not that the design is
bad, but the build process is lacking IMHO.
Jeff
Doc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nick,
Just by way of clarification, when I said it _looks_ bad I wasn't
referring to the visual aspect of the design, but
Christian Montoya wrote:
On 10/6/06, Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd appreciate any comment that would help me improve this menu:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/new_drop_down/AB.asp
I would recommend somehow positioning the sub-list to line up with the
upper link that makes
Frances Berriman wrote:
-Original Message-
From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thierry Koblentz
Sent: 06 October 2006 16:40
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] *Pure* CSS drop down menu
I'd appreciate any comment that would help me
Christian Heilmann wrote:
I'd appreciate any comment that would help me improve this menu:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/new_drop_down/AB.asp
How many more times do we have to prove that we can use CSS for
behaviour just to realise that it was never meant for it?
I agree with you, but
I'd appreciate any comment that would help me improve this menu:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/new_drop_down/AB.asp
How many more times do we have to prove that we can use CSS for
behaviour just to realise that it was never meant for it?
I agree with you, but pushing the envelop is fun
Hi Christian,
I am pretty new to all of this and by no means any kind of expert - so I
am reading this all with interest.
I have often been told that pure CSS is a good idea as javascript is
something that can be turned off - is this true?
I am very much in the camp of pushing envelopes
Hi Christian,
So, I am quite clear on what you DON'T like - but what about these
great combination menus with CSS and javascript? Can you point us to
some of your work? I am not really interested in key tab navigation
right now - I'd just like to see:
1. How good these 'super-valid' menus
Hi Al,
not condescending at all - particularly for you ;-).
All good points - and this time I realised what you meant by the sub
menu items in the flow of the page.
Many thanks,
Max.
I'm sure Christian will respond, but I would like to offer some input,
as well. Based on our last
Christian Heilmann wrote:
These are not new things. This is a dead horse that has been flogged
so many times there is nothing left of it. Search CSS-D for problems
with suckerfish, check cssplay.co.uk, there is nothing whatsoever
creative or inventive about CSS-only menus. It is an endless
Frances,
One of the issues I've found with CSS drop down menus is that the functions cannot be time sensitive. James Edwards and Cameron Adams have writen some _javascript_ functions in the Sitepoint _javascript_ Anthology that deal with this issue. This JS allows the user to take a less
One of the issues I've found with CSS drop down menus is that the
functions cannot be time sensitive. James Edwards and Cameron Adams
have writen some Javascript functions in the Sitepoint Javascript
Anthology
The issue of timers is fairly elementary JavaScript and has been at
work in many
Title: Re: [WSG] *Pure* CSS drop down menu
FWIW, what we have done in the past uses JS timers as mentioned to auto hide the drops when not moused on as well as JS to show/hide layers (the drop menus). Otherwise, if JS is off, the main nav button that would have triggered the drop is clickable,
OH ! I figured it out all by myself *big grin*
I had to make the layer size 1px x1px
Maybe someone else can tell me a better fix - but it fixed it
:)
Thanks!
***List Guidelines:
The issue of "timers" is fairly elementary _javascript_ and has been at
work in many menu systems for quite a few years - :-)
Right. Sorry. I didn't mean to suggest that they "created" the so-called timers, but they introducedthem tothe suckerfish-type menus, addressing the usability concerns
From: Christian Heilmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As to full fledged great examples of dynamic menus:
http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/menu/
http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/examples/menu/
They seem to possess the usability flaws earlier discussed in this
thread.
http://www.udm4.com/
Those are the
You like it or not, people ask for these types of menus. Mine was over three
years old and I thought it was time to work on a new one using what I
learned these last years. I don't see anything wrong with that...
Well, you expect people to keep up with your development and come back
and upgrade
This is a one-way list for WSG Announcements
Web Standards Group London meetup - October 19
On Thursday October 19th at 7pm, the second London based meeting for the Web
Standards Group will be taking take place at the New Cavendish Street Campus
of the
This is Web pages we are talking about - not operating systems. If I
were inclined to believe what you are trying to say, I would most
certainly drop back ten, punt, and transform my web site into
something that looked like this:
http://www.useit.com/
Why do you try to make them work with
As to full fledged great examples of dynamic menus:
http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/menu/
http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/examples/menu/
They seem to possess the usability flaws earlier discussed in this
thread.
You seem to have lost me. Can you elaborate?
Take the full example:
Christian Heilmann wrote:
Well, you expect people to keep up with your development and come back
and upgrade their implementations, as obviously you found flaws in the
old one.
I was talking about the look of my menu. Its functionality didn't change.
I didn't upgrade its implementation, I just
You seem to have lost me. Can you elaborate?
Take the full example:
http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/examples/menu/leftnavfromjs.html
Sure. Here is an example that shows exactly what I meant:
http://www.projectseven.com/csslab/testing/yahoomenu/yahoo.html
http://www.udm4.com/
Those are the
Christian Heilmann wrote:
do, it is constantly tested on all the A-level browsers, backed up by
Why IE Mac didn't make the list? All these Yahoo menus I tried trigger
script errors before returning a *blank* page?
In my book, that goes against accessibility. It has nothing to do with your
On 6 Oct 2006, at 22:46, Al Sparber wrote:
You seem to have lost me. Can you elaborate?
Take the full example:
http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/examples/menu/leftnavfromjs.html
Sure. Here is an example that shows exactly what I meant:
You seem to have lost me. Can you elaborate?
Take the full example:
http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/examples/menu/leftnavfromjs.html
Sure. Here is an example that shows exactly what I meant:
http://www.projectseven.com/csslab/testing/yahoomenu/yahoo.html
The flicker can be customised with a
And it is an old issue. In Feb 1999 Bruce Tognazzini mentions a cone-
shaped window for the mouse path developed for Apple in his answer to
Question 6 (sorry, no purple numbers).
http://www.asktog.com/columns/022DesignedToGiveFitts.html
Are people really re-discovering this?
Well, it happens
do, it is constantly tested on all the A-level browsers, backed up by
Why IE Mac didn't make the list? All these Yahoo menus I tried trigger
script errors before returning a *blank* page?
These are demo pages, not implementations.
In my book, that goes against accessibility. It has nothing
On 6 Oct 2006, at 23:32, Christian Heilmann wrote:
And it is an old issue. In Feb 1999 Bruce Tognazzini mentions a cone-
shaped window for the mouse path developed for Apple in his answer to
Question 6 (sorry, no purple numbers).
http://www.asktog.com/columns/022DesignedToGiveFitts.html
Are
Dear lord Christian,
what was that about? Do you preach to everyone? I was casually agreeing
with your views on usability etc (whilst trying hard not to mention your
attitude towards other posters) ... and you give me a lecture? You even
cut my paragraphs in half to allow you to treat my
On 6 Oct 2006, at 22:46, Al Sparber wrote:
You seem to have lost me. Can you elaborate?
Take the full example:
http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/examples/menu/leftnavfromjs.html
Sure. Here is an example that shows exactly what I meant:
Christian Heilmann wrote:
Why IE Mac didn't make the list? All these Yahoo menus I tried
trigger script errors before returning a *blank* page?
These are demo pages, not implementations.
I thought these demos were supposed to help developers find out how the
menus render in real life?
Don't
what was that about? Do you preach to everyone? I was casually agreeing
with your views on usability etc (whilst trying hard not to mention your
attitude towards other posters) ... and you give me a lecture? You even
cut my paragraphs in half to allow you to treat my words out of context
and
I hoped to gain a bit of insite from this thread, but things are getting a
bit thick. Are all of these threads debate oriented? This is my first
exposure to the group.
Joshua K. Briley
President
Para-Diddle Design, LLC
2196 Biron St. Mandeville, LA 70448
504-232-8250
www.para-diddledesign.com
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
In my book, that goes against accessibility. It has nothing to do
with your example of DVD and TV from the 60's, it has to do with
real people who are stuck with OS 9. For them, ie 5 is the best
(only) browser.
Let's refer to them as the technology impaired...
Don't
Just looking through the thread on pure CSS menus... I understand why some people say that CSS is not designed for, and therefore should be not be used for, behaviour. I've been using Suckerfish menus for the past couple of years, because they are simple, search engine friendly and lightweight.
Nick Gleitzman wrote:
Did iCab ship with the OS (honnest question, I don't know)? And is it
considered an A-grade browser?
No. OS7/8 shipped with Netscape as the default browser until Bill
Gates threw some money at Apple to help keep them afloat, at which
time, and as part of the deal, IE
On 10/7/06, Kay Smoljak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So to balance out that thread, which is very theoretical and philosophical,
let's have some practical examples.
What do people recommend for standards compliant, search engine friendly,
accessible JavaScript drop-down menu systems? Obviously the
From: Andrew Krespanis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
plug
I only use James Edwards' Ultimate Dropdown Menu - http://udm4.com/
It's not the lightest JS menu, but I do believe it's the most
accessible and has a very good feature set with extensive
documentation.
Any of my clients who have needed a drop-down
Kay Smoljak wrote:
not be used for, behaviour. I've been using Suckerfish menus for the
past couple of years, because they are simple, search engine friendly
and lightweight.
Scripted solutions can be search engine friendly too.
My input: I have used Revenge of the menubar from
I like the pure CSS menu idea a lot - but my approach has always been to
generate flyout menus using script only
Not sure if this still holds true, but my reason for doing this
originally was that Google PageRank works best mathematically if your
link structure is a hierarchy, rather than
55 matches
Mail list logo