I somehow got the impression p stood for phrase... (?!)
Mariusz Nowak wrote:
Anyway I wonder how it really should be treated.. (I'm not 100% positive
that my approach is right) or maybe both way are semantically valid to
treat p as I do and more strictly as you do..
However due to lack of
At 12/18/2006 01:58 AM, Barney Carroll wrote:
Geoff Pack wrote:
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
So, old hacks like the 'star html' hack for
IE6 (and older versions) is now perfectly
valid IMO, while hacks relying on bugs that
have survived into IE7, are extremely unsafe.
'extremely unsafe'? I'd say
Paul Novitski wrote:
But seriously, how many years have you been telling yourself the star
hack is unsafe? What did that lack of safety ever mean?
Same as it means now -- the likelihood that someday your code will fail
because it depends on the coincidence of two unrelated bugs in an
On 12/18/06, Barney Carroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kay Smoljak wrote:
At least you will know where to look, instead of trying to work out
which combination of backslashes and asterisks fixed the particular
issue for which version.
One would hope that this information would already be
Geoff Pack wrote:
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
So, old hacks like the 'star html' hack for IE6 (and older
versions) is now perfectly valid IMO, while hacks relying on bugs
that have survived into IE7, are extremely unsafe.
'extremely unsafe'? I'd say they are safe until Microsoft releases
another
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
To me a 'conditional comment' is a constructed hack, and I see no
reason to litter anything with it, unless there's no other option.
However, those 'conditional comments' won't target any other versions
than they are set up, so they are pretty safe in themselves.
A point
the overall layout is nice, but I think you could make a bit more of the
business card at the top left. It doesn't look quite finished. And on some
pages the drop shadow isn't lining up.
The main layout breaks a bit (and far too quickly) when the text is resized
in firefox. This isn't a problem
Chamara Peiris wrote:
Hi guys,
All ur comments about website are welcome.
http://www.minlotec.com
Cheers,
Chamara
Very nice. I think spacing is a big issue - if elements could have
larger vertical margins the whole thing could breathe a lot easier: this
is especially true of the headings,
Chamara Peiris wrote:
Hi guys,
All ur comments about website are welcome.
http://www.minlotec.com
Cheers,
Chamara
One always runs the risk a power user will break a page when images are
used (in part) to lay it out. Otherwise, very nice.
Best,
~dL
--
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
Maybe this is an incorrect philosophy when approaching (X)HTML, but I
always look at things in a more meaningful way when approaching semantics.
If you were to ask an english major and a w3c specs author to define a
paragraph, you'd get to very different answers, wouldn't you? I feel
that as
(I know I'll burn in hades for top posting, but I want to both comment
and pass this on to other lists at the same time)
Nice work. I've made a comment on the blog based on a really superficial
look of the new system, but while it's waiting in the moderation cue, I
thought I'd echo it here as
Hi Chamara,
The site looks great - well done!
One small thing (possibly related to 'Web Standards'... Sort of) - if you're
targeting an English-speaking audience, you'd do well to hire a freelance web
copy writer to rewrite the site content. Someone on the list may know of a good
freelance
I thought that p Stood for paragraph
Gerardo Cháirez
-Mensaje original-
De: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
En nombre de Barney Carroll
Enviado el: Lunes, 18 de Diciembre de 2006 03:50 a.m.
Para: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Asunto: Re: [WSG] Semantics of P element
Gerardo Chairez wrote:
I thought that p Stood for paragraph
It does.
And it should be noted that a paragraph can consist of a single word. At
least in a dialogue:
In dialogue, each speech, even if only one word, is usually a paragraph by
itself; that is, a new paragraph begins with each
One always runs the risk a power user will break a page when images are
used (in part) to lay it out. Otherwise, very nice.
Is a power user someone who resizes the text?
To that end, you might want to consider setting the width of your h2 in
ems so that when the text is resized, the space
Hi Guys,
Thanx for you guys kind help full comments. I'll be back with those
critical changes let you guys know it. As you can see i'm still learning
would love to learn from you all.
Let's rock the world ;)
Cheers,
Chamara
On 12/19/06, John Faulds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One always
16 matches
Mail list logo
