Sorry Steve, I wasn't intentionally referring your point, I was just
dismissing any general idea that it was bad design visual design. I
need to be more discriminatory with my use of quotation marks next time.
Nick
Just by way of clarification, when I said "it _looks_ bad" I wasn't
referr
> Oi vey...it's actually been a litte while since I've had to tackle a
> table inside of a div (percentage width) in IE. All the various IE's
> hate what I'm trying to do here. Are there any new techniques for
> pulling this off?
> http://www.vaska.com/a/test/
All I see is a aragraph insid
Nick,Just by way of clarification, when I said "it _looks_ bad" I wasn't referring to the visual aspect of the design, but rather the execution. CheersSteve
On 06/10/06, Nick Lo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also, I wouldn't even say it "looks bad" as visually it's much betterthan a lot of sites (asid
Yes I was thinking the same really. We cannot say this is a case of
"bad design principles" without being fully aware of the requirements
of the site. For example; if the point of the site was simply to be
referred to in correspondence or if they wanted to have something for
people who chec
Jeff,Who is the corporate site targetted towards? I don't think its actual musicians - they'd be more likely (IMO) to go to one of the specific brand sites. So for a corporate/group Web site - i.e. an umbrella site displaying the breadth of the range - the visual representation isn't bad per se. Ho
From: "Thierry Koblentz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
document.getElementById('column1').style.backgroundImage="url('c1.jpg')";
We usually don't use that method (haven't had a need to yet). We
often
do similar tasks by changing classes.
That's what I do this with pure CSS solutions [1], but when JS i
Al Sparber wrote:
> From: "Thierry Koblentz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> I'm curious to know if anyone here have successfully applied a
>> background
>> image to an IMG element through scripting?
>> I can apply a background color but I can't make
>> "style.backgroundImage"
>> work.
>
> document.getEle
On 5 Oct 2006, at 12:16, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>As far as I can see, DL's are not deprecated, but they probably should
>be, as the vast majority of use cases are semantically incorrect. The
>one you describe included; surely a vCard or other microformat is more
>appropriat
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 05:13:00PM +0300, Rimantas Liubertas wrote:
> >As far as I can see, DL's are not deprecated, but they probably should
> >be, as the vast majority of use cases are semantically incorrect.
>
> Specification provides example: "Another application of DL, for
> example, is for m
As far as I can see, DL's are not deprecated, but they probably should
be, as the vast majority of use cases are semantically incorrect.
Maybe if you look at it very strictly, but they are OK with the spirit
with at least HTML4.01.
Specification provides example: "Another application of DL, for
As far as I can see, DL's are not deprecated, but they probably should
be, as the vast majority of use cases are semantically incorrect. The
one you describe included; surely a vCard or other microformat is more
appropriate - the _definition_ of a particular company is a difficult
concept to defin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Since no-one else has replied, perhaps I may ask why you would want to
> do this?
I'm working on a variation of this:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/png_overlay_with_no_extra_markup.asp
---
Regards,
Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com
**
Christian Heilmann wrote:
>>> I'm curious to know if anyone here have successfully applied
>>> a background
>>> image to an IMG element through scripting?
> Have you tried to set the image to block first? Also, just do
> obj.style.background = 'url(bla.gif) #fff no-repeat'
> instead of background
Oi vey...it's actually been a litte while since I've had to tackle a
table inside of a div (percentage width) in IE. All the various IE's
hate what I'm trying to do here. Are there any new techniques for
pulling this off?
http://www.vaska.com/a/test/
Thanks...v
Note: this is just a fast m
> I'm curious to know if anyone here have successfully applied
> a background
> image to an IMG element through scripting?
> I can apply a background color but I can't make
> "style.backgroundImage"
> work.
Have you tried to set the image to block first? Also, just do
obj.style.background = 'ur
From: "Thierry Koblentz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'm curious to know if anyone here have successfully applied a
background
image to an IMG element through scripting?
I can apply a background color but I can't make
"style.backgroundImage"
work.
document.getElementById('column1').style.background
It is ironic that this is being done by a Marketing Department when
you consider that they should be the very ones chasing for search
engine welcoming content. Starting from the very top the titles are
not too bad but even the urls need work:
dh.html > davitt_and_hanser.html
olp.html > olp_
Since no-one else has replied, perhaps I may ask why you would want to
do this?
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thierry Koblentz
> Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 2:05 AM
> I'm curious to know if anyone here h
This is a one-way list for WSG Announcements
For members in Australia or those who would like to travel to Australia to
present... A call for papers for the 2007 WebDU conference:
http://www.webdu.com.au/go/call-for-papers
Organisers are particularly ke
19 matches
Mail list logo
