Kevin Futter wrote:
Russ
HTML element family councillor
Of course, Russ means family counsellor :-)
Not if he was laying down the law...
N
___
Omnivision. Websight.
http://www.omnivision.com.au/
**
The
Brian Cummiskey wrote:
Notice the site?
Notice the hack?
http://connect.microsoft.com/Styles/GeneralStyles.css
.ViewFeedback-Discussion-AddNewCommentLink ?
.FeedbackOverviewUserOptionsHeader ?
.AdvancedSearchSearchOptionSection-Description ?
Damn, here I was worrying about using .img
Chris Littell wrote:
Isn't adding jokes into your own code akin to telling your self a joke?
I don't know of a single client of mine who knows that View Source is
even available as a browsing command. Everyone on this list does (or
should). Code comments and css files are part of this whole
Chris Littell wrote:
I ask a question, and you respond by basically telling me to 'get
lost'?
Hardly. I got that Christian was just pointing out that you have a
choice. If you don't want a list format, you don't have to have one.
It's up to you.
Also, if you read the guidelines, you'll
Vincent Hasselgård wrote:
Explorer 5.2 for Mac is a buggy piece of crap software :)
That's not the first time I've seen a comment like that on this list -
and this time round I have to say I think that's a bit harsh. Were you
building sites when IE5/Mac was released? It was a major step
Ryan Moore wrote:
Hopefully this is not off-topic,
It is. Go to the WSG site and subscribe to the CMS list. This was
discussed - and moved over to that list - just a few days ago!
C'mon, people. Too many posts recently have been OT, or simple thanks
messages which would be better sent
David Sam Butler wrote:
Hi All,
I'm trying to implement a CSS/javascript dropdown navigation (as shown
at the seminars recently) and all's well in IE7, firefox and safari,
though in IE6 the navigation div pushes the content of the adjoining
div over to the right by a few pixels. I've tried
Google Colour blindness simulator and you get over 300 results. Can
we look there, and not list them here one at a time?
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some
On 6 Jun 2006, at 10:13 PM, Mark Harris wrote:
Herrod, Lisa wrote:
Wow, That's fontastic!
thanks lachlan hardy
you're a fontain of knowledge
Fonting hell, Lisa! I think you may be endangering the fontamental
nature of this list. Posts of this type rarely carry the weight we're
Tee G.Peng wrote:
Hi,
Please tolerate my ignorance.
I always thought transitional doctypes are quirkmode but today I was
told it's not, the quirkmode is when a page has no doctype declared.
tee
Google is your friend...
Paul Hempsall wrote:
Just wondering if anyone is aware of any web resources that detail the
default style values given to various elements by browsers
(specifically
IE6)?
For example, what are the default IE6 CSS values for body, h1-6, p,
etc?
Sandra, Samuel:
I think you're
Paul Collins wrote:
so when clients ask me what to build for I can justify building for
IE5 Mac.
Given that IE5/Mac is now officially obsolete, why not group it with
other dinosaurs (NN4.x et al) with flaky CSS support and filter your
CSS delivery so that browser only receives a stylesheet
TuteC wrote:
Hello all!
I have a rather simple question: does it have any semantical meaning
the name of a div? For example, if I have a div
class=Distributorsh3Distributors/h3/div, will the search
engine understand the name of the div or di I need that h3 to do that?
How about h3
Steve Green wrote:
I would hardly call OSX an 'upgrade' - it's a major investment. It's
not
just the £100 or so for the OS, it's the cost of all the new
applications
like an office suite and all the other stuff you need plus the
installation
time and hassle of migrating email accounts etc.
Andrew Ingram wrote:
The people who made the code originally were using left: -999em to
hide the menu, the reasoning was so that screen-readers could still
access them (as opposed to display: none), acting on a hunch I
switched to the display: none method and everything started working.
Hm,
SunUp wrote:
* refuse to support Macs and refer any compaints to the boss and
the IT
department.
Amen to that. There's no reason to be forced to support hardware it
your department won't make allowances for testing on it. If they want
you to support it, they need to make that possible.
On 22 Aug 2006, at 1:28 PM, Micky Hulse wrote:
Nick Gleitzman wrote:
Know of any other sites that have completely dropped CSS support for
IE5.2/Mac and/or IE5.0/PC?
Re IE5/Mac: see the thread from August 4, 'Re: [WSG] Support for
IE5/Mac? (was Browser stats)'.
Ah, hehe, sorry if I brought
On 25 Aug 2006, at 1:56 PM, Geoff Pack wrote:
Only seems to be an issue with inline styles.
Moral: always use a closing semi-colon.
Moral: don't use inline styles.
N
___
Omnivision. Websight.
http://www.omnivision.com.au/
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
In my book, that goes against accessibility. It has nothing to do
with your example of DVD and TV from the 60's, it has to do with
real people who are stuck with OS 9. For them, ie 5 is the best
(only) browser.
Let's refer to them as the technology impaired...
Don't
John 'Max' Maxwell wrote:
Al Sparber wrote:
Thanks in advance for not responding and taking this any more
off-topic than it already is.
Sorry, I realise that wasn't sent to me Al (despite being part of the
'open' forum it was sent out on) - but I am going to have to respond
to this just
On 10 Oct 2006, at 12:07 PM, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
Can anyone take pity on us without Safari and post a screen capture
somewhere, please?
http://lachy.id.au/lib/images/2006/safari-multibg-image-20061010
...morphs to this, seamlessly, on resize...
Kat wrote:
http://www.omnivision.com.au/safari/resize.png
http://www.omnivision.com.au/safari/extreme.png
N
Gday Nick,
I am getting a 404 on the resize.png?
Kat
Unh. Try these:
http://www.omnivision.com.au/safari/resized.htm
http://www.omnivision.com.au/safari/extreme.htm
Apologies.
David Cameron wrote:
The pertinent CSS file is www.camieabz.co.uk/menutest/menustyle.css
and is solely for the menu section of the styling. There may be bits
and pieces in the other style sheet which need to come out.
There's bits and pieces in this one which need to come out, too. For
Stevio wrote:
Hi Stephen,
Here [1] is an explanation of why the padding on your list items is
operating in a slightly odd way. When you change the li or the a
within
the li to display: block and then float it, your problems should
disappear.
[1]
24 matches
Mail list logo
