I suppose server-side makes the most sense, since the page view isn't
required to be dynamic per se.
Very neat idea.
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a good reason for doing this with JavaScript rather than
doing it server side?
Do you know of a SS solution to do
Thierry,
I don't know of an existing solution, but where static pages are
concerned, anything that can be done with JS can be done with PERL, PHP,
JSP or whatever. In this case, I am in two minds as to whether this
counts as 'progressive enhancement' or not. If it is, then JS is
acceptable (not
I don't know of an existing solution, but where static pages are
concerned, anything that can be done with JS can be done with PERL, PHP,
JSP or whatever.
I tend to disagree. I think trying to manipulate your HTML output by
buffering it and processing it on the server side is overkill.
: [WSG] Using JS to expand Abbreviations
I don't know of an existing solution, but where static pages are
concerned, anything that can be done with JS can be done with PERL, PHP,
JSP or whatever.
I tend to disagree. I think trying to manipulate your HTML output by
buffering it and processing
-Original Message-
From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kepler Gelotte
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 2:38 PM
Subject: RE: [WSG] Using JS to expand Abbreviations
I tend to disagree. I think trying to manipulate your HTML output
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is not about styling.
Without the measures being discussed, the consensus is that it is all
styling. How the abbreviation element is styled will, short of
javascript, dictate how the abbreviation's full form will be made available.
I think it is a little early to be claiming consensus on this!
Correct me if I am wrong, but without this fix, most users will never
see the full form of the abbreviation. That seems like a little more
than just styling to me.
Mike
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it is a little early to be claiming consensus on this!
Correct me if I am wrong, but without this fix, most users will never
see the full form of the abbreviation. That seems like a little more
than just styling to me.
Mike
I think this is a misunderstanding.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this counts as 'progressive enhancement' or not. If it is, then JS is
acceptable (not necessarily best) solution. On the other hand, this
solution has already been discussed in the context of final print
output, and would seem beneficial to all users, regardless of
Is there a good reason for doing this with JavaScript rather than doing
it server side?
Regards,
Mike
-Original Message-
Subject: [WSG] Using JS to expand Abbreviations
Demo:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/TJK_abbr_demo.asp
Article:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a good reason for doing this with JavaScript rather than
doing it server side?
Do you know of a SS solution to do this? I'd be glad to link to it from my
article.
IMHO, it's not a server-side vs. client-side thing, but a simple matter of
what's available to
11 matches
Mail list logo