Re: [WSG] Semantics of news

2006-12-15 Thread Mariusz Nowak

Rob O'Rourke wrote:


  ul class=news-articles
 li
p class=date09-12-2006/p
h2Article title/h2
pExcerpt here/p
pa href=full-articleRead the whole thing/a/p
 /li
/ul
James.I think using 'p' element is more appropriate as date it's text 
content. So:


I'd hesitate to use p tags like that because I wouldn't say the date 
is a paragraph. Spans and divs are perfectly acceptable content 
containers but i'm just nitpicking again.


Rob O

Why you wouldn't say that date in this case is not paragraph?
Paragraph in html is just block of text and this is block of text 
content isn't?
We don't have 'date' element in html therefore we need to take more 
universal element which in first row for me is 'p'.. (universal element 
for text content).. after that would be 'div' which is universal for any 
content but I think using it to wrap text is nearly same misconception 
as using divs for lists.


--
Mariusz Nowak

Skype: mariuszn3
AIM: mariuszn3

WWW: http://www.medikoo.com
XHTML/CSS Coding: http://cxc.medikoo.com




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] Semantics of news

2006-12-11 Thread Barney Carroll
I think that in the original case, the date can't really be perceived as 
a header item. And moreover, although I'm embroiled in a similar thread 
on another list arguing against tradition, I feel that having an h[n] 
immediately following an h[n-1] is very strange.


However there are a few things I'd like to say about header semantics 
generally.


- Love of the DOM will not teach you good English. HTML is as full of 
(often ambiguous) tags as it is to accommodate writers, not vice-versa.


- Headers do not grow on trees. ie The logic of having:

h1
 h2
  h3
  h3
 h2
h1
 h2
 h2

...is flawed. Headers do not contain anything other than themselves.

- There are plenty of real-world examples of documents where the header 
is not the first object on the page - in the case of the news article 
mentioned; letters where an address contextualizes the document before 
its subject becomes apparent...


- There is a reason h1 and title are distinct. One might think this 
is simply because the same object cannot simultaneously be in the head 
and body of a document, but that's not necessarily true. A title may 
contain what the body would display as a combination of h# tags, for 
instance titleOrganization - Your profile/title = 
h1Organization/h1 h2Members area/h2 ... h1Your profile/h1


Regards,
Barney


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] Semantics of news

2006-12-09 Thread Tim White
Hi, list.
What do you think is the best semantic markup for such a structure

06.12.2006(date)
Here goes some title of the new,(example Manchester United Have Lost
Their Mojo)
{and here goes a couple of passages of text - excerpt or full text of
the news}
---

[snip]

Some popular CMS's use
h3{date}
h2{title}
p{content}/p


This is usually how I do it (or at least something similar).

But i don't think it is correct heading structure

Why don't you think this is a correct structure?

~ Tim
www.tjameswhite.com/blog



 

Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com

***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***


Re: [WSG] Semantics of news

2006-12-09 Thread akella

That's because i think that the headings should have some logical order,
I mean that before every h3 there should be some h2, that describes in some
sense what about is that h3
h1 Site title
 h2 Post title
   h3 Post passage n1
   h3 Post passage n3
 h2 Some links on the page(not post)

Dont you think that we are losing that logical order in your case?
Im still in doubt is it completely correct to go with it.
if you check your document with validator with the outline option checked,
it will produce smth like
A level 2 heading is missing!
See this url for instance
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fcssbeauty.com%2Fcharset=%28detect+automatically%29doctype=Inlineoutline=1

That is the reason i think its not quite correct.


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] Semantics of news

2006-12-09 Thread Rob Kirton

The only time this wouldn't be a correct structure is if the first H3 was
preceeded by an H1 and not an H2

It is slightly conterintuitive to place an H3 above an associted H2.  If the
title is the most important fact, above that of date (seems sensible).  The
use of H2 and H3 is fine

--
Regards

- Rob Kirton

Raising web standards : http://ele.vation.co.uk
Connecting to others: http://www.linkedin.com/in/robkirton

On 09/12/06, Tim White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hi, list.
What do you think is the best semantic markup for such a structure

06.12.2006(date)
Here goes some title of the new,(example Manchester United Have Lost
Their Mojo)
{and here goes a couple of passages of text - excerpt or full text of
the news}
---

[snip]

Some popular CMS's use
h3{date}
h2{title}
p{content}/p


This is usually how I do it (or at least something similar).

But i don't think it is correct heading structure

Why don't you think this is a correct structure?

~ Tim
www.tjameswhite.com/blog

--
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail 
beta.http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=45083/*http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta

***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] Semantics of news

2006-12-09 Thread Joseph R. B. Taylor
I myself have been marking up new summaries with definition lists.  Very 
practical.


dl
dtMy Article Headline/dt
dd2006-12-09/dd
ddTeaser statement for the article/dd
ddLink to Full Story/dd
/dl

You can alter this format as well, like:

dl
dt2006-12-09/dt
dtHeadline for my Article/dt
ddTeaser statement for the article/dd
ddLink to Full Story/dd
/dl

Headings would be used to precede to news summaries all together, like:

h3My Site's latest Articles/h3

dl
dtMy Article Headline/dt
dd2006-12-09/dd
ddTeaser statement for the article/dd
ddLink to Full Story/dd
/dl

dl
dtMy Article Headline/dt
dd2006-12-09/dd
ddTeaser statement for the article/dd
ddLink to Full Story/dd
/dl

etc


Rob Kirton wrote:

The only time this wouldn't be a correct structure is if the first H3 
was preceeded by an H1 and not an H2


It is slightly conterintuitive to place an H3 above an associted H2.  
If the title is the most important fact, above that of date (seems 
sensible).  The use of H2 and H3 is fine


--
Regards

- Rob Kirton

Raising web standards : http://ele.vation.co.uk
Connecting to others: http://www.linkedin.com/in/robkirton 
http://www.linkedin.com/in/robkirton


On 09/12/06, *Tim White* [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



Hi, list.
What do you think is the best semantic markup for such a structure

06.12.2006(date)
Here goes some title of the new,(example Manchester United Have Lost
Their Mojo)
{and here goes a couple of passages of text - excerpt or full text of
the news}
---


[snip]


Some popular CMS's use
h3{date}
h2{title}
p{content}/p



This is usually how I do it (or at least something similar).


But i don't think it is correct heading structure


Why don't you think this is a correct structure?

~ Tim
www.tjameswhite.com/blog http://www.tjameswhite.com/blog


Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.

http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=45083/*http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta

***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
***





***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.15.15/580 - Release Date: 12/8/2006 
12:53 PM
 



--

Joseph R. B. Taylor
*Sites by Joe, LLC*
/Custom Web Design  Development/
http://sitesbyjoe.com
(609) 335-3076
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***begin:vcard
fn:Joseph R. B. Taylor
n:Taylor;Joseph
org:Sites by Joe, LLC
adr:;;408 Route 47 South;Cape May Court House;NJ;08210;USA
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel;work:609-335-3076
tel;cell:609-335-3076
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://sitesbyjoe.com
version:2.1
end:vcard




Re: [WSG] Semantics of news

2006-12-09 Thread Mike at Green-Beast.com
I'm curious, Joseph, wouldn't that be better like this?

h2Our News/h2
dl
dt2006-12-09/dt
dd
h3News Headline/h3
pTeaser statement for the article./p
pLink to Full Story/p
/dd
/dl

Assuming of course this would be valid as it would be with any other kind of 
list (I didn't check).

Respectfully,
Mike Cherim
http://green-beast.com/


- Original Message - 
From: Joseph R. B. Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Saturday, December 09, 2006 11:42 AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Semantics of news


I myself have been marking up new summaries with definition lists.  Very
practical.

dl
dtMy Article Headline/dt
dd2006-12-09/dd
ddTeaser statement for the article/dd
ddLink to Full Story/dd
/dl

You can alter this format as well, like:

dl
dt2006-12-09/dt
dtHeadline for my Article/dt
ddTeaser statement for the article/dd
ddLink to Full Story/dd
/dl

Headings would be used to precede to news summaries all together, like:

h3My Site's latest Articles/h3

dl
dtMy Article Headline/dt
dd2006-12-09/dd
ddTeaser statement for the article/dd
ddLink to Full Story/dd
/dl

dl
dtMy Article Headline/dt
dd2006-12-09/dd
ddTeaser statement for the article/dd
ddLink to Full Story/dd
/dl

etc


Rob Kirton wrote:

 The only time this wouldn't be a correct structure is if the first H3
 was preceeded by an H1 and not an H2

 It is slightly conterintuitive to place an H3 above an associted H2.
 If the title is the most important fact, above that of date (seems
 sensible).  The use of H2 and H3 is fine

 -- 
 Regards

 - Rob Kirton

 Raising web standards : http://ele.vation.co.uk
 Connecting to others: http://www.linkedin.com/in/robkirton
 http://www.linkedin.com/in/robkirton

 On 09/12/06, *Tim White* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi, list.
What do you think is the best semantic markup for such a structure

06.12.2006(date)
Here goes some title of the new,(example Manchester United Have Lost
Their Mojo)
{and here goes a couple of passages of text - excerpt or full text of
the news}
---

 [snip]

Some popular CMS's use
h3{date}
h2{title}
p{content}/p


 This is usually how I do it (or at least something similar).

But i don't think it is correct heading structure

 Why don't you think this is a correct structure?

 ~ Tim
 www.tjameswhite.com/blog http://www.tjameswhite.com/blog

 
 Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
 
 http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=45083/*http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta

 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***





 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.15.15/580 - Release Date: 12/8/2006 
12:53 PM



-- 

Joseph R. B. Taylor
*Sites by Joe, LLC*
/Custom Web Design  Development/
http://sitesbyjoe.com
(609) 335-3076
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*** 



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] Semantics of news

2006-12-09 Thread Tim White
That's because i think that the headings should have some logical
order,
I mean that before every h3 there should be some h2, that describes in
some sense what about is that h3

[...]

Dont you think that we are losing that logical order in your case?

I certainly understand your point. And while I agree that having the h3 
before the h2 is a little off, I'm willing to accept that because 
semantically I feel that the title is more important (hence, an h2) than the 
date.

Of course, just because the *display* is 
Date
Title

doesn't mean that the code has to be that way. Your HTML could be:
h2Title/h2
h3date/h3

and then use a little CSS positioning to move them around.


Im still in doubt is it completely correct to go with it.
if you check your document with validator with the outline option
checked, it will produce smth like
A level 2 heading is missing!
See this url for instance
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fcssbeauty.com%2Fcharset
=%28detect+automatically%29doctype=Inlineoutline=1


Hmm, interesting. Looking at the W3C spec, 
http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/global.html#h-7.5.5
it doesn't specify that there needs to be an order, but does have a note that 
says Some people consider skipping heading levels to be bad
practice.

 
~ Tim

tjameswhite.com





 

Need a quick answer? Get one in minutes from people who know.
Ask your question on www.Answers.yahoo.com

***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***


Re: [WSG] Semantics of news

2006-12-09 Thread Rob O'Rourke

What about
h2Title of the article span class=date9-12-2006/span/h2

?

I must admit i'm a bit of a css positioning junkie, I always do stuff 
like that in my h1s but thats the structure i use for my news articles.


Rob O



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] Semantics of news

2006-12-09 Thread Joseph R. B. Taylor

Mike,

Thats an interesting point.  I always thought that any given dt or 
dd should hold one piece of information only. If nesting stuff inside 
them like that is completely legit that certainly opens up a lot of 
possibilities.


Consider this:

dl
   dtimg src=house_photo.jpg //dt
   dt123 Property Address/dt
   dd3 Bedrooms | 1.5 Baths/dd
   dd$150,000/dd
   ddView Link/dd
/dl

This is how I've been marking up property lists (single list unit 
shown), which is where my previous example was coming from.  Your 
example seems to capture the information relationship pretty well 
thoughh


Mike at Green-Beast.com wrote:


I'm curious, Joseph, wouldn't that be better like this?

h2Our News/h2
dl
   dt2006-12-09/dt
   dd
   h3News Headline/h3
   pTeaser statement for the article./p
   pLink to Full Story/p
   /dd
/dl

Assuming of course this would be valid as it would be with any other kind of 
list (I didn't check).


Respectfully,
Mike Cherim
http://green-beast.com/


- Original Message - 
From: Joseph R. B. Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Saturday, December 09, 2006 11:42 AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Semantics of news


I myself have been marking up new summaries with definition lists.  Very
practical.

dl
dtMy Article Headline/dt
dd2006-12-09/dd
ddTeaser statement for the article/dd
ddLink to Full Story/dd
/dl

You can alter this format as well, like:

dl
dt2006-12-09/dt
dtHeadline for my Article/dt
ddTeaser statement for the article/dd
ddLink to Full Story/dd
/dl

Headings would be used to precede to news summaries all together, like:

h3My Site's latest Articles/h3

dl
dtMy Article Headline/dt
dd2006-12-09/dd
ddTeaser statement for the article/dd
ddLink to Full Story/dd
/dl

dl
dtMy Article Headline/dt
dd2006-12-09/dd
ddTeaser statement for the article/dd
ddLink to Full Story/dd
/dl

etc


Rob Kirton wrote:

 


The only time this wouldn't be a correct structure is if the first H3
was preceeded by an H1 and not an H2

It is slightly conterintuitive to place an H3 above an associted H2.
If the title is the most important fact, above that of date (seems
sensible).  The use of H2 and H3 is fine

--
Regards

- Rob Kirton

Raising web standards : http://ele.vation.co.uk
Connecting to others: http://www.linkedin.com/in/robkirton
http://www.linkedin.com/in/robkirton

On 09/12/06, *Tim White* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   


Hi, list.
What do you think is the best semantic markup for such a structure

06.12.2006(date)
Here goes some title of the new,(example Manchester United Have Lost
Their Mojo)
{and here goes a couple of passages of text - excerpt or full text of
the news}
---
 


   [snip]

   


Some popular CMS's use
h3{date}
h2{title}
p{content}/p
 


   This is usually how I do it (or at least something similar).

   


But i don't think it is correct heading structure
 


   Why don't you think this is a correct structure?

   ~ Tim
   www.tjameswhite.com/blog http://www.tjameswhite.com/blog

   
   Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.

http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=45083/*http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta

   ***
   List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
   Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
   http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
   Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   ***





***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.15.15/580 - Release Date: 12/8/2006 
12:53 PM



   



 



--

Joseph R. B. Taylor
*Sites by Joe, LLC*
/Custom Web Design  Development/
http://sitesbyjoe.com
(609) 335-3076
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***begin:vcard
fn:Joseph R. B. Taylor
n:Taylor;Joseph
org:Sites by Joe, LLC
adr:;;408 Route 47 South;Cape May Court House;NJ;08210;USA
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel;work:609-335-3076
tel;cell:609-335-3076
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://sitesbyjoe.com
version:2.1
end:vcard




Re: [WSG] Semantics of news

2006-12-09 Thread Rob O'Rourke

Joseph R. B. Taylor wrote:

Mike,

Thats an interesting point.  I always thought that any given dt or 
dd should hold one piece of information only. If nesting stuff 
inside them like that is completely legit that certainly opens up a 
lot of possibilities.


Consider this:

dl
   dtimg src=house_photo.jpg //dt
   dt123 Property Address/dt
   dd3 Bedrooms | 1.5 Baths/dd
   dd$150,000/dd
   ddView Link/dd
/dl

This is how I've been marking up property lists (single list unit 
shown), which is where my previous example was coming from.  Your 
example seems to capture the information relationship pretty well 
thoughh


Mike at Green-Beast.com wrote:


I'm curious, Joseph, wouldn't that be better like this?

h2Our News/h2
dl
   dt2006-12-09/dt
   dd
   h3News Headline/h3
   pTeaser statement for the article./p
   pLink to Full Story/p
   /dd
/dl

Assuming of course this would be valid as it would be with any other 
kind of list (I didn't check).


Respectfully,
Mike Cherim
http://green-beast.com/




Hi,

On the topic of using definition lists in this sense I know some people 
would argue that the examples above aren't semantically accurate. I have 
seen dls used as a way of organising Name-Value pairs which I've 
recently implemented on some product detail screens but is an article's 
*date* defined by its *excerpt*? Wouldn't an ordered list be better? (or 
unordered, I'm not that fussy =P) eg.


ul class=news-articles
   li
  div class=date09-12-2006/div
  h2Article title/h2
  pExcerpt here/p
  a href=full-articleRead the whole thing/a
   /li
/ul

Also, why does the date need to come first? And does it really need to 
be a heading?  I'm actually asking because I've thought about it but 
never really drawn any solid conclusions.


Just some thoughts,
Rob O


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] Semantics of news

2006-12-09 Thread akella

The date in design - so it's just better for it to go first in code
too. So my problem was that i just cant use h3-h2 - considering its
not logically correct.
As for your structure
ul class=news-articles
  li
 div class=date09-12-2006/div
 h2Article title/h2
 pExcerpt here/p
 a href=full-articleRead the whole thing/a
  /li
/ul

May be then this would be the best one:
small09-12-2006/small
h2Article title/h2
pExcerpt here/p


On 12/9/06, Rob O'Rourke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Joseph R. B. Taylor wrote:
 Mike,

 Thats an interesting point.  I always thought that any given dt or
 dd should hold one piece of information only. If nesting stuff
 inside them like that is completely legit that certainly opens up a
 lot of possibilities.

 Consider this:

 dl
dtimg src=house_photo.jpg //dt
dt123 Property Address/dt
dd3 Bedrooms | 1.5 Baths/dd
dd$150,000/dd
ddView Link/dd
 /dl

 This is how I've been marking up property lists (single list unit
 shown), which is where my previous example was coming from.  Your
 example seems to capture the information relationship pretty well
 thoughh

 Mike at Green-Beast.com wrote:

 I'm curious, Joseph, wouldn't that be better like this?

 h2Our News/h2
 dl
dt2006-12-09/dt
dd
h3News Headline/h3
pTeaser statement for the article./p
pLink to Full Story/p
/dd
 /dl

 Assuming of course this would be valid as it would be with any other
 kind of list (I didn't check).

 Respectfully,
 Mike Cherim
 http://green-beast.com/



Hi,

On the topic of using definition lists in this sense I know some people
would argue that the examples above aren't semantically accurate. I have
seen dls used as a way of organising Name-Value pairs which I've
recently implemented on some product detail screens but is an article's
*date* defined by its *excerpt*? Wouldn't an ordered list be better? (or
unordered, I'm not that fussy =P) eg.

ul class=news-articles
li
   div class=date09-12-2006/div
   h2Article title/h2
   pExcerpt here/p
   a href=full-articleRead the whole thing/a
/li
/ul

Also, why does the date need to come first? And does it really need to
be a heading?  I'm actually asking because I've thought about it but
never really drawn any solid conclusions.

Just some thoughts,
Rob O


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***





--
glhf,
akella.


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] Semantics of news

2006-12-09 Thread Rob O'Rourke

akella wrote:

The date in design - so it's just better for it to go first in code
too. 


Right, thanks. It makes sense and it seems to be the norm on every news 
related thing I've looked at in the last half hour.



So my problem was that i just cant use h3-h2 - considering its
not logically correct.
As for your structure
ul class=news-articles
  li
 div class=date09-12-2006/div
 h2Article title/h2
 pExcerpt here/p
 a href=full-articleRead the whole thing/a
  /li
/ul

May be then this would be the best one:
small09-12-2006/small
h2Article title/h2
pExcerpt here/p



Yep, or any variation on that I guess. Ideally there'd be a date tag 
but lets not go there :-)


Cheers,
Rob O



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***