I am actually currently hosting the current site. I think though for files
such as audio and mmpz's I wonder if it would be better to put those on a
directory on sourceforge? What do the others think on that?
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 11:41 PM, oeai wrote:
> www.lmms.io is probably expensive
> i
Good Morning,
Toby the upstream dev read the above reasons and would like to thank you
for a detailed explination as to why resid and zynsubaddfx need to be
bundled and why the system versions could not be used.
Thanks
Jonathan
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Tobias Doerffel wrote:
> Hi,
>
@tres, That is the whole point of silverstripe. whats seen by the end user
is what ever you really want it to be. The silver stripe back end is there
to make life easier. If you look at the pages in the back end they do Have
an editor to be able to work with custom code.
TBH I prefer option A as
Can we setup a proper pole then a bad i know there are free places for a
poll that we could use.
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 5:23 AM, Tres Finocchiaro <
tres.finocchi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Lukas W. wrote:
>
>> Actually, I'd suggest to collect some arguments and t
I wrote a short helpful guide on how to use Monstro and put it on our
user wiki... for now it's a standalone page, nothing links to it.
http://lmms.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Monstro_Manual#Monstro_Manual
I came to think, we should write similar guides to all the other
instruments. I think th
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Stian Jørgensrud wrote:
> Motivation was just to after 1.1 let themes work across versions. Then 1.1
> will be the last theme change and CSS modification.
We've done basic theming to fix contrast issues, so yes, the style.css
definitely gets imported properly. F
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Lukas W. wrote:
> Actually, I'd suggest to collect some arguments and think about it
> first? Please take a look at my post in the original thread.
>
I've slept a bit on the lmms.io and I like it. The vote process was just
too unorganized and abrupt for me.
Hey
> Btw, I hope the actual LSP content won't be ereased during any major move
> with the site...
>
Agreed. We may have issues with user ids, but the plan is to migrate the
content. This is all hypothetical at this point. Building out the
silverstripe content types to match at least the functional
If that is a worry I will most likely integrintegrate the existing lsp with
enhancements
On 27 Apr 2014 22:26, "Tobiasz Karoń" wrote:
> Btw, I hope the actual LSP content won't be ereased during any major move
> with the site...
> On 27 Apr 2014 16:19, "Jonathan Aquilina" wrote:
>
>> Understood.
www.lmms.io is probably expensive
instead of 2 domains just get 1, but maybe it is better? maybe just
upstream trend?
is there need to pay for hosting? sometimes they provide with free name
for limited zones.
+ maybe verified ssl.cert for some services if it happens - knowing
wholesale price can
Actually, I'd suggest to collect some arguments and think about it
first? Please take a look at my post in the original thread.
2014-04-27 22:31 GMT+02:00 atumra :
> Round 2 start
> vote for 1 domain only
>
> On 27.04.2014 11:42, oeai wrote:
>> a reminder for those who've missed yesterday's (or th
This is something about #628
qthreadpools
http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-4.8/qthreadpool.html
briefly pools will suspend unused threads and reuse them in needed time.
and i think that semaphores should be implemented in patterns, then this
will give exact time +/-500ms for wake or suspend thread.
Thanks for the input, however I can't see an immediate benefit. It
mainly provides, what we already have or what Qt provides. Furthermore
it's not part of Ubuntu/Debian (and probably others) and thus a
difficult dependency.
Thanks for sharing anyways!
Toby
---
Motivation was just to after 1.1 let themes work across versions. Then 1.1
will be the last theme change and CSS modification.
--
View this message in context:
http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/Building-LMMS-for-OSX-tp7098p8415.html
Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list a
Round 2 start
vote for 1 domain only
On 27.04.2014 11:42, oeai wrote:
> a reminder for those who've missed yesterday's (or this day?) night party
>
> https://pad.riseup.net/p/lmms.org
>
> take your part in domain name selection
> see instructions in pad
>
--
RA
---
Btw, I hope the actual LSP content won't be ereased during any major move
with the site...
On 27 Apr 2014 16:19, "Jonathan Aquilina" wrote:
> Understood.
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Tres Finocchiaro <
> tres.finocchi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Also to answer the LSP "from scratch" quest
I will work on the main logo as I am not 100% sure but i think I would need
to change the templates that are being used and embed the logo there.
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 9:10 PM, Tres Finocchiaro <
tres.finocchi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> @tres What do you think if we open up the graphical side of
>
> @tres What do you think if we open up the graphical side of things to
> those that want to contribute?
>
I would hope anyone that wants to help can. I'm very surprised
silverstripe doesn't have a place for the main logo. Most CMSs have a
placeholder for the banner, but I can't seem to find o
May I add that there is still lots of work to do.
@tres What do you think if we open up the graphical side of things to those
that want to contribute?
Also the site is a responsive site meaning it is viewable on mobile devices
and the layout adapts itself to the size of the device screen.
On Su
Since Jonathan granted me access, I put together a mock-up home page as
well as a mock-up downloads page.
http://lmms.eagleeyet.net/home
http://lmms.eagleeyet.net/download
-Tres
- tres.finocchi...@gmail.com
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Jonathan Aquilina
wrote:
> So I have setup a silver
So I have setup a silverstripe instance on my silverstripe. You can draft
up pages easily as well as see different versions side by side. Another
nice thing we can have custom pages instead of defaults so basically with
silverstripe CMS the skys the limit. So in a nut shell we can integrate the
sha
No, no attempts or plans to test theme changes. I do have an open item for
font readability and Vesa has already offered some patches to address that.
I'm curious as to the motivation of this question? Is it motivated on
behalf of the community members asking for an option to revert themes? If
Understood.
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Tres Finocchiaro <
tres.finocchi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Also to answer the LSP "from scratch" question, no not if we use a CMS.
> That's sort of the point, right? Let the framework manage content, and we
> customize it to suit our needs.
>
> What we
Also to answer the LSP "from scratch" question, no not if we use a CMS.
That's sort of the point, right? Let the framework manage content, and we
customize it to suit our needs.
What we absolutely need is a hand made conversion utility to bulk import
our existing content (and users if technically
Understood. Will keep everyone updated but from what I am being told it is
possible.
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Tres Finocchiaro <
tres.finocchi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Comfort is another argument, but you've already picked one nobody knows,
> so I don't see how that is relevant.
>
> If sil
Comfort is another argument, but you've already picked one nobody knows, so
I don't see how that is relevant.
If silverstripe offers a migration utility that does the database and
domain bindings easily (so we don't loose our work) then that would answer
the original question of whether or not to
Only one I know how to easily change domains is wordpress.
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Tres Finocchiaro <
tres.finocchi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If they offer a site migration tool, set it up anywhere. If they don't
> then it is probably worth waiting. Some CMS's are difficult to migrate to
If they offer a site migration tool, set it up anywhere. If they don't
then it is probably worth waiting. Some CMS's are difficult to migrate to
a new domain.
Either way, I want to be a co-maintainer.
I would personally choose a CMS that's been around for a while and has a
rich community base,
I have determined which CMS we I am considering for the new website in
addition to LSP. It is called silverstripe
http://www.silverstripe.org/
One such site that works with silverstripe is libreoffice.org.
What do you guys think? Should I wait until we have a domain setup or setup
a subdomain of
Neat video, Tres!
Have you tried different themes with LMMS on Mac? Will it support themes? If
code needs to be added which makes old themes for Win and Linux unusable
again, can you do it before 1.1.0, cause old themes will break in that
version anyway.
--
View this message in context:
http:/
> What do we have to do with the British Indian Ocean?
Nothing, but the domain is used a lot by geeks from all over the world
as IO also is an abbreviation for input/output.
2014-04-27 13:22 GMT+02:00 Stian Jørgensrud :
> What do we have to do with the British Indian Ocean? I like lmms-projec.org
And I meant, LMMS one hour challenge, not competition
Stian Jørgensrud wrote
> So the LMMS competition was inspiring for a lot of people. Stakeout Punch
> wanted to make it monthly https://www.facebook.com/LMMSchallenge. Just
> wanted to let you know, unfa.
--
View this message in context:
So the LMMS competition was inspiring for a lot of people. Stakeout Punch
wanted to make it monthly https://www.facebook.com/LMMSchallenge. Just
wanted to let you know, unfa.
--
View this message in context:
http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/LMMS-Podcast-Pilot-Episode-1-t
What do we have to do with the British Indian Ocean? I like lmms-projec.org
--
View this message in context:
http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/Time-for-a-domain-tp8326p8395.html
Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
yes. i'll put some more about .pro
there's "pro tools" and "pro logic" and it's not cocky
the minus is that lmms.pro can be unrecognizable as a domain name as
.com or .org for example
and to show it as a domain name maybe it will be better set www.lmms.pro
not just lmms.pro,
but lmms.pro itself
In the poll, 4 names quickly stood out:
* lmms-project.org ~8€|| Vote: 13 votes
* lmms.pro 16$|| Vote: 8 votes
* lmms.io ~40€/y || Vote: 5 votes
* Lmms.center 19€ || Vote: 4 votes
I propose collecting arguments for and against each domain, and then
voting a second time.
I'll just st
On 04/27/2014 12:20 PM, Tobias Doerffel wrote:
> We have to decide whether to remove
> this or find a another solution.
The only other solutions I can see is either:
- modify SF2 to not be single-stream, and instead use a new channel for
each note - but does Fluidsynth support such functionality?
Hi,
SF2 is a special case indeed. On the one hand it's single streamed and
thus envelopes etc. are not supported while on the other hand there's
some code in sf2player for updating the MIDI velocity based on the
volume envelope's current value. We have to decide whether to remove
this or find a an
Hi,
2014-04-27 9:47 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Aquilina :
> here is the reason that gentoo doesnt like bundled software
>
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Why_not_bundle_dependencies
These are good reasons but we are having good (better) reasons as
well. First of all, we're not bundling ZynAddSubFX but in
On 04/27/2014 11:07 AM, Paul Wayper wrote:
> But, thinking as a programmer, "delaying all the other sound streams"
> isn't
> really a good solution. It only makes everything later, albeit still
> lining
> up.
Actually, it's the best possible solution. We primarily want this
mechanism to be able t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24/04/14 07:02, Vesa wrote:
> On 04/23/2014 10:27 PM, Tobias Doerffel wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> 2014-04-22 20:57 GMT+02:00 Vesa :
>>> Just wondering... does LMMS do latency compensation?
>> Short answer: no. However compensation is quite difficult as you
On 04/27/2014 09:28 AM, Louigi Verona wrote:
>
> Adding envelope ability to sf2 would be very good though. Maybe this
> is a way to finally get a vol envelope on sf2 on linux!
>
No, this is not.
--
Start Your Social Netwo
here is the reason that gentoo doesnt like bundled software
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Why_not_bundle_dependencies
I had an idea, but it would probably involve some work. Would it be
possible to refactor out the lmms specific code into their own classes and
call them as needed from within their
a reminder for those who've missed yesterday's (or this day?) night party
https://pad.riseup.net/p/lmms.org
take your part in domain name selection
see instructions in pad
--
Symbiants
oe ai
--
Start Your Social Netwo
44 matches
Mail list logo
