Re: [lng-odp] generic core + HW specific drivers

FI/Espoo) <petri.savolai...@nokia.com> > Cc: Andriy Berestovskyy <andriy.berestovs...@caviumnetworks.com>; Ola > Liljedahl <ola.liljed...@linaro.org>; lng-odp@lists.linaro.org > Subject: Re: [lng-odp] generic core + HW specific drivers > > > > On W

[lng-odp] generic core + HW specific drivers

olli@vubuntu:~$ dpkg --get-selections | grep xorg xorg install xorg-docs-core install xserver-xorg install xserver-xorg-core install xserver-xorg-input-all install xserver-xorg-input-evdev install xserver-xorg-input-libinput install xserver-xorg-input-synaptics install xserver-xorg-input-wacom

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH v9 3/6] linux-gen: sched scalable: add a bitset

On 21/06/2017, 22:00, "Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov" <dmitry.ereminsoleni...@linaro.org> wrote: >On 21.06.2017 21:14, Ola Liljedahl wrote: >> >> On 20/06/2017, 15:04, "Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)" >> <petri.savolai...@nokia.com> wrote:

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH v9 3/6] linux-gen: sched scalable: add a bitset

On 20/06/2017, 15:04, "Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)" wrote: > > >> +++ b/platform/linux-generic/include/odp_bitset.h >> @@ -0,0 +1,210 @@ >> +/* Copyright (c) 2017, ARM Limited >> + * All rights reserved. >> + * >> + * SPDX-License-Identifier:

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH v9 5/6] linux-gen: sched scalable: add scalable scheduler

On 20/06/2017, 15:58, "Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)" wrote: >> --- a/platform/linux-generic/include/odp_config_internal.h >> +++ b/platform/linux-generic/include/odp_config_internal.h >> @@ -7,9 +7,7 @@ >> #ifndef ODP_CONFIG_INTERNAL_H_ >> #define

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH v9 4/6] linux-gen: sched scalable: add a concurrent queue

On 20/06/2017, 15:12, "Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)" wrote: >> +++ b/platform/linux-generic/include/odp_llqueue.h >> @@ -0,0 +1,309 @@ >> +/* Copyright (c) 2017, ARM Limited. >> + * All rights reserved. >> + * >> + * SPDX-License-Identifier:

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH v9 2/6] linux-gen: sched scalable: add arch files

On 20/06/2017, 15:00, "Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)" wrote: > >> +#endif /* PLATFORM_LINUXGENERIC_ARCH_ARM_CPU_IDLING_H */ >> diff --git a/platform/linux-generic/arch/arm/odp_llsc.h >>b/platform/linux- >> generic/arch/arm/odp_llsc.h >> new file mode 100644

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH v6 6/6] Add scalable scheduler

On 02/06/2017, 12:53, "Peltonen, Janne (Nokia - FI/Espoo)" wrote: >>> for packet output to first tell application that a packet was "accepted >>>for transmission" and then drop it silently. Packet out (it's a simple >>>function) should be able to determine if packet

Re: [lng-odp] Suspected SPAM - Re: [API-NEXT PATCH v6 6/6] Add scalable scheduler

> > >> -Original Message- >> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of >>Savolainen, Petri >> (Nokia - FI/Espoo) >> Sent: Friday, June 02, 2017 1:18 PM >> To: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagaraha...@linaro.or

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH v6 6/6] Add scalable scheduler

On 02/06/2017, 12:17, "Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)" <petri.savolai...@nokia.com> wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of >> Honnappa Nagarahalli >> Sent: Thursda

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH v6 6/6] Add scalable scheduler

On 01/06/2017, 22:15, "Honnappa Nagarahalli" <honnappa.nagaraha...@linaro.org> wrote: >On 1 June 2017 at 15:09, Ola Liljedahl <ola.liljed...@arm.com> wrote: >> >> >> On 01/06/2017, 21:03, "Bill Fischofer" <bill.fischo...@linaro.org&g

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH v6 6/6] Add scalable scheduler

On 01/06/2017, 21:03, "Bill Fischofer" wrote: >On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Honnappa Nagarahalli > wrote: >> On 1 June 2017 at 01:26, Elo, Matias (Nokia - FI/Espoo) >> wrote: >>> On 31 May 2017, at

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH v6 6/6] Add scalable scheduler

On 31/05/2017, 12:18, "Elo, Matias (Nokia - FI/Espoo)" <matias@nokia.com> wrote: > >> On 31 May 2017, at 12:04, Ola Liljedahl <ola.liljed...@arm.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 31/05/2017, 10:38, "Peltonen, Janne (Nokia - FI/Espoo)

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH v6 6/6] Add scalable scheduler

On 31/05/2017, 10:38, "Peltonen, Janne (Nokia - FI/Espoo)" <janne.pelto...@nokia.com> wrote: > > >Ola Liljedahl wrote: >> On 23/05/2017, 16:49, "Peltonen, Janne (Nokia - FI/Espoo)" >> <janne.pelto...@nokia.com> wrote: >> >>

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH v6 6/6] Add scalable scheduler

;> +{ >> +} > >Is it ok that these are no-ops? tm_enqueue() seems to use these. No these ought to be implemented. We have fixed that now. Thanks. -- Ola Ola Liljedahl, Networking System Architect, ARM Phone: +46 706 866 373 Skype: ola.liljedahl > >> + >&

Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH] test: odp_sched_latency: robust draining of queues

On 25/04/2017, 14:32, "Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)" <petri.savolai...@nokia-bell-labs.com> wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Ola Liljedahl [mailto:ola.liljed...@arm.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 1:56 PM &g

Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH] test: odp_sched_latency: robust draining of queues

On 25/04/2017, 12:54, "Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)" wrote: >Also in your patch, thread should exit only after scheduler returns >EVENT_INVALID. >Since the cool_down event is the last event on all queues (as they are >enqueued after all threads have

Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH] test: odp_sched_latency: robust draining of queues

rooks >> Sent: Monday, April 24, 2017 11:59 PM >> To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org >> Cc: Ola Liljedahl <ola.liljed...@arm.com> >> Subject: [lng-odp] [PATCH] test: odp_sched_latency: robust draining of >> queues >> >> From: Ola Liljedahl <ola.liljed...@

Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH] test: odp_sched_latency: robust draining of queues

day, April 24, 2017 11:59 PM To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org<mailto:lng-odp@lists.linaro.org> Cc: Ola Liljedahl <ola.liljed...@arm.com<mailto:ola.liljed...@arm.com>> Subject: [lng-odp] [PATCH] test: odp_sched_latency: robust draining of queues From: Ola Liljedahl <ola.lil

Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH] test: odp_sched_latency: robust draining of queues

(Responding from PoC Outlook) From: Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.org> Date: Tuesday, 25 April 2017 at 00:00 To: Brian Brooks <brian.bro...@arm.com> Cc: lng-odp-forward <lng-odp@lists.linaro.org>, Ola Liljedahl <ola.liljed...@arm.com> Subject: Re

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH v2 00/16] A scalable software scheduler

On 10 April 2017 at 10:56, Peltonen, Janne (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <janne.pelto...@nokia.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Ola Liljedahl <mailto:ola.liljed...@linaro.org> wrote: >> Peltonen, Janne (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <mailto:janne.pelto...@nokia.com> wrote: >> > In an IPsec

Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH 1/3] test: l2fwd: add group option

On 10 April 2017 at 08:43, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <petri.savolai...@nokia-bell-labs.com> wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Ola Liljedahl [mailto:ola.liljed...@linaro.org] >> Sent: Saturday, April 08, 2017 12:13 AM >> To: Petri Sav

Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH] validation: scheduler: Release context before the end of the scheduler test

tion: scheduler: Release context before >> the end of the scheduler test >> >> If the scheduler sync type is atomic or ordered, >> need to release the context. > > Release context is actually a hint. It does not guarantee that context is > released. Applicatio

Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH] validation: scheduler: Release context before the end of the scheduler test

0 Honnappa Nagarahalli > <honnappa.nagaraha...@linaro.org>: >> >> On 7 April 2017 at 07:29, Ola Liljedahl <ola.liljed...@linaro.org> wrote: >> > On 7 April 2017 at 14:06, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) < >> > petri.savolai...@nokia-bell-labs.c

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH v2 13/16] Add a bitset

On 5 April 2017 at 14:27, Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uva...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 04/05/17 15:16, Ola Liljedahl wrote: >> On 05/04/2017, 12:36, "Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov" >> <dmitry.ereminsoleni...@linaro.org> wrote: >> >>> On 05.04.2017 02:31, Ola

Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH 1/3] test: l2fwd: add group option

On 6 April 2017 at 13:59, Petri Savolainen wrote: > > User may give number of scheduling groups to test > scheduler performance with other that the default (all > threads) group. Both pktios and threads are allocated Isn't all *workers* a better default scheduler

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH v2 00/16] A scalable software scheduler

On 7 April 2017 at 08:40, Peltonen, Janne (Nokia - FI/Espoo) < janne.pelto...@nokia.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.org> > wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 1:32 PM, Ola Liljedahl <ola.liljed...@linaro.or

Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH] Relax the assert check with enqueue fails in the scheduler test case

>From test/common_plat/validation/api/scheduler/scheduler.c #define BUFS_PER_QUEUE_EXCL 1 The scalable scheduler has a default queue size of 4096 which seemed reasonable to us. We can always increase the value but applications and test prorgams should not expect infinite queue size.

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH v2 07/16] test: odp_scheduling: Handle dequeueing from a concurrent queue

On 6 April 2017 at 20:51, Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uva...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 04/06/17 13:35, Ola Liljedahl wrote: > > On 5 April 2017 at 23:39, Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uva...@linaro.org> wrote: > >> On 04/05/17 17:30, Ola Liljedahl wrote: > >>> On 5 Ap

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH v2 07/16] test: odp_scheduling: Handle dequeueing from a concurrent queue

On 7 April 2017 at 01:33, Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.org> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uva...@linaro.org> > wrote: > > On 04/06/17 13:35, Ola Liljedahl wrote: > >> On 5 April 2017 at 23:39, Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uva...@

Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH] validation: scheduler: Release context before the end of the scheduler test

the scheduler test >> >> If the scheduler sync type is atomic or ordered, >> need to release the context. > > Release context is actually a hint. It does not guarantee that context is released. Application needs to call schedule() and receive _EVENT_INVALID to be sure that it d

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH v2 00/16] A scalable software scheduler

On 6 April 2017 at 13:48, Jerin Jacob <jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com> wrote: > -Original Message- >> Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 12:54:10 +0200 >> From: Ola Liljedahl <ola.liljed...@linaro.org> >> To: Brian Brooks <brian.bro...@arm.com> >> Cc

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH v2 00/16] A scalable software scheduler

On 5 April 2017 at 18:50, Brian Brooks wrote: > On 04/05 21:27:37, Jerin Jacob wrote: >> -Original Message- >> > Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2017 13:47:52 -0500 >> > From: Brian Brooks >> > To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org >> > Subject: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH v2 07/16] test: odp_scheduling: Handle dequeueing from a concurrent queue

On 5 April 2017 at 23:39, Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uva...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 04/05/17 17:30, Ola Liljedahl wrote: >> On 5 April 2017 at 14:50, Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uva...@linaro.org> wrote: >>> On 04/05/17 06:57, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote: >>>> This can

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH v2 15/16] Add llqueue, an unbounded concurrent queue

On 5 April 2017 at 17:33, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dmitry.ereminsoleni...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 05.04.2017 17:40, Ola Liljedahl wrote: >> On 5 April 2017 at 14:20, Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uva...@linaro.org> wrote: >>> On 04/05/17 01:46, Ola Liljedahl wrote: >&g

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH v2 00/16] A scalable software scheduler

be implemented in the application. >>>>> >>>>> In addition to scalable ring buffers, the algorithm also uses unbounded >>>>> concurrent queues. LL/SC and CAS variants exist in cases where absense of >>>>> ABA problem cannot be pro

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH v2 15/16] Add llqueue, an unbounded concurrent queue

On 5 April 2017 at 01:21, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > On 05.04.2017 00:25, Brian Brooks wrote: >> On 04/04 23:23:33, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: >>> On 04.04.2017 22:25, Maxim Uvarov wrote: it's better to have 2 separate files for that. One for

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH v2 15/16] Add llqueue, an unbounded concurrent queue

On 5 April 2017 at 14:20, Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uva...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 04/05/17 01:46, Ola Liljedahl wrote: >> On 4 April 2017 at 21:25, Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uva...@linaro.org> wrote: >>> it's better to have 2 separate files for that. One for ODP_CONFIG_LLDSCD &g

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH v2 07/16] test: odp_scheduling: Handle dequeueing from a concurrent queue

cpu. But on the same cpu is has to always > work. Isn't it? No. > > Maxim. > >> >> On 4 April 2017 at 21:22, Brian Brooks <brian.bro...@arm.com> wrote: >>> On 04/04 17:26:12, Bill Fischofer wrote: >>>> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Brian Br

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH v2 13/16] Add a bitset

On 05/04/2017, 15:39, "Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov" <dmitry.ereminsoleni...@linaro.org> wrote: >On 05.04.2017 16:33, Ola Liljedahl wrote: >> >> >> >> >> On 05/04/2017, 15:22, "Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov" >> <dmitry.ereminsoleni...

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH v2 13/16] Add a bitset

On 05/04/2017, 15:22, "Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov" <dmitry.ereminsoleni...@linaro.org> wrote: >On 05.04.2017 15:16, Ola Liljedahl wrote: >> On 05/04/2017, 12:36, "Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov" >> <dmitry.ereminsoleni...@linaro.org> wrote: >> >

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH v2 13/16] Add a bitset

On 05/04/2017, 12:36, "Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov" <dmitry.ereminsoleni...@linaro.org> wrote: >On 05.04.2017 02:31, Ola Liljedahl wrote: >> On 05/04/2017, 01:25, "Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov" >> <dmitry.ereminsoleni...@linaro.org> wrote: >>> On 04.

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH v2 12/16] Add LL/SC and signaling primitives

On 05/04/2017, 01:29, "Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov" <dmitry.ereminsoleni...@linaro.org> wrote: >On 05.04.2017 01:00, Brian Brooks wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Ola Liljedahl <ola.liljed...@arm.com> >>wrote: >>> On 04/04/2017, 22:14, &quo

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH v2 13/16] Add a bitset

Trying a different way to avoid the ARM disclaimer. But just to make sure, this email does NOT contain any confidential information. On 05/04/2017, 01:25, "Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov" <dmitry.ereminsoleni...@linaro.org> wrote: >On 04.04.2017 23:52, Ola Liljedahl wrote: >

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH v2 07/16] test: odp_scheduling: Handle dequeueing from a concurrent queue

On 4 April 2017 at 20:59, Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uva...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 04/04/17 21:47, Brian Brooks wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Ola Liljedahl <ola.liljed...@arm.com> >> Reviewed-by: Brian Brooks <brian.bro...@arm.com> >> Reviewed-by: Honnappa Na

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH v2 07/16] test: odp_scheduling: Handle dequeueing from a concurrent queue

On 5 April 2017 at 00:26, Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.org> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Brian Brooks <brian.bro...@arm.com> wrote: >> On 04/04 21:59:15, Maxim Uvarov wrote: >>> On 04/04/17 21:47, Brian Brooks wrote: >>> > Signed-of

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH v2 06/16] Fix a locking bug

t this, (b) Post the fix patch noting the >> Bug URL in the commit log, and (c) update the Bug entry with the URL >> of the patch that fixes this bug. >> >> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 1:47 PM, Brian Brooks <brian.bro...@arm.com> wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Kevin

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH v2 15/16] Add llqueue, an unbounded concurrent queue

m. > > On 04/04/17 21:48, Brian Brooks wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Ola Liljedahl <ola.liljed...@arm.com> >> Reviewed-by: Brian Brooks <brian.bro...@arm.com> >> --- >> platform/linux-generic/include/odp_llqueue.h | 285 >> +++ >

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH v2 12/16] Add LL/SC and signaling primitives

Sorry to say but I see the ARM disclaimer at the bottom even though I requested the disclaimer not to be added to this specific email (there is a trick for that). I need to figure out what went wrong. -- Ola On 4 April 2017 at 22:38, Ola Liljedahl <ola.liljed...@arm.com> wrote: > >

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH v2 12/16] Add LL/SC and signaling primitives

I think I missed one comment. On 04/04/2017, 22:14, "Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov" <dmitry.ereminsoleni...@linaro.org> wrote: >On 04.04.2017 21:48, Brian Brooks wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Ola Liljedahl <ola.liljed...@arm.com> >> Reviewed-by: Brian Brooks <brian.

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH v2 13/16] Add a bitset

Sending from my ARM email account, I hope Outlook does not mess up the format. On 04/04/2017, 22:21, "Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov" <dmitry.ereminsoleni...@linaro.org> wrote: >On 04.04.2017 21:48, Brian Brooks wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Ola Liljedahl <ola.liljed...@ar

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH v2 12/16] Add LL/SC and signaling primitives

On 04/04/2017, 22:14, "Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov" <dmitry.ereminsoleni...@linaro.org> wrote: >On 04.04.2017 21:48, Brian Brooks wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Ola Liljedahl <ola.liljed...@arm.com> >> Reviewed-by: Brian Brooks <brian.bro...@arm.c

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT 2/4] linux-generic: ring.c: use required memory orderings

On 31 March 2017 at 15:21, Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uva...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 03/28/17 22:23, Brian Brooks wrote: >> From: Ola Liljedahl <ola.liljed...@arm.com> >> >> Signed-off-by: Ola Liljedahl <ola.liljed...@arm.com> >> Reviewed-by: Brian Brooks <

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT 4/4] A scalable software scheduler

No build, no run. We found several problems (memory ordering related so visible on ARM but not on x86) in the upstream code when running on ARM systems. Aren’t there any ARM systems to run on in the LNG lab? -- Ola Ola Liljedahl, Networking System Architect, ARM Phone: +46 706 866 373 Skype

Re: [lng-odp] 32b support in ODP-Cloud

On 29 March 2017 at 13:25, Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 5:47 AM, Ola Liljedahl <ola.liljed...@linaro.org> > wrote: > >> On 29 March 2017 at 10:43, Francois Ozog <francois.o...@linaro.org> >> wrote: >

Re: [lng-odp] 32b support in ODP-Cloud

; On 29 March 2017 at 10:00, Ola Liljedahl <ola.liljed...@linaro.org> wrote: > >> So there is a choice between >> A) enabling static type checking in the compiler through strong typing >> => requires (syntactical) pointers i C => handles are 64-bit on 64-bit >> s

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT 3/4] api: queue: Add ring_size

On 29 March 2017 at 03:55, Brian Brooks wrote: > On 03/28 19:18:37, Bill Fischofer wrote: >> > > It is infinitely better to do patch review in plain text rather > than HTML. I thought this was a plain text mailing list? > >> >> >>