RE: Re[2]: Log4j Configuration with Servlet

> >That's a good point. At some point in time, it should be documented > >that any container should have one and only once copy of > >log4j.jar+associates. Once the selector approach is adopted, putting > >log4j.jar in WEB-INF/lib must be strongly discouraged. > > I agree with the first part, not

RE: Re[2]: Log4j Configuration with Servlet

Yep, There is no harm in using Log4j within WEB-INF/lib even if Log4j exists in a parent classloader. It doesn't affect any other apps the the current app is free to use whatever version of the jars they want. In the context of using a repository selector, putting log4j.jar in the WEB-INF/li

RE: Re[2]: Log4j Configuration with Servlet

Howdy, >That's a good point. At some point in time, it should be documented >that any container should have one and only once copy of >log4j.jar+associates. Once the selector approach is adopted, putting >log4j.jar in WEB-INF/lib must be strongly discouraged. I agree with the first part, not the

Re[2]: Log4j Configuration with Servlet

At 08:32 13.12.2002 -0600, Jacob Kjome wrote: Looks like Mark made it so that the selectors package is separate from the core log4j.jar. I guess that is fine. Users will simply have to be diligent about making sure that the selectors.jar (or whatever it will be called) and log4j.jar are alwa

RE: Re[2]: Log4j Configuration with Servlet

Howdy, >If we think it is a good, useful example of a repository selector, and to >be useful it needs to live at the same location as the log4j jar, why >should we not include it in the official distribution? When does it become >"core", in >your opinion? In my mind, it may be possible that the

Re[2]: Log4j Configuration with Servlet

Hi Ceki, See comments inline below... At 12:09 PM 12/13/2002 +0100, you wrote: At 21:04 12.12.2002 -0600, Jacob Kjome wrote: MW> I would also like to say that I have proposed that we include servlet/web MW> application support in v1.3 of log4j. This would include an init servlet, MW> conte

Re[2]: Log4j Configuration with Servlet

At 21:04 12.12.2002 -0600, Jacob Kjome wrote: MW> I would also like to say that I have proposed that we include servlet/web MW> application support in v1.3 of log4j. This would include an init servlet, MW> context listeners, configuration via a servlet, etc. Jacob has proposed to MW> include

Re[2]: Log4j Configuration with Servlet

Hi Ceki, see comments inline below... At 12:45 AM 12/13/2002 +0100, you wrote: At 15:05 12.12.2002 -0600, Jacob Kjome wrote: Hello Mark, MW> I would also like to say that I have proposed that we include servlet/web MW> application support in v1.3 of log4j. This would include an init servlet

RE: Re[6]: Log4j Configuration with Servlet

j, I don't think the class name needs to start with Log4j... -Mark > -Original Message- > From: Jacob Kjome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 2:15 PM > To: Log4J Users List > Subject: Re[6]: Log4j Configuration with Servlet > > &g

RE: Re[2]: Log4j Configuration with Servlet

> Yes, we can reasonably do that. However, I am unsure about the > maturity of any of these approaches without proper > testing/analysis. Consequently, we should include these selectors > assuming that they are visibly marked as experimental. Their inclusion > might spur Container developers to ref

RE: Re[2]: Log4j Configuration with Servlet

At 15:54 12.12.2002 -0800, Mark Womack wrote: > One possible one-shot-kill-all-birds solution is to use the JNDI > space. See the updated version of http://www.qos.ch/logging/sc.html > (in particular JNDIRS). What do you think? > > I also suggested the JNDI solution in commons-dev in a somewhat >

RE: Re[2]: Log4j Configuration with Servlet

> One possible one-shot-kill-all-birds solution is to use the JNDI > space. See the updated version of http://www.qos.ch/logging/sc.html > (in particular JNDIRS). What do you think? > > I also suggested the JNDI solution in commons-dev in a somewhat > different context. It seemed to be well receiv

Re[2]: Log4j Configuration with Servlet

At 15:05 12.12.2002 -0600, Jacob Kjome wrote: Hello Mark, MW> I would also like to say that I have proposed that we include servlet/web MW> application support in v1.3 of log4j. This would include an init servlet, MW> context listeners, configuration via a servlet, etc. Jacob has proposed to M

RE: Re[6]: Log4j Configuration with Servlet

Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 2:15 PM > To: Log4J Users List > Subject: Re[6]: Log4j Configuration with Servlet > > > Hello Mark, > > Here it is (zip file attached). > > I set the package as org.apache.log4j.spi and commented out the > imports from that package.

Re[6]: Log4j Configuration with Servlet

4J Users List >> Subject: Re[4]: Log4j Configuration with Servlet >> >> >> MW> Jacob, do you think you can make an "official" apache >> submission (with all >> MW> the correct apache headers, etc)? >> >> Is there some place that

Re[6]: Log4j Configuration with Servlet

rovide enough MW> example. It is basically just the license header info at the top, AFAIK. MW> -Mark >> -Original Message- >> From: Jacob Kjome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 1:48 PM >> To: Log4J Users List >>

RE: Re[4]: Log4j Configuration with Servlet

Log4J Users List > Subject: Re[4]: Log4j Configuration with Servlet > > > MW> Jacob, do you think you can make an "official" apache > submission (with all > MW> the correct apache headers, etc)? > > Is there some place that describes all that, or should

Re[4]: Log4j Configuration with Servlet

MW> Jacob, do you think you can make an "official" apache submission (with all MW> the correct apache headers, etc)? Is there some place that describes all that, or should I just copy the license from some other Log4j file and paste it into Log4jCRS? Jake -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

RE: Re[2]: Log4j Configuration with Servlet

> >Actually, the main thing I'd propose is having Log4jCRS (Log4j > >Contextual Repository Selector) be included with the Log4j > >distribution. The reasons for this are described in my post > that Mark > >linked to above. > > I know this is not a vote, but +1 on that. As part of the > contrib

RE: Re[2]: Log4j Configuration with Servlet

Howdy Jacob, > Actually, If you look in my post, I mention more than just the > Log4jInit servlet. I also mention a servlet context listener > (SCL) called > Log4jApplicationWatch. I actually use that currently to do cleanup > such as shutting down loggers and appenders of the currently used >

RE: Re[2]: Log4j Configuration with Servlet

Howdy, >Actually, the main thing I'd propose is having Log4jCRS (Log4j >Contextual Repository Selector) be included with the Log4j >distribution. The reasons for this are described in my post that Mark >linked to above. I know this is not a vote, but +1 on that. As part of the contrib tree, not

Re[2]: Log4j Configuration with Servlet

-- >> From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 5:50 AM >> To: Log4J Users List >> Subject: RE: Log4j Configuration with Servlet >> >> >> Howdy, >> While Mr. (?) Lenharcik's suggestion will work, I&#x

RE: Log4j Configuration with Servlet

ecember 12, 2002 5:50 AM > To: Log4J Users List > Subject: RE: Log4j Configuration with Servlet > > > Howdy, > While Mr. (?) Lenharcik's suggestion will work, I'd suggest doing it > slightly differently: use a ServletContextListener and > initialize log4j > i

RE: Log4j Configuration with Servlet

Howdy, >Mr is right; But only if you are using the servlet api 2.3 this would be >work. My solution was done before... ;-) That's true. My solution requires servlet API 2.3 or later, and I should've mentioned that. In fact, until v2.3 came out, I had a load-on-startup servlet as well. The only

AW: Log4j Configuration with Servlet

Hi, Howdy, While Mr. (?) Lenharcik's suggestion will work, I'd suggest doing it slightly differently: use a ServletContextListener and initialize log4j in the contextInitialized() method. Mr is right; But only if you are using the servlet api 2.3 this would be work. My solution was done before.

RE: Log4j Configuration with Servlet

I suggest adding this to the FAQ. On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 11:49, Shapira, Yoav wrote: > Howdy, > While Mr. (?) Lenharcik's suggestion will work, I'd suggest doing it > slightly differently: use a ServletContextListener and initialize log4j > in the contextInitialized() method. That will get called

RE: Log4j Configuration with Servlet

Howdy, While Mr. (?) Lenharcik's suggestion will work, I'd suggest doing it slightly differently: use a ServletContextListener and initialize log4j in the contextInitialized() method. That will get called before any servlet's init() method. And the contextDestroyed() method of that listener is a

AW: Log4j Configuration with Servlet

CLASSNAME.class.getRessource("/configfile.lcf") juraj -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. Dezember 2002 11:55 An: log4j-user Betreff: Log4j Configuration with Servlet Hi all, Does anybody know if there is any particular care to

Log4j Configuration with Servlet

Hi all, Does anybody know if there is any particular care to let Log4j log inside a servlet? By now, I've just added the log4j.properties file in WEB-INF/classes (under Tomcat) of my application, as suggested in the short-manual (http://jakarta.apache.org/log4j/docs/manual.html). Am I f