AW: Log4j2 Appender attributes with strict xml config

2013-10-22 Thread Alexander.Rathai
attributes with strict xml config *snip* - To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org

Re: Log4j2 Appender attributes with strict xml config

2013-10-22 Thread Ralph Goers
, Alex -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Rathai, Alexander Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. Oktober 2013 18:16 An: log4j-user@logging.apache.org Betreff: AW: Log4j2 Appender attributes with strict xml config *snip

AW: Log4j2 Appender attributes with strict xml config

2013-10-17 Thread Alexander.Rathai
that everything is set up nicely. Best Regards, Alex -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Remko Popma [mailto:remko.po...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 16. Oktober 2013 16:40 An: Log4J Users List Betreff: Re: Log4j2 Appender attributes with strict xml config On Wednesday, October 16, 2013, Gary

AW: Log4j2 Appender attributes with strict xml config

2013-10-17 Thread Alexander.Rathai
Gary wanted (which I'd appreciate) but still an improvement imho. Best Regards, Alex -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Rathai, Alexander Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. Oktober 2013 09:15 An: log4j-user@logging.apache.org Betreff: AW: Log4j2 Appender attributes with strict xml config Hi, will do

Re: Log4j2 Appender attributes with strict xml config

2013-10-16 Thread Remko Popma
Perfection may be hard to achieve, but if Alexander's suggestions are an improvement over the current schema, should we add them to the current code base? Remko On Tuesday, October 15, 2013, Gary Gregory wrote: On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com

Re: Log4j2 Appender attributes with strict xml config

2013-10-16 Thread Remko Popma
On Wednesday, October 16, 2013, Gary Gregory wrote: On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Remko Popma remko.po...@gmail.comjavascript:; wrote: Perfection may be hard to achieve, but if Alexander's suggestions are an improvement over the current schema, should we add them to the current code

Log4j2 Appender attributes with strict xml config

2013-10-14 Thread Alexander.Rathai
Hi, I'm using log4j2-beta9 and want to configure it using a log4j2.xml in strict mode. My issue is: how do I specify attributes that are not in the shipped schema file? An Example: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8 ? Configuration status=DEBUG strict=true monitorInterval=5

Re: Log4j2 Appender attributes with strict xml config

2013-10-14 Thread Gary Gregory
Alexander , XML validation against the XML Schema is not fully baked because the Log4j 2 XML Schema is incomplete. Due to the current dynamic nature of the configuration file (it's schema is tied to the Java code and the annotations used), we need to generate the XML Schema based on these

AW: Log4j2 Appender attributes with strict xml config

2013-10-14 Thread Alexander.Rathai
...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Montag, 14. Oktober 2013 16:18 An: Log4J Users List Betreff: Re: Log4j2 Appender attributes with strict xml config Alexander , XML validation against the XML Schema is not fully baked because the Log4j 2 XML Schema is incomplete. Due to the current dynamic nature

Re: Log4j2 Appender attributes with strict xml config

2013-10-14 Thread Gary Gregory
[mailto:garydgreg...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Montag, 14. Oktober 2013 16:18 An: Log4J Users List Betreff: Re: Log4j2 Appender attributes with strict xml config Alexander , XML validation against the XML Schema is not fully baked because the Log4j 2 XML Schema is incomplete. Due to the current dynamic nature

Re: Log4j2 Appender attributes with strict xml config

2013-10-14 Thread Ralph Goers
On Oct 14, 2013, at 7:31 AM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: The current idea I have is that the XML Schema would reflect exactly the code that is running. We should start with that. AFAIK, the current code we have does not allow open-ended XML fragments, but I could be wrong...

Re: Log4j2 Appender attributes with strict xml config

2013-10-14 Thread Gary Gregory
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote: On Oct 14, 2013, at 7:31 AM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: The current idea I have is that the XML Schema would reflect exactly the code that is running. We should start with that. AFAIK, the current