On 2015-11-02, Ralph Goers wrote:
> I apologize Stefan. I had every intention on reviewing the release but time
> just got away from me. I will look at the next one for sure.
Thanks a lot, Ralph. I plan to cut a new release candidate at the
coming weekend.
Cheers
Stefan
On 2015-11-01, Dominik Psenner wrote:
> There were a few things I wanted to be fixed and I'm finished with doing so
> right now. Should we start another release vote if the next jenkins build
> is ok?
Given that it takes several hours to build an RC I won't be able to do
so before the coming week
I apologize Stefan. I had every intention on reviewing the release but time
just got away from me. I will look at the next one for sure.
Ralph
> On Nov 1, 2015, at 10:00 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
> This vote has failed to attract enough votes but there is hope a new RC
> will attract more
This vote has failed to attract enough votes but there is hope a new RC
will attract more votes (at least one more vote).
Stefan
There were a few things I wanted to be fixed and I'm finished with doing so
right now. Should we start another release vote if the next jenkins build
is ok? Despite that I've another question regarding the website. As
mentioned before the menu on the pages:
* https://logging.apache.org/log4net/mai
Take your time. It diesn't matter whether you vote two days earlier or
later.
Stefan
On 2015-10-23, Dominik Psenner wrote:
> Apologies, I've been terribly busy this week. Right now I'm on the way to a
> birthday party and I hope that afterwards I'm (still) able to review the
> release. Then we
Apologies, I've been terribly busy this week. Right now I'm on the way to a
birthday party and I hope that afterwards I'm (still) able to review the
release. Then we might start a new vote and see how it goes. Read you soon.
On 21 Oct 2015 4:54 p.m., "Jeremiah Gowdy" wrote:
> +1 Release these art
+1 Release these artifacts
> On Oct 17, 2015, at 11:20 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
> log4net 1.2.14 RC1 is available for review here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net
> (revision 10847)
>
> Details of changes since 1.2.13 are in the release notes:
> http://people.apac
On 2015-10-18, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours, not before 0700 GMT
> 21-Oct 2015
Well, I haven't seen any formal vote at all, and even counting my own
implicit one, this isn't enough.
The concerns raised against the site have been addressed, I hope, I've
On 2015-10-19, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hm, something is missing with my set up running "build.cmd compile-all":
welcome to .NET development on Windows :-)
http://stefan.samaflost.de/blog/en/Apache/Log4Net/working_on_the_1.2.11_release.html
you'll need to make sure Windows doesn't consider your NA
On 2015-10-19, wrote:
> Hi,
> Stefan Bodewig wrote on 19.10.2015 13:40:28:
>> [...]
>> If you know of any tool that creates static HTML documentation, then we
>> I'll be happy zo run it once manually to update the site and figure out
>> how to add it to the build process later.
>> For XMLUnit.
Hi,
Stefan Bodewig wrote on 19.10.2015 13:40:28:
> [...]
> If you know of any tool that creates static HTML documentation, then we
> I'll be happy zo run it once manually to update the site and figure out
> how to add it to the build process later.
>
> For XMLUnit.NET I've switched to monodoc bu
Hey Gary,
is E: a network share?
On 2015-10-19 14:40, Gary Gregory wrote:
Hm, something is missing with my set up running "build.cmd compile-all":
LOG4NET_DIR is E:\temp\rc\log4net-1.2.14
NANTEXE_PATH is nant.exe
BUILD_FILE is E:\temp\rc\log4net-1.2.14\log4net.build
log4net:ERROR XmlConfigurat
Hm, something is missing with my set up running "build.cmd compile-all":
LOG4NET_DIR is E:\temp\rc\log4net-1.2.14
NANTEXE_PATH is nant.exe
BUILD_FILE is E:\temp\rc\log4net-1.2.14\log4net.build
log4net:ERROR XmlConfiguratorAttribute: Exception getting
ConfigurationFileLocation. Must be able to reso
On 2015-10-19, Dominik Psenner wrote:
> On 2015-10-19 06:00, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> On 2015-10-18, Dominik Psenner wrote:
>>> The website has the following issues:
>>> * Sdk reference is a chm file, no longer a http website
>> This won't change, I'm afraid.
>> I forgot to mention it, sorry. n
On 2015-10-19, Ralph Goers wrote:
> There was a security notice that was sent to all PMCs about a month
> ago. The cgi is no longer to be used.
unless it only wraps "mirrors.cgi", which we do.
Cheers
Stefan
On 2015-10-19 06:00, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2015-10-18, Dominik Psenner wrote:
The website has the following issues:
* Sdk reference is a chm file, no longer a http website
This won't change, I'm afraid.
I forgot to mention it, sorry. ndoc has finally reached the point where
it doesn't w
There was a security notice that was sent to all PMCs about a month ago. The
cgi is no longer to be used.
Ralph
> On Oct 18, 2015, at 9:02 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
>> On 2015-10-18, Ralph Goers wrote:
>>
>> The download cgi extension should be changed to lua.
>
> Really, I don't recall se
On 2015-10-18, Ralph Goers wrote:
> The download cgi extension should be changed to lua.
Really, I don't recall seeing such a request. Our script is a simple
wrapper around the mirrors.cgi script, which is supposed to still work
IIRC. At least it still does here
http://logging.apache.or
On 2015-10-18, Dominik Psenner wrote:
> The website has the following issues:
> * Sdk reference is a chm file, no longer a http website
This won't change, I'm afraid.
I forgot to mention it, sorry. ndoc has finally reached the point where
it doesn't work for out codebase anymore, it just dies
The download cgi extension should be changed to lua.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 18, 2015, at 12:28 PM, Dominik Psenner wrote:
>
> The website has the following issues:
>
> * Sdk reference is a chm file, no longer a http website
> * several pages have missing menu items in the project documen
The website has the following issues:
* Sdk reference is a chm file, no longer a http website
* several pages have missing menu items in the project documentation section
* on sites where the missing project documentations are shown, they are
displayed with an indent and the menu therefore looks a
On 2015-10-18, Gary Gregory wrote:
> I've never built this guy before. Do you have a BUILDING.txt or
> instructions on a Wiki on how to validate an log4net RC?
http://logging.apache.org/log4net/release/building.html
Forget all the Visual Studio stuff and go to "NAnt". You should use
NAnt 0.92,
I've never built this guy before. Do you have a BUILDING.txt or
instructions on a Wiki on how to validate an log4net RC?
Gary
On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 11:20 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> log4net 1.2.14 RC1 is available for review here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net
>
log4net 1.2.14 RC1 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net
(revision 10847)
Details of changes since 1.2.13 are in the release notes:
http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/release/release-notes.html
The tag is here:
https://svn.apache.
25 matches
Mail list logo
